Assessing the National Mood: A Special Election in Florida and its Implications

By: Inoljt, http://mypolitikal.com/

Believe it or not, Tuesday was election night. Several million Americans voted (or more accurately, did not vote) in mostly local races.

These results provide a helpful snapshot of the national mood. Polls may be inaccurate, or – more commonly – different pollsters may have different pictures of the public mood. Unlike polls, elections have that useful tendency of never being wrong.

Special elections for congressional districts are especially convenient, because there is already a wealth of accumulated data about them. Moreover, because name recognition of both candidates is generally very low, they come as close as one can get to “generic Democrat versus generic Republican.”

Quite happily, a special election occurred on Tuesday in one such congressional district. Specifically, voters in Florida’s 19th congressional district went about replacing retired House Representative Robert Wexler. Here are the results:

Photobucket

More below.

Of course Democrats do not and have – almost – never have enjoyed a majority anything close to that pictured here. These results must be placed in the context of the congressional district’s political lean. If, for instance, FL-19 constituted a Democratic stronghold, this result would be fairly unremarkable. It might even be quite worrisome for Democrats, depending on the district’s Democratic lean (there are some very, very, very Democratic congressional districts out there). On the other hand, if FL-19 usually voted Republican, Democrats would have some reason to celebrate a victory of this magnitude.

As it turns out, FL-19 constitutes a reliable Democratic stronghold. Located in the Miami metropolis, elderly and Jewish voters compose much of the district’s population. The latter accounts for Democratic strength, making Florida’s 19th 15% more Democratic than the nation as a whole.

With this in mind, last night’s election results do not look so impressive for Democrats. In fact, it appears that the party underperformed relative to the district’s lean.

But this is not news at all – in recent months the public mood has shifted quite strongly against the Democratic Party. Almost the entire Beltway agrees that Democrats will lose seats in November’s midterm elections; the only question is the degree of their loss. Republicans are hoping for a repeat 1994-type landslide; Democrats would be happy to retain control of the House.

Due to the unfavorable public mood, Democrats have had a terrible batting average in the most recent special elections; they most famously lost the state of Massachusetts to an unknown Republican State Senator:

Photobucket

In this context, Florida’s result looks positively respectable. The Democratic Party can take heart in the relatively small drop-off since 2008 – especially compared to their previous performances. Given that President Barack Obama won the election by more than 4.65%, it even suggests that Democrats hold a slight lead on the national level.

Indeed, in recent weeks Democratic fortunes have been on the rise. The passage of health care, alongside a slowly but surely improving economy, has led to an ever-so-slight uptick in their polling. Florida’s result substantiates these polls.

Finally, the very nature of FL-19 can lead Democrats to be optimistic. Mr. Obama’s strongest supporters, young and minority voters, are not present in large numbers in FL-19. Instead, this district – whiter and much more elderly than the nation at large – is composed of the very groups which have been moving away from the Democratic Party. Although it still votes strongly Democratic, Fl-19 is not as blue as it once was:

Photobucket

That Democrats performed as well as they did in a district such as this provides further reason for Democratic optimism. Elderly and white voters have not all abandoned the party; it still can do well with constituencies outside the Obama coalition.

The national mood is still fairly unfavorable towards the Democratic Party; certainly the public is more antagonistic than it was when electing Mr. Obama. If an election were held today, there is a good chance Republicans would end up controlling at least one chamber of Congress. But perhaps, if these results are to be believed, the Democrats are climbing out of the hole the recession has dug for them.

FL-GOV: Race Tightens, Sink Launches New Salvo

According to the latest Quinnipiac poll the Florida Gubernatorial race, which had seemed to be slipping away, is now narrowing as CFO Alex Sink is now with four points of Attorney General Bill McCollum, who leads 40-36.

One of the first things to take away from the poll is that McCollum’s right-wing pandering leading the charge to overturn the HCR Bill has hurt him in the general, with 38% saying it makes them less likely to support his bid, and 54% of voters saying he should not be suing to try to repeal the bill.

Independent voters especially have panned the move:

The Quinnipiac University poll released Monday found 41 percent of independent voters said the challenge would make them less likely to vote for McCollum, compared with 27 percent who said they were more likely to vote for him.

http://www.google.com/hostedne…

Meanwhile Sink continues to tout her Economic Plan, attempting to woo moderates:

“I’m going to bring my business career to Tallahassee,” said Sink, former president of Bank of America Florida. “That is our future.”

