Under-the-Radar House Races Cattle Call

Here’s one other activity for everyone in comments, one where you can genuinely help us out by doing some crowdsourcing. As you’ve probably noticed, the list of Dems on the House race ratings board keeps growing and growing, to the extent that the large majority of members in GOP-leaning or swing districts are already on there. However, in the interest of being thorough, we’re wondering if anyone else should be on there.

To help out, here’s a table of the remaining Dems in districts with a Cook PVI of D+10 or less. (I was going to stop at D+5, but that’d be a short list, and it seems like there are occasional rumors of vulnerable members that extend higher up the list than that.) So, with an eye toward commenters who actually live in or near these districts or are connected to them, we’re wondering: do any of the Dems in these districts have compelling opponents (or not-so-compelling ones who still have the money, or deep-pocketed third-party friends, to advertise)? Are any of them egregiously phoning their own campaigns in, not treating this year any differently than any other one? Are there any other under-the-radar reasons why we should be concerned about any of these races (i.e. minor scandals or ill-conceived votes that haven’t resonated outside the local media)?

District Rep. Cook
PVI
District Rep. Cook
PVI
OK-02 Boren R+14 NC-04 Price D+8
MN-07 Peterson R+5 CA-51 Filner D+8
TX-27 Ortiz R+2 MA-05 Tsongas D+8
TX-28 Cuellar R+0 IN-01 Visclosky D+8
IL-12 Costello D+3 OH-10 Kucinich D+8
TX-15 Hinojosa D+3 TX-20 Gonzalez D+8
TN-05 Cooper D+3 MA-03 McGovern D+8
NY-27 Higgins D+4 NY-18 Lowey D+9
NY-02 Israel D+4 MA-02 Neal D+9
NY-09 Weiner D+5 NJ-09 Rothman D+9
NC-13 Miller D+5 WA-01 Inslee D+9
WA-06 Dicks D+5 RI-02 Langevin D+9
TX-25 Doggett D+6 CT-03 DeLauro D+9
CT-02 Courtney D+6 NC-01 Butterfield D+10
MD-03 Sarbanes D+6 OH-09 Kaptur D+10
NY-21 Tonko D+6 NV-01 Berkley D+10
PA-13 Schwartz D+7 TX-16 Reyes D+10
MD-02 Ruppersberger D+7 NJ-08 Pascrell D+10
MA-06 Tierney D+7 MO-05 Cleaver D+10
TX-29 Green, G. D+7

A few of these races have had public polls where there was a wide margin (OK-02, CT-02); a few more have had the incumbent release a crushing internal in response to rumored close GOP polls that never really surfaced (MN-07, PA-13). (And one of them, of course, was on the board but got taken off thanks to a little Nazi problem.) But for most of them, we’re simply bereft of information… and that’s where you guys come in.

In case you’re wondering, there are only three Dem-held seats on the board that go higher up the list than this: the open seat race in RI-01 (D+13), John Dingell in MI-15 (D+13), and Barney Frank in MA-04 (D+14).

Senate Cattle Call (October 2010)

As October winds down, it’s time that we put up another Senate cattle call. By now, you should all be familiar with the rules: Rank the Senate seats that are up this year in order of likelihood of flipping from one party to the other. The traditional SSP way is to include seats held by both parties in a single list (separate lists make comparisons harder). Go as far down the list as you like.

It might also be helpful to indicate the cutoff point where you think the losses end and the retentions begin. But that’s up to you!

Firewall for the last 10 days.

With the spirit of FIGHT until the last day…

This is the code for some statewide offices included in the next boxes (quotes):

AG=Attorney General

SS=Secretary of State

ST=State Treasurer

SC=State Comptroller

SA=State Auditor

IC=Insurance Commissioner

CL=Commissioner of Labor

LIKELY GAINS FOR BOTH SIDES

The order is not the most important thing here.

REPUBLICAN LIKELY GAINS WHAT I ASSUME AT THIS POINT

SENATE (3D):

ND-Sen

IN-Sen

AR-Sen B Lincoln

GOVERNOR (7D):

WY-Gov

KS-Gov

TN-Gov

OK-Gov

OH-Gov T Strickland

MI-Gov

IA-Gov C Culver

HOUSE (25D):

TN-06

KS-03

LA-03

IN-08

AR-02

FL-02 A Boyd

TN-08

OH-16 J Boccieri

VA-02 G Nye

MI-01

NY-29

IL-11 D Halvorson

PA-03 K Dahlkemper

NH-01 C Shea-Porter

OH-01 S Driehaus

WI-07

WA-03

OH-15 M Kilroy

PA-11 P Karjorski

FL-24 S Kosmas

TX-17 C Edwards

VA-05 T Perriello

AR-01

WI-08 S Kagen

CO-04 E Markey

LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR (7D):

LA-LG

KS-LG

OK-LG

MI-LG

IA-LG

AR-LG

OH-LG

STATEWIDE OFFICES (15D):

AL-CAI (Commissioner of Agriculture and Industries)

AR-CSL (Commissioner of State Lands)

KS-SS C Biggs

OK-AG

KS-ST D McKinney

OK-ST

KS-AG S Six

OK-CL L Fields

GA-AG

FL-CFO (Chief Financial Officer)

IL-SC

OK-SA S Burrage

OK-IC K Holland

OH-AG R Cordray

AR-SS

In the other side the likely democratic gains would be:

SYMMETRIC CRITERION FOR THE DEMOCRATIC LIKELY GAINS

SENATE (0R):

GOVERNOR (5R+1I):

RI-Gov F Caprio

MN-Gov M Dayton

HI-Gov N Abercrombie

CT-Gov D Malloy

FL-Gov A Sink

CA-Gov J Brown

HOUSE (2R):

DE-AL J Carney

IL-10 D Seals

LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR (6R):

VT-LG S Howard

MN-LG Y Prettner Solon

HI-LG B Schatz

CT-LG N Wyman

FL-LG R Smith

CA-LG G Newsom

STATEWIDE OFFICES (3R):

NM-CPL (Commissioner of Public Lands) R Powell

CA-IC D Jones

VT-SA D Hoffer

Still they are not enough data for have a strong opinion about VT-LG, NM-CPL, CA-IC and VT-SA, My numbers tell what the democratic side can be favored.

That would give net loses until now of:

Senate: -3

Governor: – 1 (FL-Gov is a gain from the Independents)

House: -23

Lieutenant Governor: – 1

Statewide Offices: -12

This mean the democrats can not have net loses of 5 senate seats (looking to J Lieberman) and 16 house seats from the next Firewall for keep the majority in both chambers.

FIREWALL FOR FIGHT HARD THE LAST 10 DAYS.

