SSP Daily Digest: 11/19

AK-Sen: In the words of Bart Simpson, “he’s like some kind of non-giving-up guy!” Joe Miller just keeps contesting the Alaska Senate race despite rigor mortis having started to set in. Today he added another legal action to the already-long (and expensive) tally, asking a federal judge for an injunction stopping state officials from certifying the election. Miller’s latest gripe is that the state started the count a week earlier than scheduled, forcing him to pull together a volunteer ballot-challenging team on short notice, meaning that “an indeterminate number” of misspelled ballots got through. (That number would have to be several thousand for this challenge to have any hope of succeeding.) This, of course, has to work in parallel to a separate suit, still in process, where he’s trying to force the state from counting any misspelled ballots.

CT-Sen: Since she apparently has absolutely nothing better to do with her piles of money, Linda McMahon is actually running a post-election “thank you” ad. Speculation is rising that she’s trying to stay top-of-mind for 2012, where there’s the possibility of running against Joe Lieberman (an option she said she wasn’t taking off the table). The article also cites increased buzz about Ted Kennedy Jr. running for the Dems. Rep. Chris Murphy is known to be interested too, and soon-to-be-ex-SoS Susan Bysiewicz, despite a year of nonstop bungling, is also in the mix.

VA-Sen: Here are a couple more Republican names who are checking out the Senate race in Virginia. One is an establishment figure, Prince William Co. Chairman Corey Stewart, but the other is Bert Mizusawa, a retired Army Reserve brigadier general whom you might remember as the more-conservative opposition from the VA-02 GOP primary this year, who lost to Rep.-elect Scott Rigell. Also, the Tom Perriello buzz (in the event of Jim Webb not running again) seems to have gotten loud enough that the Washington Post has taken notice.

NY-01, NY-25: The race in the 1st is down into the double digits, as Tim Bishop made up more ground yesterday as absentee ballots counted in his home turf of Southampton started reporting. Randy Altschuler’s lead is 81 votes, representing a gain of more than 200 for Bishop (although Altschuler’s camp says they did “better than expected” in Dem areas that reported, and that the more GOP-friendly Brookhaven has yet to report). In the 25th, Dan Maffei upped his percentage of the absentee votes coming in from the first half of votes from Onondaga County, enough to gain 521 votes, now trailing Ann Marie Buerkle by 303. He’ll still need to maintain that pace to win, though, as more GOP-friendly Wayne County has yet to report.

DSCC: Harry Reid is now saying he’s “in no hurry” to fill the still-empty DSCC slot, but Beltway CW seems to find the fickle finger pointing more clearly in Patty Murray’s direction. With Michael Bennet having pretty thoroughly declined, Reid and the White House are now making a “full court press” on Murray (who also helmed the DSCC’s 2002 cycle).

CO-St. House: 197 votes is all that kept Dems from controlling the trifecta in Colorado for 2012. The last outstanding race in the state House was concluded, with Republican Robert Ramirez beating Dem incumbent Debbie Benefield by 197, flipping the state House to the GOP by a 33-32 margin. (Dems control the state Senate and the governor’s chair.)

IA-St. Sen.: It’s been two and a half weeks since an election, and you’re already hungry for another one? Well, we’ve already got one on tap coming up very soon: the legislative special election to fill Lt. Gov.-elect Kim Reynolds’ seat in SD-48, scheduled for Jan. 4. It’s light-red turf in Iowa’s rural southwestern corner, though, so likely GOP nominee Joni Ernst (the Montgomery Co. Auditor) is probably the favorite. The local parties will select their nominees next week; despite losing the state House, Dems still control the state Senate.

Redistricting: Eight members of the new California citizens’ redistricting commission have been named (one of whom is a former US Census director). If you make unsupported assumptions based on their professions, it looks like we may have done well with the “unaffiliated” picks. Six more will be added before work begins.

NC-02: Etheridge to Concede

One more race down in the House, with NC-02 coming to a conclusion. The recount requested by Bobby Etheridge didn’t seem to change the numbers much, if at all:

Democratic Rep. Bobby Etheridge will concede to Republican Renee Ellmers, a Democratic source confirms.

With local election officials completing their recount of votes cast in North Carolina’s 2nd District race, Ellmers led Etheridge by 1,489 votes.

With Ellmers pretty clearly on the outs with the NRCC, the real question here for her survival in 2012 is how much the North Carolina legislature, under GOP control for the redistricting process, will reconfigure the Raleigh area lines in order to protect Ellmers. (You might remember that a similarly-configured 2nd also had a Republican Rep. for 2 years following the previous GOP wave in 1994, the long-forgotten David Funderburk, beaten in 1996 by Etheridge.) The current configuration of the district (which includes part of Raleigh proper) is swingy enough (R+2) that she could have a rough time in her first re-election… unless her district gets pushed further out into the exurbs and rural counties, and Brad Miller’s NC-13 becomes more Raleigh-centric.

