MI-15: Dingell, Under 50, Leads by 19

Glengariff Group for WDIV-TV and the Detroit News (9/15-16, likely voters, no trend lines):

John Dingell (D-inc): 49

Rob Steele (R): 30

Others: 8

Undecided: 13

(MoE: ±4.9%)

Dingell has been in the House for 27 terms, and occupies a district that’s given over 60% of the vote to Democrats in each of the past three Presidential elections. It’s disturbing that this race is even a topic of discussion, but that’s the nature of the year. Dingell won re-election two years ago with a whopping 71% of the vote, but it doesn’t look like he’ll enjoy the same margin when he gets his 28th term.

SSP Daily Digest: 9/20 (Morning Edition)

  • AK-Sen: This is pretty lulzy – Lisa Murkowski is busy reassuring people that she’ll still have the support of K Street as she pursued her write-in bid. In a year like this, that’s the message you want to run on? It’s even sadder that she probably feels like she has to reassure her corporate masters that she’s still there for them.
  • DE-Sen: Merry meet and blessed be! Bill Maher unearths a 1999 clip of Christine O’Donnell (a frequent guest on his show), and promises there’s more where this came from:
  • I dabbled into witchcraft – I never joined a coven. But I did, I did. … I dabbled into witchcraft. I hung around people who were doing these things. I’m not making this stuff up. I know what they told me they do. […]

    One of my first dates with a witch was on a satanic altar, and I didn’t know it. I mean, there’s little blood there and stuff like that. … We went to a movie and then had a midnight picnic on a satanic altar.

    Yesterday, though, O’Donnell decided to skip visits to some other satanic altars, namely Sunday talk shows “FOX News Sunday” and CBS’s “Face the Nation.” Dissing Bob Schieffer I can understand – I mean, that’s straight out of the Sarah Palin/Sharron Angle hide-in-a-deep-underground-bunker playbook. But the friendly confines of FOX? How will she get a job there when she moves on to her next gig in the grifter’s circuit?

  • AK-Gov: Last week we learned the disappointing news that Republican Bill Walker, who scored 30% running against Gov. Sean Parnell, would not make a third-party gubernatorial bid. But now he’s saying that Lisa Murkowski has inspired him and he might yet wage a write-in campaign. Godspeed, good buddy!
  • IL-Gov: GOP-affiliated robopollster We Ask America has their first survey of the race, finding Republican Bob Brady at 42, Gov. Pat Quinn at 32, and everybody’s favorite, Scott Lee Cohen, at 5.
  • NY-Gov: Speaking of SLC, it looks like the NY GOP has a reverse Scott Lee Cohen situation on their hands. Basically, the less-crazy guy – Greg Edwards, who was supposed to be Rick Lazio’s running-mate, won the Republican Lt. Gov. nomination. Revolting meat-bucket (and, dear lord, gubernatorial nominee) Carl Paladino preferred many-time loser Tom Ognibene instead. There’s chatter now that Edwards may stay on the ballot but not really run, or will try to drop out (a somewhat tricky proposition in NY). If he does successfully bail, the state GOP would appoint a replacement (presumably Ognibene, if Paladino’s in charge). Anyhow, I suggest you click through for Celeste Katz’s full story, because there are so many layers and permutations to this story that I simply can’t summarize them all.
  • Ognibene may be the only guy actually not running away from Paladino as fast as he can. GOP comptroller nominee Harry Wilson has refused to endorse Paladino, and attorney general nominee Dan Donovan is basically saying the same thing. Haven’t seen any word yet as to whether senate nominee Joe DioGuardi feels the same way.

  • CO-03: Republican Scott Tipton is now saying he’s no longer a Seventeenther (you know, a maniac who wants to get rid of the direct election of United States senators), despite having answered a teabagger survey on that very question in the affirmative. He’s also claiming that he doesn’t want to abolish the Department of Education. Live by the yes-no question, die by the yes-no question.
  • MO-04: Another day, another Dem gets endorsed by the NRA. This time, it’s veteran Ike Skelton.
  • NY-15: Adam Clayton Powell, who took just 25% against Charlie Rangel’s 53% in a fractured field, is saying he already has plans to run again. Of course, this district’s lines (and even number) could change substantially before 2012.
  • NY-19: Big Dog Alert (retroactive)! Bill Clinton did a fundraiser for Rep. John Hall in Cortland Manor this past weekend. Of course, Clinton lives (“lives”) just outside the 19th CD in Chappaqua (in the 18th).
  • PA-10: In a previous digest, we related the story of then-U.S. Attorney Tom Marino providing a personal reference for “businessman” Louis DeNaples’s bid to get a casino license – while DeNaples (euphemistically described as “having possible ties to organized crime”) was under investigation by Marino’s office. These dealings led to Marino’s resignation in 2007 (and, surprise surprise, he soon wound up with a nice sinecure as DeNaples’s in-house counsel). Marino claimed in April that the Department of Justice gave him permission to serve as a reference to DeNaples (then why did you resign?), but has never provided any proof. Now the AP is saying that a DoJ source tells them that there is no evidence that Marino ever received such authorization. The heat is on.
  • DCCC: The D-Trip has added Annie Kuster (NH-02) and Bill Keating (MA-10) to Red to Blue.
  • DC-Mayor: Deposed incumbent Dem Adrian Fenty says he won’t try to run in the general as a Republican. Given that there are probably 19 registered Republicans in the entire district, I’m not sure how this was even an idea in the first place.
  • Polltopia: Go tell Public Policy Polling where to poll next.
  • SSP-TV:

    • DE-Sen: DSCC ad says Christine O’Donnell will “fit right in in Washington,” thanks to her personal fiscal irresponsibility. Uh, do they remember who is in charge in DC?
    • IL-Sen: CQ reports that the DSCC is set to go up here this week for a quarter mil, but no links to actual ads yet
    • PA-Sen: Joe Sestak’s new ad compares his navy service to Pat Toomey’s service on behalf of Wall Street

    • FL-Gov: Two Alex Sink ads, one dinging Rick Scott for harping on endlessly about Obama, the other talking about schools
    • NY-Gov: Andrew Cuomo’s second spot, featuring an endorsement from a former state Republican Party chair
    • MA-10: Fresh off his primary win last week, Dem Bill Keating is up with an ad on a good issue: his pledge not to raise the retirement age for Social Security (contrasting with his Republican opponent’s desire to do so)
    • MI-07: SEIU spot hitting GOPer Tim Walberg for failing to support the auto industry and wanting to eliminate Social Security (CQ says buy is for $250K)
    • NC-11: Two spots from Heath Shuler: the first a touching ad about his efforts to build new veterans’ health clinics, the second hammering Jeff Miller for supporting the bad kind of SSP
    • NH-01: Carol Shea-Porter’s first ad, a mostly positive spot emphasizing that “whether it’s popular or not,” she “always fights for what she believes in,”
    • NY-19: George Pataki’s PAC Revere America has a spot hitting John Hall with scaaaaary music over his vote in support of healthcare reform
    • NY-23: Bill Owens’ first ad, which redistricting geeks will appreciate, emphasizing just how big the district is physically
    • NY-24: Richard Hanna personally narrates a negative ad attacking Mike Arcuri for his support of the stimulus and bailouts – I think it’s pretty effective
    • OH-13: GOPer Tom Ganley’s spot touts his work with the FBI (as a civilian) to bring down some mob extortionists
    • NRCC: CQ rounds up ads targeting Kathy Dahlkemper (PA-03), Bryan Lentz (PA-07), Paul Kanjorski (PA-11) and John Adler (NJ-03) (click here for Adler ad)

    Independent Expenditures:

    • Americans for Job Security: The right-wing front group is launching some huge buys: $443K against Mike Arcuri (NY-24), $526K against Larry Kissell (NC-08), and $712K against Heath Shuler (NC-11)
    • NY-19: Curses! Those meddling ophthalmologists! The (non-rogue) American Academy Of Ophthalmology, Inc. Political Committee (aka OPHTHPAC) is throwing down $143K on behalf of one of their own, Republican eye doctor Nan Hayworth (NY-19)

    Complete Kansas State Legislative Race Ratings 2010, Districts 80-125 + Projections & Top PACs

    Today marks the conclusion of a 3-part series examining the state of the Kansas state House of Representatives. In previous diaries, I ran through KS House seats 1-40 (start there if you’re just joining us) as well as KS House seats 41-80. In this edition, I’ll examine seats 81-125, which include most of the seats in rural Western Kansas, as well as some in the Wichita area.

    KANSAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES – 125 seats

    Current composition: 76 Republicans, 49 Democrats (or about 61%-39%)

    HOW TO READ THE COMPETITIVE SEAT LISTINGS:

    KS-HR-# <—this is the district’s number

    43.5R/27D/28.6U   <—this is the voter affiliation breakdown, R is Republican, D is for Democrat, and U is unaffiliated voters. Statewide, as of June 2010, the state’s registration numbers were 43.5% Republican, 27.2% Democrat, and 28.6% Unaffiliated.  Also, unless the tenth of a percent is a 4, 5 or 6, I rounded to the nearest full percentage point.

    District Map    <—-this is the official map from this district from: KSLegislature.org the official state gov’t site.

