Analyzing Ukrainian Elections, Part 2

This is the second part of two posts analyzing Ukrainian elections.  This second part will focus upon many factors that lead to Ukraine’s exceptional regional polarization. The first part can be found here.

Two Ukraines

Modern Ukraine is a strange hybrid of two quite  different regions. One part, composed of western and central Ukraine, is  politically more aligned with the West; it favors, for instance,  joining the European Union. This part includes the capital Kiev. The  other part of Ukraine, consisting of the Black Sea coast and eastern  Ukraine, remains more loyal to Russia and the memory of the Soviet  Union. It includes Donetsk Oblast (formerly named Stalino Oblast), the  most populous province in the country.

This division is reflected in Ukrainian politics. Take the 2004 presidential election, in which pro-Western candidate Viktor Yushchenko faced off against pro-Russian candidate Viktor Yanukovych:

Photobucket

More below.

Few things better illustrate the boundary between east and west Ukraine than this election, which Mr. Yushchenko ended up winning by a seven-point margin.

These divisions have long-standing roots. During the 16th and 17th centuries, for instance, much of Ukraine was under the control of the Poland-Lithuania. This country, which at one point constituted the largest nation in Europe, declined in the 18th century and was eventually partitioned by its stronger neighbors Prussia, Russia, and Austria.

Here is a map of Poland-Lithuania at its peak:

Analyzing Ukrainian Elections

As the map makes clear, there is a strong correlation between the parts of Ukraine once controlled by Poland-Lithuania and the parts of Ukraine that today vote for pro-Westerners such as Mr. Yushchenko. Although Poland-Lithuania is long gone, the vestiges of Polish influence still exist in these places, drawing western and central Ukraine closer to the West than eastern Ukraine and the Black Sea region.

These two parts of Ukraine differ in another, even more important aspect: language. Take a look at the most Russian-speaking regions of Ukraine:

Analyzing Ukrainian Elections

The correlation between the percentage of Russian speakers and the vote for pro-Russian candidate Viktor Yanukovych is even stronger here. The three provinces with more than 60% of Russian-speakers gave Mr. Yanukovych’s his strongest support; Mr. Yanukovych managed to gain greater than 80% of the vote in each of them, despite losing the overall vote by 7%.

Language was a matter directly related to the Soviet Union. While on paper all languages were equal in the Soviet Union, in reality there was little question that speaking Russian was necessary to succeed. Today the situation is the opposite; the government encourages individuals to speak Ukrainian, although many in the country use Russian.

Ironically, Mr. Yanukovych himself is a native-born Russian-speaker. According to the Kiev Post, his Ukrainian remains imperfect to this day. The current president is reported to desire adding Russian to Ukraine’s list of official languages (which at the moment includes solely Ukrainian). This would be quite controversial if actually done.

Ukraine’s Future

Analyzing Ukrainian Elections

Polarization, like that illustrated in the humorous picture above, is a disturbing phenomenon for any country. In Ukraine’s 2004 presidential election, all but one province gave more than 60% of the vote to a single candidate. This is the type of political division that sometimes leads to civil war, such as which occurred in Yugoslavia. That is one possible path for Ukraine to follow, unlikely as it may seem at the moment.

Yet polarization of this sort does not necessarily lead to separation. In the 2010 presidential election, polarization declined slightly; as memories fade, this trend may continue. And fortunately for Ukraine, the East-West division does not extend to ethnicity; Russian-speakers and Ukrainian-speakers may have a different language, but they look the same. It is a sad comment on the human condition that this makes a break-up of Ukraine less likely.

Moreover, a number of other countries contain similar electoral divisions without splitting up. Former East Germany votes quite differently from former West Germany (especially with regards to the Left Party, the ex-communist party), but Germany certainly will not break-up into pieces anytime soon. After the Civil War, the South unanimously supported one party for decades – parts of it still do, if one excludes blacks – but the idea of another national schism is unthinkable today. If things go well for Ukraine, the electoral divide in its voting patterns may remain nothing more than that.

–Inoljt, http://mypolitikal.com/

OPTIMISM in 2010, say what?

     

    Gloom and doom, the storm is coming anything with a D by its name is going down and going down hard. Diary after diary with ever troubling news. Yes the world is coming to an end. Don’t you get tired of this?  

   

    All this gloom and doom is just down right depressing. Seriously the tone here sometimes is plain and simply mournful. I am not saying it is not going to be a bad year, I am bracing myself for a House loss. However let me share with you a narrative from my youth that I love to tell.

    When I was younger my great aunt was very active in the local dem party. She was a community organizer and volunteer before it was cool. She would go door to door, drag her husband out to put up signs. A lot of local candidates called her the de facto campaign manager. She even got mentioned in the local newspaper as the Mother of the Harrison County Democratic Party. She was perhaps best known for making a speech at the December meeting of the local Democratic Party after the November election. In the meeting she would stand up and always say “Wow, it is a GREAT year to be a Democrat”.

    Whether it had been a horrible year or not it did not matter, she would harp onto the positive telling of all the successes and not even mention the losses. We could have lost the Sheriffs race (the Presidential race in Harrison County politics) and many others but picked up a meager county council seat. Well we would hear her tell us of how that city councilman elect is going to do so much good and she would make us feel like we won every election with her optimistic attitude.

     I am not asking everyone to be unrealistic and say everything is good but let’s take a moment to look at what is going good in this cycle. Good in 2010, I know weird to hear those in the same sentence referring to dems. I want you to pretend to be my Great Aunt except you are making that speech to a room full of dem political junkies who follow every election. What will be the races you tell to the crowd to provide comfort? Here is my list.

My First list (the near sure things)

 (these are not in any sort of order)

1. Alex Sink- I honestly believe that Sink will win this November. Scott greatly helps her. I do not think the race should be taken for granted, I could see a Scott win, and that is truly horrifying but I think Sink will get a win.  I hope so at least. I do not know why anyone would vote Scott. That man belongs in prison not the Governor’s mansion.

2. Mark Dayton- I believe we saw a poll showing this a tied race but that poll had the electorate at a huge Republican, was it 47 percent? All other polling shows a Dayton landslide. I expect him to win 7-8% at least.

