Election Predictions

Not comprehensive, but still 15 pages long and written in three hours.  

Sorry I didn’t include exact percentages and in-depth analysis for all the congressional races and toss up Presidential states, but I just didn’t have the time and energy, it was too large of a project to put off until 5:10 today. As it stands it is 15 pages long, so, enjoy.

Election Predictions

All Right, I promised, so know I’m providing. After the election I’ll display the actual results compared to my predicted results.

Senate Races:

First let me begin with the major Senate races, my predictions and my brief analyses on them.

VA-SEN: Senator, umm, I mean Mr. Mark Warner is already getting his new name plates made. The only question is how much over 60% will the insanely popular former Governor get in this open seat race against his controversial and unpopular predecessor Jim Gilmore? I’m going with three points, and a 63-37 race. Gilmore only barely won his convention against a far-right nobody, and has been plagued by poor fundraising and campaigning from the very beginning. When universally popular and respected five term Senator John Warner, (no relation), announced his retirement last year at age 80, and Mark jumped in, that’s when every pundit knew this race was the Democrat’s to lose, and they definitely have not so far, in fact they’ve gotten every break they could hope to get. It looks this year like Virginia will complete its blue trend and have two Democratic Senators and a Democratic Governor for the first time since 1973. Obama is set to carry the state too, the first Democrat since 1964. Democratic pick up.

Mark Warner, (D), 63-37. Winner.

NM-SEN: When six term Senator Pete Domenici announced his retirement, admitting he had dementia, this seat became the hottest in the nation. Then popular U.S. Representative Tom Udall, of the famed western Kennedy’s family of Stewart and Mo Udall, jumped in. The states other two U.S. Representatives jumped in too, so that uniquely, all three of its US House seats were open as all were running for senate, (an open senate seat there doesn’t happen but every 30 years or so, so you’ve got to take the chance when you get it). Then in the primary far-right Steve Pearce, who represented the southern, conservative end of the state, won the primary over moderate Heather Wilson who represented the Democratic leaning area around Bernalillo county, (Albuquerque), over the wishes of the party elite, who with Domenici, (who had groomed Wilson as an heir), coalesced around Wilson. It was expensive, and divisive, and best of all Udall just got to sit back and watch, while amassing a huge warchest of money. In late summer Udall moved up into the mid 60s in polling, and the NRSCC wrote the race off, (that’s the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee shortened),. However former Bush Press Secretary Ari Fletcher’s shady group Freedom’s Watch, spent heavily here, and Pearce spent millions. The race moved into single digits again after the Palin bounce, but since, with the economic crisis dominating the news and Udall retaking the airwaves his lead has moved back into the double digits.

Democratic pick up: Tom Udall, (D), 58-42. (On the conservative side). Winner

NH-SEN: This was the site of the infamous phone-jamming rig-up up by the NH-GOP. In 2002 they jammed the GOTV efforts of Democrats while three-term Democratic Governor Jeanne Shaheen was in a narrow race with U.S. Representative John Sununu, (son of the Bush chief of Staff and former NH Governor John Sununu), he won by six thousand votes in a year that was very favorable to Republicans. Well, several Republicans went to jail, including some from the RNC, (Republican National Committee), and the NH-GOP was ordered to pay the NH-DP several hundred thousand dollars of reparations, (imagine that as a fundraising pitch to the base, “Donate to us so we can pay your money to the other side”). Anyhow, Shaheen is back this year, and running a better campaign in a much better environment. Sununu has consistently been too strongly conservative for this Democratic leaning state, (trending more all the time). Factor in the face that he’s been behind consistently in every poll for over a year, and you get where I’m going. Shaheen has a high single digits lead in the tail end of the campaign, and the NRSCC also seems to writing this race off. Sununu retains a devoted following, but with Obama surging here late, the one break he hoped to have help him is gone, (McCain coattails, or at least a lack of Obama coattails). Democratic Pick up.

So, projected: Jeanne Shaheen (D) 54-46, winner.

CO-SEN: Another Udall! Tom’s second cousin Mark, from a few hundred miles up north, representing Boulder, Colorado and some of Denver’s inner suburbs. Mark’s about ten years younger, and in the slightly more Republican state, (but rapidly trending Democratic), of Colorado. Now its becoming a Democratic state along with the rest of the southwest. Here too, like Virginia and New Mexico, (though New Mexico was the only one with a primary), conservative Republicans pushed out the more moderate candidate in favor of a more reactionary conservative. Mark Udall has had a upper single digits lead in polling for about two years, but has recently pulled away, along with Obama in the state that McCain has now written off in favor of Pennsylvania. Udall is fairly liberal actually, but he has won the battle of who can moderate themselves and move closer to the center in this race. Schaffer is not backing down from his conservative beliefs, and he will lose. Democratic Pick up.

Projected: Mark Udall, (D), 55-45, winner.

AK-SEN: Well, it’s hard to get elected when you’ve been indicted on seven counts of fraud. That’s what happened to the longest serving Republican Senator in history, Ted Stevens, first elected in 1968, and currently 84 years old. Add into the mix a popular Democrat, Anchorage, (home of two thirds of the state’s population), mayor Mark Begich, son of former Congressman Nick Begich who disappeared along with House Majority Leader Hale Boggs in a mysterious 1973 plane crash, (presumed), on the way to Juneau. The conviction sealed Steven’s fate, as his whole campaign theme was vote for me because of my clout, and that the prosecutors were targeting him unfairly. Both arguments are gone now, and McCain has even called for the Senator to resign, as has Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. Voters now he will probably be expelled from the Senate on a bi-partisan vote if reelection, so, (and the polls show this), Begich has regained his lead and is extremely likely to win this, being the first Democrat election to a federal office in Alaska since 1974, (with Mike Gravel, actually, anyone remember his run for the Democratic Presidential nomination this time around?). Democratic Pick up.

Projection: Mark Begich, (D), (how weird, after having no Marks in the Senate now we’ll have three), 53-47. Winner over Ted “The Incredible Hulk” Stevens.

NC-SEN: Just a quick lesson, you don’t run a campaign ad calling your opponent, a former Sunday School teacher and fifth generation Presbyterian, Godless. You also don’t flash her face on the screen while a paid actress says “There is no God”. Now Bob Dole’s wife, first term senator Elizabeth Dole was still behind, but that ad sealed her defeat, and the very last polls confirm it. The DSCC, (the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee), has been brutally affective here, calling into question Dole’s effectiveness as a Senator, and attacking her for only spending about 18 days a year in the state she represents. “The Rocking Chair Ad” was perhaps the best ad in terms of effectiveness, in a number of years. State Senator Kay Hagan, Chairwoman of the State Senate Finance committee, has been running a strong campaign though, crisscrossing the state and effectively beating Dole in every measure. She won her primary huge, and surged, so Dole spent two million of her warchest to try to nip it at its bud, but this only worked about a month before the DSCC came in and shot her numbers in the polls back down. Hagan has had a consistent lead, and last minute polls from SUSA and PPP, and Rasmussen show Hagan moving firmly ahead, above 50% and outside the margin of error. Still going to be close though, but…Democratic Pick up.