LEVEL1: Hard work bust still some hope

SENATE (0D 1R):

KY-Sen J Conway

GOVERNOR (3D):

NM-Gov D Denish

PA-Gov D Onorato

WI-Gov T Barrett

HOUSE (11D 1R):

MS-01 T Childers

FL-08 A Grayson

AZ-01 A Kirkpatrick

PA-10 C Carney

MD-01 F Kratovil

CO-03 J Salazar

NM-02 H Teague

NY-19 J Hall

IL-14 W Foster

PA-07 B Lentz

TX-27 S Ortiz

WA-08 S DelBene

LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR (2D 1R):

NM-LG B Colon

WI-LG T Nelson

PA-LG H Scott Conklin

STATEWIDE OFFICES (0D):

This is the most difficult group of the firewall. If they are not enough money for all, the more difficult races of this group would have less help since my point.

LEVEL2: The pure Toss-Up zone

SENATE (2D):

WI-Sen R Feingold

NV-Sen H Reid

GOVERNOR (2D):

IL-Gov P Quinn

ME-Gov E Mitchell

HOUSE (18D 2R):

AZ-05 H Mitchell

ND-AL E Pomeroy

TN-04 L Davis

GA-08 J Marshall

MO-04 I Skelton

CA-11 J McNerney

MI-07 M Schauer

NY-23 W Owens

IL-17 P Hare

PA-08 P Murphy

NV-03 D Titus

TX-23 C Rodriguez

NC-02 B Etheridge

OH-18 Z Space

AZ-08 G Giffords

IL-08 M Bean

VA-11 G Connolly

OR-05 K Schrader

FL-12 L Edwards

AZ-03 J Hulburd

LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR (1D 1R):

IL-LG S Simon

SC-LG A Cooper

STATEWIDE OFFICES (10D 5R):

CA-AG K Harris

OK-SPI (Superintendent of Public Instruction) S Paddack

OH-ST K Boyce

AZ-AG F Rotellini

SC-SE (Superintendent of Education) F Holleman

GA-CL D Hicks

GA-CA (Commissioner of Agriculture) J Powell

CO-ST C Kennedy

IL-ST R Kelly

CO-SS B Buescher

AZ-ST A Cherny

IN-SS V Osili

SC-AG M Richardson

SD-SS B Nesselhuf

OH-SA D Pepper

In this group they are a decent number of underpolled races, some of them without no-one poll still.

LEVEL3: Democrats favored but with decent risk

SENATE (3D):

PA-Sen J Sestak

CO-Sen M Bennet

IL-Sen A Giannoulias

GOVERNOR (1D 1R):

OR-Gov J Kitzhaber

VT-Gov P Shumlin

HOUSE (15D 3R):

WV-01 M Oliverio

AL-02 B Bright

IN-09 B Hill

NC-08 L Kissell

SD-AL C Herseth-Sandlin

FL-22 R Klein

IA-03 L Boswell

OH-06 C Wilson

MS-04 G Taylor

PA-12 M Critz

NY-20 S Murphy

MA-10 W Keating

CO-07 E Perlmutter

NH-02 A Kuster

OH-13 B Sutton

FL-25 J Garcia

HI-01 C Hanabusa

LA-02 C Richmond

LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR (0D):

STATEWIDE OFFICES (4D):

OH-SS M O’Shaughnessy

IA-SS M Mauro

DE-ST C Flowers

NV-SC K Marshall

The republicans can win some of this races but I think will be few.

OFFICES BY STATE IN THE FIREWALL

IL=7 (Sen and Gov) Battleground state

PA=6 (Sen and Gov) Battleground state

CO=5 (Sen) Battleground state

OH=5

AZ=5

FL=4

WI=3 (Sen and Gov) Battleground state

NV=3 (Sen) Battleground state

NM=3 (Gov)

NY=3

GA=3

Other states have only 2 or 1 offices.

I wish recommend donate to the democratic candidates in the bold emphasized races.

The rest of the offices currently in democratic hands seem safer (including WV-Sen J Manchin, KY-06 B Chandler, SC-05 J Spratt, NC-07 M McIntyre and NY-24 M Arcuri as the more difficult seats). But still, for have not surprises I want some poll about:

STILL LOOKING FOR SOME POLL

STATEWIDE OFFICES (5):

VT-SS J Condos

OR-ST T Wheeler

MN-SA R Otto

NM-SS M Herrera

MO-SA S Montee

Still I have not enough strong opinion about the final result for many of the offices what I include in this firewall. I think is too early for it. I think the chance of keep the Senate in democratic hands is very high despite the risk of lose J Lieberman by party switch, and I concede not the House to the republicans. My numbers give not net gains of 8 senate seats or 50 house seats to the republicans .  

SSP Daily Digest: 10/22 (Afternoon Edition)

KY-Sen: The Beltway chattering class seems to have either moved on from “Aqua Buddha,” or taken it as a given that it just backfired on Jack Conway. Josh Green at the Atlantic does some actual, y’know, reporting on what’s happening on the ground, though, and finds that the ad (and its rebuttal), and their aftermath, are still completely driving the conversation in Kentucky. Local GOP pols still seem to think that Rand Paul will squeak by in the end, but it’s thrown him deeply off message and the refusal to debate again doesn’t look good on him. (UPDATE: Actually, Greg Sargent just reported that the Conway camp is taking down the Aqua Buddha ad. To clarify “taking down,” though, this was a planned move, as it reached the end of its original run, to be replaced by this sales tax ad.)

PA-Sen: Barack Obama will be making a four-state swing through the east coast and midwest over the weekend prior to the election; one of the stopping spots will be Philadelphia, where he’ll be doing a canvassing event. He’ll also be doing rallies in Chicago, Cleveland, and Bridgeport, Connecticut (indicating they’re still leaving nothing to chance with Richard Blumenthal).

CA-Gov: Meg Whitman breaking self-funding records has become something of a dog-bites-man story around here, but one more for old times sake: she spent $23 million in the first half of October, bringing her all-cycle total to $163 million. Jerry Brown, by contrast, spent $14.6 million in that period, bringing his all-cycle spending to $25 million.

CO-Gov: I doubt this is much of a game-changer, but it may help flip a few more Colorado Springs area votes in Tom Tancredo’s direction (if there were any Dan Maes supporters left there). Rep. Doug Lamborn became perhaps the most prominent elected Republican in Colorado to publicly come out in support of Tancredo, rather than Maes.

MN-Gov: The RGA must be seeing something the polls aren’t telling them, because they’re still fighting till the end in Minnesota. (Of course, if one committee has money to throw at unlikely races and see what sticks, it’s the RGA.) They just gave $1 million to third party group Minnesota Future to run more anti-Mark Dayton (and probably anti-Tom Horner) ads. (You may remember Minnesota Future from the whole Target contribution controversy. Interestingly, Hubbard Broadcasting, owner of local TV station KSTP, also was just identified as having given $25K to Minnesota Future. Y’know, because they’re part of that liberal lamestream media.)

FL-24: And here I’d thought we’d dodged something of a bullet when Karen Diebel got sent packing to spent more time guarding her swimming pool. Sandy Adams, who seems likely to be the next Representative for the Space Coast, has come out in favor of the “biblical teachings” rather than the theory of evolution. I look forward to hearing her proposals for a faith-based space program next.

ID-01: The Tea Party Express finally endorsed Raul Labrador in the 1st. However, that comes only after they tried to endorse Democratic incumbent Walt Minnick as their token Dem fig-leaf and he rejected the endorsement (over racist statements by one of their, at the time, key members).