Of all the list of outstanding races, this was the one that seemed least likely to get reversed, given that the disparity was always in the four digits and the AP never un-called the race. That leaves only four House races left to resolve, including CA-11 and CA-20, where Dem victories seem very likely, meaning that NY-01 and NY-25 are the real question marks. (UPDATE: Make that five, as a recount is still pending in the likely loss in TX-27.)

SSP Daily Digest: 11/18

AK-Sen: Is there anyone other than Joe Miller left who wants Joe Miller to keep contesting the Senate race? The state GOP organization is now saying it “stands ready to embrace Lisa Murkowski” as the winner of the race, despite her not having won its primary. I’m sure they were secretly ready all along to do so… recall that the person issuing the statement, state party chair Randy Ruedrich, was the guy that Joe Miller was trying to orchestrate a palace coup against, which got him fired from his Fairbanks borough job. I can’t imagine much love lost between Ruedrich and Miller.

IN-Sen: Richard Lugar, who just announced that he’s running for re-election, is laying down a pretty big marker (and one that probably helped convince him to run again). He’s out with an internal poll from American Viewpoint that, while it doesn’t specifically poll the 2012 GOP Senate primary, shows him with huge approvals, though apparently among all voters and not just registered Republicans. He’s at 66% favorable. Two of his potential GOP opponents, state Treasurer Richard Mourdock and state Sen. Mike Delph, have faves of 14% and 7% each.

ND-Sen, NM-Sen: This Politico article doesn’t actually contain any hard facts that are newsworthy, but it does contain one alarming sentence, that both Kent Conrad and Jeff Bingaman are “weighing retirement” (without anything beyond that). Conrad and Bingaman, though both long-timers, are still in their early 60s. Buried deep in the article is also a throwaway line that Jon Kyl is also the subject of retirement “speculation.”

NJ-Sen: That tea party push to have a recall election for Bob Menendez (despite, of course, the universally accepted legal principle that you can’t recall federal officials) seems to have finally died, courtesy of the New Jersey Supreme Court. I’m just surprised the case rose that far through the courts before, y’know, someone thought to crack open their 1L Con Law textbook, but the bright side is that every dollar right-wingers spend on pointless appellate legal fees is a dollar not spent on actually electing somebody. Menendez is up for a regularly scheduled election in 2012, anyway.

NV-Sen: Everyone seems in a fit of instant nostalgia for Sharron Angle today, with the revelation that in the course of the campaign she said “Sometimes dictators have good ideas” (in reference to Augusto Pinochet and privatized pension systems), and the leaked release of the ad that she cut that never got released, probably because it takes a minute to make a point that should take five seconds and because the 70s-disaster-flick-style overacting overshadows any possible message. (You can click here to see the ad, bearing in mind that it opens in Windows Media Player.) The real news that got leaked today that might impact the 2012 race, though, is that none other than John Ensign helped Sharron Angle prep for her debate by playing the part of Harry Reid. I wonder if that’ll be the last nail in the coffin for the reputed Reid/Ensign non-aggression pact?

RI-Sen: Add one more potential name to the roster for a Republican challenger to Sheldon Whitehouse: the state’s GOP chair, Giovanni Cicione (who has been encouraging outgoing Gov. Don Carcieri to run, as well as floating his own name as a last resort), is touting John Robitaille as a possible candidate. Robitaille (Carcieri’s former communications director) performed above expectations in the gubernatorial race in which he was supposed to be a sacrificial lamb, finishing second (though helped along by Frank Caprio’s last-minute implosion).

VA-Sen (pdf): PPP’s Virginia Senate poll had a GOP primary portion that just got released separately; right now, George Allen is the consensus pick, although that may have more to do with the ex-Gov. and ex-Sen.’s broad name rec compared with the rest of the field. Allen is at 46, with the very-unlikely-to-run Eric Cantor at 18, right-wing AG Ken Cuccinelli at 16, Lt. Gov. Bill Boling and ex-Rep. Tom Davis both at 4, and state Del. Bob Marshall (who almost sneaked into the 2008 Senate nomination) at 2.

NY-01, NY-25: Good news in the 1st, bad news in the 25th. Tim Bishop has made up some ground, as of the second day of absentee counting. Bishop picked up 108 votes on Randy Altschuler, cutting Altschuler’s lead down to 275, and that’s with Smithtown, Altschuler’s strongest area, having almost entirely reported. Bishop’s strongest turf is East Hampton, which will begin counting tomorrow. Ann Marie Buerkle, however, gained a small amount of ground in the 25th, contrary to expectations. Her lead is up to 824 votes, after a batch of small batch (230) of challenged ballots from Monroe County got opened and counted. The county to watch, though, will be Onondaga County, which is Dan Maffei’s base and where 7,000 absentees are yet to be counted.

