Month: September 2010

Ipsos for Reuters (9/10-12, likely voters, 8/6-10 in parentheses):

Kendrick Meek (D): 21 (19)

Marco Rubio (R): 40 (33)

Charlie Crist (I): 26 (38)

Undecided: 13 (10)

Alex Sink (D): 45 (31)

Rick Scott (R): 47 (33)

Undecided: 8 (18 + 17 for Chiles)

(MoE: ±4.2%)

From Ipsos, here’s more confirmation of what a number of pollsters have seen: Charlie Crist and Kendrick Meek are mostly competing over the same voters, and as Meek gains ground, Crist loses ground — and here, that’s apparently compounded by losing voters to Rubio as well. (In fact, they make that explicit with a hypothetical question asking how a two-way Rubio/Crist race would go: it would be a 46-45 Rubio win.) Wondering what this month’s Crist slump/Meek and Rubio surges look like visually? Here you go:

This poll is another example of the enthusiasm gap at work: among RVs, Rubio still leads, but it’s only 32-29-22 over Crist and Meek, while Sink leads 45-41. Finally, there’s one other bit of news that isn’t going to help Crist. His ballot position got announced, and he’s all the way down in 9th, out of 10. (In Florida, the big two parties get the top 2 spots, with the one currently holding the governor’s seat the first one, so Rubio gets the first spot.) (Yes, I know Crist is officially an independent at this point, but he was elected a GOPer, so that counts in the state’s eyes.)

SurveyUSA for KATU-TV (9/12-14, likely voters, 7/25-27 in parentheses):

John Kitzhaber (D): 43 (44)

Chris Dudley (R): 49 (46)

Other: 5 (7)

Undecided: 3 (4)

Ron Wyden (D-inc): 54 (53)

Jim Huffman (R): 38 (35)

Other: 4 (9)

Undecided: 3 (3)

(MoE: ±4.2%)

SurveyUSA’s newest poll of the Oregon governor’s race continues to have Republican Chris Dudley leading Dem John Kitzhaber, this time by 6 points. It’s superficially easy to take this poll with a grain of salt, seeing as how SurveyUSA has wound up significantly in outlier territory in the states that bookend Oregon (in CA-Sen and WA-Sen) and the crosstabs offer the usual confounding details (like a 48-48 tie between the two in the Portland area). Even if you think this race is closer to a tie, though, geez, what a missed opportunity… John Kitzhaber spent a year trying to occupy the intellectual high ground, completely foregoing the opportunity to define Dudley early as a dilettanteish empty vessel, and all he got for his good intentions was a completely avoidable Tossup.

Riley Research (pdf) (8/31-9/9, likely voters, no trendlines):

John Kitzhaber (D): 40

Chris Dudley (R): 39

Other: 5

Undecided: 16

(MoE: ±5%)

This has been a woefully underserved race, with SurveyUSA and Rasmussen left to set the story (with the only other poll I can think of, from well-respected local pollster Tim Hibbitts, showing the race a tie in early summer). So it’s good to get a second opinion from someone who’s a local pollster and not an auto-dialer (even if it’s one I’m not familiar with). They see this as a much closer race, giving Kitzhaber a tiny lead, although with a much bigger share of undecideds. Maybe most interestingly, Kitzhaber actually leads among indies (38-29); the problem here seems to be that Dudley fares much better among GOPers (79%) than Kitzhaber does among Dems (69%).

This is the first part of a series of posts analyzing the swing state Colorado. The second part can be found here.

Starting six years ago, a massive Democratic wave swept through the state of Colorado. Starting with the election of former Senator Ken Salazar, the Democratic Party took control of almost every state office there was to take. The results of this transformation are pictured in the table above.

More below.

At the time, Democrats crowed that Colorado was undergoing a fundamental political transformation. A flood of liberal migrants from California, along with steady growth in Colorado’s Latino population, was supposedly moving the state left from its decades-old conservative roots.

