Month: January 2010

It’s over:

Ending months of speculation, Las Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman announced today that he will not run for governor and will instead focus on promoting the city and improving its economy.

“It has been a great ride and I have 15 more months on this ride,” he said of the time left in his third and final term as mayor. “I’m going to keep myself busy for the next 15 months.”

Goodman was also asked if he’d consider running for Senate, and the answer there is no, too. So it looks like we’re stuck with these dorks in November.

Though the Delaware Senate race is not lost yet for Democrats, the main issue right now is finding a replacement candidate to fill the hole left by the guy who most considered likely to run (until recent weeks), Beau Biden.

Incumbent Sen. Ted Kaufman says he won’t seek a full term, and Lt. Gov. Matt Denn, a rising star in the local party, has decided to stay put (he’s been in that office for only a year).

The biggest fish left in the pond appears to be New Castle County Executive Chris Coons, who says he’s he’s seriously considering it:

One early name mentioned as a possible Democratic challenger to Castle is New Castle County Executive Chris Coons, who represents a majority of the state’s population. Coons told POLITICO Monday he is “seriously considering” a bid.

“I’ve received several calls from community leaders and friends encouraging me to run for the open seat for United States Senate,” he said. “I am seriously considering running for the open seat. I need some time to meet with my family and those close to me. I expect to make a decision in the next few days.”

Coons trailed Castle by 51-39 in the latest poll of this race, but he’d at least stand a fighting chance if he could mount a competent campaign. Remember, for all Castle’s strength, he is still a pretty old guy in the sunset of his electoral career — Coons, in his ’40s, will at least have that contrast in his favor.

UPDATE: Ex-Lt. Gov. John Carney, currently running for Castle’s open seat in the House, won’t switch races, either.

RaceTracker: DE-Sen

• Site News: SSP is instituting a one-week waiting period for new users to post diaries. New accounts can still post comments right away.

• AL-Sen: This race has to rank somewhere around 32 or 33 in order of likelihood to change hands among Senate races this November, but at least we’re showing up to compete: Birmingham-area attorney William Barnes announced that he’ll run against Richard Shelby for Team Blue. It’s his first run for office, and he says it’ll be a “total grassroots” effort (which I think is code for “can’t self-finance”).

• AZ-Sen: J.D. Hayworth and Dana Rohrabacher always seemed like kindred spirits in their particularly loudmouthed version of ultra-conservatism. That seems to continue today, as the Orange County Congressman gave his former colleague his first big-name endorsement in his newly-minted primary challenge to John McCain.

• MA-Sen (pdf): There’s a wealth of data in the Washington Post’s post-game poll of the Massachusetts special election; it’s well-worth looking through the whole memo. As with other polls, it points to a confluence of Republican enthusiasm and a Democratic failure to define the opposition (or themselves). Interestingly, only 60% of Brown voters say they favor Republican policies in Congress, and only 19% of them want him to work mostly to oppose Democratic policies instead of working to get Republican ideas into Democratic policy.

• NY-Sen-B: His helicopter’s warming up on the launch pad: Harold Ford Jr. seems to be moving closer to a Senate primary run. An ally says he’s “80 percent” likely to run, and various steps he’s taking suggest he’s getting his ducks in a row – reserving web domains, and even crisscrossing the state, visiting that previously unknown sixth borough of New York City known as “Buffalo.”

• WA-Sen: Republican insiders seem to be wondering if they can use the Massachusetts results to coax a top-tier (or any-tier, really) Republican to get into the race against Patty Murray. The problem for them is that there are really only two GOPers who are appealing and moderate enough to play at the statewide level, and AG Rob McKenna already seems to have his ticket booked for a 2012 gubernatorial run. That leaves Rep. Dave Reichert, whose spokesperson made a run sound unlikely, while still saying he “is not one to shut doors on any opportunity.”