Early voting: Ohio Democrats are pointing to an edge in early voting, where they’re leading 44 percent to 34 percent for Republicans in votes cast so far. The Republicans are claiming the edge after three days of early voting in Florida, with a 148,000 vote edge, although Dems pointed out that was about where the numbers were in the 2006 election.

Redistricting: Here’s a good counterpoint to several articles that have shrugged off the possible large Republican advantage on the redistricting front coming out of this election, one that actually looks at the actual number of House seats that are likely to be influenced. Extrapolating likely control of state governorships and legislatures, the GOP will have “untrammeled” control over 125 House seats while Dems will control only 62, a worse outcome than 1990 or 2000. (43 are in commission-based states or at-large states, with 205 drawn by divided governments.)

Chamber of Commerce: This article was been making the rounds, but it’s a must-read if you haven’t already done so and you’re interested in the “dark money” that’s swamping the transparent money, this cycle more than ever. The NYT digs into what corporations are using the national Chamber of Commerce as a pass-through for their contributions, including Prudential, Dow Chemical, and Dutch insurer Aegon.

SSP TV:

AZ-Sen: This looks like John McCain’s last ad, as it’s a soft-focus closing argument type of spot

CO-Sen: The League of Conservation Voters hits Ken Buck on environmental issues

DE-Sen: Here’s the first Chris Coons ad to take on Christine O’Donnell directly, saying she lives in the “Twilight Zone”

NV-Sen: Harry Reid rolls out endorsements from various local business leaders in his newest ad

WA-Sen: Waiting until the end to go after Dino Rossi for his anti-abortion stance seems to be tradition now, in order to swing any last-minute moderate women who haven’t decided, and the DSCC piles on

HI-Gov: Barack Obama, fresh off his Colleen Hanabusa spot, also cuts an ad touting Neil Abercrombie

RI-Gov: The DGA keeps pounding on Lincoln Chafee over the tax hikes he’d like (I’ve also heard the RGA is buying an ad here on behalf of John Robitaille, though I haven’t seen a link)

WV-03: Ewwww… Spike Maynard plays the terrorist card against Arab-American Rep. Nick Rahall

MoveOn: MoveOn seems to have saved their powder for one huge blast at the end, running ads in eight Senate races and 20 House races (here’s their WI-08 ad), helping only Dems who voted in favor of HCR

Sierra Club: The Sierra Club is out with ads boosting Democratic incumbents in FL-22, MI-07, and AZ-08

60+ Assoc.: The AARP’s evil doppelganger is running two spots, a two-fer in Arizona hitting both Raul Grijalva and Gabby Giffords, and… here’s a new one… Solomon Ortiz in TX-27

Rasmussen:

MN-Gov: Mark Dayton (D) 44%, Tom Emmer (R) 41%, Tom Horner (I) 10%

NY-Gov: Andrew Cuomo (D) 51%, Carl Paladino (R) 37%

NY-Sen: Charles Schumer (D-inc) 59%, Jay Townsend (R) 31%

SD-AL: Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (D-inc) 44%, Kristi Noem (R) 49%

SSP Daily Digest: 10/22 (Morning Edition)

  • AR-Sen (Mason-Dixon): Blanche Lincoln (D-inc) 34, John Boozman (R) 55
  • CA-Sen (Tarrance Group for NRSC): Barbara Boxer (D-inc) 44, Carly Fiorina (R) 44
  • CT-Sen, CT-Gov (PDF) (Suffolk): Richard Blumenthal (D) 57, Linda McMahon (R) 39; Dan Malloy (D) 49, Tom Foley (R) 38 (PDF of crosstabs)
  • Rather unusually, Suffolk included Blumenthal & Malloy twice in their head-to-head questions: once as the Dem candidate, and once as the Working Families Party candidate. Each got about 3-4% as the WFP candidate. I’ve never seen a pollster do this in New York, where the practice of fusion voting is best known.

  • IL-Gov (PPP): Pat Quinn (D-inc) 41 (35), Bill Brady (R) 42 (42)
  • FL-22 (Susquehanna for Sunshine State News): Ron Klein (D-inc) 44, Allen West (R) 47
  • MA-04 (Fleming & Associates for WPRI): Barney Frank (D-inc) 49, Sean Bielat (R) 37
  • MD-01 (Monmouth): Frank Kratovil (D-inc) 42, Andy Harris (R) 53
  • MI-03 (EPIC/MRA): Pat Miles (D) 37, Justin Amash (R) 46
  • MN-01 (Grove Insight (D) for Project New West): Tim Walz (D-inc) 50, Randy Demmer (R) 34
  • MS-04 (Tarrance Group (R) for Steven Palazzo): Gene Taylor (D-inc) 41, Steven Palazzo (R) 43
  • NC-11 (Greenberg Quinlan Rosner (D) for DCCC): Heath Shuler (D-inc) 54, Jeff Miller 39
  • NM-02 (Tarrance Group (R) for Steve Pearce): Harry Teague (D-inc) 41, Steve Pearce (R) 50
  • NY-20 (Public Opinion Strategies (R) for Chris Gibson): Scott Murphy (D-inc) 42, Chris Gibson 44
  • OR-05 (SurveyUSA for KATU-TV): Kurt Schrader (D-inc) 41, Scott Bruun (R) 51
  • Note: Among the 10% who have already voted, Schrader leads 47-46. This continues a pattern we’ve seen in other SUSA polls (and also some, but not all, of the early voting numbers by party registration).

  • PA-06 (Monmouth): Manan Trivedi (D) 44, Jim Gerlach (R-inc) 54
  • PA-17 (Susquehanna for ABC27 News): Tim Holden (D-inc) 58, Justin Argall (R) 28
  • TX-23 (OnMessage (R) for Quico Canseco): Ciro Rodriguez (D-inc) 39, Quico Canseco (R) 45
  • VA-02 (PDF) (Public Opinion Strategies (R) for Scott Rigell): Glenn Nye (D-inc) 41, Scott Rigell 46 (R)
  • VA-05 (Benenson Strategy Group (D) for Tom Perriello): Tom Perriello (D-inc) 46, Rob Hurt (R) 47
  • WA-08 (SurveyUSA for KING-TV): Suzan DelBene (D) 45 (45), Dave Reichert (R-inc) 52 (52)
  • Texas: No Enthusiasm Gap?

    I have been analyzing the available early/absentee vote totals from the first three days of voting in Texas.  Texas makes the cumulative early vote and absentee vote totals for the 15 most populous counties available, and also has day-by-day breakdowns available from previous years, providing great data for analysis.

    http://www.sos.state.tx.us/ele…

    Early vote numbers are up in every county.  So being that the numbers aren’t release by party, how can we tell who is turning out?  My choice was to arrange the 15 counties according to the performance of Barack Obama in the county, to get a rough idea of how Democratic the county is (arranging by Kay Bailey Hutchinson’s performance in 2006 gave a nearly identical inverse arrangement).  Then, I compared the 2010 vote so far to the vote in the county at this point in 2006, to see if there was a correlation between increased turnout this cycle and how Democratic the county was.  I then adjusted it for change in voter registration between 2006 and 2010.