These conservative roots can be seen by taking a look at Colorado’s electoral history:

Six years later, however, Democrats are not so confident. Polls show that Colorado has swung as quickly Republican as it went Democratic after 2004. Democrats are facing tough elections in Colorado’s senatorial and house races; until the Republican candidate became engulfed in scandal, they were also polling weakly in the gubernatorial race.

Whatever the future of Colorado, for the past decade the state has done a perfect job of reflecting the national mood. This is perhaps the ultimate attribute of a swing state.

–Inoljt, http://mypolitikal.com/

• AR-Sen: Mason-Dixon takes another look at the Arkansas Senate race, on behalf of Arkansas News Bureau. Blanche Lincoln hasn’t gotten any deader than she was before: she trails John Boozman 51-34, with 4 for other minor candidates (no real change from the last time they polled, back in May pre-primary, where Boozman led 52-35). Lincoln’s faves have improved a smidge: now 30/47, instead of 28/53.

• DE-Sen: Whooo, where even to begin? The national media is just starting to dig into Christine O’Donnell’s gigantic and eminently mineable opposition file, with NPR and ABC detailing her history of getting fired from right-wing think tanks and her suing for discrimination in response, of IRS audits that she blamed on “thug politics” and liens that she blamed on “computer errors,” of failure to pay for her college, and of using her campaign money to pay the rent on her house as it’s also her campaign headquarters. We also know about her stance on AIDS prevention, thanks to helpful tipsters in the comments. At least O’Donnell’s faring well in the fundraising department, raising $1 million since her victory (with Chris Coons raising only $125K, showing the harmful effects of a short-of-the-endzone victory dance). Not leaving things to chance, reports are coming in that Joe Biden will campaign for Coons “next week” and that the DSCC is starting to put money into Delaware, starting with an $85K buy in the Salisbury market.

The establishment isn’t budging much on her: the state’s virulently anti-O’Donnell GOP chair, Tom Ross, is staying in place (though calling for “unity”), and Karl Rove, although he sorta backed down in the face of a Rush Limbaugh broadside, is still challenging O’Donnell to be “honest” to voters about her difficulties… and again running through the list of all those difficulties in his media appearances. Meanwhile, O’Donnell strips…. her website, perhaps at the urging of the NRSC; after her nomination, all issues stuff vanished and it just became a donation ask. Still, Harry Reid seems to be doing all he can to fuck this up, issuing a strange quote that should play right into the whole “Obama/Reid/Pelosi agenda!!1!” messaging, expressing enthusiasm for Chris Coons but calling him his “pet.”

• NV-Sen, NV-Gov (pdf): Part of the CNN/Time onslaught yesterday was polls of Nevada (which we’re relegating to the digest, as this state, as we’ve complained before, is veering rapidly into over-polled territory). This raised some eyebrows for showing a Sharron Angle lead over Harry Reid (42-41, with 5 for Scott Ashjian) among LVs, but that’s only a point or three off from the narrow band of results that Mason-Dixon and Rasmussen have been consistently generating. (Reid leads 42-34-7 among RVs.) Many people (starting with Jon Ralston) also seemed surprised by some crosstabs weirdness, showing the race a dead heat in Democratic-favorable Clark County but giving Reid a big lead in swingy Washoe County. Brian Sandoval leads Rory Reid 58-31 in the Gov race.

• CA-Gov: It’s official: Meg Whitman is now the biggest self-funder in political history, having shown that piker Michael Bloomberg how it’s done. She gave her campaign another $15 million, which brings her personal spending on the race to $118 million overall.

• CO-Gov: Dan Maes just picked up Scott McInnis’s former campaign manager, George Culpepper, so it seems like the local GOP establishment isn’t totally abandoning him. The Colorado Independent has an in-depth piece, though, with a more nuanced look, based on interviews with at least a dozen county GOP chairs. Some of them fully back Maes, some grudgingly do so, some back Tom Tancredo, and some are still in a state of shock.