Redistricting: There are three different redistricting articles out today that are worth a read. One is about Texas, where it seems like the GOP is extended about as far as it can go (thanks to victories in TX-23 and likely TX-27); compounding the problem there is something that I’ve been pointing out for years, which is that at least two, possibly three, of its expected four new seats are going to have to be VRA seats, seeing as how the vast majority of Texas’s growth in the past decade has been among Hispanics. Trying to limit the creation of new Hispanic-majority seats will only make it harder to protect Quico Canseco and Blake Farenthold.

There’s also a piece looking at Nevada, more specifically the fight within the Dem-controlled legislature about for whom to tailor NV-04 (which will probably be a Dem-leaning suburban district, conceding a GOP-leaning NV-03 to Joe Heck). Both state Senate majority leader Steven Horsford and new state Assembly speaker John Oceguera have their eyes on the new seat. Finally, there are questions in Florida about just who’s behind the lawsuit, fronted by a bipartisan coalition of Mario Diaz-Balart and Corrine Brown, to stop implementation of Amendment 6, the one bright spot from Florida on Election Day (a new initiative that makes gerrymandering more difficult). The Orlando Sentinel traces the money trail back to a number of state legislators’ groups, including one led by GOP state Sen. Don Gaetz, the guy who… big surprise… is tasked with leading redistricting for the state Senate.

MT-Sen: Tester’s Popular, But Rehberg Leads by 2

Public Policy Polling (11/10-13, Montana voters):

Jon Tester (D-inc): 46

Denny Rehberg (R): 48

Jon Tester (D-inc): 48

Steve Daines (R): 37

Jon Tester (D-inc): 46

Neil Livingstone (R): 35

Jon Tester (D-inc): 42

Mark Racicot (R): 49

(MoE: ±2.9%)

It’s a bit of a mixed bag for Jon Tester. He’s leading his announced opponents — ’08 Lt. Gov. nominee Steve Daines and “crisis management” CEO Neil Livingstone — by double-digit spreads, and his job approval rating is 50/40, a spread so healthy that PPP is calling him one of the most popular Senators in the country. However, if current Rep. Denny Rehberg took the plunge, Tester would be in for a real challenge. (And an even bigger challenge if John Cornyn somehow managed to lure ex-Gov. Mark Racicot into the race, but that seems unlikely.)

Rehberg has until March 2012 to decide on the race, which buys him plenty of time to assess the situation — and given the B-grade level of Livingstone and Baines, he’d have a good shot at clearing the field, too, unless one or both of them decides to run as an out-and-proud insurgent teabagger.

Maryland: A Fair Gerrymander

Everyone so far it seems has gotten a little carried away with Gerrymandering Maryland. I’ve even seen some outrageous 8-0 maps. With both the Governorship and both houses of the legislature held by Democrats, another Democratic gerrymander is inevitable, particularly with the state having gotten even more Democratic over the last decade.

However, I was interested in pursuing a gerrymander that didn’t look so outrageous, as the current one does, unfortunately. The fact that the current map looks like it does is even more outrageous because it is utterly unnecessary that it look so discontinuous and spindly, (Sarbanes’, Ruppersberger’s and district all look line vines that have grown wild over the state of Maryland). I made a point to reduce the clutter, and to reduce county-splitting while making a completely reliable 7-1 map.  

Photobucket

First notice how I didn’t go wild with MD-01, (blue), like some have been doing. It doesn’t traverse the entire state and mishmash rural middle class white voters from Kent County with rich suburban black voters in Prince George’s County, (the most ridiculous thing I’d seen in a while), no, with only superficial tweaking, (does the district look that radically different to you?), I cut 7 percentage points out of McCain’s vote total, taking from 58-40 to 51-47; which also, incidentally, wipes out the totality of the margin that Harris was able to get there in this the best Republican year in a generation; what’s more I cut out the areas that Harris performed strongest, (suburban Baltimore and northern Hartford), and left a greater emphasis on counties where Kratovil over-performed the most, in addition the portion of Anne Arundel is much larger, and more Democratic. So basically, I created a swing district that would firmly favor Kratovil, particularly seeing as how his base in the upper central part of the East Shore is now also the most Republican part of the district. (Surprisingly the southern reaches of far-right Hartford County are diverse and Democratic leaning). Without radically gerrymandering, or tossing in communities of disparate interests, I managed to create a favorable district that favors a Kratovil rematch, (and draws Harris completely out of it in fact). I don’t think you can gerrymander better than that.

MD-01: 134,186 McCain, (51%), 124,315 Obama, (47%). 79% White, 16% Black, 1% Asian, 2% Hispanic, (compared to previous 58-40 McCain, 85.5% white).