Projection: Kay Hagan (D), 52-48, winner.

OR-SEN: Two Term Senator Gordon Smith, (also related to the Udalls), hasn’t done anything wrong, he’s just a Republican in Oregon and his record as a moderate is paper thin. All the top tier Democrats turned this race down before State House Speaker Jeff Merkley finally jumped in. He had to fight a contentious primary with a vicious left-wing activist who almost won, and then his campaign spent months in the gutter, running poorly and letting the fairly conservative, (in comparison to past Republicans, like Mark Hatfield, who represented Oregon), Smith maintain a double digit lead in the ever more liberal state of Oregon. Then back in August he started turning his ship back around, moved in the polls, the DSCC came in guns barreling, and Smith’s campaign went in the gutter and he permanently alienated many conservatives who already disliked him for his moderate profile by running an ad talking about being a close ally of Barack Obama. The race moved to a tie after the economic downturn, and now Merkley has, to the envy of those who turned the race down, moved ahead and is sitting pretty at just under 50% in several polls, and is ahead now of Smith, with a lead outside of the polls MoE, or margin of Error. Disgruntled conservatives are casting a lot of votes for the third party candidate, and Smith now sports a double digit disapproval rating, the kiss of death. Democratic Pick Up.

Projection: Jeff Merkley, winner (D), 51-45, four going to Steven Frohnmayer, (I).

MN-SEN: Going to say as little as I can here. What a wasted opportunity though. Norm Coleman has a been a solid conservative, (voting with the party line 98% of the time in 2003, 2004, and 2005, on issues where a majority of one party voted against a majority of the other party). This was after he ran in 2002 promising to be a moderate voice in the senate. He only won because Democrat Paul Wellstone died in a plane wreck a week before the election after skipping a fundraising event and Rally with Walter Mondale and Ted Kennedy to attend the funeral of the father of a State Representative. Mondale proved unable to win as a last minute replacement. This year all the good candidates turned down the race for some reason, and Democrats are stuck with Al Franken, enough said, even though Franken has made the race close, he’s done it polling in the upper thirties, with Independent Party Dean Barkley, an ally of former wrestling Governor Jesse Ventura, taking a double digit slice of the polls. Coleman will win, despite his unpopularity. I don’t share other Democrats optimism here. Republican Hold.

Projection: Norm Coleman ®, 44-41-15, winner.

These next races could determine whether Democrats get a filibuster proof senate that will actually be able to, you know, make any major changes.

KY-SEN: That’s right, the Republican Minority leader is again in the fight for his life down in the bluegrass state. Democrats are licking their chops over the chance to destroy the Republican leadership and, more importantly, avenge Tom Daschle’s narrow defeat in 2004 at the hands of John Thune. However, Bruce Lunsford is no John Thune, and that’s the reason McConnell holds his seat. That and he has a massive, ironclad statewide organization, and has spent fourteen million on the race. The polls are close, but Kentucky is a conservative state. Republican Hold.

Projection: Mitch McConnell, ®, 53-47, winner.

MS-SEN: Trent Lott retired, and Haley Barbour appointed congressman Roger Wicker to the seat, surprising many who saw Congressman Chip Pickering Jr. as the heir apparent. (Pickering later retired abruptly to become a lobbyist). Democrats got former Governor Ronnie Musgrove, a highly conservative Democrat born on what was little more than a sharecroppers plot and broken down house and who lost his father as a teenager, forcing him to work to support his family. The race was initially promising, and close, but Wicker has pulled away, despite the economic downturn. Now, even if polls are overstating Wicker’s portion of the black vote, (an outrageously high 26% in the last one,; it’s never usually out of the single digits), Musgrove’s still down and looks to have lost this one. If the black turnout is insanely high and he wins those votes 96-4 though, look for a possible upset in steamy Mississippi. Republican Hold.

Projection: Roger Wicker, ®, 52-48. Winner.

GA-SEN: Now this is what real revenge feels like. After Saxby Chambliss won by accusing Democratic Senator Max Cleland of being unpatriotic and weak on terrorism in 2002, Democrats felt a hot hatred. Showing Cleland’s face beside Osama Bin Laden went over the line. As Cleland was a Vietnam war veteran, triple amputee, and former Secretary of Veteran Affairs, while Chambliss got a draft deferment so he wouldn’t have to serve in Vietnam. Former State Representative Jim Martin’s been moving ever since a big primary win of Vernon Jones, a former DeKalb county something. Anyway, when you’ve been accused of rape its not good for political campaigns. Martin lost by twelve points to Casey Cagle in the open Lieutenant Governor’s race back in 2006, but Georgia looks to have moved a lot further back towards the center since then. The DSCC is spending heavily heavy, (5.8 million by election, which is a lot, even in a big and expensive state like Georgia), and Chambliss has unloaded everything to no avail. The race remains a 3-4 point race, and Chambliss peaks out at 48% in the polls. This is likely to go to a run-off and make this long political season even longer. Once we get to the run-off then I can take a look and analyze the landscape there. RUN-OFF.

Last Senate Race.

LA-SEN: Republicans continue to play this field, and Louisiana is increasingly Republican, but polls continue to show Landrieu with the safe lead. As a state resident, I’m worried about this one. Some tightness here that I don’t think others feel or predict. Democratic Hold.

Projection: Mary Landrieu (D), 51-49.

Now for a quick go on Gubernatorial races. There only three that you really need to watch, four actually. The rest will be blowouts.

IN-GOV: Democrats thought they had a shot because Daniels was unpopular, but a tenuous primary and a poor general election campaign from former U.S. Representative Jill Long Thompson, along with a good campaign from Daniels, has led to this one moving out of reach. Bad news come redistricting time in 2010. Republican Hold

Projection: Mitch Daniels ®, 55-45. Winner.

WA-GOV: The rematch from the 2004 election. Christine Gregoire won by one hundred and twenty nine votes, yes, 129 votes, out of 2.7 million cast. Similar controversy to Florida, except the Democrat came on top of this one. Dino Rossi is running again, but Gregoire has established herself as an incumbent, and managed to attain a mild popularity though her simply effectiveness at getting things done. Still, far right groups such as the builders association are heavily pushing Rossi again this time, who is not running under the Republican brand, but under the “GOP Party” as he loses two points in the polls just by running as a “Republican”. This race has been locked at 51-48 Gregoire in every poll for two years. Things haven’t changed a bit. Obama’s huge coattails and her already narrowly put her on top though, and for the seventh time in a row, Washington State will elect a Democrat as its governor. Democratic hold.