    MAIN SOURCES:

    Candidate Guide + District PVIs from Capitol Strategies LLC [pdf]

    Guide to every KS House seat’s past voting from OurCampaigns.com

    Candidate Fundraising from Ethics.ks.gov

    COMPETITIVE SEAT LISTINGS:

    KS-HR-81: 47R/22D/30.6U : District Map : (R) Peter DeGraaf was appointed to the seat in early 2008, and won it outright in 2008 after a competitive primary with 55% in the general election. So it’s a seat that can be competitive. Unfortunately, the best Dems could come up with this cycle was 21-year-old Wichita State student Zach Ketteman. Still, Ketteman is at least giving it a go, campaigning hard and scoring several endorsements, and getting fined by the state Ethics Commission for forgetting to include “Paid For By…” on campaign materials (along with several others, btw). Whoops. Well, at least we know he’s sending out campaign materials. Rating: Likely Republican

    KS-HR-82: 48.6R/21.4D/29.4U  : District Map : (R) Open (retirement of Don Myers) – KS Dem Party Exec. Board member & Dem national committeeman Lee Kinch, an attorney, is running, which is about as solid a recruit as you could land in this suburban Wichita district centered on Derby. Though it is a fairly Republican district, the Republican primary winner faced a three-way primary. Unfortunately for Democrats, the best-funded, most active and most-endorsed Republican candidate, Jim Howell, won. If Howell can retain most of the Republican base, he’ll win. Still, with Goyle leading local Dems, don’t count Kinch out completely. Kinch’s bio. Rating: Lean Republican

    KS-HR-83: 53R/25.5D/21U : District Map :  (R) In office since 1985, Jo Ann Pottorff was the only Wichita Republican to vote for the state’s temporary sales tax increase, which garnered her her first primary challenge in recent memory. She barely defeated college grad Kyle Amos 53-47, which could mean trouble: there’s a Libertarian on the ballot, which could draw conservative votes from Pottorff.  Her general election opponent is Sean Amore, a 34-year-old with a wife and young daughter, who is a Green Biz Wichita Executive Committee member, part of the United Way’s Young Leaders Association, and one of the “40 Under 40” according to the Wichita Business Journal.  Still, the moderate Pottorff hasn’t won a general election with less than two-thirds of the vote in this heavily Republican district many, many cycles, so Amore faces a tough task. Rating: Likely Republican

    KS-HR-87: 38.2R/31.5D/29.8U : District Map (D) Open (Raj Goyle) – Boeing Military Aviation Supervisor Om Chauhan, the Democrat, faces off against “self-proclaimed Todd Tiahrt conservative” Joseph Scapa in this rapidly blueing district. And fortunately for Chauhan, the locals are already used to a state Rep. with a kinda-funny furriner name thanks to Goyle. Chauhan’s actively campaigning and has a fairly snazzy website.  Rating: Lean Democrat

    Nice lady-mullet, Brenda. Flowbie or John Deere?Flowbie or John Deere?

    KS-HR-91: 42R/31D/26.4U : District Map : (R) Brenda Landwehr – Health Committee Chair Landwehr has held this gradually-blueing seat since 1994, but she’ll face a stiff challenge from West Point grad Dan Manning, who has a fairly nice-looking website (http://manningforkansas.com/) and appears to be campaigning pretty hard. The seat leans Republican only slightly, and the hard-right Landwehr had somewhat close calls in 2002 (54.5%) and 2006 (52.9%) though she nabbed 61.6% in 2008 and 64% in 2004. In other words, non-presidential-year elections are her toughies, and with a solid opponent, this might be the off-year she finally goes down. Rating: Lean Republican Dan Manning, KS State House CandidateUPDATE: I missed a little factoid in Manning’s bio: he’s trying to become the state’s first openly-gay legislator. Sweetheart that she is, this led Landwehr to stir up homophobia among local Republicans, which got Manning a death threat taped to the door of his home. That’s pretty unprecedented in KS politics, especially for just one of 125 seats in the lower house of the legislature. It will also make a lot of local moderates think twice about voting for Landwehr, and if Manning can use his newfound notoriety to attract donations and run a strong campaign, he stands a darn good shot at winning. Ahem, looking at you, JoeMyGod. Come on Joe, he’s basically a ready-made bear icon and if you ask your readers for donations, you should know their money can go really far in Kansas. Full disclosure: I’ve now contributed $75 and counting to Manning’s campaign, the only KS candidate I’ve given to this cycle (well, him and Sean Tevis). Won’t you join me? Otherwise, I’m unaffiliated with his campaign…or any of these campaigns.

    KS-HR-96: 34.5R/31D/33.7U : District Map : (R) Phil Hermanson – Democrat Brandon Whipple has raised about $20k, enough for a state rep. race, certainly. His opponent, Republican Phil Hermanson, is a first-termer who got 50.2% of the vote to defeat freshman Democrat Terry McLachlan, who’d won his seat with just 50.3% of the vote in 2006. Thankfully for Dems, Hermanson is a notoriously lazy campaigner, while Whipple’s a young, go-getting teacher and a Wichita State grad, his website is appropriately good (www.whippleforkansas.com)  and he definitely seems to be campaigning hard. The picture of him & Sebelius on his website doesn’t hurt, either. Rating: Tossup