3. John Carney- If polling is an indicator then we should pick this seat up easily. I know his opponent has gotten a lot of hype but she is not that threatening and while Castle will undoubtedly win I doubt he gives the same coattails that we expected at the beginning of the cycle. I think he will win by say 6-7% not enough to bring down Carney.

4. Dan Malloy- He is heavily favored in Connecticut and he is nice to have for a future Senate run as well.

5. Cedric Richmond- Until I see non biased internal polling I doubt Cao can win. I think he will be close-ish, much more so than he should but I am sorry his vote against HCR ruined any chances he had in my view. At best I think he loses by only 7 or 8 points, which is an impressive performance actually. This is one of the few districts were Obama can help Richmond. All Richmond needs to do is peg Cao as the anti Obama who voted against the stimulus and HCR. Hit him hard for HCR.

6. Colleen Hannabusa- Her and Richmond are fixing mistakes but they are a pickup all the same.

7. Hawaii Dem- Whoever wins the primary is overwhelmingly favored in the general to be the next Governor of Hawaii.

8. Dan Seals- I do not think we have seen a poll showing him losing. That includes polling from the ever shady We Ask America.

9. Joe Garcia- I debated putting him into the category below but I feel fairly good about this race as he is a GREAT candidate and the Republican is a horribly flawed one.

List Two (candidates who could win but are tossups)

   (No order either)

1. Jack Conway- Thanks to baggers Conway has a shot. Conway is the perfect candidate he really is. The year will keep this close and probably deliver us a Paul win but this is not guaranteed I still think this race could change course and fast. The ads literally write themselves. I have seen Conway’s tough cop ad a lot over the last week and have been impressed by it. Conway is young energetic and down right perfect. I encourage everyone to watch his fancy farm speech, his second one not the profanity one. That speech was darn good. Put that in ad form and this race narrows a lot. If anyone in the Conway camp is reading this please considering doing this. Also a lot of ads with Paul making his whack job comments.

2. Jerry Brown- Sadly it looks like money can buy votes. However I have not given up hope on Brown yet and I honestly think he can turn it around. He needs to start advertising pronto. This is an important race and if we win here then the night will not feel so bad.

3. Bill White- OMFG if we win Texas this year it would be miracle. Seriously we could lose 60 seats in the House and Bill White would make me go to bed a happy man.

4. Raj Goyle- Honestly with the third party dropping out I do not feel as good but stranger things have happened. Not getting my hopes up but I am sure that it will be closer then it should be. If only if it was 2008.

5. Scott McAdams- Unlikely but possible. Two dems from Alaska, I think I may faint.

6. Roy Barnes- Now here is someone who I honestly think stands a great chance of getting elected. I am sure he will make a good Governor and could he be a potential Senate candidate in 2016????

My list is all seats held by Republicans. Yours does not have to be like that at all. Please come up with anything you want. Vulnerable incumbents whatever. You do not have to structure it like mine either. I know my second list is a little meh but I thought it would appropriate to separate the two. Could all dem users consider making a list? Come on Tek. I think it is a real positive exercise and I know I enjoyed it anyway. 2008 was a bad year for Republicans but even they had bright spots and even some pickups. 2010 here we come.

By what margin will Bob Shamansky win?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

SSP Daily Digest: 9/10

AK-Sen: Wasn’t that Lisa Murkowski announcement about whether she was going to pursue a write-in bid supposed to be yesterday? It never materialized, but we did get some statements from local gadfly and Murkowski ally Andrew Halcro that make it sound pretty likely.

“It’s going to be the kind of campaign you should have seen in the primary,” said Andrew Halcro, an Alaska political consultant who is a longtime friend of the senator. “It’s going to be no-holds-barred, pedal-to-the-metal stuff.”

DE-Sen: After putting out a public wish for real Sarah Palin backing instead of just a cryptic retweet, Christine O’Donnell finally got her wish yesterday. O’Donnell got added to the gigantic list of Mama Grizzlies yesterday during a Palin appearance on Sean Hannity’s show. The real question, though, is it too little too late? It might help raise some funds this weekend, but it smells a little like Palin’s 5 pm-on-Tuesday endorsement of “Angela McGowen.” Meanwhile, O’Donnell seems to be doing everything she can to dance right up to the edge of calling Castle gay without going over it: she just blasted his campaign tactics as “unmanly” and also telling him “get your man-pants on.”

ME-Sen: PPP’s poll of Maine has some buried details that should lead to some soul-searching for Olympia Snowe, who could be headed down Arlen Specter Boulevard if the right-wing decides to wade into her 2012 GOP primary. (Or she might take the opportunity to retire.) Overall, she’s fairly popular at 50/40, but that’s based on 59/29 among Democrats. She’s only at 40/51 among Republicans, and by a 50-37 margin, Republicans say she really should be a Democrat. Susan Collins sports similar numbers, although she has until 2014 to deal with that, by which point the Tea Party thing may be a footnote in AP US History textbooks. PPP says they’ll have 2012 hypothetical Senate matchups out on Monday. (One other note: they find opinions on gay marriage basically unchanged since last November’s referendum: 43 in favor, 49 against.)

NH-Sen: Once he got the Manchester Union-Leader’s backing, that led to a lot of speculation that Ovide Lamontagne (as he did in the 1996 GOP gubernatorial primary) would close fast. It looks like that’s happening: he’s out with an internal poll showing himself only 10 points behind Kelly Ayotte. He trails Ayotte 34-24, with Bill Binnie (considered the real threat to Ayotte until the last couple weeks) tied at 12 with Jim Bender. It’s very close to the Magellan poll that came out last week giving Ayotte a 13-point lead. I wonder if Lamontagne would actually be able to pull out the upset if the Tea Party Express had decided to weigh in here for Lamontagne, instead of in their likely-futile efforts in Delaware?

NV-Sen: Ralston smash! The intrepid political reporter is on a rampage across the twittersphere today, after Sharron Angle previously said on Jon Ralston’s TV program “Face to Face” that she wanted to debate Harry Reid there, then arranged the debate, and then yesterday abruptly canceled the Oct. 21 shindig. The two will still meet in an Oct. 14 debate, which should be one of the most popcorn-worthy events of the year.