• IL-Gov: It may be news to you that someone named Bob Schillerstrom was running for Governor. Apparently it was news to the people of Illinois, too, as he dropped out at a strangely late stage (after consistently polling in the low single digits) and endorsed ex-AG Jim Ryan for the Republican nod. Schillerstrom’s lack of traction is kind of strange, since, as DuPage County Board Chairman, he has nearly a million constituents. His name will remain on the ballots, which have already been printed.

• MD-Gov: The one elected Republican who seemed to be following through on running for Maryland governor decided against it and opted for a different course instead. State Del. Patrick McDonough is now running for Baltimore County Executive. McDonough had previously said he wouldn’t run if ex-Gov. Bob Ehrlich tried for a rematch, and while Ehrlich hasn’t done anything public on that end, McDonough said he thinks Ehrlich is planning to do it.

• OH-Gov: More polling bad news for incumbent Democratic Gov. Ted Strickland: he’s trailing ex-Rep. John Kasich 51-45 in the new poll from the Univ. of Cincinnati. (Strickland led 49-46 in their previous poll in October.) One bit of the poll gives Strickland a potential way forward, though, if he can get his messaging to work: “When asked who’s to blame for Ohio’s economic misery, Bush ranked first, at 24 percent, followed by Wall Street and financial institutions at 23 percent and the U.S. Congress, 19 percent. President Barack Obama got the blame from 13 percent while just 3 percent blamed Strickland.”

• PA-Gov: Another poorly-kept rumor panned out to be true: that wealthy Philadelphia businessman Tom Knox was going to drop out of the race and endorse Allegheny Co. Exec Dan Onorato, which happened over the weekend. Knox said he could have funded a big ad blitz to get competitive (he’d been polling in single digits) but didn’t want to hand ammunition to the Republicans. It’s unclear whether the big beneficiary here is Onorato, though, or ex-Rep. Joe Hoeffel, who benefits from being the only Philadelphia-area candidate left.

• SC-Gov: Looks like Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer isn’t going to lay claim to the mantle of “compassionate conservatism” any time soon. The would-be successor to Mark Sanford compared poor people to stray animals over the weekend, saying: “You’re facilitating the problem if you give an animal or a person ample food supply. They will reproduce, especially ones that don’t think too much further than that.” He tried walking that back today, regretting his choice of words and also adding that he’s “not against animals,” either.

• UT-Gov: Enthusiasm about our chances in the Utah governor’s race, thanks to the entry of Salt Lake County Mayor Peter Corroon and a recent Deseret News poll showing a competitive race, has to be tempered by the new Mason-Dixon poll of the race on behalf of the Salt Lake Tribune. They find incumbent GOP Gov. Gary Herbert with a more substantial lead over Corroon, 55-30.

• WY-Gov: Former US Attorney Matt Mead made his widely-anticipated entry into the race official, as the backlog of top-tier Republicans running for the state house continues to grow. There’s still no word from incumbent Dem Dave Freudenthal on what his plans are, regarding the possibility of challenging the state’s term limits law and running for another term.

• PA-08: Ex-Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick had only a short exploratory period before an official launch of his campaign to get back his seat from Rep. Patrick Murphy; he announced his candidacy at a public appearance on Saturday.

• PA-10: Some Dude named Ted Yale announced his candidacy on the Republican side in the 10th. Considering that the news story doesn’t even note his occupation, I’m not convinced Yale poses much of a threat, but there is something more interesting buried in the article… former US Attorney Thomas Marino is now “expected” to announce his candidacy next week.

• Retread watch: Can you believe that more than 20 former House Republicans are running again this year, either for Senate, governor, their old seat or, in the case of Richard Pombo, some completely other seat? The Hill runs down the full list.

• Redistricting: Republicans have realized that the way back to power lies in the state legislatures, via their control over the post-2010 redistricting process in most states, and they’re budgeting accordingly. A new enterprise, the American Majority Project, and an old one, the Republican State Leadership Committee, are looking to get more involved in closely-controlled legislatures, and they have some big-name backers involved.