Projection: Christine Gregoire, (D), 50.5-49.5, winner.

MO-GOV: Look, Democrats pick this up. Four term Attorney General Jay Nixon has been the favorite from day one. Governor Matt Blunt is deeply unpopular, and U.S. Representative Kenny Hulshof had to contend with a divisive primary and has failed to poll well in the general election. Democratic pick up.

Projection: Jay Nixon, (D), 56-44, winner.

NC-GOV: Closer than it should be, but Beverly Perdue had to run a contentious primary campaign, and has then run a poor campaign in the General election. Still, polls show her tied with Charlotte Mayor Pat McCrory. Democrats have held this for sixteen years straight, with only one Republican governor in the history of the state in between. With Obama making this close though, she should be able to pull ahead. Democratic Hold.

Projection: Beverly Perdue, (D), 50.3-49.7, winner.

Now I can’t, and just don’t have the time or the will power to write out histories for all the congressional races in one sitting. I’ll just lay out projections for you, okay?

Democratic Pick ups:

CA-04: Charlie Brown (D) (open due to scandal)

WA-08: Darcy Burner (D) beats Dave Reichert

ID-01: Walter Minnick, (D). (I’ll give you examples of this one though).*

AZ-01: Anne Kilpatrick (D). (open due to scandal)

NM-01: Martin Heinrich oh you know they’re Democrats

NM-02: Harry Teague (open)

CO-04: Betsy Markey beats Marilyn Musgrave, in Democratic trending district.

NV-03: State Senate Minority leader Dina Titus, against 3-term inc. Jon Porter. Democratic trending Clark county district.

LA-04: Paul Carmouche (D)

FL-08: Alan Grayson, Democratic trending Orlando based district

FL-24: Suzanne Kosmas, (note, don’t run an ad apologizing for receiving a bribe from Jack Abramoff, it just doesn’t work, even in moderately Republican leaning districts, though this one is trending Democratic fast).

NC-08: Hayes is losing this time around. It didn’t help that he said “Democrats hate real Americans that work and have jobs and believe in god” at a McCain rally. Obama will win this district, as he is in polling, and over 25% of the district is black. Larry Kissell win after losing by 369 votes last time.

13. VA-05: Look for me to be the only one predicting this. Virgil Goode has had an interesting career. First a elected as a Democrat in 1996, he was so upset by Clinton that he became an independent and then a Republican. He’s controversial, and has made some bigoted, close minded remarks. But, late in this campaign season its come out that a movie called “Eden’s Curve” an artsy, movie about a Danville, (Goode’s hometown and located within his district I believe), teenager who goes to College in New York and explores his sexuality with his English Professor, is dedicated to Goode, and his Press Secretary even had a minor role in it. The movie openly depicts both homosexual and heterosexual sex scenes, foul language, and a savage beating. Now, being religious as he is this makes him look hypocritical. The truth is the whole story is rather weird and covered in layers of crap. Goode still probably has nothing to do with it, but the explanation is long and complicated and I doubt voters are willing to pay attention enough to hear after this many months of campaigning. Tom Perriello is running a strong campaign as a specialist in foreign policy. He’s been campaigning hard against Goode who largely ignored him almost right up till the end. He was down 64-30 in August, then 55-42 in September, and now on the election’s eve he’s down 50-47, and ahead by double digits in early voters, (twelve percent of the electorate). If the black vote is high I look for the upset. I’m still going to give it to him here. I missed several races like this back in 2006, mainly Jason Altmire, Nancy Boyda, Jerry McNerney, and Carol Shea-Porter.

14. VA-11: This district’s trended Democratic. Gerry Connelly has this one in the bag over a self-funder.

15. MD-01: Another surprise. Kravotil wins it because of geographical divides, and the fact that widely popular, liberal Republican incubment Wayne Gilchrest, (one of the few I really highly respected), has endorsed him and cut an ad for him over the Club for Growth funded Andy Harris who beat him in the primary. Bush got 61% of the vote here, but Kravotil’s running the right kind of campaign about independent voice and all that. Clsoe, but I think a pick up, especially with all the money the DCCC has dumped in here in the closing days of the campaign, (the same with VA-05).

16. PA-03: Kathy Dalhkemper has run a surprisingly good race and no looks to be the narrow favorite.

17. NY-13: Don’t even make me get started on this soap opera. Mike McMahon will win easily.

18. NY-25: Dan Maffei wins easily this time around, now that its an open seat and all the best Republicans declined to run.

19. NY-29: Wesley Clark chief of staff Eric Massa is doing really well in his rematch against Randy “threatened my wife with a shotgun at a dinner party” Kuhl. He wins this time.

20. CT-04: I just really don’t see Chris Shays hanging on again. Jim Himes wins after running a good campaign and with Obama’s huge coattails.

21. OH-01: Again, I just don’t see Chabot pulling it out this time. Steve Dreihaus seems to be the right Democrat to win this 50-50 swing district, (literally 50-50 in the last two elections).

22. OH-15: Mary Jo Kilroy is definitely favored in the demographic trends here. Steve Shrivers is the best candidate Republicans could have hoped for though.

23. OH-16: Iraq war vet and state Senator John Boccieri is tailor made for this blue collar, Republican leaning swing district. He’s also run the better campaign over State Sen. Kirk Shuring.

24. MN-06: Michelle Bachman’s comments are infamous. Elwyn Tinklenburg, (what a political name) has raised an additional one million dollars in one week since her comments. He had already raised one million, so the moderate former State Secretary of Transportation has moved ahead in the polls too.

25. MN-03: I still think that Madia will win this, even if he has fallen behind in some of the polling.

26. AK-AL: Young is tackled by corruption to. Ethan Berkowitz becomes the second new Democrat to Alaska’s congressional delegation.

27. FL-21: okay, suitcases full of cash smuggled in from Puerto Rico. Not a good headline for an incumbent. That and the changing values of younger Cuban-Americans who are becoming more and more Democratic, and a strong Democrat in Raul Martinez, make this a narrow pick up between two titans in the Miami Cuban Community. The other two Cuban Republican held seats should be safe, but just barely, that will be clsoe races.

Republican Pick Ups:

1. PA-11: Kanjorski has lost this to far-right Lou Barletta. How incredible.

2. TX-22: Nick Lampson can’t hold Tom DeLay’s seat this time around. Pete Olson wins.

3. FL-16: A couples of words, BRIBED campaign worker after she threatened to reveal he cheated on his wife with her and several other campaign workers. Pittsburgh Steeler’s heir Tom Rooney wins this.