    Dale Swenson, Best Mustache in the KS HouseKS-HR-97: 33.5R/32D/34U :  District Map  : (R–>D) Dale Swenson – First elected in 1994, Dale Swenson made some headlines when he switched parties shortly after being re-elected as a Republican in 2008. Though his district has become quite blue, the moderate Swenson won handily in his previous races (61.4% in ’08 and 64.5% in ’06) so it’s not terribly clear to me why he switched…unless he wants to run for the state Senate (which he did, in a Republican special election in 2003, but lost) as a Democrat. If he runs for the Senate, he might be up against Dick Kelsey (who may retire, he dropped out of the KS-04 race this year, despite being the favorite) in Senate District 26. But first, Swenson has to win in 2010 as a Democrat. In the general election, he’ll face retired consultant and “perennial candidate”/Some Dude Leslie Osterman, who, interestingly, actually ran for the seat in 2000–against Swenson–as a Democrat…and lost badly (66-34). Frankly, based on this Wichita Independent Business Association survey, Osterman doesn’t seem too bright. Rating: Likely Democrat

    KS-HR-101: 46R/24.4D/29U : District Map : (R) Joe Seiwert – Freshman Seiwert knocked off incumbent Democrat Mark Treaster 51-49 in 2008, while Treaster had defeated the previous Republican incumbent in ’04 with a similar percentage. Seiwert’s 2010 opponent, Democrat Curtis “Curt” Miller, is the mayor of Pretty Prairie. Unfortunately, Pretty Prairie, a suburb/exurb of Hutchinson, has well under 1000 people. Still, that’s a good profile for this exurban-Hutchinson Reno County district. Libertarian Thad Bartley is also running, which could draw votes from Seiwert.  Rating: Tossup

    KS-HR-105: 48R/23D/28.5U : District Map : (R/Open) Gene Suellentrop – The owner of a Gambino’s Pizza is up against dietician Jane Byrnes, who did respectably well in 2006 (not 2008, as it says on the Capitol Strategies pdf), winning 40% of the vote against previous incumbent Jason Watkins, who left the seat in 2009, leading to Suellentrop’s appointment. Still, Suellentrop’s never faced voters and the suburban/exurban parts of Wichita (like this district) can be swingy. Byrnes, a Catholic grandmother of six, also scores well for civic involvement, having launched the Westlink Neighborhood Association and served on various local committees. Plus, she has the best-named website of any candidate: http://campaignjane.com/   Rating: Lean Republican

    KS-HR-108:  51.6R/21.5D/26U : District Map : (D/Open) Don Svaty – Don was appointed to this seat by local Democrats after his son, Josh Svaty, resigned midway through his fourth term to become KS Secretary of Agriculture (a pretty important post in KS, as you might imagine). Don, like his son, has hewed to a pretty Blue Dog-ish line, taking very pro-life and pro-gun lines. Josh held the seat extremely well, defeating an incumbent in 2002 with 66%, getting 60% in 2004, unchallenged in ’06, and taking 63.2% in 2008. Can his Pops do the same? Uh…maybe. He’s up against a very strong candidate in Steven Johnson, a local boy who was Saline South High valedictorian (1984), Student Body President at Kansas State (1988), got an MBA from the Univ. of Chicago, and served on the investment committee of K-State & the 4-H and farms locally in addition to serving as a Sr. VP for a distribution company. Rating: Tossup

    Christina Stein, Gun-Totin' DemocratKS-HR-112: 53.6R/20.4D/25.6U : District Map : (R) William Wolf is running for his third term, after winning his first and second with 50.3% and 53% of the vote, respectively. He faces a competitive opponent in the form of the comely young Christina Stein, a social worker, substitute teacher, and contributor to the Kansas Free Press. While she’s from Michigan, she points out that she’s from a much smaller town than the one she wants to represent (Great Bend is the main city in the district). Even better, there’s a picture of her as a teenager with a dead deer she shot on her FAQ page.   Her slogan: Christina Stein, Gun-Totin’ Democrat. Hot.  Rating: Lean Republican

    KS-HR-116: 58R/20.5D/21U : District Map  : (D) Patrick “Pat” Maloney – Maloney was appointed to succeed Dennis McKinney upon his becoming state treasurer and has yet to face voters. The only credible comparison for this district is McKinney’s 2002 victory, wherein he beat Republican M.T. Liggett 76-24. Other than that, McKinney went uncontested in ’04, ’06 and ’08. Patrick Maloney is not so lucky–he’ll face Kyle Hoffman, a farmer and owner of Central Fuel & Service in Coldwater, KS. Hoffman is also the elected chair and 13-year member of the Comanche County Conservation District. McKinney, btw, will be on the ballot in 2010–running for a full term as State Treasurer, which could help Maloney, especially as they have separate bases–McKinney in Greensburg (Kiowa Co.) and Maloney in Kingman (Kingman Co.) while Hoffman, presumably, would do well in Comanche, with Barber in the middle as the swinger. Rating: Tossup  