• GA-Gov: After doing some pushback yesterday, Nathan “Let’s Make a” Deal had to admit today that, yes, he is in some personally dire financial straits, saying his debts are even bigger than the $2.3 million loan that’s outstanding… but also saying that he isn’t releasing any more financial records to the press. It also turns out that he never disclosed that loan to the state Ethics Commission on his financial disclosure form, which he’s now scrambling to update.

• MI-Gov: EPIC-MRA’s out with yet another poll of the Michigan gubernatorial race; I think we can start relegating their frequent polls of this pretty-much-out-of-reach race to the digest, too. They give Rick Snyder a 53-29 lead over Virg Bernero (a slight improvement for Snyder over 51-29 three weeks ago).

• UT-Gov: OK, what kind of a world is it when we’re faring better in the Utah governor’s race than we are in Michigan? Not like this is a competitive race either, but it could be a good dress rehearsal for a 2012 rematch (remember that this 2010 race is a special election). Dem Peter Corroon trails Gary Herbert by “only” 21 points, 52-31, in a poll taken by Dan Jones & Associates for the Deseret News and KSL. The numbers haven’t really changed since their previous poll in April (where Herbert led by 20).

• CA-11: As with 2008, Jerry McNerney rolled out endorsements from some local elected Republicans, as part of a list of 16 county supervisors and mayors who are backing him. Maybe most notable is the backing from the mayor of Manteca (or, in Spanish, Lard), Willie Weatherford, who had previously backed GOP primary loser Brad Goehring.

• CO-03: Here’s a boost for John Salazar, in a suddenly-tough race in this rural western district against Republican Scott Tipton: he got the backing of the National Rifle Association, with an “A” rating.

• IA-02: Another warning sign for David Loebsack: the Mariannette Miller-Meeks campaign is out with another internal poll, showing her creeping closer than her previous one. The Tarrance Group poll has her trailing Loebsack by only 1 point: 41-40 (with 6 for a Libertarian). She could do some damage her with more money.

• LA-02: Lawyer Ron Austin dropped out of the LA-02 race today, where he was an independent candidate. This is really the first I’d ever heard of him, so I can’t imagine he’d have been much of a factor here; I can’t glean whether he was running on the left or the right, but he is African-American, so that in itself may shift at least a handful of votes in Cedric Richmond’s direction in what may yet turn out to be a close race. Two other no-name indies remain.

• MD-01: One other internal poll got leaked to the Fix today, too, and this one’s a pleasant surprise for the Dems. Frank Kratovil is still claiming a lead over Andy Harris, who just won the GOP nod for a rematch. Kratovil’s poll by Garin-Hart-Yang gives him a 45-39 lead. (When I say “still,” Kratovil released an earlier internal with a 5-point lead. Harris has released two internals of his own giving him a lead.)

• MO-04: Here’s the good news: Ike Skelton got a shared endorsement from Missouri Right to Life, along with GOP challenger Vicky Hartzler. The bad news is: Skelton has generally had that endorsement to himself in the past.

• NY-14: Give Reshma Saujani credit for one thing: she’s persistent. She’s already announced that she’ll try again in 2012 to unseat Carolyn Maloney in the NY-14 Dem primary.

• NY-23: Local teabaggers (or at least one of them) sound pretty upset with Conservative nominee (and GOP primary loser) Doug Hoffman, meaning that he, rather than the GOP nominee, may find himself in the third-wheel position this time around. Mark Barie, chairman of a local Tea Party organization criticized Hoffman for a listless campaign run by outsiders with little familiarity with the district. He threw his support behind Matt Doheny, who appears to have narrowly won the GOP primary despite a late close by Hoffman in late counting.