Maryland’s Second Congressional District is really a masterpiece; I’m quite proud at how I managed to pack in almost every hardcore Republican area in the state into one district. It runs along the panhandle, across the state into northern Baltimore and Hartford counties. I figure that Andy Harris will probably run in this district rather than face Kratovil in the First. It will either be open, (Bartlett will be 86 on Election Day, 2012), or he can primary Bartlett for being far to moderate for such a hard-right district. In any case I shifted the old district five points to the right, pretty much through that shift alone accounting for my seven point shift in MD-01.

MD-02: 190,590 McCain, (63%), 106,803 Obama, (35%), 93% White, 4% Black.

Perhaps the most disgustingly gerrymandered district in the country is John Sarbane’s. It looks like a clusterfuck of sorts, a spasmodic tendril growing wild over central Maryland and taking in parts of some 6 counties, (counting Baltimore City). It’s simply crazy, and, what’s more, utterly unnecessary. As you can see, the new 3rd, (which does not contain John Sarbane’s home, though claiming a different residence is a trivial move to make, if Maryland even has a residential clause), occupies a solid space in north-central Maryland, taking in a southeastern portion of Montgomery County, northern reaches of Anne Arundel, and all of Howard County, (including the more Republican northern reaches). Howard County has reliable Democratic lean, that ranges from, (as in the 2010 Gubernatorial race), from considerable, to overwhelming, (2008 Presidential Election), and of course the county is trending Democratic at a fairly steady rate. The Anne Arundel portions have a moderate Republican lean of 9-20 points depending on the election, and these are balanced of course by the heavily Democratic portions of Montgomery county which are reliably Democratic. All in all, the current district voted for Obama by more than 20 points, and gave O’Malley at least a 7 point margin over Ehrlich by a conservative calculation. Sarbanes should have little trouble holding onto it, and what’s more it should give him a solid base should he run for Senate in 2016, (though I suspect he would have some intense competition, perhaps from Van Hollen or Donna Edwards).

MD-03: 164,854 Obama, (59%), 109,923, McCain, (39%), 69% White, 16% Black, 7% Asian, 6% Hispanic, (compared to 77.3% White previously).

Nothing much to see here. I took in southern Frederick County; which has been ‘infected,’ (using paranoid Conservative hate-talk), with liberals spilling out of Montgomery County. It’s no longer a Republican stronghold, (McCain won it 50-48), and the fact that Ehrlich only managed to win it 54-42 over O’Malley is telling. The southern portion, including the city of Frederick, is significantly more diverse and Democratic leaning, the portion now in Van Hollen’s district gave Obama a 54-45 margin and should only get more Democratic. Of course the district is still concentrated in Montgomery County, (though it loses the Prince George’s portions, though seriously, even an attempted Connie Morella comeback couldn’t hope to get more than 40% of the vote in this district). Rockville and other areas of Montgomery are overwhelmingly and reliably Democratic. This is still a 2:1 Obama district that gave O’Malley a twenty to thirty point margin as well. The other upside for Van Hollen is that this district gives him a slightly better springboard for statewide office, including as it does a shift into swingier areas.

MD-04: 173,988 Obama, (66%), 83,776 McCain, (32%), 69% White, 9% Black, 10% Asian, 9% Hispanic, (previously 62% White).

Baltimore Close-Up:

Photobucket

While Dutch Ruppersberger’s district isn’t exactly beautiful now, it is at least considerably better and more compact than it is currently. It contains some heavily African American precincts in southwestern Baltimore County, plus carves out the white areas of Baltimore City, which also have a heavy Democratic lean. My main goal was to make a district that not even a Republican politician with a base in white Baltimore County voters, like Bob Ehrlich, could win in an open seat situation in a Republican leaning year. In other words, I wanted primarily to ensure that this district, like MD-03 and MD-04 would not be going Republican barring extraordinary circumstances. I succeeded, to put it simply. In every set of my goals; from making it more Democratic to making it look less ridiculous, (though I also think that Ruppersberger actually lives a few miles outside of this district in a Republican leaning precinct in central Baltimore County, however like I said with Sarbanes such problems are quite trivial in the bigger picture).

MD-05: 177,253 Obama, (66%), 87,651 McCain, (32%), 68% White, 25% Black.

Again, not much going on with Elijah Cummings’ district. It becomes slightly more Republican, (taking in some mostly white, wealthy, overwhelmingly Republican precincts in southeastern Baltimore county that were previously mostly in MD-01), and it’s actually slightly more Black, (about 2% more so than previously). Simply put the changes are rather superficial. This is still about as heavily Democratic a district as you can find, and completely following the VRA and representing the black community in central Maryland around the Baltimore area. I can see no objections that could be found with it.

MD-06: 179,598 Obama, (78%), 47,910 McCain, (21%), 61% Black, 35% White.