    This chart shows that the average county has so far cast 1.8 votes for every vote cast in 2006.  The counties on the left voted more strongly for Obama, and the counties on the right voted more strongly for McCain.  There is a spike in the middle for two counties: Harris and Fort Bend, near Houston, which were both roughly split in the vote in 2008.  If you ignore them for now, and look at the turnout in Obama counties (52% or more Obama vote), in these counties 1.57 votes have been cast for every vote in 2006.  In the McCain counties (47% or less Obama vote), 1.65 votes have been cast for every vote in 2006.

    These numbers indicate that the advantage in Republican counties in Texas compared to Democratic counties is very slight, an advantage of 0.08 votes in 2010 for every vote in 2006.  No indication of Democrats getting crushed here.  What’s going on in Harris and Fort Bend?  My assumption is that these counties, being from the Houston area, are influenced by the presence of former Houston Mayor Bill White in the Governor’s race.  Whether people are coming out to vote for or against him, I can’t say.  I have seen it mentioned that turnout has been heavier in parts of Harris County that are more Republican-leaning, though I can’t confirm that, and it doesn’t seem to be part of a statewide trend.  Voters in urban, conservative Tarrant County are turning out at lower rate than urban, liberal Travis County.

    The turnout numbers as a percentage of registered voters seem to indicate that the partisan make-up of the county has little effect on turnout, so far.  In short: no enthusiasm gap.  There is one gap, though.  Among the top 15 most populous counties in Texas, the ones that voted for Obama (counting Harris) have cast 284,635 votes so far.  The ones that voted for McCain (counting Fort Bend) have cast 149,764 votes.

    UPDATE: Here is the graph with the 4 Houston metro area counties removed.  It’s clear that Bill White is having an effect on turnout in these counties, so I think comparing other areas of the state make a more clear apples-to-apples comparison.

    In the non-Houston counties, we have 1.57 votes in 2010 for every vote in 2006 in the Obama counties, and 1.47 votes in the McCain counties.  An enthusiasm gap which slightly favors Democratic counties!

    SSP Daily Digest: 10/21 (Afternoon Edition)

    AK-Sen: Congrats to Scott McAdams, who just cleared the McMillion hurdle with $1 million in fundraising so far. The majority of contributions were from Alaska, with 88% contributions of $200 or less.

    KY-Sen: Matt Taibbi’s new Rolling Stone article as he works the Rand Paul beat is a must-read even if it doesn’t have any revelations as freaky as the “Aqua Buddha” story, although there’s some vague and anonymous racism from the newsletter that his snarky secret society put out. The prize-winning quote, though, deals with the Tea Partiers don’t seem terribly phased by any of this:

    (“Well, I used to use that cologne myself,” was the response of one Tea Partier to a question I posed about “Aqua Buddha”)

    MO-Sen: American Crossroads has declared victory in Missouri, and is pulling out of advertising there, where Roy Blunt has a consistent but single-digit lead. (As for the actual party committees… well, it’s probably not relevant, seeing as how Crossroads and its ilk have made them basically irrelevant this year.)

    NV-Sen: Harry Reid racked up a couple endorsements from the big-in-Nevada gaming industry, including PokerPAC. He also got the endorsement of the former chair of the RNC, Frank Fahrenkopf, who warned of the threat Sharron Angle (with her ties to anti-gambling Gary Bauer) might pose to the state’s gaming industry.

    PA-Sen: Ah, sweet Schadenfreude. The Club for Growth is having to plug $1 million into the Pennsylvania Senate race in order to bail out their former boss, Pat Toomey.

    WI-Sen: Yet another story with Ron Johnson with his hand in the trough he so regularly decries: he says he’s not quite sure how five of his employees (and 10 dependents) at his plastics firm Pacur wound up on BadgerCare, the state’s health insurance program for the poor. That would seem to contradict previous statements from the Johnson camp that all Pacur full-time employees are covered by the company’s plan.

    AZ-07, AZ-08: I know John McCain has refudiated all his old mavericky ways, but did he actually have to go so far as to violate his signature piece of mavericky legislation, the McCain-Feingold Act? He recently cut spots for GOP candidates in the 7th and 8th, in which he and Jon Kyl appeared, and paid for them out of Friends of John McCain (his campaign committee). Dems have filed FEC complaints against McCain, saying that if he coordinated with the Ruth McClung and Jesse Kelly campaigns, he would’ve been limited to $4,800 contributions to each (they’d be legal independent expenditures if there was truly no coordination).

    CO-03, CO-04: The gang-that-couldn’t-shoot-straight strikes twice, in two different neighboring Old West districts. In the 3rd, an anti-abortion group has been hitting the airwaves attacking Ken Salazar. That’s fine, but Ken Salazar is the Secretary of Interior. His brother (the one with the mustache) is John Salazar, the Rep. from the 3rd. OK, understandable, since they’re brothers… but how do you explain the confusion in the 4th, where not just some outside group but the Cory Gardner campaign mixed up Betsy Markey with Massachusetts Rep. Ed Markey? They accused her of voting for the Obama budget, which she didn’t; that was the other Markey.

    FL-25: I don’t know how far this will get, but give local Dems in south Florida credit for audaciousness. A Joe Garcia backer filed a lawsuit trying to get David Rivera removed from the ballot. The suit alleges that Rivera should be removed because of state election finance disclosure irregularities, concerning Rivera’s mysterious claims of being a contractor to USAID despite USAID saying he wasn’t. While they cite a comparable case where a state senate candidate was recently stricken from the ballot from similar problems, I’m wondering if it may be too late to do anything about that even if it succeeds on the merits (although if it only serves to move the USAID deception into the spotlight, that’s good too).

    MO-04: More triage news… on the Republican side? Despite news of a Vicky Hartzler internal poll yesterday that showed a tied race, the NRCC is packing up, at least from the Kansas City market. I wonder if that has more to do with feeling neighboring KS-03 is locked down, as there are other smaller media markets in the 4th where they might still spend, but I think this has to count as at least a partial pullout.

    SD-AL: This is an interesting counterpoint to the anti-Pelosi (or at least Pelosi-skeptical) tide that seems to be rising among threatened Blue Dogs, including Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (who’s in the skeptic camp): GOP challenger Kristi Noem is saying that if she wins her race, she’s not sold yet on John Boehner as Republican leader, but would like to see who else might run. Recall that Noem previously politely told Sarah Palin to stay far away from her race, so this isn’t the first time she’s pantomimed independence.

    Early voting: There’s been some buzz today about a CBS News story that says that Dems are doing better than expected in early voting, although it’s kind of shy on actual numbers. It mentions that Dems have outpaced GOPers in early voting in Iowa, Maryland, North Carolina, and Clark Co., Nevada, while there’s a Republican edge in Florida and Colorado. Jon Ralston, of course, has more data on Nevada, while Politico has some Iowa tidbits, involving early ballot requests in IA-03 (where 50% of requests are from Dems, but where Dems are 36% of the electorate) and IA-02 (51% of the requests, 38% of the electorate).