• CfG: The Club for Growth launched a five-state buy in Senate races, to a total tune of $1.5 million (no word on specific allocation). The states under assault are Colorado, Florida, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

• NRCC: Two different rounds of TV ad buys came from the NRCC today. The first one was in WA-03 ($900K) and NM-01 ($300K), and a second one covers PA-10 ($595K), NH-01 ($1 mil), NH-02 ($1 mil), FL-08 ($817K), FL-24 ($817K), and VA-09 ($?).

• SSP TV:

• CA-Sen: Barbara Boxer goes negative against Carly Fiorina in a new spot, hitting her on (what else?) her failed tenure at HP

• MO-Sen: A new spot against Roy Blunt from Dem group Commonsense Ten (never heard of ’em, either) hits his consummate insider credentials

• PA-Sen: Yet another ad from Pat Toomey, this one featuring an oppressed doctor who doesn’t like HCR (who just happens to be a big Republican activist too, not the ad says that)

• WA-Sen: Dino Rossi’s first negative ad features him personally narrating an attack on Patty Murray (instead of using the off-camera voice of doom); he calls her “part of the problem”

• NV-Sen: Harry Reid’s newest TV spot, by way of fighting back against Angle’s attacks on immigration issues, just goes ahead and says it: it calls Sharron Angle “crazy”

• NY-Gov: Andrew Cuomo doesn’t want to leave anything to chance despite his big lead (he has the money to burn, at any rate), and he’s out with a new bio ad (not that he needs much introduction)

• PA-Gov: Dan Onorato tries introducing himself to Pennsylvania again, this time with a shorter 30-second ad that helpfully lets people know how to pronounce his name

• TX-Gov: Even Rick Perry’s going negative: three different ads go after Bill White, two trying to tie him to Barack Obama and one attacking his handling of Hurricane Rita

• VT-Gov: The RGA wades into Vermont with a negative ad against Peter Shumlin, hitting him on taxes

• CT-04: Jim Himes has not one but two new ads, stressing his independence and debt hawkishness

• KS-03: Stephene Moore’s first ad plays up her day job as a nurse

• ND-AL: Earl Pomeroy has two different anti-Rick Berg ads, one of which focuses on his crazy plans to drill for oil in Theodore Roosevelt National Park

• NH-02: Ann McLane Kuster (who’s now rebranded herself as “Annie Kuster”) goes negative on Charlie Bass in her first ad, framing him as failed retread

• NY-20: Scott Murphy’s newest spot focuses on his own personal record of job creation as businessman before entering Congress

• TX-17: Chet Edwards is out with a positive ad, touting his work on veteran’s issues like VA health care

• WA-02: John Koster tries to cram both a negative ad and a positive ad into a discordant 30 seconds

• WI-07: Sean Duffy plays up his lumberjack credentials, saying he’ll “take an ax” to Washington (I’ll admit, that’s kinda clever)

• Rasmussen:

• CO-Sen: Michael Bennet (D-inc) 45%, Ken Buck (R) 49%

• DE-Sen: Chris Coons (D) 53%, Christine O’Donnell (R) 42%

• NH-Sen: Paul Hodes (D) 44%, Kelly Ayotte (R) 51%

• NV-Gov: Rory Reid (D) 39%, Brian Sandoval (R) 52%

• PA-Gov: Dan Onorato (D) 39%, Tom Corbett (R) 49%

• WA-Sen: Patty Murray (D-inc) 51%, Dino Rossi (R) 46%

SurveyUSA (9/12-14, likely voters, 8/2-4 in parens):

Mark Dayton (DFL): 38 (46)

Tom Emmer (R): 36 (32)

Tom Horner (I): 18 (9)

Other: 5 (n/a)

Undecided: 4 (13)

(MoE: ±3.9%)

For a sec I thought, “That was one hell of a primary bounce!” But no – SUSA’s last poll was taken before the DFL primary. And man is there a lot of churn here. Among the named candidates, we’re looking at 21 points of net delta, and that doesn’t even account for the 9-point drop in undecideds. Has the race really changed so much in month-and-a-half, to go from D+14 to D+2? Or was that earlier Dayton lead just way too gaudy?