    KS-HR-119: 40R/26D/33U : District Map : (R) Pat George – There’s a slight chance that challenger Rebecca Escalante will improve enough upon her previous performance that it won’t be an embarrassing 76-24 loss. This district has turned rapidly red–Democrat Ethel Peterson won it in 2002 with 55%, though George defeated her replacement by a whopping 68-32. I mostly just like Escalante’s name, though local voters (turned xenophobic by an influx of Latinos) probably don’t. Rating: Safe Republican

    KS-HR-120: 66R/16D/17U :  District Map : (R/Open) It would be insane if Democrat Robert Strevey actually won, after having run every year since 2002 against Republican John Faber (who was first elected in 1996). Of course, this year, retired principal Strevey won’t be facing Faber, he’ll face newcomer Ward Cassidy, a retired teacher from St. Francis who won the primary 56-44. If Strevey wins, he is the new Walt Minnick. However, against a relative unknown like Cassidy, Strevey could have a chance, since folks will obviously recognize his name on the ballot more than Cassidy’s. Rating: Likely Republican

    2010 OVERALL RACE RATINGS:

    Uncontested Democrats: 05, 08, 32, 33, 34, 37, 44, 46, 58, 63, 78, 89, 102, 103, 111 (total: 15)

    Safe Dem:  01, 02, 03, 31, 35, 36, 53, 55, 56, 57, 66, 84, 86, 88, 92, 95, 98 (total: 17)

    Likely Dem:  23, 24, 40, 62, 80, 97 (total: 6)

    Lean Dem: 04, 10, 18, 22, 41, 65, 67, 87 (total: 8)

    Projected (meaning Lean D and above) Democrat: 46

    Tossups: 16, 17, 19, 39, 45, 69, 72, 96, 101, 108, 116 (total: 11)

    Uncontested Republicans: 06, 07, 11, 26, 27, 30, 48, 50, 61, 73, 77, 79, 85, 90, 93, 99, 100, 106, 107, 113, 114, 115, 117, 123, 125  (total: 25)

    Intraparty only, Republicans: 09, 13, 51, 64, 68, 70, 94, 109, 110, 118, 121, 122, 124 (total: 13)

    Safe Republican:  12, 21, 74, 76, 104, 119 (total: 6)

    Likely Rep: 15, 28, 29, 42, 47, 52, 59, 60, 71, 81, 83, 120  (total: 12)

    Lean Rep: 14, 20, 25, 38, 43, 49, 54. 75, 82, 91, 105, 112  (total: 12)

    Projected Republican: 68

    Arealmlc’s final prediction: Downballot Democrats will perform surprisingly well since it’s an off-year, taking a lot of the Tossups and a few Lean Republican seats [looking at you, Landwehr]. With only a handful of potential losses (I’d peg Svaty, Palmer & Hawk as most likely D losses, if there are any).  Combine that with a plethora of offensive opportunities, and Democrats are poised to make modest, but significant gains.

    2009-2010 Legislature: 76 Republicans, 49 Democrats (61%-39%)

    2011-2012 Legislature: 69 Republicans, 56 Democrats (55%-45%) (arealmlc’s official projection)

    Even more importantly, nearly all of the potential pickups will come against conservative Republicans, not moderates.

    BEST & WORST OF THE KANSAS HOUSE RACES, 2010:

    Best Names:  Shirley Palmer (5th), Keith Mace (49th), Om Chauhan (87th)

    Most Kansas-y Named Race:  John Grange (R) Vs. Glenda Reynolds (D) (75th)

    Best Mustache: Dale Swenson (97th)

    Hottest Female Candidates: Christina Stein (112th) & Shana Althouse (25th)

    Hottest Male Candidates: Gerrett Morris (69th)  & Jim Faris (47th)

    KS Political Hotties Stein, Morris, Faris & Althouse:

    Christina Stein, Gun-Totin' DemocratGerrett Morris, the new Deena Horst?Jim Faris, Oskaloosa City CouncilmanShana Althouse, KS-25

    Best Websites: Nancy Bauder (41st – www.nancybauder.com), Brandon Whipple (96th – www.whippleforkansas.com) & Shana Althouse (25th – www.shanaalthouse.com)

    If I could pick one candidate to automatically lose: [tie] homophobia-spreader Brenda Landwehr (91st) & Connie O’Brien (42nd) the worst state legislator in Kansas.

    If I could pick one candidate to automatically win: [tie] Dan Manning (91st) & Christina Stein (112th)

    A GUIDE TO CANDIDATES VIA ENDORSEMENTS:

    For a complete list of PACs and their relative power in the state, Kansas Watchdog is a good website with a great resource for Kansas PACs ranked by their relative strength.