    SSP TV:

    CO-Sen: Women’s Voices Women Vote Action Fund is out with a “high six-figure” buy in Colorado, with the first TV ad to take on Ken Buck’s failure to prosecute that 2005 rape case (the “buyer’s remorse” incident)

    KY-Sen: The DSCC hits Rand Paul on his support for the 23% sales (aka “fair”) tax

    NV-Sen: Sharron Angle wonders how Harry Reid made all that money in her new ad (helpful fact from Jon Ralston: he was a millionaire even before he was in the House)

    WV-Sen: Outsourcing seems to be the hot button issue coming out of focus groups that works for the Dems these days, as the DSCC keeps hitting John Raese on it with their new spot

    AZ-03: Jon Hulburd has another TV ad against Ben Quayle, poking at his values and overall maturity

    HI-01: Colleen Hanabusa’s new ad has a special guest star in the form of Barack Obama

    IN-09: The SEIU goes after Todd Young on Social Security privatization

    NH-01: Carol Shea-Porter, in her own ad, also works the SSP angle against Frank Guinta

    VA-05: Is the DCCC trying to drive up indie teabagger Jeffrey Clark’s numbers? They’re out with a spot hitting Robert Hurt for all the tax-raising he did in the state legislature

    Rasmussen:

    IL-Gov: Pat Quinn (D-inc) 37%, Bill Brady (R) 45%, Rich Whit(n)ey (G) 2%, Scott Lee Cohen (I) 6%

    MO-Sen: Robin Carnahan (D) 43%, Roy Blunt (R) 52%

    ND-AL: Earl Pomeroy (D-inc) 42%, Rick Berg (R) 52%

    NY-Sen-B: Kirsten Gillibrand (D-inc) 54%, Joe DioGuardi (R) 33%

    SC-Gov: Vincent Sheheen (D) 38%, Nikki Haley (R) 47%

    StephenCLE’s Election Rankings – October 21

    Welcome to this super-massive edition of StephenCLE’s Election Rankings:

    With election day now just 12 days away, in an effort to avoid spamming up the diaries area, I have combined all of my prognostications into one, industrial-sized effort. So here we go.  

    Ladies and gentlemen of SSP, I am frustrated.  I am also annoyed.  The reason for my trouble is that I don’t know what to believe.  This whole time, democrats in the House have been running ahead of the national generic ballot, and I held onto the belief that at some point, either the national polls or the state/district polls had to relent and fall in line with the other.  It now appears obvious that this is not likely.  This week actually saw most Senate democrats improving their position in all regions except for the west coast, and though some House democrats struggled this week, others improved their position.  Yet the generic ballot got worse for Team Blue, surging from a 4.5 point republican advantage last week to a 6-point lead in the most recent pollster.com average.  So now I’m stuck between trying to decide who is the real adjudicator of truth.  In most cases, I’m starting to hedge a bit on the individual district polls, subtracting a point or two from the democratic totals to attribute for the generic ballot.

    The other big development within the past week is that the playing field has expanded, not just on the democratic side, but the republican one as well.  Many R-leaning seats that appeared out of reach seem to be attainable for the democrats, prompting many leftward changes.  So without further ado, here’s where we stand:

    Old House – 256 Democrats, 179 Republicans

    New House – 219 Democrats, 216 Republicans

    National Swing – Republicans +37

    Democratic Pickups (6) – DE-1, FL-25, IL-10, LA-2, HI-1, WA-8

    Republican Pickups (43) – AR-1, AR-2, AZ-1, AZ-5, CA-11, CO-3, CO-4, FL-2, FL-8, FL-24, GA-8, IL-11, IL-14, IL-17, IN-8, KS-3, LA-3, MD-1, MI-1, MS-1, NH-1, ND-1, NC-8, NY-19, NY-29, OH-1, OH-15, OH-16, PA-3, PA-7, PA-10, PA-11, SC-5, TN-4, TN-6, TN-8, TX-17, TX-23, VA-2, VA-5, WA-3, WI-7, WI-8, WV-1

    Pickup Changes from last month:

    Democrat to Republican – AZ-5, IL-17, NC-8, NH-1, PA-10, TN-4, WV-1

    Republican to Democrat – NH-2, PA-8

    Net Seats Changing By Region:

    Northeast (New England & Mid-Atlantic) – R+8

    Southeast (Border South & Deep South) – R+15

    Midwest (Great Lakes & Plains) – R+10

    West (Rocky Mountains & Pacific Coast) – R+5

    The Map:

    US House 2010 - October 21

    Ratings Changes for October 13-20:

    1.New York-22 – Solid D to Lean D – It’s not good to lose your cool in politics.  For shame Hinchey.

    2.Ohio-10 – Solid D to Likely D – I’ve always thought Kucinich’s unpopularity could make this interesting.

    3.Maine-2 – Likely D to Solid D – Polling suggests that Michaud is pretty much safe now.

    4.Ohio-6 – Likely D to Lean D – Rumors of Wilson’s domestic abuse are disquieting.

    5.California-20 – Likely D to Lean D – The Central Valley could be intimidating, but Costa still leads.

    6.Arkansas-4 – Lean D to Likely D – Ross leading big in polling this week, is looking good.

    7.Pennsylvania-13 – Likely D to Solid D – Philly Burbs are moving back to Ds, good news for Schwartz.

    8.New York-23 – Lean D to Toss Up – 2-way race makes it harder on Owens to win.  

    9.New York-24 – Toss Up/Tilt D to Lean D – Arcuri has been surprisingly strong this cycle.

    10.New Jersey-12 – Likely D to Lean D – Polls show Holt only up by 5.

    11.Minnesota-1 – Likely D to Lean D – Walz in slightly tighter race than thought, but still ahead.

    12.Oregon-5 – Lean D to Toss Up/Tilt D – Schrader locked in a tight one with Bruun.

    13.Illinois-17 – Lean D to Toss Up/Tilt R – Hare got caught totally flatfooted, and the top of ticket sucks.

    14.North Carolina-8 – Lean D to Toss Up/Tilt R – This move is more national, Kissell’s probably eroded.

    15.New Hampshire-1 – Toss Up/Tilt D to Toss Up/Tilt R – Shea-Porter consistently behind in polling.

    16.New Hampshire-2 – Toss Up/Tilt R to Toss Up/Tilt D – Phenomenal surge by Kuster recently.

    17.Pennsylvania-3 – Toss Up/Tilt R to Lean R – Re-election chances slipping away for Dahlkemper.

    18.Pennsylvania-8 – Toss Up/Tilt R to Toss Up/Tilt D – Philly burbs going blue gets Murphy over hump.

    19.Pennsylvania-10 – Toss Up/Tilt D to Toss Up/Tilt R – District simply too red for Carney this year.

    20.Tennessee-4 – Toss Up/Tilt D to Toss Up/Tilt R – Dejarlais has lead, and generic ballot is scary.

