NY-01: Bishop Says He’s Re-Taken the Lead – by 15 Votes

Hot damn, this one is tight:

At the end of Day Four of counting, Bishop took the lead from his GOP challenger, Randy Altschuler, despite what Schneider described as the Republican businessman’s “aggressive ballot challenge strategy designed to suppress Bishop’s momentum.” Despite initially trailing by 383 votes, Bishop now has a lead of 15 votes.

Altschuler has challenged 212 more voters than Bishop. Schneider predicted many of those challenges will be dismissed, which will ultimately bolster the incumbent congressman’s lead even further.

The Bishop campaign has sounded confident for a while now, and they’re basically predicting victory at this point. Counting is complete everywhere except for Brookhaven, where only about one in seven precincts have have been canvassed. Brookhaven went narrowly for Obama (see p. 34), 109,665 to 98,024.

CaliWyoming: The Golden State with Wyoming-sized Districts

It’s officially redistricting season, and I wanted to take a look at how the 435-member cap that the House of Representatives imposed on itself in 1911 affects overall membership. Most districts in the USA have a population between 625,000 and 675,000, as a result of apportionment of districts between states. Yet apportionment–and therefore, district population–cannot be fully equal so long as the current rules stand, because the Constitution mandates that each state have at least one district of its own. That means that Wyoming, the smallest state, gets WY-AL, which has an estimated population of 544,000–that is, about 100,000 fewer people than the average CD.

In response to this inequality–a vote for Congress in Wyoming means comparatively more than a vote for Congress in other states–some folks have proposed a “Wyoming Rule” that would toss out the cap and make district sizes equal to the population of the smallest state. That is, each district would have 544,000 people.

I decided to test out the “Wyoming Rule” on the state where it would have the greatest effect: California, which would gain 16 new districts as a result of the overall reduction in district size. Below is one way that California could be drawn with 69 districts. I did a little bit of everything here: gerrymandered to protect incumbent parties (not incumbents themselves), tried to create as many VRA districts as possible, and sought to keep counties intact in the cases where partisan or racial numbers wouldn’t be affected.  

Northern California:

CA-01 (blue): OPEN, 77% White, D+15, Obama 67%

–This North Coast district pulls fully out of the Bay Area. I would expect Mike Thompson to move north and run.

CA-02 (green): Wally Herger (R), 80% White, R+10 McCain 55%

–Not much has changed from Herger’s current district. The loss of the southernmost portion of the district has shifted the PVI slightly to the left.

CA-03 (purple): Tom McClintock (R), 81% White, R+9, McCain 54%

–The only district to border both Oregon and Nevada, the 3rd contains some of the most conservative areas of California offset somewhat by liberal towns in the Sierra Nevada. McClintock is safe in this exurban/rural hybrid.

CA-04 (red): Dan Lungren (R), 70% White, R+8, McCain 52%.

–Lungren’s new district pulls out of the Sierra Nevada and now includes Sutter County and part of Yolo. The base remains in the northern Sacramento suburbs, and the district has flipped from Obama to McCain.

Sacramento and the North Bay:

CA-05 (yellow): Doris Matsui (D), 42% White, 22% Hispanic, 16% Asian, D+19, Obama 72%

–Almost entirely co-terminous with the City of Sacramento. This is the first of many, many majority-minority districts on the map and is safe for Matsui.

CA-06 (teal green): John Garamendi (D), 65% White, D+1, Obama 55%.

–The eastern and souther suburbs of Sacramento County give us our first tossup, which is slightly D-leaning but appears to have voted for Bush in 2004. Most of this is currently Lungren’s territory, and he could probably win here, but he would prefer to run in my 4th. Garamendi, on the other hand, does live here, but might choose to run in the 13th.

CA-07 (grey): Lynn Woolsey vs. Mike Thompson (D), 68% White, D+17, Obama 71%.

–This is basically Wine Country plus some western suburbs of Sacramento. Thompson’s inconvenient choice of residence puts him here along with Woolsey, who is from the population base in Sonoma County. As I said above, Thompson would probably run in CA-01 to the north.

CA-08 (lilac): Nancy Pelosi (D), 65% White, D+36, Obama 80%.

–The new 8th crosses the Golden Gate Bridge from Marin County into the wealthy and cosmopolitan northern neighborhoods of San Francisco, including the outgoing Speaker’s Pacific Heights. Pelosi should have no problem appealing to liberal Marin, although there is another San Francisco district that she could choose to run in if she’d rather not cross the bay.

CA-13 (peach): OPEN, 47% White, 17% Hispanic, 16% Asian, 15% Black. D+14, Obama 68%.

–Solano County with a sliver of Contra Costa to make the population match. John Garamendi represents much of this now but lives just to the east in southern Sacramento County. He may well choose to run here rather than in the tossupy 6th.

Bay Area

CA-09 (cyan): Barbara Lee (D), 37% Black, 21% Hispanic, 20% White, 17% Asian. D+36, Obama 89%.

–Now this is where the Wyoming Rule gets fun! Smaller districts allow you to draw VRA districts where you previously could not, because the population thresholds are lower. For example, this district is a new plurality-black district in the Bay Area. It combines Oakland in Alameda County with Richmond in Contra Costa and a small portion of heavily-black southeastern San Francisco. CBC chairwoman Barbara Lee will love it.

CA-10 (magenta): OPEN, 52% Hispanic, 21% Asian. D+28, Obama 81%.

–Here’s a new, heavily gerrymandered Hispanic-majority district in the West Bay. The 10th is a thin strip that hugs the bay coast, connecting parts of San Francisco with Hispanic neighborhoods in San Jose, along with certain Hispanic pockets in Daly City and Palo Alto. I’m pretty sure this would be a wide-open Democratic primary, probably favoring a Hispanic from San Jose.

CA-11 (lighter green): OPEN, 43% White, 34% Asian. D+29, Obama 82%.

–Southern San Francisco and northern San Mateo combine to form another ultra-blue open seat (assuming Pelosi runs in the 8th.) It is very telling that despite three VRA seats in the Bay Area, this “leftovers” district is still majority-minority. Much of the SF city council would be interested in the primary here, and an LGBT representative would make sense given the area.

CA-12 (periwinkle): Mike Honda (D), 50% Asian, 25% White, 17% Hispanic. D+15, Obama 70%.

–More VRA fun, as we can now draw an Asian-majority district in the Bay. Anchored in eastern San Jose, the district picks up heavily Asian precincts in Fremont and Union City (Alameda County) before jumping across the Bay into southern San Francisco. I don’t know if Mike Honda lives within the lines, but I obviously drew this with him in mind.