 

http://www.tampabay.com/news/p…

I can’t tell yet if Sink is going to quit going at McCollum with kiddie gloves and running a Craig Deeds-esque campaign or if she is going to start slamming him for his right-wingery and presenting herself as a true viable alternative for ordinary voters while also shoring up support from progressives by campaigning on Democratic principles, a crucial two-prong campaign she has to run to win statewide: get the independent vote, and get the progressive Demographics to show up. Kendrick Meek running should definitely help her by driving turnout among black voters.

I hope to hear in the near future about her launching a new campaign direction and taking on a new tone. This polls gives new hope, and if she can start running a stronger campaign we have a strong chance to pick up this crucial gubernatorial race, with the teacher pay fiasco also blowing up in the face of Florida conservatives, invoking the wrath of teachers and education groups across the state. Sink is well positioned to tap that as well.

IA-02, IA-03: NRCC votes for Gettemy and Gibbons

The National Republican Campaign Committee announced more moves in its “Young Guns” program today. Two of the districts affected are in Iowa.

The NRCC added Rob Gettemy to its list of “on the radar” candidates. Gettemy is one of four Republicans running against Dave Loebsack in Iowa’s second Congressional district.

“The NRCC is committed to working with Rob Gettemy as he continues to meet the rigorous goals of the Young Guns program,” said NRCC Chairman Pete Sessions. “Rob is an accomplished, independent leader who will fight to create jobs and rein in government spending. I am confident that Republicans will wage a strong fight against Dave Loebsack, a loyal Democrat who has repeatedly put his partisan agenda before a healthy economy.”

They’ll have to do more than that to convince me that this D+7 district will be competitive in the fall. The real reason for putting Gettemy “on the radar” is to signal to Republican donors that he’s the guy to support in this race. It’s a slap in the face to 2008 nominee Mariannette Miller-Meeks, not to mention the other two Republicans running in IA-02 (Steve Rathje and Chris Reed). Gettemy joined the race last but has the most cash on hand thanks to a $100,000 loan he made to his own campaign.

If no candidate wins 35 percent in the June 8 primary, NRCC support could help Gettemy at the district convention that would decide the Republican nominee. Gettemy already has backing from many prominent Republicans in Linn County (Cedar Rapids and its suburbs).

In the NRCC’s three-tiered system for candidates in supposedly competitive races, the next step up from “on the radar” is “contender.” Jim Gibbons’ campaign announced today that the NRCC has elevated him to that level. Gibbons became an “on the radar” candidate in February. If Gibbons can meet certain benchmarks, the NRCC may later elevate him to the top “Young Gun” level, for candidates deemed to have the best chances of winning Democratic-held House seats.

Getting a pat on the back from the NRCC will help Gibbons raise money, particularly from out-of-district donors who don’t know the political terrain in Iowa’s third district (D+1). Gibbons outraised the other Republican candidates in IA-03 by a substantial margin in the first quarter, and being a “contender” will probably help him extend that financial advantage in the second quarter. The Gibbons campaign press release is not subtle:

By achieving ‘Contender’ status, Gibbons has already proven his ability to build a successful campaign structure and achieve vital fundraising goals.

Gibbons added, “This recognition shows that our campaign is ready to take down Leonard Boswell in the fall.  I am the only candidate in this race that has shown the financial heft and organization structure to compete and win in November.  I am running for Congress to bring Iowa values back to Congress,” said Jim Gibbons.

I have to laugh to see Gibbons bragging about support from Washington party leaders a week after he tried to attack incumbent Leonard Boswell for getting help from the head of the DCCC. From where I’m sitting, Gibbons does not look ready for prime time.

Many people on the ground in IA-03 expect State Senator Brad Zaun to win the Republican nomination. Zaun appears to have an early advantage in name recognition as well as a base in vote-rich Urbandale (a Des Moines suburb). On the other hand, Zaun has raised only a little more than $80,000 for his Congressional campaign, about $50,000 of that in the first quarter. It may not be enough for strong district-wide advertising and direct mail before the June 8 primary. A majority of Republican voters haven’t yet decided on a candidate, according to a recent poll commissioned by Zaun’s campaign.