    Kansas Chamber of Commerce – The Kansas Chamber’s gone teabagger. Not only are their endorsements all Republicans (I think, though 1 or 2 Dems may have slipped in there) but they often waded into primaries to boost conservatives over moderates. Their PAC is ranked as 7th most powerful in the state, but this cycle they had few primary victories to show for it–of the 9 Republican sales-tax-increasing incumbents facing KS Chamber-supported opponents, only one lost: Jill Quigley. The other 8, including Spalding, Pottorff, Roth, and Hill, survived an onslaught of mailers from the KS Chamber and from Americans for Prosperity, the Koch Industries-funded group with radical libertarian leanings. Meanwhile, three Republicans sometimes perceived as moderate (including Salina’s Deena Horst and former Speaker Melvin Neufeld) , but who voted against the tax, lost their primaries. Kansas Chamber endorsements.

    Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce + Life Sciences Fund of Greater KC Chamber – The Greater KC Chamber is much more centrist than its KS-only counterpart. If you support stem cell research, you’ll probably get the endorsement of (and money from) at least the Life Sciences Fund, though both organizations are seemingly big fans of smart science education (ie–anti-creationist). Both are among the state’s 20 most powerful PACs (Life Sciences ranked 6th, Greater KC Chamber 18th). Naturally, being pro-business is the main criteria.

    Kansans For Life PAC – The biggest and most powerful anti-abortion group in the state is going to be weak this cycle, quite frankly. They’ve got just 5k in the bank as of July 2010, and rank only 19th among state PACs. If you’re adamantly against abortion, you’ll likely gain the support of this group, which, as you might expect, is much stronger in Republican primary battles than general election ones. They have a few local branches which can have some effect on local races: their Greater Kansas City branch ranks 47th statewide. Kansas for Life PAC site. Get their Primary Endorsements on the Topeka Examiner.

    KS-NOW – The most direct opposition to Kansans for Life is probably the local chapter of National Organization for Women: if you’re pro-choice, you can probably score their endorsement. For 2010, they endorsed 45 Democrats and 11 Republicans in contested seats. They probably would’ve endorsed more, but apparently, you actually have to want their endorsement to get it. In some swing seats, it’s a positive, in others it’s a negative. Kansas Free Press lists their endorsements.

    Mainstream Coalition (MAINstream PAC) – This is an interesting, very Kansas-y organization. The Mainstream Coalition emerged in the mid-1990s, growing out of a frustration of (mostly) Johnson County moderate Republicans pissed that the moderate Republican representatives kept getting primaried–and losing–and then dealing wacky right-wingers in government embarrassing everyone. While active in primaries, they also get involved in general elections to knock out conservatives with Democrats if they can’t win the primary: Dennis Moore was one of their early endorsees and remained in their good graces throughout his career. Their endorsees are considered social moderates if nothing else (meaning: pro-choice, anti-creationist, pro-gay-ish, pro-sex ed, pro-stem cell research) and notably include both Republicans and Democrats. They now have a PAC that gives directly to candidates (ranked 51st of 175 statewide), but their imprimateur carries significant weight among Johnson County moderates and their stated focus on downballot races makes them especially effective when they endorse state rep candidates. Mainstream Coalition Endorsements  

    Kansas NEA – The big daddy of pro-education groups in the state, the NEA gives big to Democrats and Republicans, favoring those who are big on education funding. Usually, their endorsement comes with cash as their PAC is among the state’s best-funded. The Kansas Watchdog ranks it as the most powerful PAC in the state. Some related organizations are the KASB (KS Assoc. of School Boards) & USA (United School Administrators) which also have a PAC. KNEA endorsements.

    By what margin will Bob Shamansky win?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    ME-Gov, ME-01, ME-02: Big Leads for LePage, Pingree, Michaud

    Critical Insights for Maine News Today (9/13, likely voters, no trendlines):

    Libby Mitchell (D): 25

    Paul LePage (R): 38

    Eliot Cutler (I): 11

    Shawn Moody (I): 4

    Kevin Scott (I): 1

    Undecided: 21

    (MoE: ±4%)

    More stink lines for Democrats from this open seat race. The only other polls we’ve seen, from PPP and Rasmussen, have also showed the tea-flavored LePage with a clear edge, though none of these polls were taken in time to measure the impact of the news that LePage’s wife is under investigation for receiving homestead tax exemptions for her properties in both Maine and Florida. (LePage also had a profanity-laced freakout in front of news cameras after being questioned on the issue.)

    At the very least, the House numbers offer a brighter outlook for incumbent Dems Chellie Pingree and Mike Michaud.

    ME-01:

    Chellie Pingree (D-inc): 53

    Dean Scontras (R): 29

    Undecided: 18

    (MoE: ±5.5%)

    ME-02:

    Mike Michaud (D-inc): 48

    Jason Levesque (R): 28

    Undecided: 24

    (MoE: ±5.8%)

    PPP, who polled these races a couple of weeks ago (partially over Labor Day weekend), found Pingree up by only 47-38, and Michaud up by a more alarming 45-38.