CA-14 (brown/green): Jackie Speier (D), 68% White. D+18, Obama 73%.

–Speier sheds her part of San Francisco (and a few PVI points in the process) and now has a San-Mateo centered district with a small part of Santa Clara. This is the heart of Silicon Valley and home to Stanford.

CA-15 (orange): Anna Eshoo (D), 53% White, 28% Asian. D+15, Obama 70%.

–This is intended to be Eshoo’s district, although she will have to move slightly south if she wants to live in it (why, Cali Dems, must you live so close to each other?) Essentially, these are the northern and western suburbs of San Jose plus a portion of the city itself.

CA-16 (bright green): Zoe Lofgren (D), 59% White, 21% Hispanic. D+13, Obama 67%

–Lofgren gets the San Jose leftovers, plus southern Santa Clara and a largely unpopulated part of Santa Cruz. Here district is a few points less Democratic than before but nowhere near the point where she needs to be worried.

CA-17 (deep purple): Pete Stark (D), 37% White, 28% Hispanic, 20% Asian. D+20, Obama 75%

–Yet another super-Democratic stronghold, this time in Alameda County. Stark is safe in this district that is majority-minority by accident (that is, this is what was left over after drawing 3 VRA districts, and it’s still less than 40% White.)

CA-18 (yellow): Jerry McNerney (D), 73% White. D+18, Obama 73%

–Jerry McNerney is rewarded for holding down a tough district in 2010 with the greatest gift you can give a Democrat: Berkeley. Also takes in McNerney’s home base of eastern Alameda and a slice of Contra Costa.

CA-19 (olive): George Miller (D), 61% White, D+13, Obama 67%

–No, I didn’t forget about Miller…..I just dropped his district number from 7 to 19. He is plenty safe in this surprisingly small district in northern Contra Costa County. This area looks like a wonderful place to live, by the way.

Central California

CA-20 (pink): OPEN, 65% White, R+6, McCain 52%

–This is a more Republican version of the current CA-11, covering much of San Joaquin, southern Contra Costa, and part of unincorperated Sacramento. David Harmer would run here if he ends up being declared the winner after the recount in CA-11, and he might anyway even in he loses. It’s not a certain win, especially with Obama on the ballot, but the Republicans would be favored here.

CA-21 (maroon): OPEN, 40% Hispanic, 37% White. D+8, Obama 62%

–A Hispanic plurality district including Stockton and western Stanislaus County. Dennis Cardoza does not live here but may run. Republicans won’t compete here until they learn how to better appeal to Hispanics.

CA-22 (brown): OPEN, 78% White, R+10, McCain 54%

–This district is centered in Modesto and runs to the northeast, picking up several conservative counties in the Sierra Nevada. No incumbent lives here, but a Republican would almost certainly win here.

CA-23 (aqua blue): Jeff Denham (R), 64% White, 22% Hispanic, R+10, McCain 54%

–Almost identical to its northern neighbor, the 23rd is based in Fresno and includes the rural, beautiful Yosemite Valley. Newly-elected Rep. Denham will cruise here.

CA-24 (purple): Jim Costa (D), Dennis Cardoza (D), 59% Hispanic, D+9, Obama 63%

–The trouble with the Wyoming Rule is that VRA districts don’t have to be as stretchy as they normally do. With four plurality-Hispanic districts in the Central Valley now, Costa and Cardoza are unfortunately both stuck in this one. Most of the population comes from Fresno, which would favor Costa.

CA-25 (salmon): Sam Farr (D), 52% White, 35% Hispanic, D+19, Obama 74%

–We jump back to the coast now and find a safe seat for Farr around the Monterey Bay. Surprisingly, the district is over a third Hispanic.

CA-26 (darker grey): OPEN, 58% White, 32% Hispanic, R+1, Obama 53%

–Every good map has at least one pure tossup, and this Central Coast seat is as evenly divided as they come. Democratic Monterey, slightly Democratic San Benito, heavily Republican Kings, and swingy San Luis Obispo combined to vote right at the national average in 2008, although this district voted more Republican than the nation in 2000 and 2004. California is trending Democratic, but Republicans hold most seats like this one for now. I’m sure that both sides would put up strong candidates for this one year in and year out.

CA-27 (electric green): Devin Nunes (R), 45% Hispanic, 43% White, R+9, McCain 53%

–Returning to the Central Valley, we find Nunes losing a few points off his PVI but still looking good in a Hispanic-plurality district south of Fresno. Low Hispanic participation and very conservative white voters keep this district in the Republican column.

CA-28 (pinkish purple): Kevin McCarthy (R), 65% White, R+19, McCain 65%

–By far the most Republican district in California, the dark-red 28th is based in Bakersfield (Kern County) and runs all the way to the Nevada border, picking up mountain and desert areas as well as the leftovers of Tulare County. McCarthy is safe for a long, long time.

CA-29 (earthy green): OPEN, 56% Hispanic, R+4, Obama 50%

–We round out our tour of the Central Valley with another swing seat that leans slightly Republican despite its status as a VRA Hispanic-majority seat. Many of the Hispanics are non-citizens who work the fields of this agricultural region, and the white voters in Bakersfield give the GOP the slight edge here. This would be an intriguing open-seat race in 2012.

West of Los Angeles

CA-30 (peach): Lois Capps (D), 46% White, 44% Hispanic, D+15, Obama 69%

–The sweetheart gerrymander lives on! Capps gets to keep her coastal Democratic district, but the Wyoming rule allows this district to shrink to just Santa Barbara and Oxnard.

CA-31 (pale yellow): Elton Gallegly (R), 63% White, R+5, 50% McCain

–Gallegly will always be Capps’ (electoral) sweetheart, and can thank her because he basically gets to keep the district he has now. Inland Santa Barbara and Ventura lean slightly Republican, and that should be good enough to keep the sun from going down on Elton, unless the Democrats get serious about recruiting in districts like these.

CA-33 (royal blue): Henry Waxman (D), 74% White, D+6, Obama 60%

–We’ve arrived! The first of many districts to take in part of Los Angeles, the 33rd starts in Thousand Oaks in Ventura, grabs Malibu, and ends up in the mostly residential far western reaches of LA. Waxman’s PVI is not nearly as robust as his old one, but he should hold on just fine.

Los Angeles County

I’ve labeled the districts on the map so you can tell which one is which (they’re all kind of small, and they don’t quite go in numerical order because I wanted to keep similar colors away from each other.)

