While our polling operation is only entering its 5th year, the principals of our firm have each been involved in political polling for nearly three decades. Since our founding, We Ask America has been conducting private polls for clients ranging from gubernatorial, congressional and state-level candidates, as well as large national trade associations and private businesses. We call an average of four million household a year through the U.S. In addition, we also perform many live interview polls as well.
The decision to enter the public-polling arena was made only after we experienced a great deal of success privately. We fully understand that taking a more public stance will require time and quality work to earn a reputation as a reliable voice in the public polling industry.
NY-Gov: Levy Set to Run
It appears to be on:
A governor’s race that seemed all but settled is about to be upended again, by a popular Democrat from Long Island who is set to announce that he is switching parties. The move is certain to excite Republican leaders pessimistic about their party’s hopes this fall. […]
[Steve] Levy, 50, the Suffolk County executive, said he wanted voters to see him as “Scott Brown II,” referring to the Massachusetts senator who pulled off an upset against a heavily favored Democrat in January.
“There really seems to be a void out there that I can fit perfectly,” Mr. Levy said, describing Albany’s political culture as a “cesspool.”
“We’ve got to clean house, tear that place down and build it back in a cleaner, more efficient manner,” he added.
A spokeswoman for Mr. Levy, Rene Babich, said late Wednesday that Mr. Levy would announce in a news conference in Albany on Friday that he was seeking the Republican nomination for governor.
But will New York Republicans, the same party that turned the name “Scozzafava” into a verb, be willing to accept a guy who will still technically be a Democrat on election day?
Mr. Levy will face considerable hurdles in winning the Republican nomination. Technically, his change in party registration would not take effect until after the November election; so to gain a spot on the Republican primary ballot, he would have to receive more than 50 percent of the vote at the state party convention in June.
Levy will have to go toe-to-toe with ex-Rep. Rick Lazio, which could promise to be a pretty fun primary — if Levy’s bid even gets that far.
PA-07: Lentz Campaign Attempting to Knock Meehan Off Ballot
Last week, former US Attorney Pat Meehan flagged his own nominating petitions for possible forgeries, asking the Delaware County DA (who, incidentally, is a major donor to Meehan’s campaign) to investigate the matter. Meehan’s campaign isolated the possible forgeries as the work of one veteran GOP operative, Paul Summers, who was responsible for 650 of Meehan’s 3,627 submitted signatures. (To qualify for the ballot, House candidates must file 1,000 valid signatures.)
It looks like the Lentz campaign thinks there may be even more meat on that bone:
Republican congressional candidate and former U.S. attorney Patrick Meehan filed nominating petitions riddled with enough errors to disqualify him from the ballot in the Seventh District U.S. House race, according to a challenge filed with Commonwealth Court.
The motion asks the court to rule that most of the 3,623 signatures Meehan submitted are invalid, leaving him with fewer than the 1,000 required to run in the May 18 GOP primary. […]
Technically, the petition challenge was brought by four unknown registered Republican voters in Delaware County, though the Lentz campaign expressed support in a statement released Tuesday night after the document was filed.
The challenge says two longtime leaders of the county GOP, Thomas Judge Sr. and John McNichol, were among those who signed affidavits as circulators of Meehan petitions without witnessing the signatures of voters, as required by law.
A line-by-line examination of the petition sheets found fictitious signatures, people who were not registered to vote or were not enrolled with the Republican Party, illegible signatures, and other defects, the complaint said. All signatures gathered by circulators who acted improperly should be thrown out, it said.
“What’s unusual is when a candidate recognizes impropriety,” said Cliff Levine, a Pittsburgh lawyer specializing in election law who filed the challenge. “Mr. Meehan agrees with us that there was impropriety. Our point of difference is over the scope.”
More from PA2010:
The complaint is nothing if not wide in scope, claiming to have evidence enough to strike 2,284 signatures simply on their individual merits. The signatures in question, according to the complaint, include ones that, among other things, were illegible; incomplete; belonging to voters not registered in the district; belong to voters not registered as Republicans; or forged entirely by someone else. It further alleges that many of the petitions on which signatures were gathered were circulated by people other than those who signed affidavits confirming they had witnessed each signature.
The full complaint is available here (.pdf). This looks like it’ll yield some pretty juicy news in the coming weeks, to say the least. I especially love Meehan’s response:
Meehan also said this his campaign had reviewed Lent’s nominating petitions and found 550 signatures that could be challenged (Lentz’s campaign collected more than 5,000).
“But I chose not to engage in the waste of court resources that your campaign has willingly embraced,” Meehan wrote. “I believe voters deserve better.”
So are we to believe that Meehan is not challenging Lentz’s petitions because he respects “court resources”, or because he knows that, even if his challenges were successful, Lentz would still have over four times the required signatures to qualify for the ballot? I think we all know the answer to that one.
