The Mountain West consists of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, Montana, and Idaho. This region is a growing region, having outpaced the population growth of the US in the last 50 years. Overall, certain states within this region can be considered the strongest Republican states within the US, most notably Wyoming, Utah, and Idaho. However, the Democrats have been able to win some of these states in statewide and national elections. For this segment of this series, I’m also exploring the US Presidential elections since 1960.
US Presidential elections Realignment
The following is a history of how each state supported the Democratic candidates:
1960: Kennedy wins NV and NM
1964: Johnson wins all but AZ
1968 thru 1988: Dem. candidate did not win any states
1992: Clinton wins NV, CO, MT, and NM
1996: Clinton wins AZ, NV and NM
2000: Gore wins NM
2004: Kerry doesn’t win any states
2008: Obama wins CO, NM, and NV
Overall, this region has supported the Republican candidates in most general elections. In the last 13 Presidential elections, the Republican candidate has swept this region 7 times! It’s also important to point out that NV has given its electoral votes, except in 1976, to the winning candidate every year since 1916.
US House Representation Realignment
After the 1960 general election, the Democrats had approximately 60% of all house seats (and 64 of the 100 senate seats). I have inserted below the results of certain general elections.
1960: 11(D), 5(R)
1964: 13(D), 4(R)
1966: 8(D), 9(R)
1968: 6(D), 11(R)
1972: 9(D), 9(R)
1974: 11(D), 8(R)
1976: 10(D), 9(R)
1980: 7(D), 12(R)
1982: 8(D), 16(R)
1988: 11(D), 13(R)
1992: 11(D), 13(R)
1994: 6(D), 18(R)
1996: 4(D), 20(R)
2000: 6(D), 18(R)
2004: 8(D), 20(R)
2006: 11(D), 17(R)
2008: 17(D), 11(R)
Before the 2008 elections, the Democrats had not obtained a majority of these seats since 1976, and even then it was partially due from the Watergate years. The Republicans really dominated this region in the 1990’s, and in 1996 the GOP controlled all but 4 of this region’s house seats. In 2008, NV-3, NM-1, NM-2, CO-4, ID-1, and AZ-1 switched hands from the GOP to the Dems.
US Senate Representation Realignment
1960: 11(D), 5(R)
1964: 10(D), 6(R)
1966: 10(D), 6(R)
1968: 9(D), 7(R)
1972: 9(D), 7(R)
1974: 9(D), 7(R)
1976: 7(D), 9(R)
1980: 5(D), 11(R)
1982: 5(D), 11(R)
1988: 6(D), 10(R)
1992: 6(D), 10(R)
1994: 5(D), 11(R)
1996: 4(D), 12(R)
2000: 3(D), 13(R)
2004: 4(D), 12(R)
2006: 5(D), 11(R)
2008: 7(D), 9(R)
The Democrats occupied the majority of the Rocky Mountain senate seats until 1976, and ever since the GOP has had the upper hand. 2000 was the lowest point, with the Dems occupying only 3 Senate seats. Since 2000, the Democrats have regained both CO seats, a NM seat, and a MT seat.
Conclusions:
This region is growing, and as such both the Democratic and Republican party alike should fight like crazy to gain a foothold within. As of today, this region on a National front will be a fight for both parties. You have NM (leaning Democratic State), CO and NV (true purple states), AZ (a leaning Republican state, but a state that is growing at a rapid pace), and MT (a moderate Republican state that came within 5% of voting for Obama). ID, UT, and WY are very reliable Republican states, but all 3 states will support a Democrat in the House (UT-2, ID-1. WY-AL would have been close if Cubin ran for reelection). Nothing within this region should be taken for granted.
Overall, I’m not overly optimistic about retaining our 17-11 advantage in the House. NM-2, ID-1, NV-3 and CO-4 will provide us with some intense, partisan battles. If we split these 4 seats, I’ll be jumping out of my seat with joy. In the Senate, Reid is obviously in a lot of trouble in regards to his reelection prospects. The Democrats will be hard pressed in finding races where we will play some offense against the Republicans.