Sneak on Through… to the Other Side…

How many times have you heard someone say, “Well, if the two (or three, or four) big established politicians beat each other up in the primary, Lesser Known Candidate Z could sneak through”? Certainly I’ve seen this kind of speculation far more often than it actually happens. Alice Kryzan’s win over Jon Powers and Crazy Jack Davis in NY-26 was quite the shocker – there must be a dozen (if not 50) Tom Geoghegans for every Kryzan.

But it’s obviously happened in the past, and it’ll occasionally happen in the future. So I’m asking the SSP brain trust to dig deep into the memory banks and tell us about any other “sneak through” primary winners you’re aware of. I’m sure there are some good stories out there, so let’s hear `em.

MN-06 – Taking on Michele “Bat Crap Crazy” Bachmann –

We have added the MN-06 Democratic nominee funds to the list of candidates we will be supporting in 2010. I chose this for several reasons and the most encouraging being the latest Michele Bachmann comments that we posted yesterday. Bachmann is perhaps the most divisive politician on the National scene.

Help us now as we do all we can to level the playing field for the eventual nominee who will run against her in 2010. A number of $5, $10 and $20 contributions to whoever she will face will provide an early assist to take her down.

As soon as we find out if there is a leading contender to take on Bachmann whether it be the 2008 nominee Tinklenberg or someone else we will gladly support them.

Goal Thermometer

GA-Gov: New Poll Shows Former Dem Gov. Barnes Competitive (Maybe)

Insider Advantage (3/17, registered voters, no trendlines):

Roy Barnes (D): 35

Casey Cagle (R): 39

Undecided: 26

Roy Barnes (D): 38

John Oxendine (R): 33

Undecided: 29

Roy Barnes (D): 34

Karen Handel (R): 29

Undecided: 37

(MoE: 4%)

Barnes, 61, served as Georgia’s governor for one term (1999-2003), until he was unexpectedly booted out by Sonny Perdue – who is himself term-limited, making this an open seat. Cagle is the current Lt. Gov., Oxendine is the state Insurance Commissioner, and Handel is the Secretary of State.

The original poll results are unfortunately behind a paywall now, so I don’t know what Barnes’s name rec looks like, over six years after he left office. I’d suspect it’s still fairly high, but his favorables are a separate question. Meanwhile, IA does say that all three GOP contenders are fairly unknown, so we might be comparing Generic R to Well-Known D.

These uncertainties, plus the high undecideds, might mean that Barnes isn’t actually as competitive as these early numbers show. I recall one poll just over four years ago which showed Lucy Baxley leading AL Gov. Bob Riley 39-35 with 26% undecided. Twenty months later, those numbers were the dimmest of memories.

MS-01: MS GOP Talks Up Two Potential Childers Challengers

Roll Call:

Southaven Mayor Greg Davis (R), who lost to Childers in both the special election and in the November general election rematch, said last week that he has no interest in challenging Childers again in 2010. And now Magnolia State Republican insiders have turned their attention to GOP state Sens. Alan Nunnelee and Merle Flowers.

Nunnelee, who chairs the state Senate Appropriations Committee, acknowledged his interest in the 1st district race on Monday but said he probably won’t make a decision on a Congressional bid until after the state budgeting process is complete. …

Flowers… said it is too early to talk about whether he’d challenge the Congressman in 2010. Nunnelee said that considering the close relationship that he and Flowers have, “I can’t see any scenario where Merle and I would run against each other” in a GOP primary.

A terribly divisive GOP primary for the MS-01 special last year left Nathan Lane Greg Davis badly wounded. Childers, however, won all three of his contests against Davis with increasing margins each time (3%, 8%, and 10%) and seems to be a capable politician and a good fit for his district. Even if the GOP recruits a strong candidate, Childers will have the edge – and considerable support from the DCCC.

Redistricting 2011: Florida & Louisiana

Episode 5 in my redistricting series, and as you can see, I’m picking up the pace, having just covered Georgia and New Jersey yesterday. Because the Census released 2008 county estimates last week, I feel like knocking out these diaries for the states I already mapped using 2007 numbers. Of course, because they’re 2007 numbers, they’re not quite up to snuff, but in most cases, the lines wouldn’t look too dramatically different using newer stats.