RaceTracker Wiki: PA-07
CA-Gov: Brown Slips, Whitman Takes the Lead in New Field Poll
Field Poll (pdf) (3/9-15, likely voters, 1/5-17 in parens, 9/18-10/6 in brackets):
Meg Whitman (R): 63 (45) [22]
Steve Poizner (R): 14 (17) [9]
Undecided: 23 (38) [49]
(MoE: ±5.5%)Jerry Brown (D): 43 (46) [50]
Meg Whitman (R): 46 (36) [29]
Undecided: 11 (18) [21]Jerry Brown (D): 49 (48) [50]
Steve Poizner (R): 32 (31) [25]
Undecided: 19 (21) [25]
(MoE: ±3.7%)
Whitman’s had the airwaves to herself, utterly pummeling state Insurance Co. Steve Poizner into submission. Unless Poizner can hit back, the chances of seeing a Westley/Angelides-style dogfight for the GOP nomination look pretty grim, indeed.
Fun stat: 8% of voters who “identify a lot” with the Tea Party movement favor Brown over Whitman. (Not that it matters, though, as 20% of Democrats defect to Whitman.) Whatever the case, it certainly appears that Brown is no longer in control of this race.
CT-Sen: Blumenthal Continues to Crush, McMahon Jumps Ahead of Simmons in New Q-Poll
Quinnipiac (3/9-15, registered voters, 1/8-12 in parens):
Richard Blumenthal (D): 62 (62)
Rob Simmons (R): 26 (27)
Undecided: 10 (10)Richard Blumenthal (D): 61 (64)
Linda McMahon (R): 28 (23)
Undecided: 10 (11)Richard Blumenthal (D): 64 (66)
Peter Schiff (R): 21 (19)
Undecided: 13 (14)
(MoE: ±2.6%)
And the GOP primary:
Rob Simmons (R): 34 (37)
Linda McMahon (R): 44 (27)
Peter Schiff (R): 9 (4)
Undecided: 12 (28)
(MoE: ±5%)
Let me ask you this: If you were Rob Simmons, why would you possibly want to stay in this race? Don’t get me wrong; I’m glad to see him duke it out against McMahon’s millions instead of making more winnable runs for Governor or his own old Congressional seat, but staying on this course makes little sense if he actually is planning on winning something in November.
A Texas-sized Democratic gerrymander
I know that the Dems controlling the trifecta in Texas is about as likely as the Detroit Lions winning the next Super Bowl, but I decided to give a Democratic gerrymander a shot anyways. Without further ado, here it is
District 1 (Blue): Louie Gohmert, a real nutjob’s nutjob, is safe as can be in this district, which is shifted north somewhat, but is still based in the congressman’s hometown of Tyler.
Incumbent: Louie Gohmert
Voting: 30% Obama, 70% McCain
Demographics: 72% White, 19% Black, 7% Hispanic
District 2 (Green): Ted Poe will be spending a lot less time in the suburbs, as this is now an East Texas district, although it still includes his home in Humble, which is located in Harris County.
Incumbent: Ted Poe
Voting: 29% Obama, 70% McCain
Demographics: 77% White, 12% Black, 9% Hispanic
District 5 (Yellow): Jeb Hensarling, much like Ted Poe, suddenly finds that most of his constituents are now East Texans. Much of this new territory is currently represented by Ralph Hall, who becomes a man without a district. However, Hensarling’s home is included in the tendril that reaches into Dallas County
Incumbent: Jeb Hensarling
Voting: 33% Obama, 66% McCain
Demographics: 78% White, 10% Hispanic, 8% Black 5% Asian
District 6 (Teal): Joe Barton gets a cozy Republican vote sink, albeit with a small problem named Ralph Hall, since Rockwall County has been added to the district. Hall, being as old as he is, will probably opt to retire rather than be demolished by Barton in the primary.
Incumbents: Joe Barton, Ralph Hall
Voting: 28% Obama, 71% McCain
Demographics: 77% White, 12% Hispanic, 10% Black
District 8 (Periwinkle): Kevin Brady gets an overwhelmingly Republican district based in Montgomery County (Conroe). While most of the district’s population is in Montgomery County, it includes some other heavily Republican rural counties.
Incumbent: Kevin Brady
Voting: 26% Obama, 73% McCain
Demographics: 77% White, 12% Hispanic, 9% Black
District 4 (Red): This district isn’t quite as East Texas-y as the rest of the districts in this category, but it’s based in Beaumont, so I included it here anyways. It’s an open seat that stretches from Beaumont to Harris County, where it picks up some heavily Democratic neighborhoods. It’s drawn to elect a Democrat, and possibly a member of a minority group. If Nick Lampson still has any desire to be a Congressman, this would be the place for him to run.