Mason-Dixon (1/18-20, likely voters):

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 39

Gilbert Baker (R): 43

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 43

Jim Holt (R): 37

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 40

Curtis Coleman (R): 39

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 41

Conrad Reynolds (R): 38

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 43

Kim Hendren (R): 38

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 41

Tom Cox (R): 38

(MoE: ±4%)

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 52

Bill Halter (D): 34

Blanche Lincoln (D-inc): 63

Bob Johnson (D): 22

(MoE: ±6%)

Mason-Dixon takes a first look at the Arkansas Senate race (on behalf of the Arkansas News Bureau), and while the results are still pretty ugly, they’re not as bad as some other pollsters have seen it — to the extent that there’s actually a path to victory for Lincoln. Not that it’s really in her control: she just needs to hope that the GOP manages to nominate one of the seven dwarves populating the GOP field, instead of the somewhat more appealing state Sen. Gilbert Baker (who leads her by 4)… or more ominously, that Rep. John Boozman doesn’t decide to get into the race, at which point the game would likely be over. Mason-Dixon also find her currently surviving potential Democratic primary challenges (from the left from Lt. Gov. Bill Halter or from the right from state Sen. President Bob Johnson — both of which have been rumored, but nothing tangible has happened yet).

With Lincoln’s stock palpably sinking, there have been persistent rumors that the DSCC is telling Lincoln behind-the-scenes that she might want to consider getting out of the way, Chris Dodd-style. Unfortunately, there’s no Richard Blumenthal waiting in the wings in the Wonder State, making this rumor seem unlikely — although there was a whiff of a rumor of a Wesley Clark run in her place (or a run by Rep. Mike Ross, which would probably generate much less netroots enthusiasm than a Clark run — although that could create a New Mexico-2008 type scenario where every House seat in the state is open). Lincoln herself acted this morning to bat down these rumors, saying she’s under no pressure to retire and doesn’t plan to do so, despite consistently polling in the 40% range.

RaceTracker Wiki: AR-Sen

Rasmussen (1/21 & 24, likely voters):

Evan Bayh (D-inc): 44

Mike Pence (R): 47

Other: 3

Not sure: 7

Evan Bayh (D-inc): 44

John Hostettler (R): 41

Other: 3

Not sure: 12

Evan Bayh (D-inc): 45

Marlin Stutzman (R): 33

Other: 5

Not sure: 16

(MoE: ±3.5%)

Is there a Republican candidate out there sitting on a fence who needs some convincing to enter a race? Count on Rasmussen to ride to the rescue! With the news that Republican Rep. Mike Pence was thinking about a run against entrenched, moneybags Evan Bayh in the Indiana Senate race, Rasmussen did a quick poll finding that Pence is right in the thick of things, leading Bayh by 3. (They also find ex-Rep. John Hostettler, a much flakier and less disciplined presence than Pence, within striking distance of Bayh.) Pence, for what it’s worth, said he’d make a decision over the weekend, but no response yet as of this morning.

Given the downturn in Democrats’ fortunes lately, especially in the red states, it’s not a surprise to see a Republican competitive here. Still, something’s a little weird here: Bayh is well up in the safety zone, with an approval of 58% (and 38% disapprove, with a shockingly low 4% not sure). Is this a Dorgan-style result where his popularity is trumped by the state’s lean? No, because there’s no Hoeven-style figure looming with even greater popularity. Still, the Republicans also seem to have strangely high approvals, despite, one would assume, being little-known outside their own districts: Pence is at 54/25, and Hostettler (out of the picture since 2006) is at 44/27.

RaceTracker Wiki: IN-Sen

Tears for fears:

Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden (D) will not run for Senate this year, a serious setback to Democratic hopes of retaining a seat that was long held by Biden’s father, Vice President Joseph Biden.

“I have a duty to fulfill as Attorney General – and the immediate need to focus on a case of great consequence. And that is what I must do. Therefore I cannot and will not run for the United States Senate in 2010. I will run for re-election as Attorney General,” Beau Biden said in a statement released Monday morning. […]

It’s not clear yet who would seek the Democratic nomination if party officials cannot convince Kaufman to do so. One possibility is Chris Coons, the elected executive of New Castle County, which includes Wilmington.