Prince George’s County Close Up:

Photobucket

That third map should clarify the boundaries around that area, which because of the colors are rather fuzzy on the wider view. Steny Hoyer’s district changes a bit, but the top lines and demographics aren’t all that different. It doesn’t take in a considerable portion of southern Prince George’s County anymore, but it still contains most of the basis of the old district; all of Charles, (steadily diversifying and growing more Democratic from over-spill out of Prince George’s), St. Mary’s, Calvert, and western Anne Arundel, (the latter three all of having a significant conservative lean). It reaches up and takes in a sizable portion of heavily Democratic, diverse Prince George’s county, the northern portions really, as well as the very bottom sections of Montgomery, (which are diverse and heavily Democratic as well). The result is a district that is still quite reliably Democratic, and which Hoyer shouldn’t have any trouble holding nor any Democrat after him.

MD-07: 159,947 Obama, (61%), 98,368 McCain, (38%). 65% White, 22% Black, 4% Asian, 6% Hispanic, (previously 60% White, 30% Black).

With MD-08 there really is nothing to see or talk about, (except the numbering being different and the fact it no longer does a ridiculous and pointless loop up into Montgomery County, with the two sections connected by a tiny thread, why Maryland Democrats felt the need to make such a gerrymandered looking district out of such overwhelmingly Democratic territory I’ll never understand). The district has a larger percentage of Black voters than before, and is as Democratic as ever. I fail to see any objections local pols might have to such a commonsense adjustment.

MD-08: 232,589 Obama, (92%), 18,494 McCain, (7%). 69% Black, 18% White, 7% Hispanic, 3% Asian, (previously 56.8% Black, 27.6% White, 7.5% Hispanic, 5.6% Asian).

So, in nutshell that is the gerrymander I would strongly support being enacted. For one, it doesn’t look like the brutally effective gerrymander that is, and maintains effectively communities of interest, (meaning there isn’t the fallout or controversy provoked by the last map), and it maintains 6 safe Democratic seats while putting forth one heavily Republican district and one flat out swing district. The 6 Democratic Districts can divided out as such, Overwhelmingly Democratic, (6th, Cummings, 8th, Edwards), strongly Democratic, (Van Hollen, 4th, Ruppersberger, 5th), and moderately Democratic, (3rd, Sarbanes, 7th Hoyer). I’m confident that not only is this map safe and effective, but for a Gerrymander it is also relatively fair and noncontroversial in look. (I considered adding my thoughts on Maryland, providing a rudimentary political analysis of the different regions, but as a college student I have other work to move on to and must quit playing around, and this piece here is long enough, so I will continue other thoughts later, at different time in a different place). Thanks for reading and I’m always interested in your feedback.  

By what margin will Bob Shamansky win?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

VA-Sen: First Poll Shows Dems in Decent Shape

Public Policy Polling (PDF) (11/10-13, Virginia voters, no trendlines):

Jim Webb (D-inc): 49

George Allen (R): 45

Undecided: 6

Jim Webb (D-inc): 49

Bill Bolling (R): 38

Undecided: 12

Jim Webb (D-inc): 49

Ken Cuccinelli (R): 39

Undecided: 11

Tim Kaine (D): 50

George Allen (R): 44

Undecided: 6

Tim Kaine (D): 48

Bill Bolling (R): 41

Undecided: 11

Tim Kaine (D): 50

Ken Cuccinelli (R): 40

Undecided: 11

Tom Perriello (D): 42

George Allen (R): 47

Undecided: 12

Tom Perriello (D): 41

Bill Bolling (R): 42

Undecided: 18

Tom Perriello (D): 44

Ken Cuccinelli (R): 41

Undecided: 15

(MoE: ±4.2%)

It’s a new cycle, and so we’re back to polls with zillions of permutations. Our friends over at Public Policy Polling take a look at what’s likely to be one of the more interesting races of the the 2012 campaign, and you can’t really complain if you’re a Dem – especially not after this month’s bloodbath. Of course, PPP is moving back to something closer to a registered voter model, but it’s actually a bit more than that. In an email to us last March, Tom Jensen told us:

We call people who voted in at least one of the last three general elections. We don’t explicitly ask them at this point in the game if they plan to vote in the fall. I imagine 97% of the people who answer the polls will vote this fall but since we’re not explicitly screening yet we don’t call them likely voters.

This sample voted for Obama 49-44. It’s been a long time since PPP’s visited Virginia, but in their final 2009 poll (PDF), they showed a McCain 48-47 electorate (using a likely voter screen). Will there still be (groan) an enthusiasm gap two years hence? It’s way too early to say, but count me among those who thinks the economy has entered a period of perma-suck.

Anyhow, here’s a little rundown of everyone’s favorables:

Allen: 40-41

Bolling: 20-25

Cuccinelli: 31-39

Kaine: 43-40

Perriello: 22-32

Webb, for his part, has a surprisingly decent 43-37 job approval rating. I’m also pretty heartened by Perriello’s toplines given his pretty tough approval scores – though I’m a bit skeptical that a one-term congressman in a fairly large state is actually known to over half of all Virginians. Personally, if Webb doesn’t run, I’d love to see Perriello go for the nod, since the guy is clearly a fighter and would make it a hell of a race.