OH-Sen: Who let the Big Dog out? Bill Clinton, who’ll be in Ohio soon shoring up Ted Strickland’s gubernatorial bid, will also hold a fundraiser on behalf of another long-time ally, Lee Fisher.

MI-Gov: Another day, another poll showing the Michigan gubernatorial race looking DOA. The newest poll by the Glengariff Group for the Detroit News gives Republican Rick Snyder a 56-36 lead over Virg Bernero.

VT-Gov: With the numbers having barely budged after the recount in the Democratic primary (the gap between Peter Shumlin and runner-up Doug Racine widened by 6 votes, all the way up to a whopping 203-vote margin), Racine conceded today. Shumlin, the state Senate president pro tem, will face GOP Lt. Governor Brian Dubie in the general.

CO-04: I’m tempted to put this in the “good news” file, inasmuch as she isn’t getting blown out as conventional wisdom would assume: the Betsy Markey campaign rolled out an internal poll, from Bennett, Petts, and Normington, that shows her in a 38-38 tie with Republican Cory Gardner (with 7% going to assorted third-party candidates). However, feeling like you need to release your own internal that’s a tie doesn’t exactly seem like a big sign of confidence…

IA-01, IA-02, IA-03: On the other hand, here’s a poll, considering the source, that’s pretty clear “good news” for Leonard Boswell. A poll for the conservative American Future Fund (who commissioned that avalanche of Whit Ayers polls), this time by Voter/Consumer Research, found Boswell leading Brad Zaun 48-39. That’s a complete reversal from Zaun’s couple of internals. Still, they have numbers from the 1st and 2nd that show that we need to keep at least one wary eye on these sleepy races: Bruce Braley leads Ben Lange 50-39 in the 1st, while David Loebsack leads Mariannette Miller-Meeks 47-39 in the 2nd (not far off from the one internal that MMM leaked).

NH-01: This is interesting: the state Democratic party is out with two different mailers in the 1st, attacking Sean Mahoney. There’s just one catch… Mahoney isn’t the GOP nominee yet, and we won’t know if he is or not until Tuesday, when he faces off with ex-Manchester mayor Frank Guinta. It’s unclear whether they have info leading them to believe Mahoney has the nomination locked down, or if they’d trying to sandbag Mahoney pre-primary so that the heavily-baggage-laden Guinta (about whom the ads write themselves) wins.

NY-13: With a lot of people in local GOP circles still holding ex-Rep. Vito Fossella in high esteem (despite his boo-hoo-funny fall from grace), this is one endorsement that may carry a lot of weight as we race toward the conclusion of the GOP primary in the 13th. Fossella gave his backing to Michael Allegretti. That sets up a showdown with the other big power behind the throne in this district: Staten Island borough president Guy Molinari is backing Michael Grimm.

OK-02: If we have to worry about this race, geez, better start making camel reservations for our 40 years in the desert. On the other hand, it’s pretty clear that we don’t have to worry about this race. Dan Boren is out with an internal poll, via Myers Research, that gives a jumbo-sized 34-point lead over little-known GOPer Charles Thompson: 65-31.

Mayors: In sharp contrast to yesterday’s We Ask America poll of the Chicago mayoral race, today’s Sun-Times poll finds Rahm Emanuel just one of the crowd, in high single digits. This poll finds Cook Co. Sheriff Tom Dart leading at 12, with state Sen. James Meeks at 10. Luis Gutierrez is at 9, Jesse Jackson Jr. is at 8, and Emanuel is at 7. “Don’t know” led the way at 35.

DSCC: Jeremy Jacobs, the man who always seems to know the Size Of The Buy, is out with a helpful breakdown of where the DSCC has made its $18 million worth of reservations so far. Right now, it’s $1.6 million in Kentucky, $5.1 million in Missouri, $5.2 million in Pennsylvania, $4 million in Colorado, and $2 million in Washington.

NRCC: The NRCC, currently only running independent expenditures ads in one district (IN-02), rolled out a list of ten more districts where it’ll start paying for ads. They’re staying on the air there, plus adding AL-02, AZ-01, CA-11, FL-02, KY-06, MS-01, TN-08, TX-17, VA-05, and WI-07. (The only “surprise,” inasmuch as it wasn’t on the NRCC’s big list of 40 districts from last month, is AZ-01.)

SSP TV:

IL-Sen: Not one but two ads from Mark Kirk, one touting his independence and the other attacking Alexi Giannoulias on taxes, but maybe more importantly, trying to lash him to the increasingly-anchor-like Pat Quinn

CA-Gov: Meg Whitman’s new anti-Jerry Brown ad cleverly lets Bill Clinton do most of the talking, with highlights from the 1992 Democratic presidential primary campaign

WI-Gov: Tom Barrett, who’s been fairly modest so far about having gotten badly beaten while intervening in a domestic dispute last year, is finally playing the “hero card” with his new ad

NM-01: Anti-Martin Heinrich ad from American Future Fund, focusing on the Pelosi boogeyman; it’s the first IE in the district and a $250K buy for four weeks

TN-08: Dueling ads in the 8th, with two Roy Herron ads out (one a positive bio spot, the other an anti-Stephen Fincher spot aimed at his campaign finance disclosure foibles… together they’re a “six-figure” buy for the next week), and an anti-Herron ad from the 60 Plus Association (the AARP’s anti-HCR doppelganger), who’re spending $500K on the buy.

IE tracker:

DE-Sen: Tea Party Express spending $72K on media buys, direct mail, and e-mail blast for Christine O’Donnell

MO-Sen: AFSCME spending $43K on anti-Roy Blunt mailer

NV-Sen: Patriot Majority spending $309K on new ad against Sharron Angle

NV-Sen: Patriot Majority spending another $49K on another anti-Sharron Angle ad titled “Oye, Sharron” (a Spanish-language market ad, maybe?)