If no candidate wins 35 percent in the primary, Zaun could be well-positioned to win the nomination at a district convention, having much more background in Republican politics. But Gibbons could point to the NRCC’s backing as an argument in his favor. Party leaders in Washington are less likely to commit resources to this district if Zaun is the candidate.

A final word on Zaun’s meager fundraising. His defenders claim that his fundraising has lagged because he was tied up in the state legislature from January through March. I’m not buying it. Zaun announced his candidacy against Boswell in early December, more than a month before the 2010 legislative session began. If Rod Roberts could raise more than $50,000 in the kickoff event for his gubernatorial campaign, Zaun should have been able to raise much more at his kickoff event in late December (before the legislative session began). Zaun is a former mayor of Urbandale, a community with much more wealth and more Republicans than the Carroll area Roberts has represented in the Iowa House. Zaun should have a large pool of major donors to tap.

Share any thoughts about Congressional races in Iowa in this thread.

AR-Sen: Little Change in Arkansas

Research 2000 for Daily Kos (4/12-14, likely voters, 3/22-24 in parentheses):

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 45 (44)

Bill Halter (D): 33 (31)

Other: 6 (0)

Undecided: 16 (25)

(MoE: ±5%)

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 43 (42)

John Boozman (R): 50 (49)

Undecided: 7 (9)

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 41 (41)

Gilbert Baker (R): 48 (49)

Undecided: 11 (10)

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 42 (43)

Kim Hendren (R): 49 (48)

Undecided: 9 (9)

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 43 (44)

Curtis Coleman (R): 46 (47)

Undecided: 11 (9)

Bill Halter (D): 41 (40)

John Boozman (R): 48 (48)

Undecided: 11 (12)

Bill Halter (D): 43 (44)

Gilbert Baker (R): 45 (46)

Undecided: 12 (10)

Bill Halter (D): 43 (44)

Kim Hendren (R): 46 (45)

Undecided: 11 (11)

Bill Halter (D): 44 (45)

Curtis Coleman (R): 43 (44)

Undecided: 13 (11)

(MoE: ±4%)

There’s hardly any change here in the topline numbers from the R2K poll of Arkansas released last Friday, either in the primary, or especially in the general. (There were also Tom Cox matchups; I’m leaving them out, as he’s dropped out.) Undecideds are dropping in the primary, but the real gainer here is “other,” probably in the form of previously unknown conservadem D.C. Morrison.

The numbers to note in this poll are the approvals: Blanche Lincoln’s problem is that everyone has an opinion of her, and the majority of that is negative: 43/53. Bill Halter, by contrast, is at 47/30. 23% still haven’t formed an opinion of him, giving him room to grow. Lincoln, by contrast, has hit her ceiling and is upside down — not the conditions that get you re-elected.

My Story (FL) (Video)

Thanks for allowing me the opportunity to speak to your community.  

I’m traveling all across the state getting to know Floridians and telling them about my story.  I can’t talk to everyone personally, though, and since I’m running for U.S. Senate Americans outside of Florida may be interested in who I am as well, since the important work of the U.S. Senate affects all Americans.  

Our campaign produced this video to help introduce people to me, my background and where I come from.  

http://www.kendrickmeek.com/page/s/video

We know this is a competitive election, but we have a real chance to bring progressive change to Florida and Washington, D.C. and we need your help getting the word out.  

You’ve heard a lot about my opponents and you’ll hear a lot more about them as they continue to fight a divisive primary over ideology and partisanship.  I’d rather spend my time working hard and fighting to bring jobs to Florida, help our economy recover and continue to pursue the progressive platform of the Democratic Party.

P.S. Not on our mobile list yet? Make sure to sign up today by texting JOIN to 35736. Text messages are a great way to stay updated – no matter where you are – with everything happening on the campaign!