CA-32 (red-orange): Buck McKeown (R), 57% White, R+6, McCain 49%

–This includes the entire northern half of the county, including the part cropped out of the image (more or less everything north of the San Gabriel Mountains.) McKeown drops the sprawling desert portion of the district but surprisingly, his partisan numbers actually improve. Who would’ve known?

CA-34 (Irish green): Howard Berman (D), 69% White, D+22, Obama 76%

–Bright lights! Big Stars! The place where dreams are realized! It’s Hollywood, and it belongs to Berman. This is the last white-majority district we’ll be seeing in quite some time. Swanky Beverly Hills is also in the 34th, so you can pick your favorite actor or actress to succeed Berman.

CA-35 (Laker purple): OPEN, 55% Hispanic, D+16, 70% Obama

–A new Hispanic-majority district in northwestern Los Angeles. Yes, Los Angeles is going to produce a LOT of Hispanic-majority districts.

CA-36 (yellow-orange): Brad Sherman (D), 58% Hispanic, D+20, 74% Obama

–Sherman’s district is now Hispanic-majority as well, which could make him vulnerable to a primary challenge. However, his current district is majority-minority, and he seems pretty well liked by the base. The 36th includes Burbank and the area north of downtown LA.

CA-37 (Dodger blue): Xavier Becerra (D), 65% Hispanic, D+26, Obama 80%

–One of the smallest and most densely populated districts in the country, the 37th is comprised of Downtown Los Angeles and is home to the Dodgers, Lakers, Clippers, and Kings. It has a Hispanic supermajority, and along with the 35th is one of two districts fully within the City of Los Angeles.

CA-38 (pale green): Lucille Roybal-Allard (D), 67% Hispanic, D+28, Obama 82%

–Who? Yeah, Lucille Roybal-Allard, who has actually been around for 18 years now but keeps a rather low profile, especially compared to some of the other Los Angeles Democrats. Anyway, LRA is safe in East LA, in a district so Hispanic it almost violates the VRA.

CA-39 (off-white): Karen Bass (D), 52% Black, 39% Hispanic, D+39, Obama 93%

–This Inglewood and LA district is distinctive for two reasons. First of all, it’s the most Democratic in California and probably one of the three most Democratic in the nation (along with the Harlem and Bronx districts in NYC.) Second of all, it is the only black-majority seat out of the 69, and it may no longer be possible to draw a black-majority seat except under the Wyoming Rule. California still has a significant black population, but most of the state’s African-Americans live in areas that are even more heavily populated by Hispanics. Bonus: this district is 3% white. Wow.

CA-40 (maroon): Jane Harman (D), 54% White, D+19, Obama 73%

–Stretching from Santa Monica to Redondo Beach, this district in south-central LA county is one of the few white-majority areas around. Nevertheless, it has a strong Democratic majority and Harman needs only worry about the primary.

CA-41 (white/grey): Dana Rohrabacher (R), 64% White, R+6, McCain 50%

–The token Republican district in LA County south of the San Gabriels, the 41st is similar to Dana’s current district, starting in Torrance and hugging the coast until it reaches dark-red Huntington Beach in Orange County.

CA-42 (lime green): Maxine Waters (D), 73% Hispanic, 24% Black, D+38, Obama 92%

–One of the most Hispanic and Democratic districts in the country, the new 42nd is made up of the troubled neighborhoods of Watts and Compton. Maxine Waters is the ethically-plagued incumbent, although I would expect her to get a strong Hispanic primary challenger.

CA-43 (bright magenta): Laura Richardson (D), 41% Hispanic, 25% White, 16% Black, D+ 19, Obama 73%

–Long Beach is another area in need of a cleaner Representative, but for now, Laura Richardson will represent this coalition district.

CA-44 (red-violet): Grace Napolitano (D), 68% Hispanic, D+10, Obama 64%

–We’re into the eastern suburbs of Los Angeles now, and Napolitano’s PVI has dropped a little bit (it was D+18). The congresswoman is safe, however, in the heavily Hispanic cities of Whittier, Montebello, Pico Rivera, and her hometown of Norwalk.

CA-45 (sky blue): OPEN, 42% Hispanic, 24% White, 16% Asian, 15% Black, D+15, Obama 69%

–The Port of Los Angeles is one of the most important shipping centers in America, and its next representative could conceivably be of any race in this wide-open coalition district. Carson is also included in this Democratic stronghold.

CA-46 (burnt orange): Judy Chu (D) vs Gary Miller (R), 51% Asian, D+2, Obama 56%

–The wishbone-shaped 46th, to the northeast of Los Angeles, is probably my favorite district on the map. It is Asian-majority, and surprisingly, a true swing district that George Bush narrowly carried and Barack Obama decisively won. Chu’s home city of Monterey Park, is at the tail end of the northern fork, Walnut and Diamond Bar in the Inland Empire make up the central core of the district, and Cerritos is the southernmost point. Chu is not safe here, but she makes sense for the time being. Miller lives in the eastern part of the district and could conceivably defeat Chu with a good campaign, but it would be a tough fight for him.

CA-47 (light lavender): Adam Schiff (D), 47% White, 27% Hispanic, 18% Asian, D+11, Obama 66%

–I moved back north of LA to draw the 47th in Pasadena and Glendale. These are fairly reliably Democratic suburbs, and they are combined with some leftover Hispanic precincts in LA itself to make this district safe for Schiff. Once again, this is a majority-minority seat.

CA-48 (tan): Linda Sanchez (D), 71% Hispanic, D+19, Obama 74%

–One final urban district in East LA, also with a Hispanic supermajority. Linda Sanchez lives just outside the district (her hometown of Lakewood is in Rohrabacher’s GOP-leaning 41st), but she represented a good chucnk of this area before and would fit in perfectly here.

CA-49 (terra cotta clay red): OPEN, 60% Hispanic, D+13 67% Obama

–A new Hispanic-majority district in the San Gabriel Valley, this looks somewhat like Hilda Solis’ old stomping grounds. The major centers of population are El Monte, Baldwin Park, and La Puente.

CA-51 (chocolate brown): OPEN, 56% Hispanic, D+11, Obama 65%

–Another new Hispanic-majority district in the San Gabriel Valley. This is the slightly-less Democratic northern twin of the 49th, anchored in Pomona, and is also an open seat. Hispanic Democrats would have plenty of primaries to choose from if this map were to be enacted.