Rasmussen:

CT-Sen: Richard Blumenthal (D) 53%, Linda McMahon (R) 44%

NC-Sen: Elaine Marshall (D) 38%, Richard Burr (R-inc) 54%

OR-Gov: John Kitzhaber (D) 44%, Chris Dudley (R) 49%

SD-AL: Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (D-inc) 47%, Kristi Noem (R) 45%

WA-08: 13-Point Lead for Reichert over DelBene

SurveyUSA for KING-TV (8/31-9/2, likely voters, no trendlines:

Suzan DelBene (D): 41

Dave Reichert (R-inc): 54

Undecided: 5

(MoE: ±3.9%)

I haven’t had high hopes (or even low hopes) for this race this cycle… if Darcy Burner couldn’t beat Dave Reichert in the 2008 environment, then Suzan DelBene isn’t likely to fare better in the 2010 environment with basically the same resume and without the netroots and grassroots interest. DelBene (with a BlackBerry… or maybe a Zune… full of MSFT contacts) has been one of the Dems’ brightest spots on fundraising among challengers, but money alone isn’t going to get the job done this year.

SurveyUSA has its usual age-related quirks (Reichert performs best among the 18-34 set), but these numbers aren’t that different from the composite D and R totals from the WA-08 top 2 primary, maybe even a little more Dem-favorable than the primary, so the toplines don’t seem far off. Maybe the most interesting question here is whether DelBene runs again in 2012 — although the map may look dramatically different by that point. The 8th has seen a lot of population growth, so the current 8th may be the cores of two different districts by that point, especially if Washington gets its expected 10th seat. This may take the shape of a GOP-leaning seat in SE King County (Reichert’s turf) and a pretty-solidly-Dem seat on the Eastside, which would give DelBene a much better opening, although a newly created seat would probably draw a lot of Dem state legislators out of the woodwork, too.

Rating the Ohio State House

The Ohio State House is one of the most important legislative bodies in terms of the 2010 re-districting season coming up.  With the governor’s race looking iffy for Team Blue, the democrats must hold the majority of seats in the state house in order to ensure a compromise map for congressional redistricting.  

State legislative redistricting in Ohio is based on a 5-seat panel, involving the governor, auditor, secretary of state, state house majority, and state senate majority.  However, congressional redistricting is done via legislature and governor only, thus making keeping the state house of utmost importance, especially if the governorship is lost.

The Democrats currently hold 53 seats in the Ohio State House, to the Republicans’ 46.  The GOP will need to win 4 seats in order to win a majority of seats.  In this diary, I will list the seats of importance in the fight for the statehouse and where I rate them.  This analysis is going on the assumption that John Kasich and Rob Portman are winning the governor’s and senate races somewhere in the neighborhood of 3-5 points, creating a statewide electorate similar to that of 2000 and 2004.  At present, Kasich is leading by 6-10 points over Ted Strickland in the governor’s race, and Rob Portman is up 4-7 points in the Senate race, although it has been speculated that the governor’s race may actually end up closer because of Strickland’s strong ground operation and Fisher’s lack of cash on hand.

First some eye candy!

Ohio State House District Map by party:

Ohio State House 2010

Open Seats:

As with most political races, the open seats are of utmost importance, especially in terms of political geography.  So let’s run those down first.  

1. 13 state representatives faced a primary challenge this spring.  Of these 13, only one was defeated, democrat John Otterman of district 45 (Akron).   However, district 96 (New Philadelphia) was vacated by a democrat in May after the primary, and will be up for grabs as well.

2. 13 state representatives are term limited in 2010.  Those are:

a. Michael Dubose (democrat – district 12 – Warrensville)

b. Michael Skindell (democrat – district 13 – Lakewood)

c. Dan Stewart (democrat – district 25 – Grove City)

d. Edna Brown (democrat – district 48 – Toledo)

e. Scott Oelslager (republican – district 51 – North Canton)

f. Joseph Koziura (democrat – district 56 – Lorain)

g. Sandra Harwood (democrat – district 65 – Warren)

h. Kathleen Chandler (democrat – district 68 – Ravenna)

i. Jeff Wagner (republican – district 81 – Tiffin)

j. David Daniels (republican – district 86 – Wilmington)

k. Clyde Evans (republican – district 87 – Jackson)

l. Todd Book (democrat – district 89 – Portsmouth)

m. John Domenick (democrat – district 95 – Stubenville)

3. 8 state representatives are retiring in 2010.  Those are:

a. Kris Jordan (republican – district 2 – Delaware)

b. Robin Belcher (democrat – district 10 – Cleveland)

c. Josh Mandel (republican – district 17 – Lyndhurst)

d. Kevin Bacon (republican – district 21 – Westerville)

e. Seth Morgan (republican – district 36 – Huber Heights)

f. Joe Walter (democrat – district 47 – Maumee)

g. Jennifer Garrison (democrat – district 93 – Marietta)

h. Richard Hollington (republican – district 98 – Chesterland)

Looking analytically at those 23 open seats, although the democrats are defending 14 of them, most of those are in hugely democratic parts of the state.  Districts 10, 12, and 13 are all in the Cleveland area, and should be easy holds.  Other easy holds should result for district 45 in Akron, district 48 in Toledo, district 56 in Lorain, district 65 in Warren.  The republicans failed to put up a candidate in district 95 in Stubenville, so that seat is safe D also (though it wouldn’t be if it was contested).  District 47 in Maumee isn’t quite as strongly democratic as the others, but I would call it a Likely D hold.  District 25 in southern Franklin county could potentially be interesting, but I call that one a Likely D hold as well.

That leaves 4 democratic held open seats that could be at risk of turning over to the republicans.  The most unlikely of these to turn over is district 68 in Portage County.  This is democratic territory and includes Kent State University, but also includes some more hostile exurban territory in the north and east.  I think this one is Lean D.  Obama still won here in 2008 though.  That leaves the three seats that are in the most danger of falling, district 89 in Portsmouth, district 93 in Marietta, and district 96 in New Philadelphia.  These three seats are all in eastern and southern Ohio, and are trending rightward.  I put districts 89 and 96 at Toss Up, and district 93 at Lean R.  

