SSP-TV (written by James L.):
Month: September 2010
FL-Gov, FL-Sen: Things Looking Up for Sink, Rubio
Opinion Research Corp. for CNN/Time (pdf) (9/2-7, registered voters, no trendlines):
Alex Sink (D): 49
Rick Scott (R): 42
Undecided: 3Kendrick Meek (D): 24
Marco Rubio (R): 36
Charlie Crist (I): 34
Undecided: 3
(MoE: ±3.5%)
We’re clearing the decks with a couple Florida polls from late last week, including the Sunshine State portion of those CNN polls that seemed to have mostly good news for Dems, although that may have been largely by virtue of their use of a registered-voter model. Here, they find Alex Sink with a pretty convincing lead over Rick Scott. Sink has to be helped on an ongoing basis by Bill McCollum, who keeps popping up every few days just to say “Nope, still not endorsing,” thumb his nose at Rick Scott, and retreat to his sulking place again.
In the Senate race, it’s been pretty clear ever since Kendrick Meek’s convincing victory over Jeff Greene in the Dem primary that things were going to get rockier for Charlie Crist. The CW seemed to shift almost immediately from “OMG, he’s actually threading the needle” to “uh oh, he’s gonna lose.” This poll’s a case in point: Crist isn’t going to win with Meek polling in the 20s, as Meek’s pulling away too many of the Dems that Crist needs to pull off his feat. Nevertheless, Crist is still forging ahead, out with two new ads, looking resplendently tan on the beach and saying he’s drawing a “line in the sand” (presumably with regard to his independence).
Susquehanna for Sunshine State News (9/2-7, likely voters, no trendlines, gubernatorial numbers here):
Alex Sink (D): 44
Rick Scott (R): 42
Undecided: 16Kendrick Meek (D): 23
Marco Rubio (R): 43
Charlie Crist (I): 29
Undecided: 5
(MoE: ±3.1%)
In case you were wondering what these races look like with the switch to a likely voter model, we’ve got that too, thanks to Pennsylvania-based Republican pollster Susquehanna, here operating on behalf of local GOP-flavored online news outlet Sunshine State News. The shift in the FL-Gov race seems pretty plausible, with Sink up by 2 on the free-spending Scott in a sample that breaks 45 self-identified GOP and 41 Dem. (That’s thanks to a decent lead among indies, 47-36… how rare is that, among Dem gubernatorial candidates this year.) But it looks a little ambitious in the Senate race, where this seems to be the biggest lead Rubio’s had since Crist pulled his party switch (although certainly reflective of the recent trend).
Who Has Had More F-ups this cycle?
Which party has had more dropped balls due to weak candidates (ahem, tea-baggers). Is this cycle really as bad for Dems as people think, or is it just as bad for the GOP?
Senate:
AK-Sen: Solid R –> Leans R; Teabag candidacy poses some risk
AR-Sen: Likely R –> Solid R; Keeping Blanche for the general sucks.
CA-Sen: Leans R –> Tilt D; Campbell probably would have won. Fiorina is an idiot.
CO-Sen: Likely R –> Toss-up; Teabag candidate could cost them big
DE-Sen: Likely R –> Strong D??? Oh, please. Oh, please!!!
FL-Sen: Solid R –> Lean R; Crist could have tucked this away.
IL-Sen: Solid D –> Tilt D; Damnit, Madigan, why couldn’t you just have run???
KY-Sen: Solid R –> Lean R; Rand Paul, need I say more?
MA-Sen: Solid D –> Scott Brown; Stupid Coakley
MO-Sen: Likely R –> Lean R; The Republicans would have this sewn up if Roy Blunt wasn’t so repugnant
NV-Sen: Solid R –> Leans D; Two words: Sharon Angle
NH-Sen: Likely R –> Toss-up??? Oh, please! Oh, please!
NY-Sen: Toss-up –> Strong D: No Guiliani and no Pataki means no pick-up for them.