Previously covered:

Diary 1: Massachusetts and Texas

Diary 2: Michigan and Nevada

Diary 3: Iowa and Ohio

Diary 4: Georgia and New Jersey

Geek out below!

Florida

Now, this is the single hardest state I had to tackle. More so than Texas, more so than Ohio, more so than Pennsylvania. That’s because Florida is perhaps the most masterful Republican gerrymander in the nation; a state that voted 51% to 48% for President Obama is represented in Congress by 15 Republicans and 10 Democrats, and before 2006, the skew was 18-7. Considering Democratic dominance in South Florida and clear Dem trends along I-4, that’s pretty astounding cartographic craftiness by the GOP.

Unfortunately, unless we pick up the governor’s mansion in 2010 (virtually impossible, IMHO, unless Crist runs for the Senate, and even then, the GOP bench in Florida is quite deep), Republicans are set for another round of redistricting monopoly in 2011-12 (one caveat: a nonpartisan commission initiative is on the ballot in 2010, but since it needs 60% to pass, I’m skeptical). While Republicans’ room for growth is limited, what with Dem trends in Central FL and the Cuban districts softening, there could be at least one Dem casualty along with a new GOP seat, for a 17-9 delegation, though 16-10 would be a lot easier for legislators to ensure, since it’s not exactly a cinch to dismantle a moderate I-4 Dem like Suzanne Kosmas. Note: there is an outside chance that Florida will pick up two seats in reapportionment, but the disastrous real estate market has brought that long-famed migration to the Sunshine State to a grinding halt. In 2008, even recession-battered California grew faster. So I’m betting on a one-seat gain; the explosive growth in Florida between 2000 and 2006 more or less ensures at least that one gain, but I can’t envision a sufficiently large uptick in growth between now and the Census for a 27th District.

To sum it up, I’m actually not very satisfied with this map. It’s revoltingly gerrymandered, though no worse than the current iteration, and I’m not sure about some of my boundaries (is Alcee Hastings’ 23rd still VRA black-majority with these lines?). But I tried to maintain the best possible lines for the Republicans (i.e. mostly the status quo), with an emphasis on incumbent protection. I may have done things a bit differently if I’d used 2008 numbers, so an eventual do-over on my part isn’t out of the question.

To the point: the GOP has a real problem along I-4: with Orange and Osceola Counties decidedly Democratic, and Adam Putnam’s soon-to-be-open seat a near-tie between McCain and Obama, they can only play offense so much. I figured that since Orlando is becoming so progressive, they would concede Alan Grayson’s seat (assuming he is reelected in 2010) and hurt Kosmas only by roughly maintaining the current, Feeney-drawn lines. Meanwhile, FL-12 (Putnam) is shored up by moving into some hardcore Republican territory, and a new 26th District is created from Central Florida leftovers (unfortunately for them, it only barely leans Republican in a neutral year as I’ve drawn it, and in a year like 2006 or 2008, might well elect a Democrat). Again, I tried my best to be devious, but when a state is already so gerrymandered for one party and the trends are running against that party in key regions of said state, “safety first” is the likely tack.

As for South Florida, my boundaries are imprecise, so the summary descriptions are a bit more informative. Basically, I tried to replicate the current boundaries in most of these cases, while cleaning up the 23rd (as I mentioned, though, it probably can’t be as cleaned-up as I drew it since it is a VRA seat). If more specific Census estimates were available, I could have known how to, for example, boost the Cuban-American percentage in Districts 18, 21, and 25, but instead, I was left with a sloppy, low-tech method as the Miami metro area goes.

For now, this is the map I’ve got:

Photobucket

Ugly? You bet. Want a logical map? The Sunshine State GOP wouldn’t hear of it.

District 1 – Jeff Miller (R-Chumuckla) — contracts in area; still the most conservative district in the state.

District 2 – Allen Boyd (D-Monticello) — still an old-school district of Jimmy Carter white Democrats who vote GOP for President. When Boyd retires, we will be in trouble here, as even the boosted black turnout of 2008 only resulted in a 54-45 McCain victory.