Now for the 9 republican held seats.  Districts 2, 36, 81, 86, and 87 are all located in republican voting areas, so I will call those safe R.  District 81 southeast of Toledo could be somewhat interesting as Obama moved the needle hugely here in 2008, but it generally votes republican on the local level.  I’ll list this one as Likely R.  District 51 in northern Stark county would be a pickup opportunity, but an extremely strong candidate, former state senator Kirk Schuring, is running for the republicans, so I put that race at Likely R as well.  District 17 in southeast Cuyahoga county is republican leaning, but the democrats had a big surge in turnout in the primary here, so this could be a pickup opportunity.  I put it at Toss Up.  District 21 in northern Franklin County though, is a bona fide pickup opportunity for the democrats as Obama romped here in 2008 and I think even Kerry won it too.  It’s going to come down to candidates and turnout here, so it’s a Toss Up.

Seats with Incumbents:

Now the fun begins.  My analysis with regard to incumbents is relatively simple, and goes mostly by win margin in previous election(s) and partisan voter index, while allowing for local/national voting patterns.

Democratic held seats:

District 18 – This district is in southwest Cuyahoga county, and is held by Democrat Matt Patten, who won an open seat race 51-48 in 2008.  My hometown of Strongsville is in this district, and it leans slightly republican at the local level as well as national.  Patten seems like a strong incumbent, and was the top vote getter in the primary, so I think he’s got a good shot to survive against republican Mike Dovilla.  I rank it as Toss Up.

District 19 – This district runs along the eastern tip of Franklin County, and is gerrymandered to elect a republican, but democrat Marian Harris broke through, winning a 50-49 race in 2008.  Her opponent is a strong one though in republican Anne Gonzales.  The area leans republican both locally and nationally, and with the climate, I rank this one as Lean R.

District 20 – This district is in eastern Franklin county.  Democrat Nancy Garland won here by a 53-47 amount in 2008 over Republican Matt Carle.  Carle is back for a rematch in 2010, and by all indications, this race could be a close one.  I rank this one as a Toss Up.

District 22 – This district is in northwest Franklin county and includes territory that is locally republican but nationally democratic.  Democrat John Carney is the rep here, and he first won this seat in 2006.  He won by 57-43 in 2008, so he may be gaining some entrenchment.  That being said, he’s up for a tough race against republican Angel Rhodes.  I call this one Lean D.

District 24 – This district centers on some richer, ritzier suburbs to the west of Columbus.  Democrat Ted Celeste won this seat back in 2000, but never got fully entrenched.  He won 58-42 in 2008.  Republican Nathan Larger is the republican candidate.  As with district 22, the total republican primary vote was higher than the democratic vote, but that was likely because the Rs had competitive primaries and the D incumbents didn’t.  Still, as with district 22, I rank this one Lean D.

District 28 – This district is based in northeastern Hamilton County, and is a generally conservative area.  Democrat Connie Pillich pulled off a huge upset here in 2006 to win the seat.  She won re-election 54-45 in 2008.  Her opponent is republican Mike Wilson.  Alarmingly, the republican primary vote here was more than twice the democratic turnout, suggesting that minorities and other democratic voting groups that heavily supported Obama in the Cincinnati area might be snoozing.  I give this one a Lean R rating.

District 41 – This district is located in northern and western Summit county, and combines rich, republican suburbs of Cleveland and Akron with more working class, industrial areas.  Democrat Brian Williams is the rep here, he first won in 2004, but only won 54-46 in 2010.  The republican candidate is Lynn Slaby.  Even though this district appears to be swingish and the year is bad, the fact that Williams won in a bad environment before leads me to believe he can do it again.  My rating is Lean D.

District 42 – This district is based in northeastern Summit county in suburban Akron.  The district leans democratic locally and nationally.  Representative Mike Moran, a democrat, won this seat in 2008 by a 56-44 count.  The republican candidate is Kristina Roegner, who from what I’ve heard about her is an extremely formidable candidate.  Despite the district’s lean, I feel that this year, Roegner could pull it off, so this race is a Toss Up.

District 63 – The district is centered on the more rural and exurban eastern part of Lake county, and leans slightly republican for the most part, though it’s definitely contestable most years.  Democrat Mark Schneider won here by a 54-45 count in 2008, which was a nice over performance of the presidential topline.  Still, he’s facing a tough race from republican Ron Young.  I put this race at Toss Up.

District 73 – Now this is a weird one.  Democrat Jay Goyle is the majority whip of the Ohio House, and won his 2008 race by a 65-34 count.  Should be a shoo-in for re-election right?  Wrong.  This district is centered in Richland county, mostly on the Mansfield area, which is generally quite republican.  In fact, no democrats represent any districts touching Goyle’s.  The PVI suggests a takeover, but Goyle didn’t win by big margins and become majority whip by accident.  He’s the Chet Edwards of the Ohio House, if you will.  I start this race at Lean D.

District 80 – This district centers on the Lake Erie coastline.  Democrat Dennis Murray first won this seat in 2008 by a 53-46 margin, which actually was under Obama’s total by a slight amount.  I wonder about his ability to campaign to some degree, but he did receive more votes in the primary than did republican challenger Frank Krabill.  This district seems to be trending leftward, so I start this one out at Lean D.

District 85 – This district is southwest of Columbus and centers on exurban and rural territory that leans quite far to the republicans.  Democrat Raymond Pryor pulled off a huge upset by winning 52-48 in 2008 to win the seat.  Republican Bob Peterson is running strong to knock off Pryor, and looking at the district’s geography, I think he’s got a great shot at doing that.  This is the one seat in the Ohio House that I think is most likely to flip, and I put it at Likely R.

District 91 – This district is an oddly-shaped one in southeast Ohio, and centers on some nationally republican but locally democratic ground.  Democrat Dan Dodd is the rep here, and he won by a 57-42 count in 2008 after initially winning the seat in 2006.  His opponent is republican Bill Hayes, who alarmingly got more votes than Hayes in the primary even though he was facing a primary challenger and Hayes wasn’t.  I don’t know how much to read into that after Hayes’s strong 2008 result and the district’s two-faced voting habits.  This is a tough one to read overall, so I’ll call it a Toss-Up.

District 92 – This district is in southeastern Ohio, and includes some republican friendly territory in Meigs and Morgan counties but is anchored by hugely democratic Athens county, which contains Ohio University.  Democrat Debbie Phillips won an extremely close contest in 2008 by 51-49.  That means that the seat is at least somewhat likely to flip back, especially if students from OU don’t turn out.  Phillips’s situation seems awfully familiar to one of Ohio’s U.S House members, Mary Kilroy.  I rate this at Toss Up.