Incumbent: OPEN SEAT
Voting: 54% Obama, 46% McCain
Demographics: 42% White, 32% Hispanic, 23% Black
District 29 (Weird Grayish Green): Gene Green’s district is still heavily Hispanic and Democratic. Gene Green is safe here.
Incumbent: Gene Green
Voting: 60% Obama, 39% McCain
Demographics: 55% Hispanic, 27% White, 15% Black
District 18 (Yellow): Sheila Jackson Lee’s district now has a slight Hispanic plurality, and sees a drop in Democratic performance, although Obama still won this district in a landslide. The edge Hispanics have over Blacks in the district is small enough that a successful racial primary challenge is unlikely.
Incumbent: Sheila Jackson Lee
Voting: 64% Obama, 35% McCain
Demographics: 33% Hispanic, 31% Black, 30% White, 5% Asian
District 20 (Light Pink): This is an open seat that leans Republican. Its creation was necessitated by the screwing over of Pete Olson. In spite of this fact, it has no overlap with Olson’s current district. However, if 2012 is a good year, it’s possible we could contest this.
Incumbent: OPEN SEAT
Voting: 44% Obama, 55% McCain
Demographics: 63% White, 21% Hispanic, 9% Black, 7% Asian
District 9 (Light Blue): This is a plurality-black district represented by Al Green. Like the 18th district, this district sees a sharp drop in Democratic performance. However, Obama won here in a landslide
Incumbent: Al Green
Voting: 64% Obama, 35% McCain
Demographics: 32% Black, 30% White, 28% Hispanic, 9% Asian
District 7 (Gray): Wanna know how I can get all these Democratic districts out of a county that gave Obama 50.5% of the vote? By making sure Republican votes are wasted in districts like this one, which is represented by John Culberson.
Incumbent: John Culberson
Voting: 34% Obama, 66% McCain
Demographics: 69% White, 17% Hispanic, 7% Asian, 6% Black
District 33 (Medium Blue): Now we get to the fun part; setting Republican incumbents up for defeat. Enjoy it, because you won’t see any more of this until we get to Dallas. This is a new, Democratic district based in Fort Bend County. It also includes some minority-heavy areas currently represented by Al Green. Under these lines, Pete Olson’s second term will probably be his last.
Incumbent: Pete Olson
Voting: 55% Obama, 45% McCain
Demographics: 40% White, 23% Hispanic, 22% Black, 14% Asian
District 17 (Bluish Purple): My number one priority while making this map was protecting Chet Edwards. Out of all 435 members of the House, he is probably my favorite, which is something I never thought I’d say about a Texan. (Seriously, learn to drive in the snow before you come to Colorado in the winter). This district includes his current base of Waco, his pre-DeLaymander base of Bell County, and some minority heavy areas of Travis County where Obama won a staggering 83% of the vote, enough for Obama to carry this district by about 1,000 votes. Edwards is untouchable here, and this district will be a tossup at worst when he retires.
Incumbent: Chet Edwards
Voting: 50% Obama, 49% McCain
Demographics: 54% White, 22% Hispanic, 20% Black
District 25 (Salmon): This district looks like a sprawling, rural slice of Central Texas where a liberal Democrat like Lloyd Doggett wouldn’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell. However, looks can be deceiving. While Austin accounts for only a tiny fraction of the land area, it consists of most of the district’s population, and its liberal voting habits are more than enough to make this a safe Democratic seat.
Incumbent: Lloyd Doggett
Voting: 58% Obama, 40% McCain
Demographics: 56% White, 30% Hispanic, 10% Black
District 36 (Orangeish): This district runs from southern Williamson County to San Marcos, passing through Austin along the way, which is where it gets most of its population. It is an open seat, with a strong Democratic lean.
Incumbent: OPEN SEAT
Voting: 56% Obama, 43% McCain
Demographics: 67% White, 20% Hispanic, 7% Black, 6% Asian
District 24 (Purple): The vote sink where most of the region’s Republicans, along with Congressman Mike McCaul, end up living. While I could have targeted the perpetually shaky McCaul for defeat, I chose to create a new open seat instead.
Incumbent: Mike McCaul
Voting: 33% Obama, 65% McCain
Demographics: 72% White, 18% Hispanic, 7% Black
District 21 (Wine Red): This district, while less Republican than before, would still be an uphill climb for any Dem. It consists of suburban San Antonio, and is represented by Lamar Smith.
Incumbent: Lamar Smith
Voting: 41% Obama, 58% McCain
Demographics: 62% White, 27% Hispanic, 7% Black
District 11 (Radioactive Green): This is a heavily Hispanic district based in San Antonio. It changes very little, but is renumbered (it used to be the 20th).
Incumbent: Charlie Gonzales
Voting: 62% Obama, 36% McCain
Demographics: 67% Hispanic, 24% White, 6% Black
District 31 (Yellowish Tan): This district is made much, much more Republican, largely due to the inclusion of some very hostile territory that is currently represented by Chet Edwards, and the removal of both Bell County and Democratic areas of Williamson County. Obama didn’t even break 30% here, and John Carter is completely safe.