District 3 – Corrine Brown (D-Jacksonville) — well, it’s not quite as grossly drawn as before, but it must remain a VRA African-American seat, so I had to get creative.

District 4 – Ander Crenshaw (R-Jacksonville) — random trivia: did you know there were Civil War battles in this district?

District 5 – Ginny Brown-Waite (R-Brooksville) — I tried to clean up this and the 6th, both previously with needlessly messy lines; this one stays safely Republican, but now only splits one county (Pasco).

District 6 – Cliff Stearns (R-Ocala) — stays heavily Republican but looks a bit more aesthetic. No, I don’t like Gainesville being represented by a Republican any more than you do, but it is a blue island in a sea of red (much like Athens, Georgia).

District 7 – John Mica (R-Winter Park) — by only encroaching a bit into Orange County and making St. Johns County the largest population source, I attempted to help Mica, but the long-term trends here are not advantageous to him. If he moved out of Orange County, he could be drawn a safer seat.

District 8 – Alan Grayson (D-Orlando) — entirely within Orange County, meant to soak up Democrats to allow for a Republican 26th and to prevent Kosmas from getting too comfortable. I think if there’s one painful concession the GOP will have to make, this is it.

District 9 – Gus Bilirakis (R-Palm Harbor) — jumps around north Tampa Bay looking for Republicans, doesn’t change too much.

District 10 – Bill Young (R-Indian Shores) — entirely within Pinellas, probably still a 50/50 district. This is a seat they may well lose when Young calls it quits. With both A) the need to protect Bilirakis, and B) Castor’s 11th being maxed-out on Democrats, it’s another uncomfortable decision for the Republicans not to shore this district up very much. As long as the aging Young stays on the ballot, they don’t have to worry.

District 11 – Kathy Castor (D-Tampa) — still the bay-dancing Tampa-St. Petersburg seat, concentrating Democrats and with a significant black minority.

District 12 – Adam Putnam (R-Bartow) — since McCain won here by a mere inch, and Putnam is leaving in 2010, I figured protecting the 12th for future elections will be a major priority (if a Dem wins in 2010, the GOP will seek to dismantle that person before targeting Grayson or Kosmas). So, even as slightly GOP-leaning Polk County dominates my 12th, Sumter, Hardee, and DeSoto put it over the edge to produce a McCain victory of at least 53-46.

District 13 – Vern Buchanan (R-Sarasota) — this is only a tad more Republican than before, with the whole inclusion of Manatee County aiding GOP numbers.

District 14 – Connie Mack (R-Fort Myers) — dominated by Lee County with remainders of Sarasota and Charlotte. Still the quintessential Gulf Coast GOP mecca.

District 15 – Bill Posey (R-Rockledge) — in retrospect, I’d do this differently, as this is one district the GOP would probably weaken a bit to harm Kosmas or solidify the new 26th.

District 16 – Tom Rooney (R-Tequesta) — stretches from Charlotte to Palm Beach, much like before. If Rooney is easily reelected in 2010, he will be another incumbent they loosen up to cement weaker districts.

District 17 – Kendrick Meek (D-Miami) — should stay the most heavily black, most overwhelmingly Democratic district in the state.

District 18 – Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Miami) — while Ros-Lehtinen can probably hold on quite a few more cycles, this is the only GOP district other than Bill Young’s 10th that voted for Obama, and as Miami Hispanics trend toward the Democrats, all three Cuban-American Republican seats will be endangered. What happens when Ros-Lehtinen and/or the Diaz-Balarts retire? I’m not exactly sure how to solidify these three seats, as the nearest turf they could grab is mostly liberal-leaning anyway. Perhaps they could snag some Gulf Coast Republicans, but that would dilute the VRA Hispanic percentages…

District 19 – Robert Wexler (D-Boca Raton) — the most liberal of the three “Jewish districts” (I say that, of course, tongue firmly in cheek, as the Jewish percentage is a distinct minority in all three seats).

District 20 – Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Weston) — the second of the three, nearly as Democratic as the 19th.