Well, for starters, things are back to “normal” – at least, normal for SUSA-land – which is to say, the kids love them some Tom Emmer, with the youngest cohort supporting him at 46-30 clip, the only group among which he leads. In August, by contrast, Dayton led this bracket 43-35. It’s also worth pointing out that there were huge gyrations among all age groups. The good news is that Dayton does better with his own party than Emmer does with his, winning Dems 74-7 (vs. Republicans going 72-11 for Emmer).

Given that SurveyUSA’s June poll of the race showed a three-point Dayton lead, it’s tempting to write the middle poll off as an outlier. But the poll before that gave Emmer an eight-point lead. So wild swings seem to be the order of the day for SUSA – 11 points, then 11 points again, and now 12 points. I don’t really think this race is that volatile – do you?

Public Policy Polling (9/11-12, likely voters, 8/7-8 in parens):

John Carney (D): 48 (48)

Glen Urquhart (R): 37 (30)

Undecided: 16 (22)

(MoE: ±3.2%)

Former Lt. Gov. John Carney starts strong against businessman Glen Urquhart, with an 11-point lead. While the trendline shows some movement for Urquhart, that can be explained by two factors: First, PPP moved from the registered to a likely voter screen (meaning the sample went from 30 to 38% Republican – pretty much exactly the baseline support that Urquhart is enjoying), and second, Urquhart’s been spending big over the last month on his primary campaign.

To give you a taste of just how douche-flavored Urquhart is as a human being, I encourage you to check out this DCCC tracker video showing Urquhart telling an audience earlier this year to ask their “liberal friends… why they’re Nazis”. Needless to say, Mr. Urquhart can fuck himself.

Meanwhile, the Politico hears some chatter that the NRCC may not spend any money on this race now that they’re preferred candidate, businesswoman Michele Rollins, fell in the primary. Hard not to see why.

Awhile back, the old mainframe down at SSP Labs told us that not only that absentees and provisionals wouldn’t be enough to help Lisa Murkowski overcome her then 1,668-vote deficit, but that they’d be likely to actually hurt her and drop her further behind, to the tune of 341 votes.

Three weeks after election day, we finally have some certainty, as the results are now certified. Drumroll, please:

With all the final results, Miller’s margin on Murkowski increased from 1,668 to 2,006. An increase of … 338!

Now, of course, things aren’t that simple, and frankly, we’re not that good. In my input, we’d assumed 7,500 absentees and 5,000 provisionals, when in actuality, there were 17,364 additional ballots. I don’t have those broken down between provisionals and absentees, but applying that figure post hoc, that would have yielded an estimate of an increase in Miller’s margin of between 410 and 516.

But indeed, absentees and provisionals were not friendlier to Murkowski – she lost by 1.81% among election day ballots and early votes; she lost by 1.95% among provisionals and absentees. (We’d estimated she’d lose by 2.36% among provisionals and 2.97% among absentees).

No models are perfect, and they remain exactly that – models, dependent on anorexia! er…proper inputs and proper assumptions; we’ll continue to put them forth to the best of our ability. Moving forward, even as the news may get even worse (or even better, if you’re one of our many newfound GOP-leaning readers), we hope to bring the same solid news and analysis (that we assume) you come here to enjoy!

P.S. I’m no salesman, but since I’ve already gotten wet in the self-congratulatory rain, I might as well go swimming: we’re a mere 5 followers short of 3,000 on Twitter. Wink wink. Nudge nudge.

P.P.S. We have a Facebook page too.

…and that’s good enough for me; I hope that’s good enough for you, too!

Two quick ones today, one of New Hampshire and one of DC.

First, New Hampshire:

Green for Ayotte, red for Ovide. Binnie and Bender each won exactly one town, Binnie’s down on the Massachusetts line (blue) and Bender’s way up in Coos County (purple). As you can tell, Lamontagne did very well in the cluster around Manchester.