NC-Sen: Lean D –> Likely R: Too bad about Roy Cooper
WI-Sen: Lean R –> TIlt D: Without Thompson, it becomes harder for them.
OVERALL SENATE: 12 Republican F-ups, 4 Democratic F-Ups; likely costs: Republicans lose 7 seats they could have had (CA, CO, DE, NV, NY, WI, NH), Dems lose 2 they could have had (MA, NC).
Governors:
CO-Gov: Leans R –> Solid D Biggest cluster-f*ck ever
FL-Gov: Leans R –> Leans D Rick Scott
GA-Gov: Likely R –> Lean R Nathan Deal is corrupt and a deeb
IL-Gov: Likely D –> Lean R Hynes would have been much better
MN-Gov: Toss-up –> Likely D Emmer sucks
NV-Gov: Lean R –> Strong R Rory Reid sucks
TX-Gov: Solid R –> Lean R Hutchison would have won easily
OVERALL GOVS: 5 GOP F-ups, 2 DEM F-ups
GOP Loses 3 seats they could have won (CO, FL, MN); Dems lose 1 seat they could have won (IL)
House:
AZ-03 Solid R –> Likely R
AZ-08 Toss-up –> Lean D
AR-02 Lean R –> Solid R
FL-08 Likely R –> Toss-up
FL-24 Likely R –> Toss-up
FL-25 Lean R –> Tilt D
HI-01 Strong D –> Charles Djou
ID-01 Lean R –> Likely D
IL-10 Lean R –> Lean D
IN-02 Toss-up –> Lean D
IA-03 Likely R –> Lean D
MD-01 Likely R –> Toss-up
MA-10 Toss-up –> Lean D
MI-07 Likely R –> Toss-up
MN-06 Solid R –> Likely R
NH-01 Lean R –> Toss-up
NY-13 Toss-up –> Lean D
NY-20 Lean R –> Lean D
NY-23 Lean R –> Lean D
PA-04 Toss Up –> Likely D
PA-11 Likely D –> Lean R
OVERALL HOUSE: 17 GOP F-Ups, 3 DEM F-Ups
GOP Loses 5-10 seats they could have won, Dems lose around 2-3 they could have won
Conclusion: While this cycle looks bad, it would be a lot worse if the GOP weren’t so stupid! They shoot themselves in the foot more than we do. What do you all think?
Women in Congress 2010
There are currently 75 women serving in the House, an all-time high but still less than 18% of the chamber as a whole. A similar percentage (17 of 100) of Senators are women. The female percentages have gradually crept up over the past 50 years, but with the Republican lean of this cycle, I wondered if we would see the number of women in Congress actually decrease in 2010, given that women are more likely to be Democrats. The State of the Female Lawmaker, below the jump.
HOUSE INCUMBENT WOMEN
Safe Female (by seniority)
Marcy Kaptur, OH-09
Louise Slaughter, NY-28
Nancy Pelosi, CA-08
Nita Lowey, NY-18
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, FL-18
Rosa DeLauro, CT-03
Maxine Waters, CA-35
Corrine Brown, FL-03
Anna Eshoo, CA-14
Eddie Bernice Johnson, TX-30
Lucille Roybal-Allard, CA-34
Nydia Velazquez, NY-12
Lynn Woolsey, CA-06
Sheila Jackson Lee, TX-18
Zoe Lofgren, CA-16
Sue Myrick, NC-09
Jo Ann Emerson, MO-08
Diana DeGette, CO-01
Kay Granger, TX-12
Carolyn McCarthy, NY-04
Lois Capps, CA-23
Barbara Lee, CA-09
Tammy Badwin, WI-02
Shelley Berkley, NV-01
Judy Biggert, IL-13
Grace Napolitano, CA-38
Jan Schakowsky, IL-09
Shelley Moore Capito, WV-02
Jane Harman, CA-36
Susan Davis, CA-53
Betty McCollum, MN-05
Marsha Blackburn, TN-07
Candice Miller, MI-10
Linda Sanchez, CA-39
Melissa Bean, IL-08
Virginia Foxx, NC-05
Cathy McMorris Rodgers, WA-05
Gwen Moore, WI-04
Allyson Schwartz, PA-13
Debbie Wasserman Shultz, FL-20
Doris Matsui, CA-05
Jean Schmidt, OH-02
Kathy Castor, FL-11
Yvette Clarke, NY-11
Mazie Hirono, HI-02
Laura Richardson, CA-37
Jackie Spier, CA-12
Donna Edwards, MD-04
Marcia Fudge, OH-11
Lynn Jenkins, KS-02
Cynthia Lummis, WY-AL
Judy Chu, CA-32
Otherwise Safe Female
CA-33–The retiring Diane Watson will be replaced by Karen Bass.