District 21 – Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R-Miami) — as with Ros-Lehtinen and the 18th, I don’t know how to shore up the three traditionally GOP Cuban seats.

District 22 – Ron Klein (D-Boca Raton) — still a coastal stretch; I think the GOP won’t change the lines much here, unless they can find a way to pack Democrats here who would otherwise be left in the 18th, 21st, or 25th.

District 23 – Alcee Hastings (D-Miramar) — regardless of how my lines appear, Hastings’ seat will stay majority-black under the VRA.

District 24 – Suzanne Kosmas (D-New Smyrna Beach) — the closest I could come to targeting Kosmas was to only take in 10% of Orange County, along with 64% of GOP-leaning Seminole and 67% of narrowly Dem-leaning Volusia. Once again, Republican gerrymandering in Central Florida can’t possibly get much more aggressive without sacrificing a couple seats.

District 25 – Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Miami) — see the 18th and 21st.

New District 26 – Central FL, Leans Republican — Osceola and St. Lucie Counties favor Democrats, so it is no accident that I made the largest pop. source here 56% McCain-supporting Lake County, cutting through heavily GOP Okeechobee. Due to the inclusion of Osceola, there will be a significant Hispanic minority here, and a Dem base vote of about 46-47%, rendering it vulnerable to a future loss. Is there a way to draw this that is better for the Republicans? Probably, and I’m sure their computers will find it…but Putnam, Posey, Rooney, Bilirakis, Brown-Waite, and Stearns all need to be protected at the same time. The balance along I-4 really is that tenuous for them.

Overall, my map is flawed, as is the current map in Florida. I intended for realism’s sake to create a masterful Republican gerrymander and ended up with a plan that would, at best, maintain the status quo with a 16-10 GOP edge (with the best possible scenario being an eventual 18-8 if Boyd retires, Kosmas is defeated, and every Republican seat stays intact…quite a tall order indeed). Unless Central FL swings decisively to the Republicans in 2010, there is minimal room for offense on their part…and how to stave off Dem advances in Miami-Dade? In the end, to everyone’s surprise, the biggest winners from the next map may be incumbent Democrats like Klein, Grayson, and Kosmas who picked up seats drawn to reelect Republicans. It really is in the GOP’s interest to salvage what they have in Florida rather than get too greedy.

Louisiana

This was a lot easier, though not exceedingly comforting for a Democrat. The severe population loss in the New Orleans area means that there may no longer be a strong Dem seat in Louisiana, let alone a VRA district. No doubt my proposed District 2 would retain a large black percentage, but I’m far from certain it would be anything near a majority. Might the same judicial system that once rejected Cleo Fields’ “Z district” as a racial gerrymander change its tune in the name of the Voting Rights Act?

As for the political dynamics in Louisiana, Jindal will still be Governor at least through 2011, when redistricting starts, and the legislature is perilously close to flipping to the GOP (the House is already run by a de facto GOP-friendly coalition, with a Republican Speaker to boot). Even if the Senate remains in Democratic hands, Louisiana Dems aren’t exactly known for their party loyalty.

But the task here is simple, and Democratic strength in the Pelican State has collapsed so rapidly that partisan considerations aren’t nearly as influential as they would seem. Everyone agrees that a New Orleans-area seat has to be eliminated, so here’s roughly what I imagine the somewhat Republican-esque legislature coming up with:

Louisiana

Note: Technically, Charlie Melancon’s home was put in the 1st for population reasons, but I would expect him to run in the 2nd instead.

District 1 – Steve Scalise (R-Jefferson) — had to expand in land, but stays heavily Republican.

District 2 – tentatively, Joseph Cao (R-New Orleans) vs. Charlie Melancon (D-Napoleonville) — Melancon would do well to move here, as the boundaries do vaguely resemble his old 3rd, but since the bulk of district population is in Jefferson and Orleans Parishes, it’s his seat that was cracked and eliminated. A New Orleans pol would be favored geographically, and I’m not sure what the political leanings would be here (my guess is competitive, with Dem strength in New Orleans offset by GOP dominance in Jefferson Parish). This might make a worthy court challenge, depending what the race stats are here (and I have no idea what they would be, nor does anyone else post-Katrina).