    MN-06: SUSA Has Bachmann Up by 9

    SurveyUSA (9/13-15, likely voters, 7/9-11 in parens):

    Tarryl Clark (D): 40 (39)

    Michele Bachmann (R-inc): 49 (48)

    Bob Anderson (IP): 6 (6)

    Aubrey Immelman (I): 1 (2)

    Undecided: 4 (5)

    (MoE: ±4.2%)

    Not much has changed since July, despite a ream of attack ads from Camp Bachmann on Tarryl Clark’s tax votes in the legislature. SUSA still finds that Bachmann is the choice of Generation Now, giving her a big 57-31 lead among 18 to 34 year-olds, while the gray-haired set in the 50-plus crowd backs Clark by 48-41 (up from a 1-point Bachmann lead last time).

    I have a pretty jaundiced view of the chances of Dems in a district where they’ve been twice-bitten by Bachmann, and while these numbers aren’t atrocious, I just don’t see how this one gets done.

    HI-Gov: Results Open Thread

    12:32pm: In the end, the numbers barely changed from the first batch. Neil Abercrombie crushed Mufi Hannemann, 60-38.

    2:17am: TV station KHON was just at Abercrombie HQ, and while the crowd seems pretty pumped there, I’m still not getting the sense that they think the race is over – they keep talking about waiting for the “second printout” (ie, the next batch of results).

    2:10am: DavidNYC here. Not so sure about this call. Doesn’t seem like local HI TV news is acknowledging what the AP is saying.

    1:51am: We don’t need to wait up all night, though – the AP has just called the race for Neil Abercrombie!

    1:26am: It looks like we won’t have any new numbers for another two hours. Go take a ganja break and check back later.

    1:17am: We finally have some numbers, and Abercrombie is up big: 42K to 28K votes (59%-40%). It looks like this hasn’t been a very smooth process in Hawaii today.


    RESULTS: Associated Press | Politico

    AK-Sen: Murkowski Will Run as a Write-In Candidate

    It’s official – Lisa Murkowski just threw her hat into the Alaska Senate race, turning this contest into a three-way race between an insane teabagger, a party-line Republican, and a mainstream Alaska Democrat.

    I don’t buy into the reasoning that says that a Murkowski bid hands the election to Joe Miller – three-way races are unpredictable things to handicap at the outset. Many will cite the PPP poll showing that Democrat Scott McAdams trailed in third place with Murkowski running as a Libertarian… but a write-in campaign is different kettle of fish, requiring a greater voter buy-in than a traditional campaign would demand. Note that the strongest write-in campaign for federal office in Alaska history came from sitting Democratic Senator Ernest Gruening in 1968, who won 17% against fellow Democrat Mike Gravel. (Imagine that: two Dems splitting the vote in Alaska and still yielding a win for Team Blue. Funny what oil wealth can do to a once-bluish frontier state.)

    Much depends on the type of campaign that Murkowski chooses to run. Will she spend most of her time educating voters on how to spell her name (and how to shade an oval)? (Though note that precise spelling is not a deal-breaker according to the AK DoE.) Will she spend her war chest launching broadsides against her right – and her left? In her remarks tonight, Murkowski’s anger against Joe Miller was clearly palpable, deriding him for his “extremist views” and “lies”, and making a veiled reference to Miller’s Twitter adventures that we kindly exposed. In a way, she’s helping to do some of Scott McAdams’ work for him!

    She ultimately declared that the “gloves were off” after a primary campaign that was criticized for being too restrained and lackadaisical, but also pointed her finger at “outside extremists” for her primary loss. As for those outsiders, you can bet that we haven’t heard the last from the Tea Party Express (as well as the Johnny-come-latelies at the Club for Growth).

    I still think that Scott McAdams has a shot at this race, though much will depend on his fundraising (and thank you to all who showed your support on that score). Let the games begin.

    Race and Crime In The Big City: The Baltimore States’ Attorney Race (Part 1)

    This is the first post in what is planned to be a series on racial dynamics in big city politics through the lens of the recently conducted Democratic primary election for States’ Attorney for the City of Baltimore.  

    So much of big-city politics, since the early days of the Republic, has been about race. It has quite often been the prism through which nearly every issue has been viewed and perceived by all racial groups alike. Elections and campaigns have often turned on it, either implicitly or explicitly, and so has political patronage.

    And Baltimore, Maryland is no exception. I’m not writing a broad history of Baltimore generally, or racial demographics or the history thereof, so I’m going to try to spell out the background as quickly as I can.

    According to the 2008 population estimate for Maryland, the City of Baltimore has 636,919 residents. Of those, 401,573 (about 63%) are black while 196,112 (about 31%) are non-Hispanic white. The Hispanic (17,014) and Asian (12,840) populations are relatively small, at about, respectively, 3% and 2%.  

    Like many old cities, Baltimore has been losing population for most of the past 60 years and it is not at this time clear whether that long-term trend has fully reversed itself. (At the very least, the mass exodus we saw for a few decades appears to have stopped for now.) At first it was mostly whites who fled, either to the suburbs (Baltimore County, an entirely separate jurisdiction which consists largely of suburbs, now has more population than the City of Baltimore) or to outside the metro area. In the later years of the exodus, many African-Americans, particularly middle-class and/or upwardly mobile families joined them.