Kendrick

Originally posted at kendrickmeek.com

Filing: Who Missed Out

I got the inspiration from a comment

Here are the unopposed reps, with PVI

Illinois:

Dem:

Bobby Rush D+34

Luis Gutierrez D+32

Texas:

Rep:

Louie Gohmert R+21

Ted Poe R+13 <——- Here’s one we should have had

John Culberson R+13 <——- And this

Kevin Brady R+25

Mac Thornberry R+29

Kenny Marchant R+11 <—-And this

John Carter R+14 <—–And this

Ohio:

Dem:

Marcia Fudge D+32

Pennsylvania:

Dem:

Bob Brady D+35

Rep:

Bill Shuster R+17

California:

Dem:

Zoe Lofgren D+16

Rep:

Devin Nunes R+13 <—–Fail

Kevin McCarthy R+16

Alabama:

Rep:

Bob Aderholt R+26

Spencer Bachus R+29

Virginia:

Dem:

Bobby Scott D+20

Rasmussen Reports, You Decide, Vol. 14

AZ-Sen (4/13, likely voters, no trendlines):

Rodney Glassman (D): 32

John McCain (R-inc): 54

Some other: 8

Not sure: 6

Rodney Glassman (D): 39

J.D. Hayworth (R): 48

Some other: 7

Not sure: 7

(MoE: ±4.5%)

AZ-Sen (R primary) (4/13, likely voters, 3/16 in parentheses):

John McCain (R-inc): 47 (48)

J.D. Hayworth (R): 42 (41)

Some other: 2 (3)

Not sure: 8 (8)

(MoE: ±4%)

CA-Sen (4/12, likely voters, 3/11 in parentheses):

Barbara Boxer (D-inc): 43 (43)

Tom Campbell (R): 41 (41)

Some other: 6 (6)

Not sure: 10 (10)

Barbara Boxer (D-inc): 42 (46)

Carly Fiorina (R): 38 (40)

Some other: 7 (4)

Not sure: 13 (10)

Barbara Boxer (D-inc): 42 (46)

Chuck DeVore (R): 39 (40)

Some other: 8 (4)

Not sure: 12 (9)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

CO-Gov (4/14, likely voters, 3/4 in parentheses):

John Hickenlooper (D): 42 (42)

Scott McInnis (R): 48 (48)

Some other: 4 (3)

Not sure: 6 (6)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

CO-Sen (4/5, likely voters, 3/2 in parentheses):

Michael Bennet (D-inc): 41 (39)

Jane Norton (R): 46 (48)

Some other: 5 (7)

Not sure: 8 (6)

Michael Bennet (D-inc): 40 (38)

Ken Buck (R): 44 (44)

Some other: 3 (6)

Not sure: 12 (11)

Michael Bennet (D-inc): 39 (40)

Tom Wiens (R): 45 (43)

Some other: 4 (7)

Not sure: 12 (11)

Andrew Romanoff (D): 38 (42)

Jane Norton (R): 49 (44)

Some other: 5 (6)

Not sure: 8 (9)

Andrew Romanoff (D): 37 (40)

Ken Buck (R): 45 (41)

Some other: 4 (5)

Not sure: 13 (13)

Andrew Romanoff (D): 38 (41)

Tom Wiens (R): 45 (41)

Some other: 6 (6)

Not sure: 11 (13)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

CT-Gov (4/1, likely voters, 2/1 in parentheses):

Ned Lamont (D): 37 (40)

Tom Foley (R): 44 (37)

Some other: 7 (9)

Not sure: 13 (14)

Ned Lamont (D): 41 (41)

Michael Fedele (R): 38 (33)

Some other: 9 (8)

Not sure: 12 (18)

Dan Malloy (D): 35 (37)

Tom Foley (R): 44 (36)

Some other: 8 (10)

Not sure: 14 (18)

Dan Malloy (D): 40 (36)

Michael Fedele (R): 37 (35)

Some other: 7 (9)

Not sure: 16 (21)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

CT-Sen (4/7, likely voters, 3/2 in parentheses):

Richard Blumenthal (D): 52 (58)

Rob Simmons (R): 38 (32)

Some other: 4 (3)

Not sure: 6 (7)

Richard Blumenthal (D): 55 (60)

Linda McMahon (R): 35 (31)

Some other: 3 (3)

Not sure: 6 (7)

Richard Blumenthal (D): 58 (57)

Peter Schiff (R): 32 (27)

Some other: 4 (6)

Not sure: 6 (10)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

FL-Sen (R primary) (4/8, likely voters, 3/18 in parentheses):

Marco Rubio (R): 57 (56)

Charlie Crist (R): 28 (34)

Some other: 3 (1)

Not sure: 12 (8)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

IL-Gov (4/5, likely voters, 3/8 in parentheses):