District 3 – John Fleming (R-Minden) — still quite Republican and trending more so.

District 4 – Rodney Alexander (R-Quitman) — other than the 1st, the most Republican district in the state.

District 5 – Bill Cassidy (R-Baton Rouge) — I thought including some more former Melancon territory might help Cassidy and lessen the influence of Dem-friendly Baton Rouge, but it might also prompt Melancon to move here and mount a long-shot challenge instead of battling it out with a New Orleanian in the urban/suburban-dominated 2nd.

District 6 – Charles Boustany (R-Lafayette) — expands in area, but is still the conservative Cajun seat.

Other than what happens with the eliminated seat, there shouldn’t be too much drama in Louisiana, since Jindal’s loyal GOPers and the conservative Dems will likely seek a consensus plan that somehow cracks Melancon’s seat and consolidates it with NOLA. Actually, the real drama may arise in the courtroom re: racial demographics in each district.

Coming soon: Pennsylvania and Utah, followed by Arizona and New York. Eventually I may tackle other states as well, but I haven’t even mapped New York yet.

EDIT: Clearly my Louisiana map is something of a flop, and I blame the fact that I drew it some weeks ago using 2007 estimates. If I’d known Orleans Parish had regained nearly 73,000 residents between 2007 and 2008, I would have drawn the lines a lot differently, and probably could have more easily retained that VRA New Orleans-area seat. I still imagine Melancon’s seat being cracked, but the majority-black 2nd will remain (just expand due to population loss from 2000).

Hopefully my Florida effort was less ill-informed?

What About the Losers?

DavidNYC’s great post about House election winners from 2008 who underperformed their district’s presidential numbers got me thinking. It left me wondering: what about the incumbents who outright lost? Were there a lot of incumbents who overperformed their district and still lost?

It turns out, yes, there were quite a few. (In fact, it’s not a difficult question at all; you can just reverse-engineer the previous diary to find the overperformers. For instance, if Jim Himes underperformed by 16 points, Chris Shays necessarily overperformed by 16.) So, while doing this, what turned out to be interesting was who the truly pathetic figures were… the ones on both sides of the aisle who underperformed their districts’ leans on their way down to their own ignominious defeats. By doing this, we can separate out the representatives who simply got swamped by a wave from those who lost purely on their own merits.

Let’s start with our five Democratic casualties:























































State CD Member Party Dem
Margin
Obama
Margin
Difference
TX 22 Lampson (D) -7 -17 +10
KS 02 Boyda (D) -4 -12 +8
LA 06 Cazayoux (D) -8 -16 +8
FL 16 Mahoney (D) -20 -5 -15
LA 02 Jefferson (D) -3 49 -52

Bill Jefferson takes the prize for futility in 2008, with a 52-point disparity. Tim Mahoney also had a run-in with his own petard, while Nick Lampson, Nancy Boyda, and Don Cazayoux overperformed their dark-red districts and still lost.

Now for the Republicans:








































































































































State CD Member Party GOPer
Margin
McCain
Margin
Difference
CT 04 Shays (R) -4 -20 +16
NV 03 Porter (R) -5 -12 +7
OH 01 Chabot (R) -5 -11 +6
MI 07 Walberg (R) -2 -6 +4
MI 09 Knollenberg (R) -9 -13 +4
FL 08 Keller (R) -4 -6 +2
PA 03 English (R) -2 0 -2
VA 02 Drake (R) -5 -2 -3
VA 05 Goode (R) 0 3 -3
NY 29 Kuhl (R) -2 3 -5
NC 08 Hayes (R) -11 -6 -5
CO 04 Musgrave (R) -12 1 -13
FL 24 Feeney (R) -16 2 -18
ID 01 Sali (R) -1 26 -27

Not surprisingly, moderates Chris Shays and Jon Porter did what they could but simply got drowned by the blue tsunami in their districts. On the other hand, several unlikable wingnuts like Tim Walberg and Steve Chabot also overperformed, indicating that despite their out-of-whackness with their swing districts, they were primarily wave victims.