    What remained was a city that, outside of a few enclaves of relative prosperity, consisted in large part of people who had nowhere to run to.

    Pervasive, multi-generational poverty crippled many neighborhoods, crime of all kinds ran rampant, particularly waves of violence driven by the trade in illicit drugs.  

    Fast forward to 2010.

    Things in Baltimore have actually rebounded a bit. Murder rates are still shockingly high but have come down some, though not as much as in some places. Some neighborhoods have become trendy places for young people to settle, attracting various businesses catering to their tastes. The Inner Harbor and Harbor East parts of downtown have improved markedly in appearance.  

    It is against this backdrop that the 2010 race for States’ Attorney occurs. Longtime incumbent Patricia C. Jessamy, an African-American female resident of Northwood in northeastern Baltimore. Jessamy is a veteran of the civil rights movement (growing up in the Deep South in the final years of Jim Crow) and a prosecutor in Baltimore since 1985 and State’s Attorney since her appointment to the job in 1995. Challenger Gregg Bernstein, a Caucasian male and resident of Roland Park in north-central Baltimore, is a former federal prosecutor who’s been in private practice since 1991; though he has been a proscutor, he has never dealt with Baltimore City juries before.

    Trying to summarize the salient issues as quickly as possible, since this isn’t about policy, Bernstein’s challenge was based mostly on the following ideas:

    * The city’s conviction rates were too low;

    * The relationship between Jessamy’s office and law enforcement was poor;

    * Jessamy’s office wasn’t doing enough to combat witness intimidation, a major problem in Baltimore;

    * Jessamy and her chief deputies are too focused on rehabilitation and crime prevention measures and not enough on locking up violent predators;

    * Above all, too many violent repeat offenders weren’t being prosecuted aggressively enough, allowing them to commit crime after crime in the community.

    Jessamy supporters responded to this charge in various ways:

    * Most kinds of crime, particularly homicide, have been dropping during most of her tenure.

    * Many of the factors behind low conviction rates are beyond her control and often come down to lack of resources, and that conviction rates are “smoke and mirrors.”

    * For a few years, under prior leadership, Baltimore Police experimented with an aggressive “zero tolerance” policy that made many residents distrust law enforcement, and it was the States’ Attorney’s role to rein in police misconduct.  

    Naturally, a lot of these arguments carry racial overtones and undertones, especially given Baltimore’s history. It occasionally got ugly. The police chief put a sign for Berstein on his lawn, prompting calls for investigation by Jessamy supporters. Jessamy at one point accused Bernstein of wanting to bring back the 1950s.

    According to everything we commonly assume about how big-city politics operates, the incumbent should by all rights have prevailed. Without going too deeply into the merits of the candidates’ substance, there are many more blacks in Baltimore than whites, significantly more women than men, and a higher than usual number of people of all races who regard law enforcement officers with some suspicion and are somewhat uncomfortable with the notion of a prosecutor so clearly aligned with the police.

    But a funny thing happened on September 14, 2010, something few observers were expecting.

    Patricia Jessamy lost.

    She ended up with 29,824 votes against Berstein’s 31,187 votes. (A third challenger, Sheryl Lansey, notched 2,361 votes, more than the difference between the two contenders; stay tuned for why that might prove signficant. The full precinct data for this election isn’t available yet.)

    The rest of this series will focus on how that result happened and why.

    Part 2 of the series will lay out my base assumptions and the reasons and justifications for them and what kind of data would tend to confirm those assumptions and what kind of data would force me to revise or abandon those assumptions. I’m also going to throw some conjectures out there I’m going to have a difficult time proving or disproving with the data I plan to have available, and there’s where I’m going to need the most from my SSP commentariat help in that section.  

    Once I actually have data, Parts 3 and beyond is where the numbers get crunched. I’ll examine different neighborhoods and classes of neighborhoods and how they voted and with the help of my base assumptions as spelled out in Part 2, attempt to construct the most plausible narrative for how this result could have happened.  

    Before I take a break for a while, I’ll spell out the broad scenarios I’m most looking out for going forward. Going in I know it could be a combination of these, or even something completely different from any of them.

    1. A near-total racial polarization scenario where nearly all black voters supported Jessamy across the board and nearly all white votes supported Bernstein across the board. In this scenario Bernstein wins because mostly white turnout is far higher than black turnout.

    2. A multi-racial coalition of voters, consisting of white voters and middle- and upper-middle class black voters, perhaps less skeptical of law enforcement than those in poorer neighborhoods, propelled Bernstein to victory.

    3. A multi-racial coalition of voters, consisting of white voters plus black voters in crime-plagued poorer neighborhoods, weary of a States’ Attorney office many perceive as being “soft on crime.”

    Through this exercise, I’m hoping to find out how far has Baltimore come and where is it going. and I can’t think of a better web community to welcome along for the ride.