FL-24–Rep. Suzanne Kosmas has a female challenger in GOPer Sandy Adams
MN-06–Likewise, Michele Bachmann’s challenger is a woman, Tarryl Clark
SD-AL–Ditto for Stephanie Herseth Sandlin and Kristi Noem.
NY-14–Carolyn Maloney faces only a long-shot primary challenge, but it’s from a woman.
Likely/Leans Female Holds
Loretta Sanchez, CA-47
Mary Bono Mack, CA-45
Gabrielle Giffords, AZ-08
Betty Sutton, OH-13
Niki Tsongas, MA-05
Chellie Pingree, ME-01
Female Incumbents In Tossups/ Lean Male Takeover
Carol Shea-Porter, NH-01
Kathy Dahlkemper, PA-03
Debbie Halverson, IL-11
Mary Jo Kilroy, OH-15
Ann Kilpatrick, AZ-01
Betsy Markey, CO-04
Dina Titus, NV-03
Safe Male Takeover
Ginny Brown-Waite, FL-05
Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick, MI-13
Mary Fallin, OK-05
HOUSE PICKUP OPPORTUNITIES
Safe Female Pickups
Terri Sewell, AL-07 (Artur Davis)
Diane Black, TN-06 (Bart Gordon)
Frederica Wilson, FL-17 (Kendrick Meek)
Lean/Likely Female Pickups
Jaime Herrera, WA-03 (vs. Denny Heck for the seat of Brian Baird)
Colleen Hanabusa, HI-01 (vs. Charles Djou)
Tossups
Vicky Hartzler, MO-04 (vs. Ike Skelton)
Martha Roby, AL-02 (vs. Bobby Bright)
Julie Lassa, WI-07 (vs. Sean Duffy for the seat of Dave Obey)
Jackie Walorski, IN-02 (vs. Joe Donnelly)
Nan Hayworth, NY-19 (vs. John Hall)
Lean/Likely Male Holds
Annie Kuster, NH-02 (vs. Charlie Bass for the seat of Paul Hodes)
Ann-Marie Buerkle, NY-25 (vs. Dan Maffei)
Lori Edwards, FL-12 (vs. Dennis Ross for the seat of Adam Putnam)
Beth Anne Rankin, AR-04 (vs. Mike Ross)
Joyce Elliott, AR-02 (vs. Tim Griffin for the seat of Vic Snyder)
Paula Brooks, OH-12 (vs. Pat Tibieri)
Mariannette Miller-Meeks, IA-02 (vs. Dave Loebsack)
Stephene Moore, KS-03 (vs. Kevin Yoder for the seat of her husband, Dennis Moore)
Suzan DelBene, WA-08 (vs. Dave Reichert)
SENATE INCUMBENT WOMEN
Safe Female Holds
Barbara Mikulski, MD
Kirsten Gillibrand, NY
Otherwise Safe Female Seats
Barbara Boxer, CA (vs. Carly Fiorina)
Leans Female Hold
Patty Murray, WA
Likely Male Takeover
Blanche Lincoln, AR
Lisa Murkowski, AK (Miller or McAdams, unless she wins as a write-in)
SENATE PICKUP OPPORTUNITIES
Leans Female Takeover
Kelly Ayotte, NH (vs. Paul Hodes for the seat of Judd Gregg)
Leans Male Hold
Sharron Angle, NV (vs. Harry Reid)
Robin Carnahan, MO (vs. Roy Blunt for the seat of Kit Bond)
Elaine Marshall, NC (vs. Richard Burr)
Linda McMahon, CT (vs. Richard Blumenthal for the seat of Chris Dodd)
Likely/Safe Male Hold
Christine O’Donnell, DE (vs. Mike Castle, then Chris Coons)
Roxanne Conlin, IA (vs. Chuck Grassley)
CONCLUSIONS