Instead, the majority of the GOPers who lost underperformed, some badly. Only two underperforming Republicans (Thelma Drake and Robin Hayes) were in districts that Obama narrowly won and thus have at least a partial excuse. The rest were in districts that McCain won, and have nothing to assign blame to other than their own loathsomeness. Bill Sali takes home top honors, managing to take a district that McCain won 62-36 and stil lose.

NY-Gov, NY-Sen-B: Disaster Mode for Paterson; Gillibrand Tied with Pataki

Siena College (PDF) (3/16-18, registered voters, Feb. 2009 in parens):

David Paterson (D-inc): 17 (27)

Andrew Cuomo (D): 67 (53)

Undecided: 17 (20)

(MoE: ±_._%)

David Paterson (D-inc): 33 (36)

Rudy Giuliani (R): 56 (51)

Undecided: 11 (13)

Andrew Cuomo (D): 51 (51)

Rudy Giuliani (R): 41 (38)

Undecided: 9 (11)

(MoE: ±3.9%)

Brutal. Just brutal. Paterson’s favorables are now at 29-58 – in November, they were 64-19! His job approval is even worse, 17-78, and his re-elects are 14-67. Meanwhile, Cuomo is busy clocking in some of his highest ratings ever – almost the mirror-image of the Governor. He’s even winning African American voters by 55-22. I never imagined I’d say this considering how high he was riding just half a year ago, but it may seriously be time for Paterson to consider not running again.

Siena also tested some Senate nums:

Kirsten Gillibrand (D-inc): 41

George Pataki (R): 41

Undecided: 18

Kirsten Gillibrand (D-inc): 47 (40)

Peter King (R): 23 (27)

Undecided: 30 (33)

(MoE: ±3.9%)

These aren’t as interesting as they may look. Fifty-four percent of the state has no opinion of Gillibrand, while Pataki has 90% name rec. Plus, I’d be quite surprised if he got in. Gillibrand’s considerable resources will undoubtedly allow her to enhance her statewide profile over the next year.

The full cross-tabs are here (PDF). BigDust also has a post on this poll.

NYC Mayor- The State of the Race without Weiner

Crossposted at LibertyAvenuePolitics.com

After narrowly losing the Democratic Primary for NYC Mayor in 2005 to Fernando Ferrer, Congressman Anthony Weiner of Queens appeared to be the instant frontrunner for 2009. At times during his second term, Mayor Bloomberg’s numbers were so bad that it appeared Weiner would waltz into Gracie Mansion.

But Democrats are apparently fortune’s fool when it comes to New York City Mayoral Elections. Since the economic crisis, Bloomberg’s numbers have shot up and their frontrunner, Anthony Weiner, appears to be backing out of the race according to a letter to supporters;

Over the next months, the task of lifting our nation and our city out of the worst economic turmoil in 70 years will be – and I hope agree, should be – my top priority.

So you won’t see me holding campaign rallies. You won’t see me knocking on doors asking for votes.

There is a time for politics, but this is a time for problem solving. And boy do we have a lot of problems to solve in Washington today.

Weiner says he will make a final decision in late Spring, but it is unlikely, given that the election is eight months away and he is behind in the polls, that Weiner would enter the race so late.

A January Quinnipiac poll http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x130… showed that while Weiner was ahead of NYC Comptroller Bill Thompson in the Democratic Party, Weiner would start out well behind Bloomberg in a general election. Despite supporting a controversial bill that allowed him to run for a third term, Bloomberg lead Weiner 50%-35%. He also leads Thompson 50%-34%. Is Weiner willing to fight a year long battle he would an underdog in during a time when he could be a major player in a Democratic majority in Congress?

Weiner is also face with the reality that his district, the 9th district of New York, was the only one in the New York Metropolitan Area where President Obama actually lost ground from John Kerry and Al Gore. Where Kerry won the district 56%-44%, Obama beat McCain in the district 55%-44%. Although most district residents are Democrats and Obama ran away with the Queens portion of the district, a special election to fll the seat if Weiner vacates it may produce a nasty divisive Democratic split that could enable a Republican or conservative Democrat to win the seat. (The 9th district produced nasty Democratic primaries in the past, including the divisive battle between Weiner and now City Councilwoman Melinda Katz in 1998 after Charles Schumer vacated the seat to run for the Senate).