Possible Shockers, (both parties), R and D stand for the party that would pick up a if there is an upset:

1. WY-AL: Trauner is just a little behind, but may pull it off. D.

2. VA-02: Same with Glen Nye.

3. WV-02: 91 year old Robert Byrd is trying to groom a successor here. Anne Barth may have what it takes. D.

4. PA-12: Murtha stuck his foot in his mouth again. R.

5. KS-02: I don’t expect Boyda to lose. R.

5. GA-08: Goddard has kept this one close in this very Republican, Macon centered district, but Marshall is a conservative Democrat and a good campaigner with a political base in Macon. R.

6. SC-01: A note, don’t break a law and then change it to get out of the penalty. Just saying… D. Linda Ketner has run a good, well-funded campaign, but the District may just be too Republican for her to beat four term incumbent. And she’s openly gay, in the bible belt.

7. AL-02: Montgomery Mayor Bobby Bright might just pull this off in this 2:1 Republican district, (was 66-33 in 2005). He’s got the endorsement of two of the districts biggest Republicans, including one who is McCain’s campaign chair for that region of the state. His background from the wiregrass area of the district, combined with his record in the Montgomery area make him the perfect Democrat to hold it. Did I mention Republicans were originally trying to get him to run for the open seat too? He’s that conservative. D.

8. NE-02: Lee Terry continues to decline as Omaha becomes more Democratic.

9. AZ-05: Bob Lord has run a great, well financed campaign, and hit Shadegg hard on his (un)-retirement. Still, this district was drawn to elect a Republican. D.

10. NV-02:This conservative, huge Nevada district could be an upset, but probably not. D

Presidential Election:

Obama holds all of Kerry’s state’s, plus picks up Iowa, New Mexico, Nevada, Colorado, Virginia, and Ohio. The total end result will be Obama 311 electoral votes, McCain 227. Obama will win 51-47 in popular, give or take a percentage point, and some very close races in Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, Indiana, and Nevada, even Virginia, though Obama has moved solidly in front according the last polls of the race. Hard to see how McCain holds all the toss ups and improbably picks up Pennsylvania to win.

11. IA-04: Becky Greenwald is close, and htis is a toss up district. D.

12. Mo-09: State Rep. Judy Baker’s running strong, but this is a conservative district. D.

I’d put on the actual results Wednesday, if they’re all in.

By what margin will Bob Shamansky win?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

SSP House Race Ratings Changes: 11/03

(DavidNYC and Crisitunity contributed to the writing of this post.)

  • NC-08 (Hayes): Tossup to Lean Democratic

    We here at SSP were skeptical of Larry Kissell’s rematch bid for a long while, in large part because he seemed to be denying himself a chance to be competitive due to his lackluster fundraising. (We never bought the “I’m not from a wealthy district” excuse – just check out Eric Massa’s fundraising.) Yet he finally stepped it up in the third quarter, and then three polls in a row showed him with a lead.

    More importantly, the DCCC jumped in in a big way. In fact, no district has seen a bigger disparity in party committee spending – about $2.5 million to zero. Indeed, it seems that the NRCC has given up on sad-sack Robin Hayes, putting Kissell in a commanding position to finish off the Republican once and for all. (David)

  • NE-02 (Terry): Lean Republican to Tossup

    There’s no question that the momentum lies with the Democrats in this Omaha-based CD. For the first time since 1994 (the last year that this district had Democratic representation), Dems have built up a voter registration lead in Douglas County (which makes up over 80% of the district’s population). Esch has been aided significantly by the efforts of the Obama campaign, which has an aggressive field campaign in place here to steal the district’s electoral vote from John McCain, as well as the DCCC, which has backed Esch up with over $750,000 in independent expenditures in the past few weeks.

    Terry only led Esch by a single point in the most recently-released poll of this district, and the DC scuttlebutt indicates that Terry is only clinging to a small lead in his own polling. That might have been enough to hold on in other years, but no incumbent under 50% and feeling their challenger’s breath on the back of their neck can be considered especially favored, especially with uncertainties surrounding the turnout of a newly-energized pool of African-American voters in this district. This one should be be close. (James)

  • TX-10 (McCaul): Likely Republican to Lean Republican

    The DCCC hasn’t jumped in with guns blazing in this district, but there’s still reason for optimism in this R+13 district that wanders all the way from the Houston suburbs to Austin suburbs. Polling shows former TV judge Larry Joe Doherty within arm’s length of incument Mike McCaul, including a recent R2K poll with Doherty down by just 4. McCaul’s fundraising has been lackluster, and he’s been nervous about early voting patterns in this district. This is also a district that has changed dramatically even since 2004; population-wise, it’s the fastest-growing district in Texas and most of that growth is non-white. McCaul still has to be favored to pull it out, but Doherty is poised for an upset. (Crisitunity)

    Our full ratings chart is available here.

  • Charlie Cook’s last batch of ratings changes

    Interesting.  All are movements from solid R to likely R.  Must mean he can see more longshot upsets happening.

    http://www.cookpolitical.com/r…

    SOUTH CAROLINA | District 2: Solid Republican to Likely Republican (11/03/08)

    OKLAHOMA | District 4: Solid Republican to Likely Republican (11/03/08)

    OKLAHOMA | District 1: Solid Republican to Likely Republican (11/03/08)

    OHIO | District 14: Solid Republican to Likely Republican (11/03/08)

    MICHIGAN | District 11: Solid Republican to Likely Republican (11/03/08)

    LOUISIANA | District 7: Solid Republican to Likely Republican (11/03/08)

    ILLINOIS | District 13: Solid Republican to Likely Republican (11/03/08)

    CALIFORNIA | District 45: Solid Republican to Likely Republican (11/03/08)

    CALIFORNIA | District 26: Solid Republican to Likely Republican (11/03/08)

    OHIO | District 12: Solid Republican to Likely Republican (11/03/08)

    NORTH CAROLINA | District 10: Likely Republican to Solid Republican (11/03/08)

    MICHIGAN | District 8: Solid Republican to Likely Republican (11/03/08)

    Swing County Project

    Swing State Project is a place for advanced election returns watchers, so here’s a tool for those who want to delve a little more into the nuts and bolts of what’s happening at the county level as swing state returns come trickling in, rather than just relying on the statewide numbers. The focus is on states with competitive senate or governor’s races, but there are also a few presidential swing states thrown in as well. Bookmark it or print it for easy reference tomorrow!

    What I’ve done is start with the 2004 presidential numbers and look at all the counties that comprised 1% or more of the state’s votes (so that you aren’t spending your time worrying about 50/50 counties that turn out to only have a few thousand people in them). I’ve added (or subtracted) from those numbers to find where we need to be in each county to get over 50% on a statewide basis (regardless of whether you’re looking at these states in terms of the presidential race or another close statewide race). The assumption is that each states’ counties form a pretty consistent left-to-right spectrum no matter what the race is.