In the polling we’ve seen of this race so far, Beau Biden was the only Democrat who began the race in a clearly competitive position with Castle. For instance, an October poll by Research 2000 had Beau trailing Castle by a single point, whereas Castle led Coons by 12, ex-Lt. Gov. John Carney by 8, and incumbent Ted Kaufman by 14.

With Democrats now behind the 8-ball in this state, SSP is changing our rating of this race from Tossup to Lean Republican.

RaceTracker: DE-Sen

The upcoming 2010 mid-term elections are causing me some mild anxiety, and I don’t know if there is an appropriate historical model for this election.  I’m asking for some insight from the SSP nation on what they see is the best historical model.

Facts

1.  A moderately popular Democratic President currently occupies the White House, although his popularity is not as strong as the day he was sworn in.

2.  The United States’ economy is hopefully in “recovery” mode from The Great Recession.  Most of the events leading to The Great Recession began under the Bush Administration.

3.  The opposition to the Obama administration is energized (note:  I don’t necessarily believe that “opposition” is solely the Republican base.  Certain factions within the Tea Party movement seems to be at odds with both the Obama Administration and the Republicans that were in power during the Bush Administration).

4.  Health Care legislation.  This is not to debate the health care legislation, but instead to compare how the electorate reacted to other administrations’ attempts to pass meaningful health care reform.

5.  Since the 2004 elections, the Democrats have (net) gained 14 seats in the Senate, 54 seats in the House, and the White House.

6.  The United States has 2 wars, 1 in Iraq and 1 in Afghanistan.

Mid-term elections in the past

I haven’t included all the mid-term elections in the past, but instead a select sample that we may compare to the current environment:

1930 mid-term elections.  The Stock Market crashed in October 1929, and the Great Depression was sinking into the United States.  Democrats won 8 seats in the Senate, and 52 seats in the House.

1934 mid-term elections.  Combining the results from the 1930 and 1932 elections, the Democrats had already picked up 149 seats in the House and 21 seats in the Senate, plus a new Democratic President.  In the 1934 mid-terms, the Democrats picked up an additional 9 seats in both the House and the Senate.  During this time FDR passed some key New Deal legislation.

1938 mid-term elections. Although in 1936 the Democrats won an additional 12 seats in the House and 6 seats in the Senate, there was certain opposition to some of FDR’s “court-packing” plan.  In addition, a recession hit the United States around 1937.  In 1938, the Democrats lost 7 seats in the Senate and 72 seats in the House.

1946 mid-term elections.  Harry Truman is now President, but he’s not a popular President.  At the time, Truman was not considered by most to be as presidential as FDR.  Although WWII was over, the Dems becaming the minority party, losing 55 seats in the House and 12 seats in the Senate.

1966 mid-term elections.  After the 1964 elections, with LBJ winning in a land-slide, the Dems had a 295-140 advantage in the House and a 67-33 advantage in the Senate.  The LBJ introduced the Great Society, which included Medicare/Medicaid.  In addition, the Vietnam war had heated up.  The Dems lost 48 seats in the house and 3 seats in the senate.

1978 mid-term elections.  In 1976, the United States elected a Georgian named Jimmy Carter.  Jimmy Carter was considered an honest man who could clean up DC.  Instead, President Carter fought with his own party over various issues.  The economy wasn’t strong, but it wasn’t yet weak from subsequent stagflation.  In the 1978 mid-terms, the Dems lost 3 seats in the Senate and 15 seats in the House.

1982 mid-term elections.  The United States elected former California Governor and former actor Ronald Reagan as President.  However, the economy was in recession with inflation and unemployment high.  Although Reagan is charismatic, his popularity had started to plunge.  In the 1982 mid-terms, the Dems gained 27 seats in the House.  The Senate, in Republican control (54-46) did not change.

1994 mid-term elections.  Bill Clinton was elected 2 years prior with 43% of the vote, and he pushed some ambitious legislation to Congress.  Gun-control legislation passed, but Health-care reform died.  The Dems lost 54 seats in the house and 8 seats in the Senate.  The Republicans are now in control.