Second, DC, but let’s play a game.

Pop quiz for all you hotshots – what are the following maps?

Hard to tell, right? Answer over the flip.

Stephen Colbert’s not far off when he described DC as the “Chocolate City with Marshmallow Center”, though it might more accurately be termed, the Chocolate East half and the Marshmallow West half…but that, of course, isn’t as catchy.

The map on the left is the percentage of the population that was Black at the 2000 census by block group (blue being a lower%); the map on the right is the margin between Fenty and Gray by precinct (blue for Fenty, red for Gray). Two larger versions below, with the color scale modified (darker green indicating a higher percentage of African-Americans)…the correlation is quite stunning.

After some recent discussions on here regarding wealthier suburban districts that have been held by Republicans since 1994, but lean Democratic, I have compiled a list of such districts:

These districts were selected for meeting the following criteria:

1)  Above average median income (42,000 per individual or higher)

2)  A PVI score of D even to D+7

3)  Held by a Republican for at least one term since 1994

In no way I claim any of these seats are in play, but I am just providing a list of seats that could fall if the anti-Democratic wave is concentrated in suburban districts.  Many of them are considered in play though.  Others probably are not in play unless the Democratic incumbent runs a terrible campaign and/or the Republican runs a really competent campaign.

Colorado-7

Ed Perlmutter – D+4

Connecticut-2

Joe Courtney – D+6

Connecticut-4

Jim Himes – D+5

Connecticut-5

Chris Murphy – D+2

Florida-22

Ron Klein – D+1

Iowa-3

Leonard Boswell – D+1

Maryland-2

Dutch Ruppersberger – D+7

Massachusetts-6

John Tierney – D+7

Michigan-9

Gary Peters – D+2

New Jersey-12

Rush Holt – D+5

New York-1

Tim Bishop – D-EVEN

New York-2

Steve Israel – D+4

New York-4

Carolyn McCarthy – D+6

New York-25

Dan Maffei – D+3

Ohio-15

Mary Jo Kilroy – D+1

Oregon-5

Kurt Schrader – D+1

Pennsylvania-7

Joe Sestak – D+3 (Open)

Pennsylvania-8

Patrick Murphy – D+2

Pennsylvania-13

Allyson Schwartz – D+7

Virginia-11

Gerry Connolly – D+2

Washington-2

Rick Larsen –  D+3

Washington-9

Adam Smith – D+5

SurveyUSA for WXIA-TV/V103-FM/WMAZ-TV (9/10-12, likely voters, no trend lines):

Roy Barnes (D): 38

Nathan Deal (R): 49

John Mounds (L): 9

Undecided: 4

(MoE: ±4.1%)

We’ve actually had a dearth of non-Rasmussen polling of Georgia’s hotly-contested gubernatorial race. In the past six months, we’ve seen five polls by Rasmussen and a single release by Georgia-based InsiderAdvantage in August (which had Deal up by four). It may be worth comparing SUSA’s cross-tabs to InsiderAdvantage’s: SUSA has Deal up by 64-24 among white voters, while I.A. had the spread at 58-31. Among independents, Deal led Barnes by just 41-38 last month, compared to a whopping 54-26 according to SUSA. Also worthy of attention is the male-heavy nature of the poll (54%) and Deal’s 49-30 lead over Barnes among 18 to 34 year-olds. It’d sure be nice to get some work done on this race from some more non-robopollsters…

For what it’s worth, the DGA certainly sounds enthused about this race, as seen today by their decision to send $1 million to the Georgia Democratic Party (on top of $500K sent last month). And, as we noted in the digest today, Deal’s financial issues aren’t going anywhere.

Senate nums:

Michael Thurmond (D): 34

Johnny Isakson (R-inc): 56

Chuck Donovan (L): 6

Undecided: 4

(MoE: ±4.1%)

InsiderAdvantage had this race at 47-35 for Isakson.