Good news for the Democrats is that with Weiner out, it’s likely they will avoid a divisive primary, something that has hurt the Democratic Party in every mayoral race sincethe infamous Ed Koch/David Dinkins battle in 1989. Bill Thompson becomes the instant frontunner with his only opponent, NYC Councilman Tony Avella of Queens, largely unknown and underfunded only six months out from the primary. A well run campaign by Thompson could unite the Democratic Party and help him win an election, but many Democrats appear to approve of Bloomberg, so even with a clear path through the primary, the race is probably uphill for Thompson.

Thompson may still face a competitive primary, if Avella runs a strong campaign to gather support from those who would have supported Weiner, or if another strong Democrat enters the race. Other Democrats looking into the race include Deputy Mayor Patricia Harris, Queens Borough President Helen Marshall, Schools Chancellor Joel Klein, and actor Alec Baldwin. Bloomberg also hasn’t yet received the full support of the city’s Republican party. John Catsimatidis, CEO of the Red Apple Group, has indicated he is running for the Republican nomination.  

Tennessee’s 2010 Redistricting

Tennessee isn’t expected to gain or lose any seats from the 2010 Census.  But certainly things could change in Tennessee’s House delegation.

Currently, Tennessee’s House delegation is 5-4 Democratic, despite the state’s recent trend toward the Republicans.  A large part of this has to do with Democrat-friendly redistricting following the 2000 Census.  At that time, there was a Republican governor, but Democrats had sizable majorities in both houses of the state legislature, and they were able to pass into law a new redistricting plan without his signature.  This plan not only protected potentially vulnerable incumbent Bart Gordon, but also altered the 4th District — where Republican Van Hilleary was running for governor — enough to elect a Democrat.

But that’s unlikely to be the case in 2010.  While Republicans hold narrow majorities in both houses of the legislature, given the state’s general Republican trend, it’s unlikely that Democrats will recapture either house in 2010.  And since 1978, Tennessee has changed parties in the governor’s mansion every eight years like clockwork.  Odds are that Republicans will control redistricting in Tennessee after the 2010 Census.

Even if Republicans aren’t in complete control of the process, population shifts dictate that some changes will have to be made.  Specifically:

-West Tennessee has gained population much more slowly than the rest of the state.  After the 2000 Census, West Tennessee had enough population for roughly 2.37 districts; that’s now down to about 2.16 or so.

-Middle Tennessee, correspondingly, has seen its proportion of the state’s population increase, from about 3.24 to 3.45 districts.  Virtually all of that shift has been in the Nashville metro area; rural Middle Tennessee has seen no population shift.

Assuming Republican control, here’s what to expect.

East Tennessee

From the Republican perspective, redistricting in East Tennessee is pretty simple.  Its proportion of the state’s population has not changed much (3.38 districts in 2000, 3.36 projected in 2010), and it’s heavily Republican.

Most likely, the three districts entirely in East Tennessee will not be changed much except to reflect population shifts.  There will be a 1st District based in the Tri-Cities area of northeast Tennessee (currently represented by Phil Roe); a Knoxville-based 2nd District to re-elect Jimmy Duncan; and a Chattanooga-based 3rd District, currently held by Zach Wamp (who’s running for Governor), and presumably held by another Chattanooga-based Republican after 2010.  The current 3rd District was gerrymandered in part to deprive the Republican candidate in the 4th District of key votes; presumably Republicans will do no such thing.

Middle Tennessee

As mentioned before, Middle Tennessee has increased its proportion of the state’s population, from enough population for 3.24 districts in 2000 to a projected 3.45 districts in 2010.  Four incumbents currently reside in Middle Tennessee — Democrats Jim Cooper of Nashville, Bart Gordon of Murfreesboro, Lincoln Davis of Byrdstown, and Republican Marsha Blackburn of Franklin.

Middle Tennessee will be the key battleground of redistricting — East Tennessee is Republican enough that the lines don’t make much of a difference, and it’s hard to imagine Republicans could draw a district that wouldn’t re-elect John Tanner (more on that later, though.)  In addition, while Nashville and the six suburban counties immediately surrounding it have enough population for 2.08 districts, three incumbents live in this area.