Pat Quinn (D-inc): 38 (37)

Bill Brady (R): 45 (47)

Some other: 7 (6)

Not sure: 10 (9)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

IL-Sen (4/5, likely voters, 3/8 in parentheses):

Alexi Giannoulias (D): 37 (44)

Mark Kirk (R): 41 (41)

Some other: 8 (5)

Not sure: 13 (10)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

KY-Sen (3/31, likely voters, 3/2 in parentheses):

Jack Conway (D): 36 (34)

Rand Paul (R): 50 (49)

Some other: 3 (4)

Not sure: 11 (13)

Jack Conway (D): 32 (31)

Trey Grayson (R): 52 (49)

Some other: 5 (6)

Not sure: 11 (14)

Dan Mongiardo (D): 37 (34)

Rand Paul (R): 52 (51)

Some other: 3 (3)

Not sure: 8 (12)

Dan Mongiardo (D): 33 (33)

Trey Grayson (R): 53 (46)

Some other: 5 (5)

Not sure: 9 (16)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

LA-Sen (4/, likely voters, 3/10 in parentheses):

Charlie Melancon (D): 36 (34)

David Vitter (R-inc): 52 (57)

Some other: 4 (3)

Not sure: 8 (6)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

MA-Gov (4/5, likely voters, 3/8 in parentheses):

Deval Patrick (D): 35 (35)

Charlie Baker (R): 27 (32)

Tim Cahill (I): 23 (19)

Not sure: 15 (14)

Deval Patrick (D): 38 (34)

Christy Mihos (R): 15 (19)

Tim Cahill (I): 33 (30)

Not sure: 14 (16)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

MO-Sen (4/6, likely voters, 3/9 in parentheses):

Robin Carnahan (D): 42 (41)

Roy Blunt (R): 48 (47)

Some other: 3 (4)

Not sure: 7 (8)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

NH-Gov (4/7, likely voters, 3/8 in parentheses):

John Lynch (D-inc): 47 (50)

John Stephen (R): 37 (35)

Some other: 5 (2)

Not sure: 11 (14)

John Lynch (D-inc): 50 (51)

Jack Kimball (R): 34 (32)

Some other: 4 (3)

Not sure: 12 (13)

John Lynch (D-inc): 50 (54)

Karen Testerman (R): 33 (28)

Some other: 6 (5)

Not sure: 11 (14)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

NH-Sen (4/7, likely voters, 3/8 in parentheses):

Paul Hodes (D): 35 (37)

Kelly Ayotte (R): 50 (47)

Some other: 4 (4)

Not sure: 11 (12)

Paul Hodes (D): 37 (36)

Bill Binnie (R): 49 (46)

Some other: 4 (4)

Not sure: 10 (14)

Paul Hodes (D): 39 (42)

Ovide Lamontagne (R): 44 (38)

Some other: 7 (5)

Not sure: 11 (15)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

NV-Gov (3/31, likely voters, 3/3 in parentheses):

Rory Reid (D): 43 (44)

Jim Gibbons (R-inc): 45 (36)

Some other: 8 (15)

Not sure: 4 (4)

Rory Reid (D): 34 (35)

Brian Sandoval (R): 55 (53)

Some other: 6 (7)

Not sure: 4 (5)

Rory Reid (D): 38 (37)

Mike Montandon (R): 45 (42)

Some other: 9 (13)

Not sure: 8 (8)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

NV-Sen (3/31, likely voters, 3/3 in parentheses):

Harry Reid (D-inc): 39 (38)

Sue Lowden (R): 54 (51)

Some other: 4 (7)

Not sure: 2 (3)

Harry Reid (D-inc): 42 (37)

Danny Tarkanian (R): 49 (50)

Some other: 6 (9)

Not sure: 2 (4)

Harry Reid (D-inc): 40 (38)

Sharron Angle (R): 51 (46)

Some other: 6 (11)

Not sure: 3 (5)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

PA-Sen (4/12, likely voters, 3/15 in parentheses):

Arlen Specter (D-inc): 40 (40)

Pat Toomey (R): 50 (49)

Some other: 4 (5)

Not sure: 6 (7)

Joe Sestak (D): 36 (37)

Pat Toomey (R): 47 (42)

Some other: 5 (7)

Not sure: 12 (15)

(MoE: ±3%)