District 99 – This district is centered in Ashtabula County in the state’s northeast corner.  The territory generally leans democratic, and rep Deborah Newcomb won here by a 56-43 margin in 2008.  Republican Casey Kozlowski is running against her, but I think the GOP has other better targets than this.  I put it at Likely D.  

Republican held seats:

District 16 – This district is in northwestern Cuyahoga County, taking in many of Cleveland’s western suburbs.  Republican rep Nan Baker won by a 51-49 margin here in 2008, and as it turns out, her 2008 opponent, democrat Jennifer Brady, is back for another run at it.  This is a seat that is swingish, and has a decent chance of going blue despite the environment, as evidenced by the total democratic vote way outnumbering the republican vote (although the Rs didn’t have a competitive race, so that’s taken with a grain of salt).  I rank this as a Toss Up race.

District 58 – This district lies in north-central Ohio, mostly in farmland south of the Lake Erie coastline.  Republican rep Terry Boose won this race by a 53-46 count in 2008, and may have some visible weaknesses as a campaigner.  Democrat Gregory Davidson will try to take him out, but this is locally republican territory for the most part, although Obama probably ran even with McCain in 2008.  I start this one out at Lean R.

District 72 – This district is centered on Springfield and the generally more democratic parts of swingy Clark County.  I would guess that Obama probably won here, and it was here that republican Ross McGregor survived by less than 600 votes in 2008.  He has survived some bad environments already, but is facing a tough challenge again from democrat Gregory Krouse.  This area seems to be trending rightward to some degree but is still somewhat democratic at the local level.  I rank this one as Toss Up.

District 75 – This is a republican-leaning district in rural northwest Ohio.  Republican Lynn Wachtmann went unopposed in 2008, but Obama really moved the needle strongly toward the left that year.  I wouldn’t even list this one, except that democrat Cletus Schindler scored more votes than did Wachtmann in the primary and seems to be mounting a pretty serious challenge.  I’m skeptical though, as this area is nearly 100% republican at the local level.  It’s Likely R.

Ohio State House Scoreboard:

Democrat held seats (53 total) – 32 Safe D, 3 Likely D, 6 Lean D, 8 Toss Up, 3 Lean R, 1 Likely R

Republican held seats (46 total) – 38 Safe R, 3 Likely R, 1 Lean R, 4 Toss Up

Total seats (99 total) – 32 Safe D, 3 Likely D, 6 Lean D, 12 Toss Up, 4 Lean R, 5 Likely R, 38 Safe R

Ohio State House Ratings Map:

Ohio State House Ratings 2010

Assuming I haven’t misfired on any of the 87 races that lean one direction or the other (big, big assumption to make!), that means that Dems will have 41 seats and the Reps will have 47 seats, meaning that the Democrats will have to win 9 of the 12 toss-up seats to retain control of the chamber.  That’s not an impossible task, but it’s a tough one.  At this point, I think the most likely scenario is that the Republicans pick up somewhere between 3-7 seats in the state house, and their chances of a takeover is probably about 60-70%.  That of course assumes that Kasich and Portman win their races by about 4-5%, if they win by more, they could get more seats.  Likewise, if one of them loses, or their win margin is really tight, the democrats could fare well enough to retain control.  

NV-03: Life Inside a “Swing District”

(Also at Nevada Progressive)

All too often, I hear the Beltway pundits chatter away over national poll numbers, party fundraising, who’s hiring which lobbyists, what the strategists at The White House must REALLY be thinking, and so much more.

But you know what? Here in what may be one of the districts that determines who will control Congress next year, none of that really matters. People here are asking who has solutions to the actual problems that plague us.

“For Sale” signs hang in front of houses on most blocks. Apartment buildings fly banners advertising discounted rent and free Internet to lure tenants into vacant units. Businesses are closing, and the ones staying open are cutting employees’ hours. The district leads the nation in unemployment and the state in foreclosures.

In interviews with the Sun, the overwhelming sentiment among voters of all political persuasions is that government is not working.

How to fix it? That’s the debate that will decide this congressional race – and the races for U.S. Senate and governor.

And I know all about these real problems, as my own friends and family here have suffered in this economy. They’ve lost jobs. They’ve come dangerously close to foreclosure. And I’ve felt scared.

No, most of my fellow voters in Nevada’s 3rd Congressional District aren’t paying too much attention to the DC chatter. They just want solutions to the problems we’re facing here.

And one of the biggest problems here is home foreclosures, and Dina Titus has had to fact this head on. Dina’s district office is constantly working on helping distressed homeowners avoid foreclosure. I have spoken with people whose homes were saved thanks to the help they got from Dina and her staffers. While she’s just one representative in the US House, she just happens to represent one of the hardest hit districts in the country and her office has had to rise to this occasion.

Over the past year, her office estimates Titus has saved constituents $2.4 million, most of it by reworking mortgages. (Some of the savings is from unrelated help, including securing veterans’ or Social Security benefits.)

Five staffers in Titus’ district office in Las Vegas now handle housing problems, in addition to the jobs they were hired to do. They have no formal training in real estate or mortgage finance. Each carries about 100 cases at a time. One staffer has personally handled 300 cases.

The group started out rescuing homes from foreclosure in much the same way homeowners facing foreclosure do, dialing up the banks’ call centers and asking for help. They got put on hold, transferred, disconnected.

They learned by “trial and error.” Each time they found a bank staffer who seemed competent, they jotted down the name and number, and returned with new cases. They built relationships.

Of course, the other big concern here is jobs.

And of course, Joe Heck, the Republican running against Dina Titus, is trying to make this into an issue that hurts her. And yes, people here are very frustrated over the economy here and the need for more and better jobs. However, Heck seems to forget what he has said about jobs in contrast to what Dina Titus has done to bring jobs here. And by the way, guess who he agrees with on this?

Dr. Heck even used the same wording as Angle, “the role of Congress is not to create jobs”, and he also wants to privatize Social Security and Medicare, just as Sharron Angle wants to do. In fact,Dr. Heck took $5000.00 dollars for signing a pledge to privatize Social Security and Medicare.