    A few caveats: I didn’t want to spend weeks on this project, so these numbers presume essentially the same model as 2004 and push the percentages in exactly the same way in each county. Obviously, there are going to be some differences from that. Take Colorado, for instance. We can probably bank on increased African-American turnout in Denver, and increased young voter turnout in Boulder and Ft. Collins (Larimer County), which may express itself both as a greater Dem percentage gain than other counties and as a higher percentage of the total state tally. We also should factor in that disproportionately more growth in the last four years in Colorado has occurred in red counties (especially booming Douglas and Weld Counties), meaning those counties may also be a higher percentage of the total state… but we should also account for the fact that as suburban ripples spread out into exurban counties, they also tend to get bluer. Unfortunately, you’ll need to put on your political geography expert hats and make any of those mental adjustments yourselves.

    Also, for statewide (governor or senator) races, assume that there might be regional concentrations in favor of particular candidates (i.e. the part of the state they’re from and where they know everybody… for example, look for Kay Hagan to overperform in Guilford County or Gordon Smith to overperform in Umatilla County). So what happens tomorrow won’t necessarily mirror my numbers (especially since in many places we’ll be easily exceeding 50%); they aren’t projections as much as just benchmarks on where we need to be at a minimum in order to win.

    Colorado

    County % of 2004
    statewide vote
    What we need to
    break 50% statewide
    2004 Pres.
    Statewide 100.0 50/49 47/52
    Jefferson 12.7 50/49 47/52
    El Paso 11.3 35/64 32/67
    Denver 11.2 73/26 70/29
    Arapahoe 10.9 50/48 47/51
    Boulder 7.5 69/29 66/32
    Larimer 6.9 50/49 47/52
    Adams 6.4 54/45 51/48
    Douglas 5.7 36/64 33/67
    Weld 4.2 39/60 36/63
    Pueblo 3.2 56/43 53/46
    Mesa 2.9 35/64 32/67
    La Plata 1.2 56/43 53/46
    Broomfield 1.1 50/49 47/52

    Much more over the flip…

    Florida

    County % of 2004
    statewide vote
    What we need to
    break 50% statewide
    2004 Pres.
    Statewide 100.0 50/49 47/52
    Miami-Dade 10.2 56/44 53/47
    Broward 9.3 67/32 64/35
    Palm Beach 7.2 63/36 60/39
    Hillsborough 6.1 49/50 46/53
    Pinellas 6.0 53/47 50/50
    Orange 5.1 53/47 50/50
    Duval 5.0 45/55 42/58
    Brevard 3.5 45/55 42/58
    Lee 3.2 42/57 39/60
    Volusia 3.0 53/46 50/49
    Polk 2.8 44/56 41/59
    Sarasota 2.6 48/51 45/54
    Pasco 2.5 47/51 44/54
    Seminole 2.4 44/55 41/58
    Manatee 1.9 46/54 43/57
    Escambia 1.9 37/62 34/65
    Marion 1.8 44/55 41/58
    Leon 1.8 65/35 62/38
    Collier 1.7 37/62 34/65
    Lake 1.6 42/57 39/60
    Alachua 1.5 59/40 56/43
    St. Lucie 1.3 55/45 52/48
    Okaloosa 1.2 25/75 22/78
    St. Johns 1.1 34/66 31/69
    Osceola 1.1 50/49 47/52
    Clay 1.1 26/73 23/76
    Hernando 1.1 49/50 46/53
    Charlotte 1.0 46/53 43/56

    Georgia

    County % of 2004
    statewide vote
    What we need to
    break 50% statewide
    2004 Pres.
    Statewide 100.0 50/49 41/58
    Fulton 10.2 68/31 59/40
    Cobb 8.5 46/53 37/62
    DeKalb 8.4 82/18 73/27
    Gwinnett 7.4 42/57 33/66
    Chatham 2.8 59/41 50/50
    Clayton 2.4 79/20 70/29
    Cherokee 2.2 29/70 20/79
    Richmond 2.1 66/34 57/43
    Henry 1.9 42/58 33/67
    Muscogee 1.9 60/39 51/48
    Bibb 1.7 60/40 51/49
    Forsyth 1.7 25/74 16/83
    Fayette 1.6 37/62 28/71
    Hall 1.5 30/69 21/78
    Columbia 1.4 33/66 24/75
    Houston 1.4 42/57 33/66
    Coweta 1.3 34/65 25/74
    Douglas 1.3 47/52 38/61
    Paulding 1.2 32/67 23/76
    Clarke 1.1 67/31 58/40
    Carroll 1.1 38/61 29/70
    Dougherty 1.0 68/32 59/41

    Kentucky

    County % of 2004
    statewide vote
    What we need to
    break 50% statewide
    2004 Pres.
    Statewide 100.0 50/50 40/60
    Jefferson 18.8 60/39 50/49
    Fayette 7.0 56/43 46/53
    Kenton 3.7 44/55 34/65
    Boone 2.5 37/62 27/72
    Daviess 2.3 48/51 38/61
    Campbell 2.2 45/54 35/64
    Warren 2.2 46/53 36/63
    Hardin 2.0 42/58 32/68
    Madison 1.7 48/52 38/62
    McCracken 1.7 48/51 38/61
    Bullitt 1.6 42/58 32/68
    Oldham 1.5 40/59 30/69
    Pike 1.5 62/37 52/47
    Pulaski 1.4 33/67 23/77
    Franklin 1.3 58/41 48/51
    Laurel 1.2 34/66 24/76
    Boyd 1.2 57/43 47/53
    Christian 1.1 43/56 33/66
    Hopkins 1.0 44/55 34/65
    Henderson 1.0 53/46 43/56
    Jessamine 1.0 39/60 29/70

    Minnesota

    (I’m going to try something very different here; I’m going to set the target at 45%, to account for the Barkley effect, assuming he draws equally from both sides and finishes around 10, both of which may be completely wrong on my partl)

    County % of 2004
    statewide vote
    What we need to
    break 45% statewide
    2004 Pres.
    Statewide 100.0 45/42 51/48
    Hennepin 22.9 53/33 59/39
    Ramsey 9.6 57/30 63/36
    Dakota 7.6 42/44 48/50
    Anoka 6.2 40/47 46/53
    Washington 4.5 42/45 48/51
    St. Louis 4.2 59/28 65/34
    Stearns 2.7 37/49 43/55
    Olmsted 2.5 41/46 47/52
    Scott 2.1 34/53 40/59
    Wright 2.1 32/55 38/61
    Carver 1.6 30/57 36/63
    Sherburne 1.5 32/55 38/61
    Crow Wing 1.2 36/51 42/57
    Blue Earth 1.2 45/42 51/48
    Otter Tail 1.1 31/55 37/61
    Rice 1.1 47/39 53/45