Incumbent: John Carter
Voting: 29% Obama, 70% McCain
Demographics: 82% White, 11% Hispanic, 4% Black
District 26 (Dark Gray): Here’s another Republican vote sink. I really wouldn’t consider this a Central Texas district, as most of its residents live in Denton and Tarrant Counties, but it didn’t fit in the screen shot of Dallas, so it gets lumped in here. It is represented by Michael Burgess, who is an anonymous backbencher. However, it was formerly represented by Dick Armey.
Incumbent: Michael Burgess
Voting: 32% Obama, 67% McCain
Demographics: 82% White, 10% Hispanic, 5% Asian, 4% Black
District 12 (Light Blue): This district is designed to pack Republicans, and connects two separate, heavily Republican sections of Tarrant County via Johnson County.
Incumbent: Kay Granger
Voting: 34% Obama, 65% McCain
Demographics: 76% White, 13% Hispanic, 6% Black
District 35 (Light Purple): This district, which resembles a backward L, is a newly created open seat that is composed of suburbs to the east and south of Dallas. It is contained entirely within Dallas County, and was won handily by Obama.
Incumbent: OPEN SEAT
Voting: 56% Obama, 43% McCain
Demographics: 56% White, 20% Black, 19% Hispanic, 6% Asian
District 30 (Salmon): This is a heavily Democratic, plurality Black district represented by Eddie Bernice Johnson. It meanders about Dallas County, combining minority-heavy Democratic areas with areas to the north of Dallas that are heavily White and Republican, and currently form the base of Pete Sessions, who is unfortunate enough to find his home in this district, although the prospect of him running here is unlikely, as there are several less hostile districts nearby.
Incumbents: Eddie Bernice Johnson, Pete Sessions
Voting: 66% Obama, 33% McCain
Demographics: 34% Black, 32% Hispanic, 31% White
District 34 (Green): This is another open seat which should lean Democratic. It includes a fair bit of territory that is currently represented by Pete Sessions, but I just don’t see a district that’s only 42% White electing a Republican.
Incumbents: OPEN SEAT
Voting: 55% Obama, 44% McCain
Demographics: 42% White, 38% Hispanic, 12% Black, 7% Asian
District 22 (Brown): This is easily the most gerrymandered district in the entire state. It meanders through Tarrant, Denton, Collin, and Dallas counties, picking up swingish areas, and includes a small portion of Central Dallas, which is enough to put Obama over the top here. While Kenny Marchant isn’t a sure loser under these lines, he’ll have a tough fight on his hands hold onto this district, where much of the territory is new to him. Even if he wins in 2012, this district is trending Democratic, and he will never be able to take it for granted.
Incumbent: Kenny Marchant
Voting: 51% Obama, 48% McCain
Demographics: 57% White, 22% Hispanic, 13% Black, 8% Asian
District 3 (Dark Purple): Nothing to see here, folks. This district is heavily Republican and based in Plano. It is represented by Sam Johnson, and even after he retires, as folks his age are bound to do eventually, it will be safe for the Republicans.
Incumbent: Sam Johnson
Voting: 37% Obama, 62% McCain
Demographics: 78% White, 10% Hispanic, 8% Asian, 5% Black
District 32 (Orange): This is a new, Democratic district which encompasses much of Tarrant County. Obama won here handily, and whoever wins the Democratic nomination will be a strong favorite.
Incumbent: OPEN SEAT
Voting: 56% Obama, 43% McCain
Demographics: 48% White, 27% Hispanic, 20% Black
District 13 (Light Pink): It’s unbelievable that this district was represented by a Democrat as late as the 1990s, because now it’s the most Republican district in Texas, and possibly in the entire nation. Obama flirted with the 20% mark here, while McCain scored close to 80%. It’s based in Amarillo, and includes the Texas Panhandle, and expands to take in some conservative areas south of Wichita Falls.
Incumbent: Mac Thornberry
Voting: 22% Obama, 77% McCain
Demographics: 74% White, 18% Hispanic, 5% Black
District 19 (Pea Soup Green): This district, while still stretching from Lubbock to Abilene, takes on a much less gerrymandered appearance, but doesn’t lose any Republican strength. Randy Neugebauer is still a Congressman for life.
Incumbent: Randy Neugebauer
Voting: 28% Obama, 71% McCain
Demographics: 63% White, 29% Hispanic, 6% Black
District 10 (Hot Pink): This Midland-based district exists due to Tom Craddick. It does an excellent job of packing Republicans, so I figured I’d keep it around.
Incumbent: Mike Conaway
Voting: 24% Obama, 75% McCain
Demographics: 67% White, 28% Hispanic, 3% Black
District 16 (Bright Green): This is a heavily Democratic and Hispanic district based in El Paso. It hardly changes at all from its current form.