In the House, women will be lucky to break even. The certain losses of Kilpatrick, Watson, Brown-Waite, and Fallin will be made up for by the certain additions of Wilson, Bass, Black, and Sewell. However, there are 7 female incumbents in serious danger of losing to men and 6 more who cannot be considered safe at this point. The likely addition of Hanabusa, and somewhat likely addition of Herrera, will help somewhat, but if all or most of the endangered women lose it will be up to the likes of Lassa, Hayworth, et al to keep the number of women at 75.
In the Senate, the picture is similarly discouraging. There are two clear losses on the horizon, and only race in which women are favored to pick up a seat (NH, if Ayotte wins her primary.) If Republicans do even better than expected, it will help women in the Senate, as the additions of Angle and McMahon, plus Ayotte, would mean a net change of +1 woman.
Fun facts: Three of the four “Congresswidows” (women who succeeded their deceased husbands in the House) are from California (the fourth is from MO, home of the most recent Senate Widow,) and three women are running underdog Senate campaigns against men with the initials RB.
WA-Sen: Murray Leads Rossi By 9
Elway Poll (9/9-12, likely voters, 6/9-13 in parens):
Patty Murray (D-inc): 50 (47)
Dino Rossi (R): 41 (40)
Undecided: 9 (13)
(MoE: ±4.5%)
I’d actually spent some time wondering this weekend when Elway was ever going to get around to polling the Washington Senate race again. (Hmmm. Maybe I need to have more exciting weekends.) Lo and behold, they have done so, and the results have to be pretty heartening to Democrats, who’ve probably been worried about this race in view of seeing Dino Rossi with small leads according to the latest SurveyUSA and Rasmussen offerings.
So who are these Elway clowns who dare challenge the conventional wisdom, the non-Washingtonians among you may be asking? They have probably the longest and most solid reputation among local pollsters, and more importantly, a track record of being right before it’s fashionable to do so. For instance, at this point two years ago in mid-September of 2008, when Rasmussen was giving Dino Rossi a 52-46 lead over Chris Gregoire and SurveyUSA a 48-47 Rossi lead, Elway was seeing a 48-44 advantage for Gregoire. (Gregoire went on to win by 6.)
Elway finds that Murray leads 61-30 in the Democratic stronghold of King County, pretty consistent with her 59% performance in the Top 2 primary… and pretty inconsistent with SurveyUSA’s odd finding that Murray and Rossi were tied in the Seattle metro area (although they may have meant that descriptor to include Pierce and Snohomish Counties as well).
KY-06, NM-02, OR-05, PA-12: Dems Lead in DCCC Polls
The D-trip is out with four new internal polls showing Democratic incumbents in the lead.