Orange County

CA-50 (pale blue): David Drier (R), 58% White, R+7, 52% McCain

–No, this district isn’t anywhere near Orange County, but it has to be written up somewhere. The well-dressed Rules Chairman gets a better district for his electoral future in the northeastern corner of Los Angeles County and rural western San Bernardino. Drier probably wishes this plan would be enacted, because his current district is vulnerable to being ripped apart.

CA-52 (forest green): OPEN, 43% White, 27% Hispanic, 25% Asian, R+6, 51% McCain

–If Democrats really think Orange County is trending their way, they’ll have to prove it by winning districts like this one, which runs from Cypress through Garden Grove and Fountain Valley and ends up in Huntington Beach. This would start out as Lean R in a neutral year, and you could see a Vietnamese Republican run against a Hispanic Democrat. One thing about California that has surprised me is that Republicans are competitive in many majority-minority districts.

CA-53 (almost white): Loretta Sanchez (D), 66% Hispanic, D+10, Obama 66%

–Sanchez’s district sees little change in racial figures but does get a healthy jump in PVI to protect the congresswoman against future challenges. It is based in Santa Ana with tendrils into Irvine and Anaheim.

CA-54 (light beige): Ed Royce (R), 49% White, 32% Hispanic, R+8, McCain 53%

–Don’t be deceived, this district is very Republican, with Obama’s exceptionally strong performance lowering the PVI somewhat. Anaheim, Yorba Linda (Nixon’s birthplace) and Royce’s home city of Fullerton are the key players. I believe Mickey Mouse is a constituent, although he and the rest of Disneyland may be in the 53rd as well. You may see Gary Miller make a run at this one instead of challenging Chu, but the primary geography would favor Royce.

CA-55 (darker purple/brown): John Campbell (R), 60% White, R+6, McCain 51%

–Cambell moves inland and in the process gets a McCain district instead of his slight Obama district. The giant suburbs of Orange and Irvine make up the vast majority of this one.

CA-56 (blue): OPEN, 78% white, R+9, McCain 54%

–The most Republican district in Orange County is an open seat that stretches from Newport Beach to San Clemente, and then inland to Santa Margarita.  Gary Miller represented a small portion of the 56th but would have to move about 50 miles to make a run. More likely, there would be a competitve primary that would favor a Laguna-area Republican.

CA-58 (purple): OPEN, 44% Hispanic, 40% White, D+2, Obama 57%

–I can’t figure out whether this new district may have just barely voted for Bush in ’04, but it certainly leans Democratic. The largest city in the district is Ontario; it also has Chino and part of Riverside. You would probably see a Hispanic Democrat and a white Republican face off here, favoring the Democrat in presidential years but a tossup in a good GOP year like 2010.

CA-60 (yellow): Ken Calvert (R), 53% White, 31% Hispanic, R+6, McCain 51%

–This is mostly a Riverside district but I’m covering it here because it crosses the Santa Ana Mountains to take in the easternmost part of the OC. Calvert, like many of his GOP colleagues, now has a district McCain won, in this case centered on his home city of Corona.

Inland Empire

CA-57 (green); Joe Baca (D), 60% Hispanic, D+16, Obama 70%

–A Hispanic-majority district in San Bernardino County, centered on the county’s namesake city. Baca is safe.

CA-59 (red): Jerry Lewis (R), 60% White, R+10, McCain 54%

–This massive district takes up most of San Bernardino County, but a lot of that is desert. The population comes from the city of San Bernardino and the suburb of Highland, and there are a few lonely Mojave outposts like Barstow in the mix too. Lewis actually lives just outside the district in my new 61st, but he’d be most comfortable here.

CA-61 (teal green): OPEN, 42% White, 35% Hispanic, 12% Black, D+2, Obama 56%

–This southern SB/northern Riverside district is trending Democratic and would probably favor a Democrat from Moreno Valley or Loma Linda in a presidential year. Certainly not an area the Republicans are ready to give up on though.

CA-62 (grey): OPEN, 66% White, R+8, McCain 53%

–This longtime GOP stronghold in central Riverside County has trended Democratic as well, but is still fairly safe territory for Republicans for the foreseeable future. Hemet and San Jacinto are the nucleus of the district.

CA-63 (lilac): Mary Bono Mack (R), 51% White, 41% Hispanic, R+6, McCain 51%

–Republicans will want Bono Mack to run here instead of the safer 62nd. Her home city of Palm Springs is split between the two districts, but it is the heart and soul of the 63rd and an outlier of the 62nd. Like Bono Mack’s current constituency, it runs all the way to the Arizona border and leans Republican in a normal cycle.

San Diego

CA-64 (cyan): Darrell Issa (R), 57% White, R+11, McCain 55%

–We’re almost there. This is the safest seat for the GOP in Southern California. The investigation king takes in some wealthy areas along the coast north of San Diego, along with the very conservative inland part of the county.

CA-65 (magenta): Brian Bilbray (R), 65% White, R+6, 50% McCain

–More wealthy towns north of San Diego that historically vote Republican. Obama ran strongly here, but Bilbray is probably safe for the next decade.

CA-66 (electric green): Susan Davis (D), 68% White, D+13, Obama 67%

–Davis gets the white liberals along the coast, centered in San Diego and running north to Encinitas and south to Imperial Beach and the Mexican border. The Pacific Fleet of the US Navy is headquartered in this district.

CA-67 (pale blue): Bob Filner (D), 56% Hispanic, D+14, Obama 68%

–Enough of that silly tail to Imperial County! Filner now has a compact, Hispanic-majority district made up of South San Diego and Chula Vista. The busiest border crossing station in the state is here, so immigration must be a hot topic among the constituents.

CA-68 (peach): OPEN, 65% White, R+1, Obama 53%

–One final open seat, and one final tossup. The fightin’ 68th is home to the majority of the City of San Diego and is comfortable voting for either party (although it was historically very Republican.) Expect a great fight here in 2012.

CA-69 (green/brown): Duncan Hunter (R), 43% White, 38% Hispanic, R+5, McCain 50%

–The final district in the state can be summed up in one word: leftovers. More accurately, these are the very Republican suburbs and exurbs of San Diego and the Democratic bastion of Imperial County, which doesn’t really fit anywhere in SoCal (it belongs with the Central Valley.) The San Diego County portion of the district is more populous, hence the Republican lean. And oh yeah, lots of the Mexican Border.