Incumbent: Silvestre Reyes
Voting: 65% Obama, 34% McCain
Demographics: 76% Hispanic, 18% White, 3% Black
District 23 (Pale Blue): Ciro Rodriguez comes out of redistricting as a big winner. His district goes from one that barely supported Obama over McCain to one that supported Obama with over 60% of the vote. This is because it no longer includes nearly as many Republican areas of Bexar County. Taking the place of those Republican areas are heavily Democratic neighborhoods in San Antonio.
Incumbent: Ciro Rodriguez
Voting: 61% Obama, 38% McCain
Demographics: 72% Hispanic, 21% White, 5% Black
District 28 (Light Purple): This district, which stretches from the border town of Laredo to the exurbs of Houston, adds some Democratic strength. I find the current map, where a couple of the South TX districts, including this one, have Republican PVIs, to be no bueno, and I set about rectifying that situation.
Incumbent: Henry Cuellar
Voting: 55% Obama, 44% McCain
Demographics: 76% Hispanic, 20% White, 3% Black
District 15 (Orange): This district becomes much more compact and Democratic, and is concentrated mostly in Hidalgo County. Ruben Hinojosa has nothing to worry about here.
Incumbent: Ruben Hinojosa
Voting: 66% Obama, 33% McCain
Demographics: 85% Hispanic, 13% White
District 27 (Greenish): This district, which stretches from Corpus Christi to Brownsville is, heavily Hispanic. Like the other Hispanic districts in South Texas, it becomes somewhat more Democratic.
Incumbent: Solomon Ortiz
Voting: 56% Obama, 43% McCain
Demographics: 74% Hispanic, 22% White, 2% Black
District 14 (Greenish Brown): We finish with the district of Ron Paul. The vast majority of this district’s population is in Brazoria County, which is where Paul is from. The district is heavily Republican.
Incumbent: Ron Paul
Voting: 34% Obama, 65% McCain
Demographics: 62% White, 28% Hispanic, 7% Black
SSP Daily Digest: 3/17 (Afternoon Edition)
• CO-Sen, CO-Gov: As we mentioned on the front page yesterday, Andrew Romanoff won the Democratic primary precinct-level caucuses last night; the final tally, percentage-wise, was 51-42 (with 7% uncommitted) over Michael Bennet (who, by the way, hit the airwaves with the first TV spot yesterday, a decidedly anti-Washington ad). Things were actually much closer on the GOP side, where it looks like ultra-conservative Weld County DA Ken Buck is actually leading establishment fave Jane Norton by a paper-thin margin (37.9% to 37.7%). Of course, the activist-dominated straw polls are going to be Buck’s strong suit and his strength here may not translate as well to the broader GOP electorate, but he performed well enough to show that he’s in this for the long haul. (A similar dynamic played out in the Governor’s race, where ex-Rep. Scott McInnis easily beat teabagger Dan Maes, 61-39, although Maes has polled in the single digits out in reality.)
• NC-Sen (pdf): PPP’s monthly poll of the North Carolina Senate race general election shows little change, with Richard Burr (with a 35/37 approval) still winning in very humdrum fashion. Burr leads Elaine Marshall 41-36 (a positive trend, as she was down by 10 last month, although she was also within 5 of Burr in December). He also leads both Cal Cunningham and Kenneth Lewis 43-32, and leads Generic Dem only 41-39. With low familiarity for all three Dems (Marshall’s the best-known, but even she generates 71% “not sure”s), PPP’s Tom Jensen expects the race to tighten once they actually have a nominee.
• WA-Sen: Here’s some food for thought on why Dino Rossi has retreated back to the private sector and has seemed reluctant to come back out to play, despite the NRSC’s constant entreaties: his financial links to Seattle real estate developer Michael Mastro, whose local real estate empire collapsed in late 2008, leaving hundreds of investors out to dry.
• MA-Gov: Here’s more evidence that Tim Cahill, a Democrat until a few months ago, is heading off to the right to try and claim some of Republican Charlie Baker’s turf for his independent challenge to Deval Patrick: he fessed up to having voted for John McCain and is attacking Massachusetts’s universal health care plan (which even Scott Brown didn’t have a beef with, during his campaign) and saying that if the nation took the same approach it would be bankrupt “in four years.”
• NM-Gov: Oooops. Pete Domenici Jr. got a little presumptuous prior to the state’s Republican convention, issuing fliers touting his “great success” and his getting put on the ballot. Turns out neither happened — his 5% showing was last place, not a great success, and didn’t qualify him for the ballot either (he can still do so by gathering signatures).