As most of you can see, the current 2010 elections are not exactly like any of the above, but all of them have certain similarities to the current environment.  Please vote on which model is the closest to our current situation.  I’d like any additional thoughts to this diary.

Beau Biden announces that he is running for re-election to AG in Delaware:

http://www.delawareliberal.net…

(I apologize for the very brief diary, but I wanted to post it as soon as possible)

Another firehose-blast of Rasmussen polls….

AZ-Sen (1/20, likely voters, 11/18 in parens):

John McCain (R-inc): 53 (45)

J.D. Hayworth (R): 31 (43)

Chris Simcox (R): 4 (4)

Other: 3 (2)

Undecided: 8 (7)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

CA-Gov (1/19, likely voters, 9/24 in parens):

Jerry Brown (D): 43 (44)

Meg Whitman (R): 39 (35)

Other: 7 (3)

Undecided: 11 (18)

Jerry Brown (D): 45 (45)

Steve Poizner (R): 35 (32)

Other: 9 (5)

Undecided: 11 (18)

Dianne Feinstein (D): 43

Meg Whitman (R): 42

Other: 6

Undecided: 9

Steve Poizner (R): 39

Dianne Feinstein (D): 43

Other: 8

Undecided: 10

(MoE: ±4.5%)

GA-Gov (1/20, likely voters, no trendlines):

Roy Barnes (D): 42

John Oxendine (R): 44

Other: 6

Undecided: 8

Roy Barnes (D): 43

Nathan Deal (R): 42

Other: 7

Undecided: 8

Roy Barnes (D): 43

Karen Handel (R): 42

Other: 5

Undecided: 10

Thurbert Baker (D): 32

John Oxendine (R): 50

Other: 8

Undecided: 10

Thurbert Baker (D): 32

Nathan Deal (R): 49

Other: 7

Undecided: 11

Thurbert Baker (D): 34

Karen Handel (R): 46

Other: 8

Undecided: 11

(MoE: ±4.5%)

MO-Sen (1/19, likely voters, 12/15 in parens):

Robin Carnahan (D): 43 (46)

Roy Blunt (R): 49 (44)

Some other: 3 (4)

Not sure: 5 (6)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

NY-Gov (1/18, likely voters, 11/17 in parens):

David Paterson (D-inc): 38 (37)

Rick Lazio (R): 45 (41)

Other: 9 (13)

Undecided: 8 (8)

Andrew Cuomo (D): 54 (57)

Rick Lazio (R): 35 (29)

Other: 5 (6)

Undecided: 7 (9)

(MoE: ±4.5%)

NY-Sen-B (1/18, likely voters, no trendlines):

Kirsten Gillibrand (D-inc): 39

Republican Candidate: 34

Harold Ford, Jr. (I): 10

Not sure: 17

(MoE: ±4.5%)

PA-Sen (primary) (1/18, likely voters, 12/8 in parens):

Arlen Specter (D-inc): 40 (42)

Pat Toomey (R): 49 (46)

Other: 4 (4)

Undecided: 8 (8)

Joe Sestak (D): 35 (38)

Pat Toomey (R): 43 (44)

Some other: 6 (6)

Not sure: 16 (13)

(MoE: ±3%)

Arlen Specter (D-inc): 53 (48)

Joe Sestak (D): 32 (35)

Other: 4 (3)

Not sure: 11 (14)

(MoE: ±5%)

[A note to the winners: Please email me your address so that I can send you your babka! – DavidNYC]

So, I’m lazy and took my sweet time in writing this up. In my defense, Martha Coakley happened, and I chose to distract myself by working on more datasets for Dave’s App. I won’t steal Dave’s thunder, and I’ll leave it to him to announce any news on his time.

Nevertheless, here are the results from the Great Swing State Project Redistricting Contest, Round 1.

Some specifics first. I received 18 entries that were judgable; if I was missing anything from you, I tried my best to reach out and get everything I needed to judge your entry.