Current Map

34 Democrats, 19 Republicans

25 White majority, 9 Hispanic majority, 13 White plurality, 6 Hispanic plurality

0 Black plurality, 0 Asian plurality

Wyoming Rule Map

44 Democrats, 25 Republicans (giving 6, 26, 46, and 61 to the D’s, 29 and 68 to the R’s.)

35 White majority, 15 Hispanic majority, 2 Asian majority, 1 Black majority, 10 White plurality, 5 Hispanic plurality

So what did my incumbent-party-protection Wyoming Rule map create? Well, it did its job–the new delegation is expected to be made up of 64% Democrats, just like the old one! The most notable accomplishment was eliminating the “Obama Republican” districts; that is, the 8 districts located mainly in SoCal that voted for President Obama but sent a Republican to Congress. All eight of those Republicans now have a McCain district, with Buck McKeown having the most tenuous hold of any of them. Previously there had also been three “Bush Democrat” districts, whereas now there is one: Judy Chu’s CA-46, and only because I saw no other way to make that district majority-Asian. There are also six open seats that can be considered competitive for 2012.

My other goal was to create as many VRA districts as possible. Sure, I had to create 7 new white-majority districts, but that’s to be expected when you need to make 16 new districts overall. Hispanics are big winners with this map, as they gain five new VRA majority seats and also upgrade one of their plurality seats to a full majority. African-Americans now have a majority seat in Inglewood and a plurality seat in Oakland. Finally, the Wyoming Rule creates the first two Asian-majority districts outside Hawaii, one in the Bay Area and one in Greater LA.

This exercise has proven to me firsthand that California is a ticking time bomb for Republicans. The “average” Democratic district on my map gave about two thirds of the vote to President Obama–in other words, a very safe blue seat. On the other hand, the “average” Republican district gave about 54% of the vote to John McCain, rendering many of the red seats vulnerable if California continues its Democratic trend. If there’s any consolation for Republicans, the are competitive in a surprising number of majority-minority seats, which is uncommon outside of California. However, they will need to do much better with minority voters, particularly Hispanics, if they are to make any serious comeback in the state.

Thanks for making it all the way through. As always, I appreciate and enjoy your feedback.

By what margin will Bob Shamansky win?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

SSP Daily Digest: 11/19

AK-Sen: In the words of Bart Simpson, “he’s like some kind of non-giving-up guy!” Joe Miller just keeps contesting the Alaska Senate race despite rigor mortis having started to set in. Today he added another legal action to the already-long (and expensive) tally, asking a federal judge for an injunction stopping state officials from certifying the election. Miller’s latest gripe is that the state started the count a week earlier than scheduled, forcing him to pull together a volunteer ballot-challenging team on short notice, meaning that “an indeterminate number” of misspelled ballots got through. (That number would have to be several thousand for this challenge to have any hope of succeeding.) This, of course, has to work in parallel to a separate suit, still in process, where he’s trying to force the state from counting any misspelled ballots.

CT-Sen: Since she apparently has absolutely nothing better to do with her piles of money, Linda McMahon is actually running a post-election “thank you” ad. Speculation is rising that she’s trying to stay top-of-mind for 2012, where there’s the possibility of running against Joe Lieberman (an option she said she wasn’t taking off the table). The article also cites increased buzz about Ted Kennedy Jr. running for the Dems. Rep. Chris Murphy is known to be interested too, and soon-to-be-ex-SoS Susan Bysiewicz, despite a year of nonstop bungling, is also in the mix.

VA-Sen: Here are a couple more Republican names who are checking out the Senate race in Virginia. One is an establishment figure, Prince William Co. Chairman Corey Stewart, but the other is Bert Mizusawa, a retired Army Reserve brigadier general whom you might remember as the more-conservative opposition from the VA-02 GOP primary this year, who lost to Rep.-elect Scott Rigell. Also, the Tom Perriello buzz (in the event of Jim Webb not running again) seems to have gotten loud enough that the Washington Post has taken notice.

NY-01, NY-25: The race in the 1st is down into the double digits, as Tim Bishop made up more ground yesterday as absentee ballots counted in his home turf of Southampton started reporting. Randy Altschuler’s lead is 81 votes, representing a gain of more than 200 for Bishop (although Altschuler’s camp says they did “better than expected” in Dem areas that reported, and that the more GOP-friendly Brookhaven has yet to report). In the 25th, Dan Maffei upped his percentage of the absentee votes coming in from the first half of votes from Onondaga County, enough to gain 521 votes, now trailing Ann Marie Buerkle by 303. He’ll still need to maintain that pace to win, though, as more GOP-friendly Wayne County has yet to report.

DSCC: Harry Reid is now saying he’s “in no hurry” to fill the still-empty DSCC slot, but Beltway CW seems to find the fickle finger pointing more clearly in Patty Murray’s direction. With Michael Bennet having pretty thoroughly declined, Reid and the White House are now making a “full court press” on Murray (who also helmed the DSCC’s 2002 cycle).

CO-St. House: 197 votes is all that kept Dems from controlling the trifecta in Colorado for 2012. The last outstanding race in the state House was concluded, with Republican Robert Ramirez beating Dem incumbent Debbie Benefield by 197, flipping the state House to the GOP by a 33-32 margin. (Dems control the state Senate and the governor’s chair.)

IA-St. Sen.: It’s been two and a half weeks since an election, and you’re already hungry for another one? Well, we’ve already got one on tap coming up very soon: the legislative special election to fill Lt. Gov.-elect Kim Reynolds’ seat in SD-48, scheduled for Jan. 4. It’s light-red turf in Iowa’s rural southwestern corner, though, so likely GOP nominee Joni Ernst (the Montgomery Co. Auditor) is probably the favorite. The local parties will select their nominees next week; despite losing the state House, Dems still control the state Senate.

Redistricting: Eight members of the new California citizens’ redistricting commission have been named (one of whom is a former US Census director). If you make unsupported assumptions based on their professions, it looks like we may have done well with the “unaffiliated” picks. Six more will be added before work begins.

NC-02: Etheridge to Concede

One more race down in the House, with NC-02 coming to a conclusion. The recount requested by Bobby Etheridge didn’t seem to change the numbers much, if at all:

Democratic Rep. Bobby Etheridge will concede to Republican Renee Ellmers, a Democratic source confirms.

With local election officials completing their recount of votes cast in North Carolina’s 2nd District race, Ellmers led Etheridge by 1,489 votes.

With Ellmers pretty clearly on the outs with the NRCC, the real question here for her survival in 2012 is how much the North Carolina legislature, under GOP control for the redistricting process, will reconfigure the Raleigh area lines in order to protect Ellmers. (You might remember that a similarly-configured 2nd also had a Republican Rep. for 2 years following the previous GOP wave in 1994, the long-forgotten David Funderburk, beaten in 1996 by Etheridge.) The current configuration of the district (which includes part of Raleigh proper) is swingy enough (R+2) that she could have a rough time in her first re-election… unless her district gets pushed further out into the exurbs and rural counties, and Brad Miller’s NC-13 becomes more Raleigh-centric.