• NY-Gov: This may be a tea leaf that Democratic Suffolk Co. Exec Steve Levy is gearing up to challenge ex-Rep. Rick Lazio for the Republican gubernatorial nomination. He hired a Republican consultant, Michael Hook, to help with preparations. Meanwhile, will the last person left in David Paterson‘s employ please turn the lights out? Another top staffer, press secretary Marissa Shorenstein just hit the exits today.
• PA-Gov, PA-Sen: Could ex-Rep. Joe Hoeffel be knocked off the Democratic gubernatorial primary ballot? That’s what Allegheny County Executive Dan Onorato is trying to make happen, as his team is challenging the validity of Hoeffel’s 7,632 ballot petitions. In order to qualify for the ballot, candidates need 2,000 valid signatures, including at least 100 from 10 different counties. (JL) Hoeffel’s not the only one; Joe Sestak‘s also challenging signatures in the Senate primary. Sestak’s target isn’t Arlen Specter, though, but rather Joseph Vodvarka, a Pittsburgh-area businessman who was a surprise last-minute filer and is the primary’s only third wheel. Sestak, no doubt, is worried that Vodvarka could peel off enough anti-Specter votes to throw a very close election.
• HI-01: Here’s a sign of life from the seemingly placid Colleen Hanabusa campaign; she just got the endorsement of the Hawaii State Teachers’ Association. (Not that it was likely they’d endorse Ed Case, but it’s still important for GOTV.)
• NY-13: Politico’s Ben Smith reported that Republican state Senator Andrew Lanza was taking a second look at the race in the 13th, now that the possibility of the Working Families Party withdrawing its support for Rep. Mike McMahon (if he votes against health care reform) could make a GOP challenge easier in the face of a divided left. The NRCC denied having reached out to Lanza; Lanza confirmed, though, that they had, but said that he was still unlikely to get in the race, preferring to focus on taking back GOP control of the state Senate. While the two GOPers in the race, Michael Grimm and Michael Allegretti, both have had some fundraising success, Lanza would be a definite upgrade for the GOP in the unlikely event he runs.
• PA-06: Another bummer for Doug Pike, who seems to be losing as many endorsements as he’s gaining these days. State Rep. Josh Shapiro, who briefly explored a bid for U.S. Senate last year, has officially switched his endorsement from Pike to “neutral”. (JL)
• SC-03: With rivals Rex Rice and Jeff Duncan (both state Reps.) having gotten the lion’s share of the endorsements and money, state Sen. Shane Massey appears ready to drop out of the GOP primary field in the 3rd. It looks like it’ll be a two-man fight between the Huckabee-backed Rice and CfG-backed Duncan.
• VA-05: I’ll repeat all the usual caveats about how straw polls reflect the most extreme and engaged activists, not the broader electorate, bla bla bla, but there’s just no good way for state Sen. Robert Hurt to spin his showing at the Franklin County GOP Republican Womens’ straw poll. The establishment pick drew 11.6% of the vote, while self-funding teabagger Jim McKelvey grabbed 51%.
• WA-03: The Dick Army (aka FreedomWorks) has weighed in with a rare primary endorsement in a rather unexpected place: the GOP primary in the open seat in the 3rd. They endorsed David Castillo, the financial advisor and former Bush administration underling who stayed in the race despite state Rep. Jaime Herrera’s entry. Here’s the likely explanation: Castillo actually used to work for FreedomWorks’ predecessor organization, Citizens for a Sound Economy. Still, that’s a boost for Castillo, who’s been faring pretty well on the endorsements front against the establishment pick Herrera (and a boost for Dems, who’d no doubt like to see a brutal GOP primary). Meanwhile, on the Dem side, state Sen. Craig Pridemore is holding outgoing Rep. Brian Baird’s feet to the fire to get him to switch his vote to “yes” on health care reform; primary opponent Denny Heck has avoided taking much of a position on HCR.
• Census: Here’s some interesting background on how the Census protects respondents’ privacy. Not only are individual responses sealed for 72 years, but the Census intentionally adds “noise” that camouflages individuals whose particular combination of data would make them unique in some way and thus not be anonymous, at least to someone seeking them out (for instance, they cite the hypothetical only 65-year-old married woman attending college in North Dakota). (P.S.: You probably got your form in the last day or two. Please fill it out!)
StephenCLE’s 2010 House Predictions – Part 11/March Ratings Update
So, after 50 states and 435 districts, we have reached the end of our first journey through the House of Representatives. In this part, I will provide a summary of everything we’ve seen, and the total big board for 2010 will be unearthed. But as we all know, things can change rather quickly in politics and virtually everything is fluid. Indeed, it’s been almost a month and a half since I completed the first section of this series, and many of my ratings are no longer where I put them back then. So in addition to providing the big board, I’ll have my first update of race ratings changes. So this will essentially serve as a double post.