    Mississippi

    County % of 2004
    statewide vote
    What we need to
    break 50% statewide
    2004 Pres.
    Statewide 100.0 50/49 40/59
    Hinds 8.0 69/30 59/40
    Harrison 5.5 46/53 36/63
    Rankin 4.7 30/69 20/79
    Jackson 4.4 40/59 30/69
    De Soto 4.4 37/62 27/72
    Madison 3.3 45/54 35/64
    Lee 2.7 43/56 33/66
    Lauderdale 2.6 44/55 34/65
    Forrest 2.3 48/51 38/61
    Jones 2.3 38/62 28/72
    Lowndes 2.1 53/46 43/56
    Lamar 1.8 29/70 19/80
    Warren 1.7 52/48 42/58
    Washington 1.7 69/29 59/39
    Pearl River 1.7 33/66 23/76
    Hancock 1.6 39/60 29/70

    (In another example of how the netroots hate the flyover states, I stopped at 1.5% of state vote share in Mississippi. Lots of medium-sized counties there.)

    (I’ve left out New Hampshire because it reports by towns rather than by counties, and that would get a little too complicated.)

    New Mexico

    County % of 2004
    statewide vote
    What we need to
    break 50% statewide
    2004 Pres.
    Statewide 100.0 50/49 49/50
    Bernalillo 34.0 53/46 52/47
    Santa Fe 8.8 72/27 71/28
    Dona Ana 8.2 52/47 51/48
    San Juan 6.0 34/65 33/66
    Sandoval 5.9 49/50 48/51
    Valencia 3.4 44/55 43/56
    Chaves 2.9 32/67 31/68
    Otero 2.7 32/67 31/68
    McKinley 2.7 64/35 63/36
    Eddy 2.7 35/65 34/66
    Lea 2.4 21/78 20/79
    Rio Arriba 2.0 66/33 65/34
    Taos 2.0 75/24 74/25
    Curry 1.9 26/74 25/75
    Grant 1.8 54/45 53/46
    San Miguel 1.6 73/26 72/27
    Los Alamos 1.5 48/51 47/52
    Lincoln 1.2 32/66 31/67
    Socorro 1.0 52/46 51/47
    Luna 1.0 45/54 44/55

    North Carolina

    County % of 2004
    statewide vote
    What we need to
    break 50% statewide
    2004 Pres.
    Statewide 100.0 50/50 44/56
    Wake 10.0 55/45 49/51
    Mecklenburg 9.2 58/42 52/48
    Guilford 5.7 56/43 50/49
    Forsyth 4.0 52/48 46/54
    Durham 3.1 74/26 68/32
    Buncombe 3.0 55/44 49/50
    Cumberland 2.7 54/46 48/52
    New Hanover 2.3 50/50 44/56
    Orange 1.8 73/26 67/32
    Gaston 1.8 38/62 32/68
    Union 1.7 35/64 29/70
    Cabarrus 1.7 39/61 33/67
    Davidson 1.7 35/65 29/71
    Catawba 1.7 38/61 32/67
    Iredell 1.6 38/62 32/68
    Johnston 1.6 38/62 32/68
    Alamance 1.5 44/55 38/61
    Pitt 1.5 52/47 46/53
    Rowan 1.5 38/61 32/67
    Randolph 1.5 31/68 25/74
    Henderson 1.2 41/59 35/65
    Wayne 1.1 44/56 38/62
    Moore 1.1 41/58 35/64
    Brunswick 1.1 45/54 39/60
    Craven 1.1 43/56 37/62
    Nash 1.1 48/52 42/58
    Rockingham 1.1 45/55 39/61
    Onslow 1.1 36/63 30/69
    Cleveland 1.1 44/55 38/61

    Ohio

    County % of 2004
    statewide vote
    What we need to
    break 50% statewide
    2004 Pres.
    Statewide 100.0 50/50 49/51
    Cuyahoga 12.0 68/32 67/33
    Franklin 9.3 55/44 54/45
    Hamilton 7.5 48/52 47/53
    Montgomery 5.0 52/48 51/49
    Summit 4.9 58/42 57/43
    Lucas 3.9 61/39 60/40
    Stark 3.3 52/48 51/49
    Butler 3.0 35/65 34/66
    Lorain 2.5 57/43 56/44
    Mahoning 2.4 64/36 63/37
    Lake 2.2 50/50 49/51
    Trumbull 1.9 63/37 62/38
    Warren 1.7 29/73 28/72
    Clermont 1.6 30/70 29/71
    Medina 1.5 44/56 43/57
    Delaware 1.4 35/65 34/66
    Licking 1.4 39/61 38/62
    Greene 1.4 40/60 39/61
    Portage 1.4 54/45 53/46
    Clark 1.2 50/50 49/51
    Fairfield 1.2 38/62 37/63
    Wood 1.1 47/52 46/53
    Richland 1.1 41/59 40/60

    Oregon

    County % of 2004
    statewide vote
    What we need to
    break 50% statewide
    2004 Pres.
    Statewide 100.0 50/48 51/47
    Multnomah 19.7 71/28 72/27
    Washington 12.6 51/47 52/46
    Clackamas 10.6 48/51 49/50
    Lane 10.1 57/41 58/40
    Marion 7.1 43/55 44/54
    Jackson 5.6 42/56 43/55
    Deschutes 4.0 41/57 42/56
    Douglas 3.0 32/66 33/65
    Linn 2.8 37/61 38/60
    Benton 2.5 57/41 58/40
    Josephine 2.3 35/63 36/62
    Yamhill 2.3 41/58 42/57
    Polk 1.9 43/56 44/55
    Coos 1.8 42/56 43/55
    Klamath 1.7 25/73 26/72
    Umatilla 1.4 33/66 34/65
    Columbia 1.4 49/49 50/48
    Lincoln 1.3 56/43 57/42
    Clatsop 1.1 53/45 54/44