Of all the list of outstanding races, this was the one that seemed least likely to get reversed, given that the disparity was always in the four digits and the AP never un-called the race. That leaves only four House races left to resolve, including CA-11 and CA-20, where Dem victories seem very likely, meaning that NY-01 and NY-25 are the real question marks. (UPDATE: Make that five, as a recount is still pending in the likely loss in TX-27.)

SSP Daily Digest: 11/18

AK-Sen: Is there anyone other than Joe Miller left who wants Joe Miller to keep contesting the Senate race? The state GOP organization is now saying it “stands ready to embrace Lisa Murkowski” as the winner of the race, despite her not having won its primary. I’m sure they were secretly ready all along to do so… recall that the person issuing the statement, state party chair Randy Ruedrich, was the guy that Joe Miller was trying to orchestrate a palace coup against, which got him fired from his Fairbanks borough job. I can’t imagine much love lost between Ruedrich and Miller.

IN-Sen: Richard Lugar, who just announced that he’s running for re-election, is laying down a pretty big marker (and one that probably helped convince him to run again). He’s out with an internal poll from American Viewpoint that, while it doesn’t specifically poll the 2012 GOP Senate primary, shows him with huge approvals, though apparently among all voters and not just registered Republicans. He’s at 66% favorable. Two of his potential GOP opponents, state Treasurer Richard Mourdock and state Sen. Mike Delph, have faves of 14% and 7% each.

ND-Sen, NM-Sen: This Politico article doesn’t actually contain any hard facts that are newsworthy, but it does contain one alarming sentence, that both Kent Conrad and Jeff Bingaman are “weighing retirement” (without anything beyond that). Conrad and Bingaman, though both long-timers, are still in their early 60s. Buried deep in the article is also a throwaway line that Jon Kyl is also the subject of retirement “speculation.”

NJ-Sen: That tea party push to have a recall election for Bob Menendez (despite, of course, the universally accepted legal principle that you can’t recall federal officials) seems to have finally died, courtesy of the New Jersey Supreme Court. I’m just surprised the case rose that far through the courts before, y’know, someone thought to crack open their 1L Con Law textbook, but the bright side is that every dollar right-wingers spend on pointless appellate legal fees is a dollar not spent on actually electing somebody. Menendez is up for a regularly scheduled election in 2012, anyway.

NV-Sen: Everyone seems in a fit of instant nostalgia for Sharron Angle today, with the revelation that in the course of the campaign she said “Sometimes dictators have good ideas” (in reference to Augusto Pinochet and privatized pension systems), and the leaked release of the ad that she cut that never got released, probably because it takes a minute to make a point that should take five seconds and because the 70s-disaster-flick-style overacting overshadows any possible message. (You can click here to see the ad, bearing in mind that it opens in Windows Media Player.) The real news that got leaked today that might impact the 2012 race, though, is that none other than John Ensign helped Sharron Angle prep for her debate by playing the part of Harry Reid. I wonder if that’ll be the last nail in the coffin for the reputed Reid/Ensign non-aggression pact?

RI-Sen: Add one more potential name to the roster for a Republican challenger to Sheldon Whitehouse: the state’s GOP chair, Giovanni Cicione (who has been encouraging outgoing Gov. Don Carcieri to run, as well as floating his own name as a last resort), is touting John Robitaille as a possible candidate. Robitaille (Carcieri’s former communications director) performed above expectations in the gubernatorial race in which he was supposed to be a sacrificial lamb, finishing second (though helped along by Frank Caprio’s last-minute implosion).

VA-Sen (pdf): PPP’s Virginia Senate poll had a GOP primary portion that just got released separately; right now, George Allen is the consensus pick, although that may have more to do with the ex-Gov. and ex-Sen.’s broad name rec compared with the rest of the field. Allen is at 46, with the very-unlikely-to-run Eric Cantor at 18, right-wing AG Ken Cuccinelli at 16, Lt. Gov. Bill Boling and ex-Rep. Tom Davis both at 4, and state Del. Bob Marshall (who almost sneaked into the 2008 Senate nomination) at 2.

NY-01, NY-25: Good news in the 1st, bad news in the 25th. Tim Bishop has made up some ground, as of the second day of absentee counting. Bishop picked up 108 votes on Randy Altschuler, cutting Altschuler’s lead down to 275, and that’s with Smithtown, Altschuler’s strongest area, having almost entirely reported. Bishop’s strongest turf is East Hampton, which will begin counting tomorrow. Ann Marie Buerkle, however, gained a small amount of ground in the 25th, contrary to expectations. Her lead is up to 824 votes, after a batch of small batch (230) of challenged ballots from Monroe County got opened and counted. The county to watch, though, will be Onondaga County, which is Dan Maffei’s base and where 7,000 absentees are yet to be counted.

Redistricting: There are three different redistricting articles out today that are worth a read. One is about Texas, where it seems like the GOP is extended about as far as it can go (thanks to victories in TX-23 and likely TX-27); compounding the problem there is something that I’ve been pointing out for years, which is that at least two, possibly three, of its expected four new seats are going to have to be VRA seats, seeing as how the vast majority of Texas’s growth in the past decade has been among Hispanics. Trying to limit the creation of new Hispanic-majority seats will only make it harder to protect Quico Canseco and Blake Farenthold.

There’s also a piece looking at Nevada, more specifically the fight within the Dem-controlled legislature about for whom to tailor NV-04 (which will probably be a Dem-leaning suburban district, conceding a GOP-leaning NV-03 to Joe Heck). Both state Senate majority leader Steven Horsford and new state Assembly speaker John Oceguera have their eyes on the new seat. Finally, there are questions in Florida about just who’s behind the lawsuit, fronted by a bipartisan coalition of Mario Diaz-Balart and Corrine Brown, to stop implementation of Amendment 6, the one bright spot from Florida on Election Day (a new initiative that makes gerrymandering more difficult). The Orlando Sentinel traces the money trail back to a number of state legislators’ groups, including one led by GOP state Sen. Don Gaetz, the guy who… big surprise… is tasked with leading redistricting for the state Senate.