CA-AG: Maybe Our Last Update?

Hopefully, this is the last update we’ll have to make about the Attorney General’s race!

We went through and did another county-by-county canvass, and we now have Kamala Harris (D) leading Steve Cooley (R) by 37,662 votes, 4,251,331 to 4,213,669. This count is about 100,000 votes ahead of the SoS.

Again we sync up the estimates, and my estimation of the number of unprocessed ballots differs from the UBR for the following counties:

  • Butte: +222; the county reports 18,229 ballots left.

  • Del Norte: -1,002 for votes added since November 8.

  • El Dorado: -1,795 for votes added since November 9.

  • Fresno: -8,687 for votes added since November 12.

  • Imperial: -6,089 for votes added since November 6.

  • Kern: -4,831 for votes added since November 8.

  • Marin: -19,108 for votes added since November 8.

  • Mariposa: -267; this is the county’s “final update.”

  • Nevada: -4,730; the county estimated 4,730 outstanding on November 8 but has added 6,692 votes since then.

  • Orange: -53,404; the county reports 912 ballots left.

  • Placer: +27,956; vote counts have not been updated since November 3.

  • Riverside: -11,300; the county reports 18,400 ballots left.

  • San Diego: -44,970; the county reports 27,000 ballots left.

  • San Francisco: -18,892 for votes added since November 8.

  • San Luis Obispo: -826 for votes added since November 12.

  • San Mateo: -26,812; this is the county’s “final unofficial results.”

  • Santa Clara: -18,100; the county estimated 18,100 outstanding on November 10 but has added 18,174 votes since then.

  • Tehama: -1,976 for votes added since November 10.

  • Ventura: -6,142 for votes added since November 11.

  • Yolo: -9,791; the county reports 0 ballots unprocessed.

Therefore, we estimate 428,179 ballots left unprocessed (compared to the SoS’ 671,594.)

The remaining territory is pretty much a wash, with our estimates having Harris gaining 47 votes to pad her margin.

As with last time, the ballots reporting have been more friendly to Kamala than before; she’s doing 0.36% better than we expected her to based on the November 13 canvass and 0.65% better than expected based on the November 8 canvass. Here are the relative swings in each county since the November 13th and 8th updates.


































































































































































































































































































































County 11/8 – 11/13 11/13 – 11/17 11/8 – 11/17
San Benito 1.98% 0.00% 1.98%
Alameda 0.75% 0.65% 1.39%
Orange 1.30% 0.05% 1.35%
Nevada 1.42% -0.34% 1.08%
Sacramento 0.70% 0.36% 1.06%
Fresno -0.08% 1.12% 1.04%
San Mateo 0.55% 0.43% 0.98%
Monterey 0.93% 0.00% 0.93%
San Francisco 0.38% 0.30% 0.68%
Inyo 0.64% 0.00% 0.64%
Del Norte 0.00% 0.63% 0.63%
Contra Costa 0.71% -0.18% 0.53%
Ventura 0.12% 0.41% 0.53%
Riverside 0.10% 0.40% 0.50%
San Diego -0.04% 0.51% 0.47%
Merced 0.45% 0.00% 0.45%
San Luis Obispo 0.39% 0.02% 0.41%
Kern -0.03% 0.37% 0.34%
Kings 0.28% 0.00% 0.28%
Santa Barbara 0.28% 0.00% 0.28%
Santa Clara 0.03% 0.23% 0.26%
San Bernardino 0.24% 0.00% 0.24%
Mariposa 0.00% 0.24% 0.24%
Marin 0.18% 0.00% 0.18%
Shasta 0.10% 0.00% 0.10%
Tuolumne 0.00% -0.08% -0.08%
Yolo -0.15% 0.00% -0.15%
Los Angeles -0.33% 0.18% -0.15%
Siskiyou -0.16% 0.00% -0.16%
San Joaquin -0.15% -0.02% -0.16%
Imperial 0.14% -0.30% -0.17%
Solano -0.29% 0.00% -0.29%
Yuba -0.35% 0.00% -0.35%
Tehama -0.64% 0.27% -0.37%
Santa Cruz -0.43% 0.00% -0.43%
Amador -0.58% 0.00% -0.58%
El Dorado -0.89% 0.30% -0.59%
Sutter -1.34% 0.20% -1.15%
Tulare -1.38% 0.00% -1.38%

Movers and shakers below the fold.






