Of the 18 entries, with David’s generosity, I selected two winners: abgin, and MattTX2.

The first, I hope, is of no surprise – abgin’s 28-0 map, I think, made everyone’s jaw drop in its brilliance/hideousness/all-around-awesomeness. His/her entry was simply too good not to reward with babkaness!

For the other 17 entries, there was only one 26-2 plan, from silver spring. Three of you tried 28-0 plans, and the remaining 13 of you gave us 27-1 plans.

I tried to come up with some objective measures to help me consider them. Here are the two I considered:

1. To determine the amount of gerrymandering, I created a “county fragmentation index,” which indicates the number of “unnecessary” splits.

2. I also created a “swing index,” to measure quantitatively the improvements given to each district. I used a “safe line” concept (ala my New York State Senate district diary). Since reasonable people can disagree on what an appropriate safeline is, I evaluated each plan on safe lines at 1% increments from 50% Obama to 60% Obama.

Without further ado, I chose MattTX2 as the second winner. I thought he executed the screwing of Peter King in the most precise way, and as the first entrant, showed that this could be done (something I was skeptical of; I believed that the population simply wasn’t in place for that to happen.) His map also produced the best objective improvements, improving the 27 Democratic districts by an aggregate of 5,600 basis points in the 57-60% ranges, the best among the 27-1 plans. The performance, notably, didn’t drop off in the 54-56% range either. Matt’s map, compactness wise, wasn’t a horrendous gerrymander either; with 26 more county fragments than minimally necessary, this was solidly in the middle of the pack (the median, in fact.)

Here are improvement and county fragment scores for every entry.

I would be remiss in judging, though, if I didn’t mention some other notable entries:

• Abgin obviously had the loosest defintion of “contiguity”, but I think the award for loosest definition of “water contiguity” goes to andgarden.
• duffman gets the award for most compact map, creating just 11 more county fragments than necessary.
• bschak made the best attempts for population equality, acheiving a total deviation of only 3,902.
• AdmiralNaismith played population equality the loosest, racking up a total deviation of more than 113,000.
• Alibguy had the best 28-0 plan, yielding the best improvements from 52-60%.

In conclusion, thanks to everyone who participated, to Dave for developing this wonderful time-sink (I could never get GUIs down when programming), and to DavidNYC for giving me this opportunity to judge the contest, and for spreading the glory that is Green’s chocolate Babka! Congratulations again to abgin and MattTX2!

Update: I should better explain what the swing index is: the swing index is, in total, a slightly-adjusted measurement of the Democratic percentage improvement. The index is the sum, across all Democratic districts, of swings toward Obama in basis points.

When I say slightly adjusted, for example, I want to punish someone for unpacking Louise Slaughter’s district. So you have the Obama percentage before (Ob1), and the Obama percentage after (Ob2), and the “Safe line” percentage (SL).

So you have four situations:

1. Ob1 > SL, and Ob2 > SL: the district was above the safeline before, and the new district is above the safeline. The contribution to the swing index from the district is 0.

2. Ob1 < SL, and Ob2 > SL: the district used to be below the safeline, the new district was boosted above the safeline. The contribution to the swing index from the district is Ob2-Ob1, in basis points.

3. Ob1 > SL, and OB2 < SL: the old district was above the safeline, the new district was weakened. The contribution to the swing index from the district is SL-Ob2, in basis points. I did this so that you’re not being punished for an astronomic drop for a district that was much much too safe before, like Louise Slaughters.

4. Ob1 < SL, and OB2 < SL: the old and new districts are both in marginal territory; the new district could be stronger or weaker than the old. The contribution to the swing index from the district is Ob2-Ob1 in basis points. This can be positive or negative.

So I totaled up the numbers from each district, yielding the swing index that you see.

Also, the ones highlighted in green are the highest two indexes for a given safe line.

Lastly, the CFI is the “County Fragment Index” – the number of excess county fragments created over what is minimally necessary for 28 districts with perfect population equality.