MT-Sen: Tester’s Popular, But Rehberg Leads by 2

Public Policy Polling (11/10-13, Montana voters):

Jon Tester (D-inc): 46

Denny Rehberg (R): 48

Jon Tester (D-inc): 48

Steve Daines (R): 37

Jon Tester (D-inc): 46

Neil Livingstone (R): 35

Jon Tester (D-inc): 42

Mark Racicot (R): 49

(MoE: ±2.9%)

It’s a bit of a mixed bag for Jon Tester. He’s leading his announced opponents — ’08 Lt. Gov. nominee Steve Daines and “crisis management” CEO Neil Livingstone — by double-digit spreads, and his job approval rating is 50/40, a spread so healthy that PPP is calling him one of the most popular Senators in the country. However, if current Rep. Denny Rehberg took the plunge, Tester would be in for a real challenge. (And an even bigger challenge if John Cornyn somehow managed to lure ex-Gov. Mark Racicot into the race, but that seems unlikely.)

Rehberg has until March 2012 to decide on the race, which buys him plenty of time to assess the situation — and given the B-grade level of Livingstone and Baines, he’d have a good shot at clearing the field, too, unless one or both of them decides to run as an out-and-proud insurgent teabagger.

Maryland: A Fair Gerrymander

Everyone so far it seems has gotten a little carried away with Gerrymandering Maryland. I’ve even seen some outrageous 8-0 maps. With both the Governorship and both houses of the legislature held by Democrats, another Democratic gerrymander is inevitable, particularly with the state having gotten even more Democratic over the last decade.

However, I was interested in pursuing a gerrymander that didn’t look so outrageous, as the current one does, unfortunately. The fact that the current map looks like it does is even more outrageous because it is utterly unnecessary that it look so discontinuous and spindly, (Sarbanes’, Ruppersberger’s and district all look line vines that have grown wild over the state of Maryland). I made a point to reduce the clutter, and to reduce county-splitting while making a completely reliable 7-1 map.  

Photobucket

First notice how I didn’t go wild with MD-01, (blue), like some have been doing. It doesn’t traverse the entire state and mishmash rural middle class white voters from Kent County with rich suburban black voters in Prince George’s County, (the most ridiculous thing I’d seen in a while), no, with only superficial tweaking, (does the district look that radically different to you?), I cut 7 percentage points out of McCain’s vote total, taking from 58-40 to 51-47; which also, incidentally, wipes out the totality of the margin that Harris was able to get there in this the best Republican year in a generation; what’s more I cut out the areas that Harris performed strongest, (suburban Baltimore and northern Hartford), and left a greater emphasis on counties where Kratovil over-performed the most, in addition the portion of Anne Arundel is much larger, and more Democratic. So basically, I created a swing district that would firmly favor Kratovil, particularly seeing as how his base in the upper central part of the East Shore is now also the most Republican part of the district. (Surprisingly the southern reaches of far-right Hartford County are diverse and Democratic leaning). Without radically gerrymandering, or tossing in communities of disparate interests, I managed to create a favorable district that favors a Kratovil rematch, (and draws Harris completely out of it in fact). I don’t think you can gerrymander better than that.

MD-01: 134,186 McCain, (51%), 124,315 Obama, (47%). 79% White, 16% Black, 1% Asian, 2% Hispanic, (compared to previous 58-40 McCain, 85.5% white).

Maryland’s Second Congressional District is really a masterpiece; I’m quite proud at how I managed to pack in almost every hardcore Republican area in the state into one district. It runs along the panhandle, across the state into northern Baltimore and Hartford counties. I figure that Andy Harris will probably run in this district rather than face Kratovil in the First. It will either be open, (Bartlett will be 86 on Election Day, 2012), or he can primary Bartlett for being far to moderate for such a hard-right district. In any case I shifted the old district five points to the right, pretty much through that shift alone accounting for my seven point shift in MD-01.

MD-02: 190,590 McCain, (63%), 106,803 Obama, (35%), 93% White, 4% Black.

Perhaps the most disgustingly gerrymandered district in the country is John Sarbane’s. It looks like a clusterfuck of sorts, a spasmodic tendril growing wild over central Maryland and taking in parts of some 6 counties, (counting Baltimore City). It’s simply crazy, and, what’s more, utterly unnecessary. As you can see, the new 3rd, (which does not contain John Sarbane’s home, though claiming a different residence is a trivial move to make, if Maryland even has a residential clause), occupies a solid space in north-central Maryland, taking in a southeastern portion of Montgomery County, northern reaches of Anne Arundel, and all of Howard County, (including the more Republican northern reaches). Howard County has reliable Democratic lean, that ranges from, (as in the 2010 Gubernatorial race), from considerable, to overwhelming, (2008 Presidential Election), and of course the county is trending Democratic at a fairly steady rate. The Anne Arundel portions have a moderate Republican lean of 9-20 points depending on the election, and these are balanced of course by the heavily Democratic portions of Montgomery county which are reliably Democratic. All in all, the current district voted for Obama by more than 20 points, and gave O’Malley at least a 7 point margin over Ehrlich by a conservative calculation. Sarbanes should have little trouble holding onto it, and what’s more it should give him a solid base should he run for Senate in 2016, (though I suspect he would have some intense competition, perhaps from Van Hollen or Donna Edwards).

MD-03: 164,854 Obama, (59%), 109,923, McCain, (39%), 69% White, 16% Black, 7% Asian, 6% Hispanic, (compared to 77.3% White previously).

Nothing much to see here. I took in southern Frederick County; which has been ‘infected,’ (using paranoid Conservative hate-talk), with liberals spilling out of Montgomery County. It’s no longer a Republican stronghold, (McCain won it 50-48), and the fact that Ehrlich only managed to win it 54-42 over O’Malley is telling. The southern portion, including the city of Frederick, is significantly more diverse and Democratic leaning, the portion now in Van Hollen’s district gave Obama a 54-45 margin and should only get more Democratic. Of course the district is still concentrated in Montgomery County, (though it loses the Prince George’s portions, though seriously, even an attempted Connie Morella comeback couldn’t hope to get more than 40% of the vote in this district). Rockville and other areas of Montgomery are overwhelmingly and reliably Democratic. This is still a 2:1 Obama district that gave O’Malley a twenty to thirty point margin as well. The other upside for Van Hollen is that this district gives him a slightly better springboard for statewide office, including as it does a shift into swingier areas.

MD-04: 173,988 Obama, (66%), 83,776 McCain, (32%), 69% White, 9% Black, 10% Asian, 9% Hispanic, (previously 62% White).