    21.Washington-3 – Toss Up/Tilt R to Lean R – Herrera might win this without even campaigning.

    22.Arkansas-1 – Lean R to Toss Up/Tilt R – Causey still alive in close race with AR improving barely.

    23.Arizona-3 – Lean R to Toss Up/Tilt R – Hulburd lead from PPP means it’s game on here.

    24.Arizona-5 – Toss Up/Tilt D to Toss Up/Tilt R – Can’t make up my mind on this one, national move.

    25.West Virginia-1 – Toss Up/Tilt D to Toss Up/Tilt R – Same here, national move over local race.  

    26.California-44 – Likely R to Lean R – Hedrick showing competitive in polls, if only he had the cash.

    27.Tennessee-5 – Solid D to Likely D – The PVI suggests that Cooper could be in trouble in a wave state.

    The Senate:

    The situation in the Senate has improved rather dramatically for Team Blue in the last several days, to the point where it is now fairly conceivable to see them keep 55 or 56 seats if everything goes their way on election night.  Pennsylvania is definitely the biggest mover, as I now have that seat moving into the blue column while Nevada actually drifted the other way.  West Virginia is now on the positive side of the ledger as well (unless you’re a republican).  Missouri and Kentucky are definitely races to watch now as well, as Carnahan and Conway saw good polling results this week, especially the latter.  I’ve moved both races to toss-up.  In all honesty, I think that Missouri could be this week’s Pennsylvania, and that a Carnahan close similar to Sestak could be coming.  New Hampshire is still out there, but it’s a very unlikely victory I think.  The 4th and final seat that the democrats might have a shot at is Alaska, which has de-generated into a 3-way free-for-all.  For the purposes of that race, I consider Miller and Murkowski one in the same, and the Dem chances are solely the chances that McAdams wins.  I’ve included my probabilities of each seat flipping on the commentary.

    First off, to the map:

    US Senate 2010 - October 21

    Senate Math:

    Current Senate – 59 Democrats, 41 Republicans

    New Senate – 53 Democrats, 47 Republicans

    Swing – Republicans +6

    Pickups (listed in order of likelihood)

    Dem pickups – none

    Rep pickups – North Dakota, Arkansas, Indiana, Wisconsin, Colorado, Nevada

    Ratings Commentary:

    1.North Dakota (100%) – This one’s a lock.  

    2.Arkansas (99%) – This seat is virtually gone as well.  Blanche is becoming marginally better in polling, but Boozman is still well over 50%.  This would be a real miracle.

    3.Indiana (96%) – Now that Ellsworth is up with ads all over Indiana, I wonder if this race has tightened at all.  The dearth of polling here makes it hard to tell.  Still, Coats is extremely likely to win here.

    4.Wisconsin (85%) – Feingold is improving marginally in the polls now, but Johnson is still pulling in at least 49% in every poll I’ve seen.  Still hard to see how Feingold pulls it out unless if Johnson loses his favorables somehow as Feingold is a known quantity.

    5.Colorado (58%) – This race is still close, with both sides claiming a lead in various surveys.  I’m surprised that the independent nature of the CO electorate hasn’t turned against Bennet, he’s actually been quite impressive and has about a 4 in 10 chance of pulling it off.

    6.Nevada (52%) – Angle has moved into the lead, barely.  But the fact that she has any lead at all speaks to just how much Nevadans don’t like Harry Reid.  This is going to be a very ugly finish on both sides, and it’s a jump ball.

    ——————————————————————————————————————————————–

    7.Illinois (49%) – This begins the start of the blue column, and it’s a cliffhanger right now between Giannoulias and Kirk.  The fact that PPP had Kirk leading this week really concerns me, as it shows that maybe Democrats won’t come home to Alexi like I thought they would.  Still, I think Giannoulias wins this one because of IL’s partisan lean.

    8.Pennsylvania (46%) – This race started moving a bit last week, and I got some flak for moving this race into the toss-up column.  While I don’t want to self-gloss, that was the right call, as earlier this week Joe Sestak surged into a statistical tie with Pat Toomey and probably a very small lead if PPP, Quinnipiac, and Muhlenberg are to be believed.  This one is better than IL because Sestak is better than Giannoulias.

    9.West Virginia (39%) – We have a bit of conflicting data right now in WV.  Some polls late last week made it look like Manchin was pulling away, yet Scotty Rass came to Raese’s rescue earlier this week with both his original recipe and extra crispy polling.  I suspect that Manchin is winning, and that he’ll pull away late because of his extremely strong favorables.

    10.Washington (34%) – Unlike other parts of the country, it appears that the west coast is moving rightward right now, and Dino Rossi has closed the gap somewhat on Patty Murray.  I’ve yet to see him get over the 46% mark in any polls though, and that has to be a concern for any GOPers that are hoping for a pickup here.  Murray’s favorables are still very good.

    11.Kentucky (32%) – Kentucky makes a foray into the rankings on the back of several good polls for Jack Conway.  This is probably a low single digit race now, and if the undecideds break away from Paul, who knows, this one could turn over.  I’m ambivalent though because after all, this is Kentucky.

    12.Alaska (23%) – The crazy three-way nature of this race makes this one unpredictable.  The major question on everybody’s mind is whether or not people will write in for Murkowski like they are telling pollsters, and if not, to whom will they go, Miller or McAdams?  This is probably a 35-35-28 race right now, putting it in the same neighborhood as CA and MO, just slightly higher because of ballot situation.

    13.California (19%) – Fiorina is showing some fight even though her compatriot Meg Whitman is falling in the governor’s race.  She’s even tied with Boxer in some republican polling, although Boxer has a lead in all independent surveys that I’ve seen.  Still, this is going to be a very tough one for Fiorina to pull out because of CA’s democratic electorate.

    14.Missouri (17%) – Roy Blunt’s lead on Robin Carnahan has dropped into the mid-single digits, and what I think is telling is that, even in his best of surveys, Blunt was barely hitting the 50% mark.  If Carnahan closes strongly, this could be a race that shocks everybody on election night.  I’ve always thought that Carnahan was the superior candidate anyway.

    Pretty much everything is quiet on the gubernatorial side of things.  I only had one governorship changing hands this week, that one being Maine where Paul LePage has led by 3-5 points in most recent polls.  But considering those leads are of the 33-28-14 variety, anything is still possible here.  

    The governor races I’m watching most closely are all cliffhangers, those being Florida, Oregon, Vermont, Ohio, and Maine.  Florida and Ohio are huge races not only for the statehouse balance but also for redistricting, as wins by Alex Sink and Ted Strickland would undo republican gerrymanders of congressional seats.  Right now I have Sink barely ahead, Strickland barely behind.  At the moment I have Kitzhaber and Shumlin barely ahead as well, though I’m more confident about the former than the latter.

    One last note, Rhode Island, I consider independent candidate Lincoln Chafee as a democrat, so combined between him and Frank Caprio, RI-Gov is a solid D pickup.