KY-06: Grove Insight for the DCCC (9/7-9, likely voters):
Ben Chandler (D-inc): 52
Andy Barr (R): 38
(MoE: ±4.9%)
NM-02: Anzalone Liszt for the DCCC (9/7-9, likely voters):
Harry Teague (D-inc): 51
Steve Pearce (R): 44
(MoE: ±4.9%)
OR-05: Grove Insight for the DCCC (9/7-9, likely voters):
Kurt Schrader (D-inc): 42
Scott Bruun (R): 29
(MoE: ±4.9%)
PA-12: Grove Insight for the DCCC (9/7-9, likely voters):
Mark Critz (D-inc): 48
Tim Burns (R): 41
(MoE: ±4.9%)
Analyzing Polish Elections
By: Inoljt, http://mypolitikal.com/
The country Poland is comprised of two main political parties; the first is Prawo i Sprawiedliwosc (PiS) – “Law and Justice” in English. This party is a populist group which runs upon anti-corruption and anti-Communist credentials. The second party is the Platforma Obywatelska (PO) – in English the “Civic Platform” – a group espousing support for free market capitalism.
On October 2007, Poland held parliamentary elections between the two parties. Most of the Western media backed the Civic Platform (PO), disliking the unpredictability of the Kaczynski twins (leaders of Law and Justice). Here is a map of the results:
More below.
As it turns out, the Civic Platform (PO) won the election, taking 41.5% of the vote. Law and Justice polled 32.1%, with the rest of the vote going to third parties.
A clear regional split is apparent in these results. Poland’s southeast – with the exception of Warsaw – generally voted for Law and Justice (PiS). On the other hand, support for the Civic Platform (PO) took a sickle-like shape along Poland’s northern and western borders.
These patterns are not random. Take a look at pre-WWI Imperial Germany superimposed upon this map:
As the map above indicates, there is a powerful correlation between the borders of Imperial Germany and support for the free-market, pro-Western Civic Platform (PO) Party. In contrast, areas that voted strongest for Law and Justice (PiS) used to belong to the Austrian-Hungarian and Russian empires.
An exact map of Poland’s pre-WWI boundaries looks as so:
These voting patterns have very little to do with any actual German presence in pro-Civic Platform regions. Few Germans live in the regions that used to belong to Imperial Germany; after WWII the process of ethnic cleansing effectively expelled them all from modern-day Poland.
The reason, rather, involves economics. The German Empire was far more economically developed than the Russian and Austria-Hungarian empires. This legacy is still present today, as Poland’s 2007 parliamentary elections showed quite starkly.
An interesting instance of Poland’s “German” divide occurred during the 1989 parliamentary elections. One may recognize this date: it was the year that communism fell in Poland. In these elections the Polish communists actually competed directly with the anti-communist Solidarity movement.
Here are the results:
Solidarity, of course, won in a landslide victory – which is why communism fell in Poland. Yet even in these elections one can make out the regional, east-west divide in Poland. Surprisingly, the more “Western” and economically developed regions actually gave stronger support to the Communists.
All in all, Poland’s electoral divide provides a powerful example of how long-past history can influence even the most modern events. Whatever the political parties of Poland’s future, and whatever their political positions, one can be fairly sure that Polish elections will continue to replicate the boundaries of pre-WWI Germany for a long, long time.
SSP Daily Digest: 9/13 (Afternoon Edition)
• AK-Sen: Lisa Murkowski is still mum on the prospects of a write-in run, but this looks like a potentially important tea leaf: she isn’t returning to the Beltway as the Senate goes back into session, but is remaining in Alaska attending to… something. Maybe it’s the grieving process, but it’s also shades of how Bob Bennett behaved while he weighed his post-primary recourse. And while this hadn’t looked likely in a week, Libertarian candidate David Haase confirmed he won’t step down to make way for Murkowski on the Libertarian line… so it’s write-in or bust for her.