Here are the total # of seats I have in each rating category through part 10. Note that all categories except for “Safe R” and “Safe D” are what I consider to be “On the board”. Districts in italic text represent pickups. At present, the national score is Republicans +20 seats. The Democrats are forecast to pick up 5 seats (PA-6, MD-1, LA-2, IL-10, and CA-3). The Republicans are forecast to pick up 25 seats (NH-1, NY-24, NY-29, MD-1, PA-11, VA-2, VA-5, TN-4, TN-6, TN-8, MI-7, IN-8, OH-1, AL-2, MS-1, LA-3, TX-17, AR-1, AR-2, IA-3, KS-3, CO-4, NV-3, ID-1, and WA-3).
2010 Big Board:
Safe Dem – 161 seats
Likely Dem – 41 seats
CA-36 (Harman)
CA-47 (Sanchez)
HI-1 (Open)
CO-3 (Salazar)
CO-7 (Perlmutter)
NM-1 (Heinrich)
AZ-1 (Kirkpatrick)
AZ-8 (Giffords)
NV-1 (Berkley)
OR-5 (Schrader)
SD-1 (Herseth-Sandlin)
IL-8 (Bean)
IL-11 (Halvorson)
WI-7 (Obey)
MN-1 (Walz)
MS-4 (Taylor)
LA-2 (Cao)
TX-23 (Rodriguez)
TX-27 (Ortiz)
IN-2 (Donnelly)
OH-6 (Wilson)
OH-10 (Kucinich)
SC-5 (Spratt)
GA-2 (Bishop)
FL-2 (Boyd)
VA-11 (Connolly)
KY-3 (Yarmuth)
NC-11 (Shuler)
NJ-12 (Holt)
DE-1 (Open)
PA-3 (Dahlkemper)
PA-4 (Altmire)
PA-17 (Holden)
MA-4 (Frank)
MA-10 (Open)
RI-1 (Open)
CT-4 (Himes)
NY-4 (McCarthy)
NY-13 (McMahon)
NY-20 (Murphy)
NY-25 (Maffei)
Lean Dem – 24 seats
CA-11 (McNerney)
AZ-5 (Mitchell)
MO-4 (Skelton)
ND-1 (Pomeroy)
IL-14 (Foster)
WI-8 (Kagen)
MI-9 (Peters)
OH-13 (Sutton)
OH-16 (Boccieri)
OH-18 (Space)
GA-8 (Marshall)
FL-8 (Grayson)
FL-24 (Kosmas)
VA-9 (Boucher)
WV-1 (Mollohan)
KY-6 (Chandler)
NC-8 (Kissell)
NJ-3 (Adler)
PA-8 (Murphy)
PA-10 (Carney)
ME-1 (Pingree)
NH-2 (Open)
CT-5 (Murphy)
NY-1 (Bishop)
Toss Up – 31 seats
CA-3 (Lungren)
CO-4 (Markey)
NM-2 (Teague)
NV-3 (Titus)
ID-1 (Minnick)
WA-3 (Open)
WA-8 (Reichert)
IA-3 (Boswell)
AR-1 (Open)
IL-10 (Open)
MS-1 (Childers)
TX-17 (Edwards)
IN-9 (Hill)
MI-7 (Schauer)
OH-1 (Driehaus)
OH-15 (Kilroy)
FL-22 (Klein)
VA-2 (Nye)
VA-5 (Perriello)
TN-4 (Davis)
TN-8 (Open)
MD-1 (Kratovil)
PA-6 (Gerlach)
PA-7 (Open)
PA-11 (Kanjorski)
PA-12 (Open)
NH-1 (Shea-Porter)
NY-19 (Hall)
NY-23 (Owens)
NY-24 (Arcuri)
NY-29 (Open)
Lean Rep – 14 seats
AZ-3 (Open)
KS-3 (Open)
NE-2 (Terry)
MN-6 (Bachmann)
AL-2 (Bright)
LA-3 (Open)
IN-8 (Open)
OH-2 (Schmidt)
OH-12 (Tiberi)
SC-2 (Wilson)
FL-10 (Young)
FL-12 (Open)
FL-25 (Open)
PA-15 (Dent)
Likely Rep – 24 seats
CA-19 (Open)
CA-25 (McKeon)
CA-44 (Calvert)
CA-45 (Bono Mack)
CA-48 (Campbell)
CA-50 (Bilbray)
AK-1 (Young)
MO-8 (Emerson)
AR-2 (Open)
KS-2 (Jenkins)
KS-4 (Open)
IL-13 (Biggert)
MN-3 (Paulsen)
AL-3 (Rogers)
AL-5 (Griffith)
TX-32 (Sessions)
MI-3 (Open)
MI-11 (McCotter)
SC-1 (Open)
VA-1 (Wittman)
KY-2 (Guthrie)
TN-6 (Open)
NJ-7 (Lance)
NY-26 (Lee)
Solid Rep – 140 seats
If you do the math, the Republicans currently have 178 seats on their side of the ledger, meaning that the Democrats would need to sweep all the toss ups to retain their current amount of 257 seats. Either that, or they would have to pick up some seats from the Republican side of the ledger in exchange for losing some toss ups. Obviously, the chances of Democrats retaining a 257 seat majority is very minute. On the flip side, if the Democrats were to lose all 31 toss up seats, they would be dropped to 226 seats to the Republicans’ 209, meaning that they Republicans would still need to pick off 9 seats on the Democratic side of the ledger while losing none of their own in order to regain the House majority. My gut instinct tells me that this outcome isn’t very likely either.