Baltimore Close-Up:

Photobucket

While Dutch Ruppersberger’s district isn’t exactly beautiful now, it is at least considerably better and more compact than it is currently. It contains some heavily African American precincts in southwestern Baltimore County, plus carves out the white areas of Baltimore City, which also have a heavy Democratic lean. My main goal was to make a district that not even a Republican politician with a base in white Baltimore County voters, like Bob Ehrlich, could win in an open seat situation in a Republican leaning year. In other words, I wanted primarily to ensure that this district, like MD-03 and MD-04 would not be going Republican barring extraordinary circumstances. I succeeded, to put it simply. In every set of my goals; from making it more Democratic to making it look less ridiculous, (though I also think that Ruppersberger actually lives a few miles outside of this district in a Republican leaning precinct in central Baltimore County, however like I said with Sarbanes such problems are quite trivial in the bigger picture).

MD-05: 177,253 Obama, (66%), 87,651 McCain, (32%), 68% White, 25% Black.

Again, not much going on with Elijah Cummings’ district. It becomes slightly more Republican, (taking in some mostly white, wealthy, overwhelmingly Republican precincts in southeastern Baltimore county that were previously mostly in MD-01), and it’s actually slightly more Black, (about 2% more so than previously). Simply put the changes are rather superficial. This is still about as heavily Democratic a district as you can find, and completely following the VRA and representing the black community in central Maryland around the Baltimore area. I can see no objections that could be found with it.

MD-06: 179,598 Obama, (78%), 47,910 McCain, (21%), 61% Black, 35% White.

Prince George’s County Close Up:

Photobucket

That third map should clarify the boundaries around that area, which because of the colors are rather fuzzy on the wider view. Steny Hoyer’s district changes a bit, but the top lines and demographics aren’t all that different. It doesn’t take in a considerable portion of southern Prince George’s County anymore, but it still contains most of the basis of the old district; all of Charles, (steadily diversifying and growing more Democratic from over-spill out of Prince George’s), St. Mary’s, Calvert, and western Anne Arundel, (the latter three all of having a significant conservative lean). It reaches up and takes in a sizable portion of heavily Democratic, diverse Prince George’s county, the northern portions really, as well as the very bottom sections of Montgomery, (which are diverse and heavily Democratic as well). The result is a district that is still quite reliably Democratic, and which Hoyer shouldn’t have any trouble holding nor any Democrat after him.

MD-07: 159,947 Obama, (61%), 98,368 McCain, (38%). 65% White, 22% Black, 4% Asian, 6% Hispanic, (previously 60% White, 30% Black).

With MD-08 there really is nothing to see or talk about, (except the numbering being different and the fact it no longer does a ridiculous and pointless loop up into Montgomery County, with the two sections connected by a tiny thread, why Maryland Democrats felt the need to make such a gerrymandered looking district out of such overwhelmingly Democratic territory I’ll never understand). The district has a larger percentage of Black voters than before, and is as Democratic as ever. I fail to see any objections local pols might have to such a commonsense adjustment.

MD-08: 232,589 Obama, (92%), 18,494 McCain, (7%). 69% Black, 18% White, 7% Hispanic, 3% Asian, (previously 56.8% Black, 27.6% White, 7.5% Hispanic, 5.6% Asian).

So, in nutshell that is the gerrymander I would strongly support being enacted. For one, it doesn’t look like the brutally effective gerrymander that is, and maintains effectively communities of interest, (meaning there isn’t the fallout or controversy provoked by the last map), and it maintains 6 safe Democratic seats while putting forth one heavily Republican district and one flat out swing district. The 6 Democratic Districts can divided out as such, Overwhelmingly Democratic, (6th, Cummings, 8th, Edwards), strongly Democratic, (Van Hollen, 4th, Ruppersberger, 5th), and moderately Democratic, (3rd, Sarbanes, 7th Hoyer). I’m confident that not only is this map safe and effective, but for a Gerrymander it is also relatively fair and noncontroversial in look. (I considered adding my thoughts on Maryland, providing a rudimentary political analysis of the different regions, but as a college student I have other work to move on to and must quit playing around, and this piece here is long enough, so I will continue other thoughts later, at different time in a different place). Thanks for reading and I’m always interested in your feedback.  

By what margin will Bob Shamansky win?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

VA-Sen: First Poll Shows Dems in Decent Shape

Public Policy Polling (PDF) (11/10-13, Virginia voters, no trendlines):

Jim Webb (D-inc): 49

George Allen (R): 45

Undecided: 6

Jim Webb (D-inc): 49

Bill Bolling (R): 38

Undecided: 12

Jim Webb (D-inc): 49

Ken Cuccinelli (R): 39

Undecided: 11

Tim Kaine (D): 50

George Allen (R): 44

Undecided: 6

Tim Kaine (D): 48

Bill Bolling (R): 41

Undecided: 11

Tim Kaine (D): 50

Ken Cuccinelli (R): 40

Undecided: 11

Tom Perriello (D): 42

George Allen (R): 47

Undecided: 12

Tom Perriello (D): 41

Bill Bolling (R): 42

Undecided: 18

Tom Perriello (D): 44

Ken Cuccinelli (R): 41

Undecided: 15

(MoE: ±4.2%)

It’s a new cycle, and so we’re back to polls with zillions of permutations. Our friends over at Public Policy Polling take a look at what’s likely to be one of the more interesting races of the the 2012 campaign, and you can’t really complain if you’re a Dem – especially not after this month’s bloodbath. Of course, PPP is moving back to something closer to a registered voter model, but it’s actually a bit more than that. In an email to us last March, Tom Jensen told us:

We call people who voted in at least one of the last three general elections. We don’t explicitly ask them at this point in the game if they plan to vote in the fall. I imagine 97% of the people who answer the polls will vote this fall but since we’re not explicitly screening yet we don’t call them likely voters.

This sample voted for Obama 49-44. It’s been a long time since PPP’s visited Virginia, but in their final 2009 poll (PDF), they showed a McCain 48-47 electorate (using a likely voter screen). Will there still be (groan) an enthusiasm gap two years hence? It’s way too early to say, but count me among those who thinks the economy has entered a period of perma-suck.

Anyhow, here’s a little rundown of everyone’s favorables:

Allen: 40-41

Bolling: 20-25

Cuccinelli: 31-39

Kaine: 43-40

Perriello: 22-32

Webb, for his part, has a surprisingly decent 43-37 job approval rating. I’m also pretty heartened by Perriello’s toplines given his pretty tough approval scores – though I’m a bit skeptical that a one-term congressman in a fairly large state is actually known to over half of all Virginians. Personally, if Webb doesn’t run, I’d love to see Perriello go for the nod, since the guy is clearly a fighter and would make it a hell of a race.