For more than 200 years, voters in every State have sent their elected officials to DC to help bring money back to their States for all kinds of special projects that create jobs.

There are thousands of special projects across the country and most of them are worthy projects and deserving of our federal dollars, not all special projects are pork.

Because of Nevada’s Democratic delegation of Dina Titus, Shelly Berkley, and Harry Reid, new jobs are being created for Nevada.

Solar plants, wind turbines, and geothermal are all being expanded in our State, and with that expansion comes jobs. A new high speed train system from Southern California to Las Vegas will be built, which will bring more tourists to our State, which will create new jobs. A new VA hospital, more jobs, etc. You get the idea.

None of those special projects could have happened without the help of the federal government and the federal dollars that our elected officials help to secure for those special projects.

What, you thought we could talk about Nevada politics without bringing up Sharron Angle??!!

But seriously, compare this…

To this…

Remember, they are both Republicans running for Congress on the same platform here in Nevada… And Heck wholeheartedly endorsed Angle in July at the Nevada GOP Convention!

“The primary’s over. We now have to rally around a slate of candidates up and down the ticket — Sharron Angle all the way down the ticket.” [Emphasis mine.]

So while Joe Heck tries to “hedge his bets” these days, he can’t take back his doubling down on Sharron Angle’s extreme agenda.

But of course, there’s a flip to this. What about this guy?

Yep, Harry Reid factors very much into this as well. Not that long ago, when Reid was considered “a goner”, many pundits were also quick to write off Titus. However, I had thought otherwise for some time… And now, I’m hoping and doing whatever I can to ensure I’ll be proven right in November.

For one, it’s not like everyone here is ignorant as to who’s been working hard to deliver some much needed help.

In addition, Angle and Heck are doing themselves (and each other) no favors in refusing to offer any help and skewing so far to the right.

Phil Esser, 68, a music minister in Boulder City, said he voted for Porter two years ago because he trusted him. This year, Esser will vote for Titus.

“I think she’s doing a good job.”

For Esser, it comes down to the approach. The Tea Party, with its aggressive anti-establishment campaign, turns him off. He sees local Republicans, including Heck, as sharing the Tea Party vision.

“It’s kind of like the old Ross Perot party, but with torches,” Esser said. “Ross Perot wanted change and accountability in government. I thought that was healthy for our political system. But I don’t see that now with the Tea Party people insisting our president is a Muslim.”

In the U.S. Senate race, Esser plans to vote for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for the same reasons. Two years ago, Esser was unsure whether he would vote to re-elect Reid.

And here’s another thing that the pundits don’t see, but I do. I see Dina Titus out in the community all the time, whether it’s at festive events like the Boulder City Damboree Parade

Or at a BBQ by my house in Henderson with our local LGBTQ community

Or at all the “Congress on the Corner” open house days with constituents and other events throughout the community where she just takes time to listen to us and whatever concerns we have to share with her. Honestly, I really can’t think of any representative I’ve had to deal with before who was more available and more accessible than Dina is. If I had to grade Dina on constituent service, she’d easily get an A+!

(And for the record, I still haven’t seen Heck anywhere around here…)

And finally, there’s a little something I consider to be Nevada Democrats‘ “secret weapon” in winning this election. No, I’m not really about EMILY’s List or President Obama coming to town, though both will certainly be helpful in keeping NV-03 and the entire state blue. No, I’m talking about something that I saw being built up in 2008, and is now operating in full force.

The state party has been very wise in investing in a strong party structure and strong field operation designed to turn out votes for Reid, and for Titus here in NV-03. Whenever I stop by my local office in Henderson, I always see volunteers on the phones and field organizers at work planning walks and other events. Even while we may be freaking out over poll numbers and White House rumors and lobbyist chatter online, they’re laying the essential groundwork for any kind of Democratic win here in November. And most importantly, the base is busy at work here.

Now don’t get me wrong, we can’t take anything for granted here. Times are turbulent, people are restless, and there’s still so much more to do to get our state and our country back on track.

However, I feel a sense of zen calm when I think about what might happen in November. I listen to what my neighbors have to say at our “poolside chats”. (Yes, I’m fortunate enough to have two lovely pools in my suburban gated community in Henderson.) I always let them start the discussion, and they tell me about how Sharron Angle scares them or how Dina Titus had a card table outside the grocery store or how Harry Reid brought home more funds for UNLV. As long as they, and all the other sane folks here vote, we’ll win. 😉

KS-04: Hartman Won’t Run

Major bummer:

Onetime Republican congressional candidate Wink Hartman has ended his flirtation with the Libertarian Party, announcing that he won’t take the small party’s nomination in the general election.

“After several days of prayerful reflection, I have decided not to seek the Libertarian Party’s congressional nomination,” Hartman said in a statement. “I am humbled by the Libertarian Party’s consideration and belief in me. Through this process, I have gained additional respect for their dedication to the fight for limited government.”

Hartman said he would support Republican candidates in the November election, but stopped short of endorsing his own former Republican rival, Mike Pompeo, who beat him in the GOP primary last month.

Democrat Raj Goyle, down by just three points in his latest internal poll, is still running a surprisingly strong race given the GOP slant of the district, but a Hartman Libertarian bid would have turned the dynamics upside-down. It sounds like someone convinced the seriously wealthy Hartman that his re-entry would have only helped Democrats steal the seat. Tough luck for us.

Pompeo, who has yet to earn the endorsement of any of his primary rivals, is still in the running for GOP Dickbag of the Year – but his chances of getting elected to the House just got better.