    Current Governors – 26 democrats, 24 republicans

    New Governors – 20 democrats, 30 republicans

    Swing – Republicans +6

    Pickups (listed in order of likelihood)

    Dem Pickups – Rhode Island, Connecticut, Minnesota, Hawaii, California, Florida, Vermont

    Rep Pickups – Wyoming, Kansas, Tennessee, Oklahoma, Iowa, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, New Mexico, Illinois, Ohio, Maine

    The Map:

    US Governors 2010 - October 21

    And now, the Big Boards:

    2010 House Big Board (as of October 21 update)

    Solid Dem – 146 seats:

    AL-7, AZ-4, CA-1, CA-5, CA-6, CA-7, CA-8, CA-9, CA-10, CA-11, CA-12, CA-13, CA-14, CA-15, CA-16, CA-17, CA-23, CA-27, CA-28, CA-29, CA-30, CA-31, CA-32, CA-33, CA-34, CA-35, CA-36, CA-37, CA-38, CA-39, CA-43, CA-51, CA-53, CO-1, CO-2, CT-1, CT-2, CT-3, FL-3, FL-11, FL-17, FL-19, FL-20, FL-23, GA-4, GA-5, GA-13, HI-2, IL-1, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IN-1, IN-7, KY-3, MD-2, MD-3, MD-4, MD-5, MD-7, MD-8, MA-1, MA-2, MA-3, MA-4, MA-6, MA-7, MA-8, MA-9, ME-1, ME-2, MI-5, MI-12, MI-13, MI-14, MN-4, MN-5, MN-7, MS-2, MO-1, MO-3, MO-5, NV-1, NJ-1, NJ-6, NJ-8, NJ-9, NJ-10, NJ-13, NY-2, NY-4, NY-5, NY-6, NY-7, NY-8, NY-9, NY-10, NY-11, NY-12, NY-14, NY-15, NY-16, NY-17, NY-18, NY-21, NY-27, NY-28, NC-1, NC-4, NC-12, NC-13, OH-9, OH-11, OH-17, OK-2, OR-3, OR-4, PA-1, PA-2, PA-13, PA-14, RI-1, RI-2, SC-6, TN-9, TX-9, TX-15, TX-16, TX-18, TX-20, TX-25, TX-28, TX-29, TX-30, VT-1, VA-3, VA-8, WA-1, WA-6, WA-7, WV-3, WI-2, WI-4

    Likely Dem – 28 seats:

    Arkansas-4 (Ross)

    Arizona-7 (Grijalva)

    Arizona-8 (Giffords)

    Connecticut-4 (Himes)

    Delaware-1 (Open)

    Georgia-12 (Barrow)

    Illinois-12 (Costello)

    Indiana-2 (Donnelly)

    Louisiana-2 (Cao)

    Massachusetts-5 (Tsongas)

    Michigan-15 (Dingell)

    Minnesota-8 (Oberstar)

    North Carolina-2 (Etheridge)

    North Carolina-11 (Shuler)

    New Mexico-3 (Lujan)

    New York-20 (Murphy)

    New York-25 (Maffei)

    Ohio-10 (Kucinich)

    Ohio-13 (Sutton)

    Oregon-1 (Wu)

    Pennsylvania-4 (Altmire)

    Pennsylvania-17 (Holden)

    Tennessee-5 (Cooper)

    Virginia-9 (Boucher)

    Virginia-11 (Connelly)

    Utah-2 (Matheson)

    Washington-9 (Smith)

    Wisconsin-3 (Kind)

    Lean Dem – 30 seats:

    California-18 (Cardoza)

    California-20 (Costa)

    California-47 (Sanchez)

    Colorado-7 (Perlmutter)

    Connecticut-5 (Murphy)

    Georgia-2 (Bishop)

    Hawaii-1 (Djou)

    Idaho-1 (Minnick)

    Iowa-1 (Braley)

    Iowa-2 (Loebsack)

    Iowa-3 (Boswell)

    Illinois-10 (Open)

    Kentucky-6 (Chandler)

    Massachusetts-10 (Open)

    Michigan-9 (Peters)

    Minnesota-1 (Walz)

    Mississippi-4 (Taylor)

    New Jersey-3 (Adler)

    New Jersey-12 (Holt)

    New Mexico-1 (Heinrich)

    New York-1 (Bishop)

    New York-13 (McMahon)

    New York-22 (Hinchey)

    New York-23 (Owens)

    North Carolina-7 (McIntyre)

    Ohio-16 (Wilson)

    Ohio-18 (Space)

    Pennsylvania-12 (Critz)

    South Dakota-1 (Herseth)

    Texas-27 (Ortiz)

    Toss Up/Tilt Democratic – 15 seats:

    Alabama-2 (Bright)

    Florida-22 (Klein)

    Florida-25 (Open)

    Illinois-14 (Foster)

    Indiana-9 (Hill)

    Michigan-7 (Schauer)

    Missouri-4 (Skelton)

    Nevada-3 (Titus)

    New Hampshire-2 (Open)

    New Mexico-2 (Teague)

    New York-23 (Owens)

    Oregon-5 (Schrader)

    Pennsylvania-8 (Murphy)

    Washington-2 (Larsen)

    Washington-8 (Reichert)

    Toss Up/Tilt Republican – 27 seats:

    Arizona-1 (Kirkpatrick)

    Arizona-3 (Open)

    Arizona-5 (Mitchell)

    Arkansas-1 (Open)

    California-3 (Lungren)

    California-11 (McNerney)

    Colorado-3 (Salazar)

    Florida-2 (Boyd)

    Florida-8 (Grayson)

    Florida-12 (Open)

    Georgia-8 (Marshall)

    Illinois-17 (Hare)

    Maryland-1 (Kratovil)

    Michigan-1 (Open)

    Mississippi-1 (Childers)

    New Hampshire-1 (Shea-Porter)

    New York-19 (Hall)

    North Carolina-8 (Kissell)

    North Dakota-1 (Pomeroy)

    Ohio-16 (Boccieri)

    Pennsylvania-7 (Open)

    Pennsylvania-10 (Carney)

    South Carolina-5 (Spratt)

    Tennessee-4 (Davis)

    Texas-23 (Rodriguez)

    West Virginia-1 (Open)

    Wisconsin-8 (Kagen)

    Lean Rep – 21 seats:

    Alabama-5 (Open)

    California-44 (Calvert)

    California-45 (Bono Mack)

    Colorado-4 (Markey)

    Florida-24 (Kosmas)

    Illinois-11 (Halvorson)

    Indiana-8 (Open)

    Kansas-3 (Open)

    Kansas-4 (Open)

    Minnesota-6 (Bachmann)

    Ohio-1 (Driehaus)

    Ohio-15 (Kilroy)

    Pennsylvania-3 (Dahlkemper)

    Pennsylvania-11 (Kanjorski)

    Pennsylvania-15 (Dent)

    Virginia-2 (Nye)

    Virginia-5 (Perriello)

    Tennessee-8 (Open)

    Texas-17 (Edwards)

    Washington-3 (Open)

    Wisconsin-7 (Open)

    Likely Rep – 11 seats:

    Arkansas-2 (Open)