• DE-Sen: With everyone abuzz over last night’s PPP poll giving Christine O’Donnell an improbable lead in the GOP primary, there’s word today of a Mike Castle internal giving him a 7-point lead (it’s buried deep in this Politico article, with no further details). PPP has some further thoughts on their poll, pointing out that in some ways Castle might be in worse shape than Lisa Murkowski going into the primary: his faves among GOP voters were 43/47, compared with Murk’s 48/46, and 55% thought he was too liberal, compared to 47% in Alaska. At any rate, the right wing is still engaged in full court press on O’Donnell’s behalf, though, with Sarah Palin cutting a radio ad for her. And if you’re like me, you were spending a lot of time last night trying to mentally ballpark how big an impact on an O’Donnell win would have on overall odds of retaining the Senate… well, don’t worry, because Nate Silver has already figured it out for you.
• ME-Sen: So after Murkowski and Castle, which GOPer is next on the chopping block? Looks like it’s Olympia Snowe, looking ahead to 2012. PPP finds that only 29% of Republicans are committed to backing Snowe in that year’s primary, with 63% saying they’ll back a more conservative alternative. Snowe loses a hypothetical primary matchup with 2006 gubernatorial nominee Chandler Woodcock, 38-33.
• NH-Sen: GOP pollster Magellan is out with a last-minute pre-primary look at the GOP Senate field, and they find the closest result yet for late-surging Ovide Lamontagne. It still doesn’t look likely he can pull out the upset unless somehow an extra week or two of stoppage time got added to the election’s clock (based on the rate at which he’s closing), but he’s within 4. The poll puts it at Kelly Ayotte 35, Lamontagne 31, Bill Binnie 14, Jim Bender 10.
• CO-Gov: Could the Colorado GOP find itself a “minor party” in 2012, mostly just an embarrassment but also something that affects where they’re positioned on the ballot? That’s what would happen if Dan Maes somehow finds himself gaining less than 10% of the vote in November’s gubernatorial race.
• MN-Gov: In a convoluted way, this is likely to help Dem nominee Mark Dayton. The former moderate Republican governor, Arne Carlson, announced that he’s backing the IP nominee, Tom Horner, and will be stumping on his behalf today. That may give some a nice outlet to moderate Republican rank-and-file loath to the too-far-right-for-Minnesota Tom Emmer but who can’t bring themselves to vote DFL.
• OR-Gov: Chris Dudley’s attempts to game the system vis-à-vis the clashing tax structures of Washington and Oregon get dicier the more the media look into it, maybe to the extent of actual tax avoision. (It’s a word. Look it up.) Long story short: he moved his primary residence from Oregon to Washington because Washington doesn’t have income tax (he still had to pay tax on his Trail Blazers salary, but not on capital gains and dividends). However, it’s come to light that not only did he not sell his Portland home, but he just kept on using it at least part-time for years after switching his domicile.
• TX-Gov (pdf): The Texas Tribune is out with another poll of the Texas gubernatorial race via the University of Texas, and they find that while Rick Perry has a decent lead, he’s far from putting the race away yet. Perry leads Dem Bill White 39-33, with 5 for Libertarian Kathie Glass, and 1 for “Green Party” plant Deb Shafto. Dems are losing all the statewide downballot races as well, although Hank Gilbert’s in striking distance in the Agriculture Commissioner race (down 33-26 to Todd Staples).
• LA-02: Despite the warm relations between Barack Obama and GOP Rep. Joe Cao, Obama isn’t going easy on Cao. Obama just gave his endorsement to Dem primary winner Cedric Richmond in a statement last night.
• MD-01: Wow, still no love lost between Wayne Gilchrest and the man who teabagged him to death in the 2008 GOP primary before teabagging was fashionable, Andy Harris. Gilchrest jumped into the fray with an endorsement for Harris’s self-funding primary opponent, Rob Fisher.
• NY-15: Clinton alert, times 4! Hot on the heels of support from Michael Bloomberg for Charlie Rangel ahead of tomorrow’s primary, Bill Clinton (maybe the 15th’s most famous commercial tenant) just cut a robocall on Rangel’s behalf too. The Big Dog is also making campaign appearances in three different gubernatorial races: stumping with Dan Onorato in Pennsylvania today, Mark Dayton in Minnesota tomorrow, and Rory Reid in Nevada on Wednesday.