The point is that even in a situation where a vast majority of the toss ups break one way or the other, the balance of power in the House is not likely to change all that much except perhaps on major/controversial legislation such as health care reform.
Changing gears now, here is the list of ratings changes that I’m making for the second half of February/first half of March:
New York-29 – from Toss Up to Lean Republican
Utah-2 – from Safe Democrat to Likely Democrat
Ohio-13 – from Lean Democrat to Likely Democrat
Kansas-3 – from Lean Republican to Likely Republican
Florida-10 – from Lean Republican to Likely Republican
Alabama-2 – from Lean Republican to Toss Up
North Carolina-8 – from Lean Democrat to Likely Democrat
New Hampshire-2 – from Lean Democrat to Toss Up
Massachusetts-10 – from Likely Democrat to Lean Democrat
New York-13 – from Likely Democrat to Lean Democrat
Florida-8 – from Lean Democrat to Toss Up
Explanations – NY-29 & MA-10 have opened up since the time we last ran through those districts, as Eric Massa and William Delahunt have moved on. NY-29 now looks like a good pickup opportunity for Team Red, and though they are also optimistic about MA-10, I give pause there because of how dominant the democrats have been in congressional elections there outside of Scott Brown’s shocking upset win for Senate two months ago. AL-2 produced a shockingly good poll result for Bobby Bright a few weeks ago, so that rating changes in the democratic direction. However, I’m not willing to pull the seat back into democratic control without some corroborating evidence. North Carolina-8 also produced some strong polling for Larry Kissell, changing its rating.
With it looking more likely that Charlie Justice just doesn’t have it, and that Bill Young is sticking around, FL-10 moves in the republican direction. The democrats still don’t have a qualified challenger in KS-3, so that one moves right. I think I overreacted somewhat upon hearing about Tom Ganley’s entry into the OH-13 race, really I don’t think an incumbent as popular as Betty Sutton , in a district this democratic has much to worry about. With the virtual certainty that Mike McMahon will lose the WFP ballot line in his November race, the chance of a republican pickup there increases marginally. In NH-2, the odds are growing that Charlie Bass will win the republican primary, increasing the chances of a pickup there, though I’m not moving the seat yet. It’s becoming increasingly obvious that Alan Grayson won’t be able to stay out of the news, or stop saying controversial things before November. I’m starting to fear that independents could turn against him en masse, and a right-wing Some Dude could pull off an upset, so his race is now a Toss Up.
And lastly, a procedural move in UT-2. As a rule, I always keep on the board races in which the incumbent is in a district that (according to the PVI) favors the opposing party by +10 points or more. According to that standard, Jim Matheson’s race is now Likely D. If you were wondering why I have Gene Taylor’s MS-4 on the Big Board, that’s the reason.
For now, I’m not going to flip any seats from one party to another, so the score remains Republicans +20. There were some seats I considered changing, but I’ll leave them be for now, especially with health care reform on the precipice of passing, which could change the dynamics of a LOT of races. Beginning in April I will be updating the national score twice a month, and then I’ll probably do it once a week in the final 4-5 weeks before the election.
And so, the journey begins…
SSP Daily Digest: 3/17 (Morning Edition)
Much more interesting poll numbers on healthcare can be found here. It turns out that the public was evenly divided on Medicare before it became law, too. Now, of course, the program is unassailable.
NY-SD-13 Special Election (Update: Peralta Wins)
Sorry for not putting up a thread earlier. In tonight’s special election for the state Senate in Queens, it looks like Dem Jose Peralta is crushing disgraced ex-Sen. Hiram Monserrate (now running as an independent) 60-33 with a quarter of precincts reporting.
UPDATE (James): Looking for Colorado caucus results? Democrats have a nice spreadsheet of results, while Republicans are actually forcing you to download an Excel file to see their state of affairs. The Colorado Springs Gazette and the Denver Post are also liveblogging the caucuses.
UPDATE (J): With 56 of 158 precincts in, Peralta leads Monserrate by 61-33.
CONCESSION UPDATE (J): Monserrate has conceded the race. Woo-hoo!
UPDATE: So far, Romanoff leads Bennet by 904-704 in the precinct caucus count.
UPDATE: Romanoff now has a 4764-3248 edge on Bennet after a big win in the Denver precincts.