    Indiana-3 (Open)

    Louisiana-3 (Open)

    Michigan-3 (Open)

    Nebraska-2 (Terry)

    New York-29 (Open)

    Ohio-12 (Tiberi)

    Pennsylvania-6 (Gerlach)

    Pennsylvania-16 (Pitts)

    South Carolina-2 (Wilson)

    Virginia-1 (Wittman)

    Solid Rep – 156 seats:

    AL-1, AL-3, AL-4, AL-6, AK-1, AZ-2, AZ-6, AR-3, CA-2, CA-4, CA-19, CA-21, CA-22, CA-24, CA-25, CA-26, CA-40, CA-41, CA-42, CA-46, CA-48, CA-49, CA-50, CA-52, CO-5, CO-6, FL-1, FL-4, FL-5, FL-6, FL-7, FL-9, FL-10, FL-13, FL-14, FL-15, FL-16, FL-18, FL-21, GA-1, GA-3, GA-7, GA-9, GA-10, GA-11, ID-2, IL-6, IL-13, IL-15, IL-16, IL-18, IL-19, IN-4, IN-5, IN-6, IA-4, IA-5, KS-1, KS-2, KY-1, KY-2, KY-4, KY-5, LA-1, LA-4, LA-5, LA-6, LA-7, MD-6, MI-2, MI-4, MI-6, MI-8, MI-10, MI-11, MN-2, MN-3, MS-3, MO-2, MO-6, MO-7, MO-8, MO-9, MT-1, NE-1, NE-3, NV-2, NJ-2, NJ-5, NJ-4, NJ-7, NJ-11, NY-3, NY-26, NC-3, NC-5, NC-6, NC-9, NC-10, OH-2, OH-3, OH-4, OH-5, OH-7, OH-8, OH-14, OK-1, OK-3, OK-4, OK-5, OR-2, PA-5, PA-9, PA-18, PA-19, SC-1, SC-3, SC-4, TN-1, TN-2, TN-3, TN-6, TN-7, TX-1, TX-2, TX-3, TX-4, TX-5, TX-6, TX-7, TX-8, TX-10, TX-11, TX-12, TX-13, TX-14, TX-19, TX-21, TX-22, TX-24, TX-26, TX-31, TX-32, UT-1, UT-3, VA-4, VA-6, VA-7, VA-10, WA-4, WA-5, WV-2, WI-1, WI-5, WI-6, WY-1

    2010 Senate Big Board (as of October 21)

    Solid Dem – 6 seats

    Hawaii (Inouye)

    Maryland (Mikulski)

    New York (Schumer)

    New York (Gillibrand)

    Oregon (Wyden)

    Vermont (Leahy)

    Likely Dem – 2 seats

    Connecticut (Blumenthal)

    Delaware (Open)

    Lean Dem – 1 seats

    California (Boxer)

    Toss Up/Tilt Democratic – 4 seats

    Illinois (Open)

    Pennsylvania (Open)

    Washington (Murray)

    West Virginia (Manchin)

    Toss Up/Tilt Republican – 5 seats

    Colorado (Open)

    Missouri (Open)

    Kentucky (Open)

    Nevada (Reid)

    Wisconsin (Feingold)

    Lean Rep – 2 seats

    Alaska (Murkowski)

    New Hampshire (Open)

    Likely Rep – 7 seats

    Arkansas (Lincoln)

    Florida (Open)

    Indiana (Open)

    Louisiana (Vitter)

    North Carolina (Burr)

    Ohio (Open)

    Solid Rep – 11 seats

    Arizona (McCain)

    Alabama (Shelby)

    Georgia (Isakson)

    Idaho (Crapo)

    Iowa (Grassley)

    Kansas (Open)

    North Dakota (Open)

    Oklahoma (Coburn)

    South Carolina (Demint)

    South Dakota (Thune)

    Utah (Open)

    2010 Governors Big Board (as of October 21)

    Solid Dem – 4 seats

    Arkansas

    New Hampshire

    New York

    Rhode Island

    Likely Dem – 2 seats

    Colorado

    Connecticut

    Lean Dem – 5 seats

    California

    Hawaii

    Maryland

    Massachusetts

    Minnesota

    Toss Up – 7 seats

    Florida

    Illinois

    Maine

    New Mexico

    Ohio

    Oregon

    Vermont

    Lean Rep – 5 seats

    Georgia

    Pennsylvania

    South Carolina

    Texas

    Wisconsin

    Likely Rep – 5 seats

    Alaska

    Arizona

    Iowa

    Michigan

    Nevada

    Solid Rep – 9 seats

    Alabama

    Idaho

    Kansas

    Nebraska

    Oklahoma

    South Dakota

    Tennessee

    Utah

    Wyoming

    PA-Sen, PA-Gov: Keystone Kollapse

    Quinnipiac (10/13-17, likely voters, 9/15-19 in parens):

    Joe Sestak (D): 46 (43)

    Pat Toomey (R): 48 (50)

    Undecided 5 (7)

    (MoE: ±3%)

    While Quinnipiac doesn’t quite give us the hat trick of three polls in a row with a lead for Joe Sestak, it does show, similarly, significant movement in Sestak’s direction, not just from the undecided column but also directly out of Toomey’s share. While Quinnipiac doesn’t give registration or 2008-vote numbers, Barack Obama’s approval is 44/53, showing this is a similar-looking sample to Tuesday’s PPP poll. As with that poll, the difference is Dems finally consolidating around Sestak, who’s 89-7 among Dems. (Toomey leads 56-35 among indies here, which explains their slightly more favorable overall result for Toomey.) Also, worth noting: Quinnipiac’s survey period was ending at the same time that PPP’s was beginning (see below), so there may have been slightly less Sestak surge for them to measure at that point.

    Public Policy Polling (10/17-18, likely voters, 8/14-16 in parens):

    Dan Onorato (D): 46 (35)

    Tom Corbett (R): 48 (48)

    Undecided 6 (17)

    (MoE: ±3.7%)

    The gubernatorial race has gotten short shrift all cycle long — partly because it hasn’t been very interesting — and even as it’s been clear Sestak was making his move, there wasn’t any matching movement in the gubernatorial race… until now. Here’s the gubernatorial half of the PPP sample, and it’s the best result Dan Onorato has gotten all cycle. Republican Tom Corbett still has better favorables (47/34 to Onorato’s 45/39), and he hasn’t lost any ground in the toplines, but Onorato has closed the gap among indies (to the same 48-46 Corbett lead as the toplines).

    Muhlenberg (10/17-20, likely voters, 10/16-19 in parens):

    Joe Sestak (D): 43 (44)

    Pat Toomey (R): 43 (41)

    Undecided 14 (15)

    Dan Onorato (D): 38 (40)

    Tom Corbett (R): 49 (47)

    Undecided 12 (14)

    (MoE: ±5%)

    Muhlenberg’s daily tracking poll splits the difference: they keep seeing a tossup race between Sestak and Toomey (although the tie is down a few points from yesterday’s results), but not seeing what PPP is seeing regarding the gubernatorial race.