    Pennsylvania

    County % of 2004
    statewide vote
    What we need to
    break 50% statewide
    2004 Pres.
    Statewide 100.0 50/49 51/48
    Philadelphia 11.7 79/20 80/19
    Allegheny 11.2 56/43 57/42
    Montgomery 6.9 55/45 56/44
    Bucks 5.5 50/49 51/48
    Delaware 4.9 56/43 57/42
    Chester 4.0 47/53 48/52
    Lancaster 3.8 33/67 34/66
    York 3.1 35/65 36/64
    Westmoreland 3.1 43/57 44/56
    Berks 2.9 45/54 46/53
    Lehigh 2.5 50/49 51/48
    Luzerne 2.4 50/49 51/48
    Northampton 2.2 49/50 50/49
    Erie 2.2 53/47 54/46
    Dauphin 2.1 45/55 46/54
    Cumberland 1.8 35/65 36/64
    Lackawanna 1.8 55/43 56/42
    Washington 1.7 49/51 50/50
    Butler 1.5 34/65 35/64
    Beaver 1.4 50/49 51/48
    Cambria 1.2 48/52 49/51
    Schuylkill 1.1 44/56 45/55
    Centre 1.1 47/53 48/52
    Franklin 1.0 27/72 28/71

    Virginia

    County % of 2004
    statewide vote
    What we need to
    break 50% statewide
    2004 Pres.
    Statewide 100.0 50/49 45/54
    Fairfax 14.4 58/41 53/46
    Virginia Beach city 5.5 45/54 40/59
    Chesterfield 4.2 42/58 37/63
    Henrico 4.2 51/49 46/54
    Prince William 4.1 51/48 46/53
    Loudoun 3.4 49/51 44/56
    Arlington 3.0 73/26 68/31
    Chesapeake city 2.9 47/52 42/57
    Richmond city 2.3 75/24 70/29
    Norfolk city 2.2 67/32 62/37
    Newport News city 2.1 57/42 52/47
    Alexandria city 1.9 72/37 67/32
    Hampton city 1.7 62/37 57/42
    Hanover 1.6 33/66 28/71
    Roanoke 1.5 39/60 34/65
    Stafford 1.4 42/57 37/62
    Spotsylvania 1.4 42/58 37/63
    Albemarle 1.4 56/43 51/48
    Portsmouth city 1.2 66/34 61/39
    Roanoke city 1.1 57/41 52/46
    Suffolk city 1.0 52/47 47/52

    Washington

    County % of 2004
    statewide vote
    What we need to
    break 50% statewide
    2004 Pres.
    Statewide 100.0 50/49 53/46
    King 31.3 62/37 65/34
    Pierce 11.0 48/51 51/48
    Snohomish 10.3 50/49 53/46
    Spokane 7.1 40/58 43/55
    Clark 6.0 44/55 47/52
    Kitsap 4.1 48/50 51/47
    Thurston 3.9 53/46 56/43
    Whatcom 3.2 50/48 53/45
    Yakima 2.5 36/63 39/60
    Benton 2.3 29/69 32/66
    Skagit 1.8 45/53 48/50
    Cowlitz 1.5 48/51 51/48
    Island 1.3 44/54 47/51
    Clallam 1.3 43/54 46/51
    Lewis 1.1 30/68 33/65
    Chelan 1.0 33/66 36/63

    Upset Specials?

    There’s no question that this has been an extremely rough year for Republicans — just take a look at how far Democrats have spread the playing field in the House battleground this year. The fact that Dems are seriously contesting deep-red districts in Indiana, Nebraska, and Virginia tells you the story of this election pretty quickly.

    We’re all aware of the top-tier races, but one thing I know that we’re all quietly waiting for are the freak race shockers of 2008. Few expected the likes of Carol Shea-Porter and Dave Loebsack to knock off Republican incumbents in 2006, and on election eve two years later, a lot of people are finding themselves scrambling to identify possible stunners. Our good friends over at the Cook Political Report, for instance, just moved OH-12 and MI-08, two tossup districts with underfunded Democratic challengers, to their “Likely Republican” column from their previous rating of Solid Republican. If the prognosticator class is doing a double-take on races as quiet as those ones, you know that tomorrow could be potentially explosive.

    So if you had to guess, where might we see a surprise win tomorrow and why? I might go for something like IA-04 (a tossup district that Obama is likely to romp in), but I’m sure some of you have even freakier long-odds hopes.

    NC-Sen, NC-Gov: Liddy Dole is Going to Lose

    SurveyUSA is out with a new round of North Carolina polls, and the results look pretty similar to other recent polls (10/30-11/2, likely voters, 10/18-20 in parens):

    Kay Hagan (D): 50 (46)

    Elizabeth Dole (R-inc): 43 (45)

    Chris Cole (L): 5 (5)

    (MoE: ±3.8%)

    Bev Perdue (D): 48 (43)

    Pat McCrory (R): 47 (46)

    Mike Munger (L): 4 (7)

    (MoE: ±3.8%)

    McCain leads Obama by a single point here, 49-48, but turnout will determine it all. Among those who have already voted (57% of the sample), Hagan leads Dole by 58-39, Perdue leads McCrory by 55-41, and Obama leads McCain by 56-41.

    A Hagan win seems like a safe bet right now (and how sweet that is, really), but the Presidential and Gubernatorial races seem set to come down to every last vote.

    Election Eve: The 2008 Senate races

    This is it.  It’s time for my final look at all the 2008 Senate races.  There are 35 seats up for election because of a scenario in Wyoming and Mississippi where both seats are up, due to the passing of Craig Thomas and the resignation of Trent Lott, respectively.  Obviously, quite a few of the races are considered “safe” for the incumbent.  So what are the competitive races?

    Again, just to be clear, I don’t do predictions.  Every time I do, horrible things happen.  So I won’t even make an actual prediction on the Virginia Senate race, because doing so would effectively jinx Mark Warner.  And with the election tomorrow, tiers no longer matter, so I’ll simply rank the competitive races where party control of the seat may switch.  All others are deemed safe seats, which now include all of the Tier II and III seats from last time.

    See my previous mid-October diary to see what things have changed since my last update.  Previous rankings are in parentheses.

    Tier I

    1. Virginia (1): Former popular Governor Mark Warner (D) is still cruising.  Former unpopular former Governor Jim Gilmore (R) hasn’t even gotten above 35% in any poll taken since early September, and Warner cannot get below 55%.  Only God or the Devil can stop this one now, but still, no official predictions from me.

    2. New Mexico (2): Rep. Tom Udall (D) is running against Rep. Steve Pearce (R).  Since October, Udall’s re-opened his massive lead after getting hit by attacks from conservative independent groups.  Pearce has not gotten above 42% since early September, while Udall has been consistently over the 50% mark at the same time.  The NRSC has basically conceded defeat in this race.

    3. Colorado (3): Rep. Mark Udall (D) is Mo Udall’s son, and Tom Udall’s cousin.  He’s facing off against former Congressman Bob Schaffer (R).  All the late October polling shows Udall ahead by double digits.  The NRSC finally pulled out of Colorado last week after doing a head fake.