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































County Total Harris Cooley Unproc Harris Cooley Margin
Los Angeles 2,135,078 1,135,803 842,854 93,590 49,787 36,946 12,841
Sonoma 138,383 79,052 45,321 35,500 20,280 11,626 8,653
Mendocino 19,097 10,321 6,159 12,358 6,679 3,986 2,693
Marin 102,499 63,668 31,727 7,942 4,933 2,458 2,475
Contra Costa 317,509 169,278 125,519 16,982 9,054 6,713 2,340
Monterey 87,434 47,784 32,266 11,563 6,319 4,267 2,052
Santa Cruz 87,349 54,033 24,218 5,655 3,498 1,568 1,930
Humboldt 35,966 18,011 13,436 13,387 6,704 5,001 1,703
Napa 28,480 14,229 11,711 17,877 8,932 7,351 1,581
San Francisco 254,252 180,762 51,748 2,484 1,766 506 1,260
Solano 109,963 55,825 45,385 5,498 2,791 2,269 522
Imperial 24,344 11,807 10,247 3,097 1,502 1,304 198
Lake 14,980 6,585 6,430 5,372 2,361 2,306 56
San Benito 15,164 7,007 6,759 200 92 89 3
Del Norte 7,878 2,905 4,049 6 2 3 -1
Merced 46,263 18,698 23,540 400 162 204 -42
San Luis Obispo 100,062 37,545 52,335 902 338 472 -133
Sacramento 392,703 176,034 184,727 8,774 3,933 4,127 -194
Orange 842,060 261,964 506,586 912 284 549 -265
Santa Barbara 119,282 51,662 57,104 6,536 2,831 3,129 -298
Tehama 19,093 5,141 11,478 1,023 275 615 -340
San Joaquin 146,789 60,116 71,201 6,844 2,803 3,320 -517
Sutter 23,325 6,849 14,240 1,694 497 1,034 -537
Amador 15,640 4,334 9,238 1,741 482 1,028 -546
El Dorado 73,928 21,681 44,647 2,105 617 1,271 -654
Ventura 247,505 96,609 132,181 6,414 2,504 3,425 -922
Stanislaus 110,462 41,587 59,205 6,980 2,628 3,741 -1,113
Tulare 76,763 22,316 48,368 3,350 974 2,111 -1,137
Shasta 59,536 15,995 37,152 3,400 913 2,122 -1,208
Calaveras 14,501 4,168 8,236 4,918 1,414 2,793 -1,380
Fresno 174,704 62,671 98,351 8,813 3,161 4,961 -1,800
Madera 27,635 8,130 16,872 5,806 1,708 3,545 -1,837
Kern 163,889 44,444 103,680 5,371 1,457 3,398 -1,941
Butte 56,937 20,635 29,626 18,229 6,607 9,485 -2,879
Riverside 455,493 166,883 251,301 18,400 6,741 10,152 -3,410
San Diego 838,571 323,600 435,683 27,000 10,419 14,028 -3,609
San Bernardino 393,156 145,444 207,987 29,000 10,728 15,342 -4,613
Placer 107,703 31,998 66,112 28,056 8,335 17,222 -8,886

2011 Virginia General Assembly Elections – An Early Look

The 140 seats of Virginia’s general assembly are all up in 2011. This will be one of the first post-redistricting elections in the country; redistricting will take place next spring in Virginia, and must be submitted to the Department of Justice for VRA pre-clearance. This will likely result in a compressed campaign season, as the composition of the maps will not be known until March or April, and they won’t be approved until June or July. This is especially frustrating, as many legislative seats hang in the balance due to the explosive population growth in the Northern Virginia exurbs.

The Virginia Public Access Project has posted maps that estimate the current population variance of the existing legislative (and Congressional) maps. A quick look at the maps makes the population trends in Virginia readily apparent: the state is experiencing huge amounts of growth in the outer NoVa suburbs of Loudoun and Prince William Counties, as well as the more exurban parts south of Prince William (Culpeper, Fauquier, Spotsylvania, and Stafford Counties). The Richmond suburbs (Chesterfield and Henrico Counties and some of the more rural counties to the north) and outer Hampton Roads areas (Isle of Wight and York Counties and the city of Suffolk) are also experiencing growth, although not as significant.

This growth comes at a cost: the rural areas of Southwestern and Southside Virginia are taking a beating, as well as Richmond proper and the older, more urbanized cities of Hampton Roads (Hampton, Newport News, Norfolk, and Portsmouth). Even Northern Virginia is not immune to these trends: growth has stagnated in the inside-the-beltway areas of Alexandria, Arlington, and inner Faifax.

What does all this mean? The obvious answer is that reapportionment is going to draw seats away from these areas and towards the outer ring of D.C. suburbs and exurbs. In the short-term, this is likely going to hurt Democrats; although they had some success in these areas during the Bush administration, capped by Obama’s double-digit wins in Loudoun and Prince William, the areas have swung back to the Republicans in the past couple years. The Democratic Party can’t take these places for granted — they’re filled with fiscally conservative, socially moderate voters who have no problem voting for a Republican over a Democrat when it comes to pocketbook issues.