PA-Sen (D primary) (4/12, likely voters, 3/15 in parentheses):

Arlen Specter (D-inc): 44 (48)

Joe Sestak (D): 42 (37)

Some other: 4 (5)

Not sure: 10 (9)

(MoE: ±5%)

UT-Gov (4/8, likely voters, no trendlines):

Peter Corroon (D): 29

Gary Herbert (R-inc): 57

Some other: 4

Not sure: 10

(MoE: ±3%)

UT-Sen (R primary) (4/8, likely voters):

Bob Bennett (R-inc): 37

Tim Bridgewater (R): 14

Mike Lee (R): 14

Merrill Cook (R): 6

Cherilyn Eagar (R): 4

Some other: 3

Not sure: 21

(MoE: ±4%)

WA-Sen (4/6, likely voters, 3/9 in parentheses):

Patty Murray (D-inc): 48 (46)

Dino Rossi (R): 46 (49)

Some other: 3 (3)

Not sure: 4 (2)

Patty Murray (D-inc): 48 (48)

Don Benton (R): 40 (37)

Some other: 4 (3)

Not sure: 8 (12)

Patty Murray (D-inc): 47 (49)

Clint Didier (R): 37 (30)

Some other: 5 (6)

Not sure: 11 (15)

Patty Murray (D-inc): 46 (47)

Chris Widener (R): 37 (32)

Some other: 5 (5)

Not sure: 12 (16)

Patty Murray (D-inc): 45 (NA)

Paul Akers (R): 37 (NA)

Some other: 5 (NA)

Not sure: 13 (NA)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

House candidate filing rolls on and on

With candidate filing now closed in 28 states (as per the SSP election calender)it is time to pause, take a deep breath, and have a look at how both parties are traveling vis a vis candidate recruitment for the House of Representatives.

Below the fold for all the details and hey go check out the 2010 Race Tracker Wiki over at Open Congress for all your House, Senate and Gubernatorial needs.

State      No of CD’s    D    R

Alabama         7CD      4    7

Arkansas        4CD      4    4

California      53CD     51   52

Idaho           2CD      2    2

Illinois        19CD     19   18

Indiana         9CD      9    9

Iowa            5CD      5    5

Kentucky        6CD      6    6

Maine           2CD      2    2

Mississippi     4CD      4    4

Missouri        9CD      8    9

Montana         1CD      1    1

Nebraska        3CD      3    3

Nevada          3CD      3    3

New Jersey      13CD     13   13

New Mexico      3CD      3    3

North Carolina  13CD     13   13

North Dakota    1CD      1    1

Ohio            18CD     18   18

Oregon          5CD      5    5

Pennsylvania    19CD     18   18

South Carolina  6CD      6    6

South Dakota    1CD      1    1

Tennessee       9CD      9    9

Texas           32CD     26   32

Utah            3CD      3    3

Virginia        11CD Parties can nominate candidates until May 15th

West Virginia   3CD      3    3

TOTAL           316      302  313

So the GOP are contesting 11 more House districts than us.

In 2006 We contested 425 and in 2008 421. This year we will be lucky to get to 410. As for the GOP they are well on the way to contesting 430 or so; which would be a record.

What a shame.

GA-Sen: Thurmond Will Challenge Isakson

In today’s digest, we mentioned that Georgia Labor Commissioner Michael Thurmond was leaning towards a bid against frosh GOP Sen. Johnny Isakson. That was a nice bit of unexpected good news, considering that most of the chatter surrounding a Thurmond candidacy seemed purely grounded on hypothetical speculation. It now looks like you can take a Thurmond candidacy to the bank:

State Labor Commissioner Michael Thurmond, a Democrat, on Tuesday will announce his entrance into the U.S. Senate race against Republican Johnny Isakson.

Thurmond, one two remaining Democrats holding statewide office, had been spoken of as a candidate for lieutenant governor.

But many Democrats had expressed concern that a strong bid for governor could be affected by the lack of a strong candidate at the top of the ticket running against Isakson.

While a recent R2K poll gave Isakson a 53-26 lead over Thurmond, this is still good news all around for Georgia Democrats. Thurmond’s candidacy will be expected to help gin up turnout among African-American voters, and perhaps enjoy some reciprocal benefits from the gubernatorial candidacy of ex-Gov. Roy Barnes.