One thing is rather certain: the Nashville-based 5th District will be preserved in something close to current form.  Davidson County has almost enough population for a whole Congressional district, and it’s Democratic enough that Republicans won’t want any part of it.

After the 2000 Census, Democrats altered Gordon’s 6th District to exclude Williamson County; since that change, Gordon hasn’t had a close race after having several in the 1990s.  Republicans probably won’t be so kind.  One possibility would be to combine Gordon’s Rutherford County base with the Nashville base of Jim Cooper.  There are two reasons for this: one, to force Cooper and Gordon into a primary with one another; and two, Rutherford County is the least Republican of the counties surrounding Nashville.  The other possibility is that Republicans would place Gordon in the same district with Marsha Blackburn, in a district that would probably at least lean Republican at the national level.

The current 7th District, which stretches from suburban Nashville to suburban Memphis, is unlikely to be preserved.  The whole point of it was to pack Republican votes into one district in an attempt to help Democratic incumbents in neighboring districts; Republicans are unlikely to be so inclined.  One possibility is for a new 7th District to be based in Montgomery County (Clarksville) and include some of the western suburbs of Nashville, combined with the Tennessee River counties and/or some of the rural areas south and west of Nashville.

Davis’s 4th District is Republican enough on the national level that even in current form, it could give him a tough time.  A new 4th District might combine his base in the upper Cumberland area with a few counties in East Tennessee, and possibly stretching west as far as the outskirts of metro Nashville.

West Tennessee

Steve Cohen’s 9th District is likely to be preserved in close to current form; the Voting Rights Act dictates one black-majority district in Tennessee, and since the city of Memphis is majority-black and has almost enough population for an entire Congressional district, there is little point in altering the lines much except to meet the population standard.  Republicans could attempt to combine inner-city Memphis with rural Haywood County (a majority-black county that voted 60 percent for Obama), but it’s unclear why Republicans would do this.

Republicans are probably never going to unseat John Tanner; it’s almost impossible to imagine a district based in rural West Tennessee that would not elect Tanner.  But Tanner turns 65 this year, and there’s a good possibility that he’ll retire some time in the next decade, so Republicans will probably want to draw a district that they can win in the event that he retires.  Such a district would probably combine the Shelby County suburbs with most of the rest of West Tennessee; the remainder of West Tennessee would probably be placed in the 7th District.

This obviously becomes complicated if Blackburn runs for governor and a Shelby County Republican wins the current 7th; Republicans wouldn’t dare throw a freshman Republican in a race against Tanner.

Summary

Tennessee’s current 5-4 Democratic House delegation, unfortunately, is probably living on borrowed time.  Eventually, the state’s Republican trend and population shifts will catch up to the Democrats.  Retirements too will help that along: currently, Lincoln Davis is 65, Bart Gordon is 60, and John Tanner is 64.

The picture I’ve painted is bleak, to be sure.  It assumes that Republicans will be in complete control of redistricting following the 2010 Census.  It’s not hard to imagine them drawing a district that would vote out Davis, while they might draw Gordon into a district with another incumbent.

Even if Democrats gain control of one house of the legislature, or retain control of the governorship, population shifts will make it difficult to preserve their current advantage.  The suburban counties surrounding Nashville, which are heavily Republican for the most part, will command a greater share of current districts that could threaten Gordon and possibly Davis.

On the other hand, it’s worth noting that while Tennessee has shifted toward Republicans to be sure, the shift probably isn’t as great as it would appear merely from looking at the Presidential results.  The drop from Gore in 2000 to Kerry in 2004 is easily explained by the fact that, well, Gore is from Tennessee.  And as much as it pains me to say it, the drop from Kerry to Obama probably had a lot to do with Obama’s race.  (You’ll notice that in Memphis and Nashville, Obama actually improved on Kerry’s performance; the rural areas had a lot more to do with the dropoff.)

Nathaniel90 will probably get around to doing Tennessee eventually, and he’ll probably have a map.