• DCCC: At SSP, we’re all about The Size Of The Buy, and National Journal has sussed out which of the DCCC’s round of 60 reservations are the biggest ones. There are at least a dozen districts where they’ve reserved $1 million or more: MO-04, NV-03, NH-01, AZ-01, CA-11, AL-02, AZ-05, IN-09, ND-AL, PA-03, and (no surprise here, giving Larry Kissell’s fundraising fail) NC-08. Interestingly, they’re also putting $1.8 million in to FL-25, where they’re on the offensive, a sign of a lot of confidence in Joe Garcia’s chances. (The story also details some investments in big markets where there are multiple races and it’s unclear which races will get the money.)
• AFL-CIO: The AFL-CIO is spending big on a gigantic direct mail binge, hitting 2 million households of members. (They’ll also be making 4 million follow-up phone calls.) The six Senate races involved are NV-Sen, MO-Sen, WI-Sen, IL-Sen, FL-Sen, and PA-Sen; the four gubernatorial races are OR-Gov, OH-Gov, IL-Gov, and MI-Gov. There are also 24 House districts (see the link for more).
• SSP TV:
• NV-Sen: Harry Reid’s newest ad targets Sharron Angle’s “extreme and dangerous” legislative record, focusing on voting against allowing out-of-state restraining orders to be enforced in Nevada
• FL-12: Dennis Ross goes after Dem Lori Edwards, tying her to Obama
• FL-22: Ron Klein moves past the who-cares lien stuff and gets on to the juicy stuff regarding Allen West’s statements about Social Security and Medicare
• MS-01: Another Travis Childers spot goes negative on Alan Nunnelee, hitting him on the regressive “Fair Tax”
• Rasmussen:
• CT-Gov: Dan Malloy (D) 46%, Tom Foley (R) 39%
• IL-Gov: Pat Quinn (D-inc) 37%, Bill Brady (R) 50%, Rich Whitney (G) 4%
• SD-Gov: Scott Heidepriem (D) 28%, Dennis Daugaard (R) 57%
“Aren’t you tired of being scared?”
[Cross Posted from Dailykos.com]
Last night I went to a meet and greet for US congressional candidate Fred Johnson (MI-2), and the man was absolutely brilliant. I went there with my two little boys (6 and 2), who I always seem to have in tow. Before the meeting I apologized in advance to Dr. Fred Johnson for the chaos my children would inevitably bring, and that I would try to keep it to a minimum.
Fred laughed and indicated that perhaps a little chaos would be good, overall.
As they played with the peanuts on the table later and made fussing sounds about M&Ms between my searing glances at them, Fred Johnson spoke about his candidacy to a room of supporters, not once flinching at the sounds from the various children in the crowd…though one kept cheering loudly.
I had spoken to Dr. Johnson numerous times before and heard him speak, but this time in the middle of his talk, while discussing his opponent…he paused and looked around the room and simply said “aren’t you tired of being scared?”
It was one of those moments where you notice you had been letting the usual information wash over you, and you take the question and mull it over…and the more you think about it…the more meaning it starts to take. The more personal it becomes.
Wait a minute…have I been scared?
Lately…I’ve tried to bury that down. But it’s been there, lurking constantly in the background. This fear. This fear that things are collapsing and I can’t do anything about it. And what else is there to do but try to forget it. Try to push it out of the mind. Replace that feeling of helplessness with general goofiness or anger so I can convince myself I’m not afraid of losing my childrens’ sense of security, my home, our ability to hang on.
And the whipped up fear from the Tea Party folks, from random stuff…just RANDOM made up stuff. Fear falling from the airwaves, whipping these people into a frenzy of anger over manufactured issues, dug up and refined in focus groups for maximum potency and then fed into the airwaves to push the buttons of those who are ready to be afraid of nearly anything.