ME-01, ME-02: Pingree and Michaud Both Under 50

Public Policy Poling (9/2-6, likely voters, no trend lines):

Chellie Pingree (D-inc): 47

Dean Scontras (R): 38

Undecided: 15

(MoE: ±3.5%)

Some have cited Maine’s first district as a potential upset this fall, pointing to Pingree’s underwhelming 10-point win in 2008 (a spread that Obama doubled against McCain). It looks like Pingree is still underperforming against the not terribly well-funded businessman Dean Scontras (who tried but failed to win the GOP nomination in ’08). However, it’s looking like the 2nd District race may end up to be quite a bit closer:

Mike Michaud (D-inc): 45

Jason Levesque (R): 38

Undecided: 17

(MoE: ±3.8%)

Levesque has raised a bit of money that has enabled him to actually go on the air, and we recently flagged this race as one worth keeping a wary eye on. The numbers suggest that Levesque is the candidate with more room to grow:

This race is probably going to tighten up because 21% of Republicans are undecided while only 10% of Democrats are. Michaud has his party base pretty much locked up at 81% while Levesque’s getting only 65% of his party as many remain undecided. Michaud is also leading 43-34 with independents despite the fact that they disapprove of him by a 34/46 margin.

Both of these are interesting races. Neither incumbent has locked up their re-election, but their GOP opponents will probably need some help in overtaking them. The NRCC may have more opportunities this fall than they can afford.

SSP Daily Digest: 9/9 (Afternoon Edition)

DE-Sen: Despite all the hullabaloo about the late-breaking surge by Christine O’Donnell (which, if you look at fundraising and ad spending, seems like it might not have been that much of a surge at all), both parties seem to be reconciled to a Chris Coons/Mike Castle race, according to CQ. O’Donnell seems to be hanging her hopes on a last-minute Sarah Palin endorsement, which, according to intense semantic analysis by Twitterologists, didn’t really happen with her recent retweety-hashtaggy thing.

HI-Gov: Hawaii’s the last primary in the nation, and that also means it’s the last for pre-primary financial reporting. Neil Abercrombie, who’d been lagging Mufi Hannemann on the fundraising front previously, shot ahead for the months of July and August. Abercrombie raised $768K while Hannemann raised $330K. Hannemann still has the CoH edge, $792K to $275K.

NM-Gov: GOPer Susana Martinez has led narrowly in most polls here, but the RGA isn’t taking this race for granted: they’re moving $500K to the Martinez campaign. The DGA is also continuing to fight here, and they seem to think they have something here with their own little Bonusgate story here (where Martinez allegedly spent border security money on staff bonuses instead); they’re running their second attack ad here, and it (like the first ad) focuses on the bonuses.

RI-Gov: There had been rumors of this way, way back, but the RNC is revisiting them today, saying that Democratic candidate Frank Caprio talked to them about a possible party switch in February (back when he was still facing the more-liberal Patrick Lynch in the Dem primary). It’s unclear what the GOP’s angle is in releasing this now… their chances are pretty much DOA, so are they just hoping to deny the DGA a victory here (for post-election talking points purposes) by driving Caprio votes to Lincoln Chafee (the indie who seems to be running, for the most part, to Caprio’s left)?

VT-Gov: The recount has begun for the ultra-close Democratic primary in the Vermont gubernatorial race, but instead of lobbing grenades at each other, 197-vote leader Peter Shumlin and runner-up Doug Racine are touring the state together in an RV, stumping along with the other three candidates. In fact, Racine is urging his donors to get behind Shumlin, despite having requested the recount. (So far, Shumlin’s lead has edged up by 9, with 10 of the state’s 14 counties having completed the recanvass.)

WI-Gov: Here’s a good development, that a lot of other outgoing Dem incumbents might take a lesson from: Jim Doyle, with $1.8 million sitting around in his campaign funds as he ends his gubernatorial run, is transferring $1 million of that money to the Greater Wisconsin Committee, which has aired both anti-Scott Walker and anti-Mark Neumann ads.

CT-05: Here’s one House GOP internal that’s getting a little stale, but somehow eluded us until just now: Sam Caligiuri put out a late-August internal from National Research showing him right on Chris Murphy’s heels, trailing 40-39.

Committees: Jim Doyle’s not the only guy with money to burn who’s emptying out the piggy banks. Barack Obama will be transferring $4.5 million from his campaign fund, divvying it up three ways with $1.5 million each to the DCCC, DSCC, and DNC.

Mayors (pdf): Two mayoral polls are out today. One is more timely, with the DC primary only days away: Clarus finds Vincent Gray ready to oust incumbent Adrian Fenty in the Dem primary, 45-38. We Ask America also pounces on the Chicago mayor question, despite a thoroughly unclear field, and finds Rahm Emanuel would be starting in the pole position out of 10 names they gave. Emanuel’s at 30, followed by Tom Dart at 14, and both Luis Gutierrez and Jesse Jackson Jr. at 13.

Massachusetts: Here’s an interesting set of numbers out of the Bay State: despite the election of Scott Brown and running a competitive gubernatorial race, Republicans have actually lost ground lately in terms of registration. The GOP has lost more than 9,000 voters over the last two years, and are down to 11% of all registrations. Dems held almost even at 37%, while the ranks of the unenrolled grew (by 187K since 2006), up to 51% of the electorate.

SSP TV:

IN-Sen: The Chamber of Commerce is out with an anti-Brad Ellsworth ad hitting the usual “trillions of government spending” points

WV-Sen: Joe Manchin’s first TV ad attacks John Raese for running attack ads

OH-Gov: The SEIU attacks John Kasich on his Wall Street days, with a “significant six-figure” buy

PA-Gov: Dan Onorato’s first TV ad of the general is a 60-second extravaganza focusing on the revitalization of Pittsburgh

IL-14: Randy Hultgren talks jobs

MI-01: Gary McDowell’s first ad has testimonials from locals saying he’s just like them, only “better dressed”

OH-18: Americans for Job Security is out with four anti-Dem House ads, in IN-08, PA-04, and PA-07 as well as the 18th… and we have actual numbers ($124K in OH-18, $415K in PA-04, $293 in PA-07, and $318K in IN-08)

SC-05: John Spratt’s first TV ad of the cycle focuses, unsurprisingly, on his constituent service reputation and attention to local issues

Rasmussen:

AZ-Sen: Rodney Glassman (D) 37%, John McCain (R-inc) 51%

IL-Sen: Alexi Giannoulias (D) 34%, Mark Kirk (R) 37%, LeAlan Jones (G) 12%

MO-Sen: Robin Carnahan (D) 43%, Roy Blunt (R) 53%

WV-Sen: Joe Manchin (D) 50%, John Raese (R) 45%