    4. New Hampshire (4): Former Governor Jeanne Shaheen (D), who John Sununu (R) beat in 2002, is back for a rematch.  She has led Sununu in almost every single poll taken in 2008, and without some illegal phone-jamming on Election Day to help Sununu out this time around, Shaheen looks to be in good shape.  Though Sununu still has a significant cash on hand advantage, it hasn’t helped him.

    5. Alaska (8): Conviction!  84-year-old Ted Stevens (R) was convicted on all 7 felony counts for not disclosing the gifts (over $250,000 worth) he got from oil company Veco Corp. last Monday.  Anchorage mayor Mark Begich (D), who had been in a very close race with Stevens, has now opened up a decent lead in the polls, turning what seemed to be a nailbiter into a more comfortable lead.  Something about voting for a convicted felon, I guess.  Still, Rasmussen’s poll has it as a single-digit race, so don’t count out Alaska’s unique brand of crazy just yet.

    6. North Carolina (5): The polls have shown a complete reversal of fortune starting in August.  Kay Hagan (D) has been climbing steadily in the polls, while incumbent Elizabeth Dole (R) has been steadily falling.  So what do you do if you’re Dole?  Run an incredibly horrible attack ad calling your opponent, a Sunday school teacher, “godless”.  That’s the sign of a desperate and losing campaign, as four different polls taken in late October now show Hagan at or above the 50% mark.

    7. Oregon (6): Oregon House Speaker Jeff Merkley (D) is challenging incumbent Gordon Smith (R), and has been steadily gaining ground in the polls over the past month.  Every non-partisan poll taken in late October showed Merkley with some kind of lead.  Still, none of them showed him at 50% or above, so this one’s not a done deal yet.

    8. Minnesota (7): Norm Coleman (R) won this seat in 2002 only after Paul Wellstone (D) died just a few weeks before the election.  Comedian Al Franken got the DFL (basically the Democratic Party for Minnesota) nod.  The recent polling now shows a pure tossup, with some polls showing Franken in teh lead, and some polls showing Coleman leading.  But late-breaking news has a new lawsuit filed against Coleman alledging $75,000 being funneled to Coleman’s wife from a big GOP donor.

    9. Georgia (9): Former state representative Jim Martin (D) is going up against Saxby Chambliss (R), who ousted Vietnam veteran and triple amputee Max Cleland (D) in 2002 by running a despicable ad blending the images of Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein into Cleland’s face, earning him the nickname “Shameless Saxby”.  Starting with the economic collapse, poll after poll showed a completely different race, with Martin only behind by a statistically insignificant margin.  However, they all still show Martin trailing.  Now, Georgia has a rule that the winner must get over 50% of the vote, and the Libertarian candidate may take enough away that nobody can get 50%, in which case it will go to a runoff in December.

    10. Kentucky (10): Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R) is now a top target of the Democrats.  Wealthy businessman Bruce Lunsford (D) can afford to self-fund, and he’ll need to, with McConnell’s HUGE warchest of over $9 million.  In just the last month, the polls suddenly showed Lunsford gaining significant ground on McConnell, but the latest two polls show McConnell gaining ground again, getting over the 50% mark.

    11. Mississippi-B (11): Roger Wicker (R), appointed by governor Haley Barbour (R) on New Year’s Eve after Trent Lott (R) resigned to become a lobbyist, was previously the Congressman from MS-01.  Former Governor Ronnie Musgrove (D) has kept it close in the polls until recently.  As with Kentucky, the latest two polls now show Wicker above 50%.

    Democratic safe seats

    Arkansas (Mark Pryor)

    Delaware (Joe Biden)

    Illinois (Dick Durbin)

    Iowa (Tom Harkin)

    Louisiana (Mary Landrieu)

    Massachusetts (John Kerry)

    Michigan (Carl Levin)

    Montana (Max Baucus)

    New Jersey (Frank Lautenberg)

    Rhode Island (Jack Reed)

    South Dakota (Tim Johnson)

    West Virginia (Jay Rockefeller)

    Republican safe seats

    Alabama (Jeff Sessions)

    Idaho (Jim Risch)

    Kansas (Pat Roberts)

    Maine (Susan Collins)

    Mississippi (Thad Cochran)

    Nebraska (Mike Johanns)

    Oklahoma (James Inhofe)

    South Carolina (Lindsey Graham)

    Tennessee (Lamar Alexander)

    Texas (John Cornyn)

    Wyoming (Michael Enzi)

    Wyoming (John Barrasso)

    So there you have it, my final rankings for the 2008 Senate races, as they stand with less than 24 hours to go.  We’ll see what happens tomorrow.

    Predictions Contest Closed

    Just a reminder — tonight is your last chance to enter SSP’s prediction contest. We’ll be cutting off all entries at midnight Eastern tonight, so get cracking. (And you also have a few hours left if you wish to revise your earlier predictions.)

    Babka is on the line here, people!

    UPDATE (David): The contest closes in three hours! Get your last-minute predictions (or tweaks) in now!

    Also, Daily Kos is having a predictions contest, too. Win both and you can eat delicious chocolate babka while surfing the net on your new MacBook!

    LATE UPDATE: It’s done! No more entries will be accepted.

    Populista’s Predictions

    Here goes. Just beacuse.

    Presidential Election:



    Electoral Votes:
    Barack Obama 364, John McCain 174

    Popular Vote: Obama +6.9

    McCain Pickups: None



    Obama Pickups:
    Iowa, New Mexico, Colorado, Nevada, Missouri, Ohio, Virgina, North Carolina and Florida

    I’m a little unsure about North Carolina and Missouri but I’m going to call them for Barack. I think he’ll come up just short in Indiana, Montana and Georgia.

    Gubernatorial Elections:

    Republican Pickups: None

    Democratic Pickups: Missouri

    Not much to see. I think we’ll hold in NC and WA.

    Senate Elections:

    Republican Pickups: None



    Democratic Pickups:
    Virgina, New Mexico, Colorado, New Hampshire, Alaska, Oregon, North Carolina, Minnesota

    And I also predict the Georgia Senate race will go into a runoff and Jim Martin will win it but I’ll have final predictions closer to that election.

    House Elections:

    Republican Pickups: FL-16, TX-22, PA-11

    Democratic Pickups: NY-13, AZ-01, VA-11, NY-25, AK-AL, CO-04, FL-24, IL-11, MI-09, MI-07, NY-29, OH-16, OH-15, NC-08, NM-01, NM-02, CA-04, CT-04, FL-08, FL-25, ID-01, IL-10, IN-03, LA-04, MD-01, MN-03, MN-06, MO-09, NJ-03, NJ-07, NV-03, OH-01, PA-03, WA-08, AL-02, AZ-03, OH-02, VA-02, VA-05.

    Net Democratic Gain: +36

    Maybe a little optimistic. But I think that’s going to be pretty close.