And the ruling by fear we’re in for if the Republicans get back into control, like the elevated terrorist threat levels right before an election that I knew were a sham but still made my gut sink a little.
And I’m tired of just thinking money is going to roll over the average people, every single time.
I have been scared.
And, dammit, it seems to radiate from the same folks.
There’s a fear that mobilizes, like the Tea Party folks…
And there’s a fear that demoralizes…like feeling your mouth sink just under the waterline as you kick helplessly in icy water and you just can’t take a breath or seem to get out of your head.
I am tired of being afraid.
I’m TIRED of being ruled and motivated by fear.
I’m tired of my actions being dictated by fear of loss or humiliation.
I’m tired of being afraid.
I’ve spoken with Fred Johnson numerous times before.
As a college professor, Dr. Fred Johnson talks a lot about greater funding for our schools.
As a former Marine captain he spoke of doing right by our troops who have served with more robust veteran services, especially veterans in rural areas who otherwise have little access to the services enjoyed by those who live near a VA hospital and other services.
And as a guy who lives in West Michigan he talked about the pressing and uncertain economic issues all of here face…finding more aggressive ways to force banks to work toward options other than foreclosure, and rewarding the production of goods and services in the US
If you didn’t already know…I’m officially blogging for Fred Johnson’s campaign. We’re facing a hard campaign, but for the first time in a long time, there is no incumbent here…and now is the window of opportunity to replace Hoekstra’s seat with a Democrat.
The campaign is trying to raise $4000 to do a TV spot and get more yard signs. Five dollars…even ONE dollar will help out a lot to get this guy into office…Donate Here, please and thank you.
NV-Sen, NV-Gov, NV-03: Senate Race Flat, Titus Moves Up
Mason-Dixon for Las Vegas Review-Journal (9/7-9, likely voters, 8/23-25 in parentheses):
Harry Reid (D-inc): 46 (45)
Sharron Angle (R): 44 (44)
Other: 1 (2)
None of these: 3 (4)
Undecided: 6 (5)
(MoE: ±4%)
There’s very little movement in the Nevada Senate race; most everyone has decided and it’s a game of inches. Tea Party candidate Scott Ashjian is in better shape after a U.S. District Court judge dismissed a suit intended to keep Ashjian off the ballot, saying the time for legal challenges was long ago. Of course, with “Other” (not just Ashjian, but also the AIP candidate) polling at 1%, that really doesn’t mater one iota.
Rory Reid (D): 36 (31)
Brian Sandoval (R): 52 (53)
Other: 2 (2)
None of these: 2 (3)
Undecided: 8 (11)
(MoE: ±4%)
Jon Ralston has teased the existence of some other poll that has Reid the Younger within 9 (saying “he’s not dead yet”), which we’ll be on the lookout for. That, plus Ralston-tweeted word of another Reid internal that has him within 7, and the trendlines here, suggest that Reid somehow has gotten some momentum. Is there enough time left to capitalize, though?
NV-03 numbers (trendlines from 8/9-11):
Dina Titus (D-inc): 47 (43)
Joe Heck (R): 43 (42)
Other: 1 (3)
None of these: 2 (4)
Undecided: 7 (8)
(MoE: ±5%)
One other race where there’s some Democratic progress — and where it may actually affect the bottom line — is the 3rd, where Dina Titus moved from a 1-point edge to a 4-point edge, and closer to the 50% mark. It’s pretty easy to diagnose what happened there, though: the AFSCME poured $750K into the district on Titus’s behalf. Now if we could just get them to do that in about 30 or 40 other districts, then we’d be in pretty good shape overall.
If you’re wondering about the state’s downballot offices, they’re all crammed in there too. GOPer Brian Krolicki is poised to return for another turn as Lt. Governor, while the Dems, including sorta-embattled AG Catherine Cortez Masto, are winning the other four races.