Having said all that, I’m now turning my attention to the State Senate, where Democrats hold a 22-18 edge. The Democrats will find defending all 22 seats a challenge; currently the map is maxed out for them, there are no realistic targets for picking up Republican seats. That may change in redistricting, but of course, I can’t guess what the map will look like. For now, I’ll run down the Democrats in the Senate that may be vulnerable in 2011, ranked from most vulnerable to least vulnerable. The district numbers are linked to VPAP’s breakdown of each district by locality and statewide performance.

1. SD-01 (John Miller, elected in 2007) – In 2007, Miller beat a fairly nutty Republican who knocked off the popular, moderate incumbent in a primary. Sound familiar? As it stands, Miller’s district is a pretty conservative one; although Kaine and Obama did come close to winning it, it includes the extremely Republican city of Poquoson and carves out the most Republican parts of Newport News. If I had to hazard a guess, the next map will likely trade out the York/Poquoson areas in exchange for the Newport News/Williamsburg portion of SD-03. Either way, Miller will be in for a tough fight next year.

2. SD-29 (Chuck Colgan, elected in 1975) – Colgan, the President Pro Tem of the Senate, may retire next year. At 84 years old, it would be hard to blame him. The district is one that on paper favors Republicans, being a swath of central Prince William County. However, Colgan’s long tenure in office has helped him hold on, although his margins in recent elections have not been impressive: he won 55% in 2003 and 54% in 2007. Democrats might try to draw a better district, given that the 29th has to shed quite a few voters, but it will be tough to hold this one even if Colgan doesn’t retire. Colgan hasn’t raised a whole lot of money so far — about $150k, with only $43k in the bank.

3. SD-17 (Edd Houck, elected in 1983) – Houck is one of the few “old guard” Democrats left. A 27-year veteran of the Senate, he chairs the Education and Health Committee, and represents a conservative district that spans from the sleepy, rural counties of Madison and Orange to the growing exurbs of Fredericksburg and Spotsylvania County. Houck has been facing decreasing margins of victory over the years; in 1999 he won 60%; in 2003, 59%; and in 2007, 56%, despite outspending his opponent nearly 3-1. With $300,000 in the bank, Houck seems likely to run for another term, but it will be a struggle. The district needs to shed voters, but I don’t really see how it can be made much better for Houck; Fredericksburg is the only real Democratic bastion in the district. Regardless, Houck will be in for a fight next year.

4. SD-38 (Phil Puckett, elected in 1998) – Puckett is probably the most conservative Democrat in the Senate, and it’s not surprising to see why: he represents a chunk of Southwestern Virginia that has voted for exactly two statewide Democrats in the past six years, Creigh Deeds in 2005 and Mark Warner in 2008. Again, not to sound like a broken record, but this is a part of the state that is becoming extremely unfriendly to Democrats. Pucket hasn’t had an opponent in the past two contests, which probably won’t be the case this time. Of course, he could turn out to still be a safe bet, but given what has happened over the last two years in this part of the state, I wouldn’t put money on it.

5. SD-20 (Roscoe Reynolds, elected in 1996) – Reynolds is a conservative Democrat representing a swath of Southside Virginia that stretches from Martinsville to Wythe County. He has won handily in each of his three election contests, but this is an area that has been sharply trending away from the Democrats in the past few years. Not helping things is the fact that this district, like all of those in this part of the state, is going to have to expand in order to meet population requirements. I’m not sure what the districts in the area are going to look like next year, but if Republicans don’t mount a strong challenge to Reynolds, they’re missing a big opportunity.

6. SD-06 (Ralph Northam, elected in 2007) – Northam easily defeated Republican Nick Rerras in 2007. He’s a moderate Democrat with a great bio: he grew up on the Eastern Shore, went to VMI, and is a pediatric neurologist at CHKD. The district is split between the white parts of northern Norfolk and the Eastern Shore, and Northam has ties to both parts of the district. I don’t expect this one to change that much, though it may have to expand east into SD-07 (which may benefit Northam, as there are some precincts in western Virginia Beach that are generally favorable to Dems). Northam is definitely favored for re-election, but as a freshman in a swing district, he should be watched carefully.

7. SD-33 (Mark Herring, elected in 2006) – Herring picked this seat up in a special election in 2006, and though his margin slipped the next year, he still won by a double-digit margin. The concern, of course, is that Loudoun County has swung back to the Republicans in the past couple years, kicking out both of its Democratic Delegates in 2009. There are two good bits of news for Herring, though: first, the district is going to have to shed about half its voters, which means Democrats should be able to draw a much safer district. The other good news for Herring is the cast of characters running against him: Dick Black, a long-time embarrassment who lost his House seat in 2005, Patricia Phillips, who lost to Herring in 2007, and some guy who came in third for a Board of Supervisors seat in 2007.

8. SD-39 (George Barker, elected in 2007) – Barker’s district is located mostly in southern Fairfax with some of Prince William County. I don’t think he should be in too much trouble, but I’m including him here because he’s a freshman in a fairly swingy district, though the Democrats might be able to shore him up a bit.